Triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a comparison of pantoprazole once versus twice daily.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy is recommended as treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication. The proton pump inhibitor may be given once or twice daily. However, little information is available on how these two treatment strategies compare. METHODS: H. pylori-positive patients (two positive test results) with endoscopy-proven healed duodenal ulcer or non-ulcer dyspesia were randomly allocated to 1 week of double-blind treatment with pantoprazole 40 mg once or twice daily, plus clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg twice daily. Eradication was defined as a negative 13C-urea breath test (13C-UBT) and histology, 4-5 weeks post-treatment. The follow-up phase comprised 12 months off therapy, with 13C-UBT at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Two hundred and four patients received treatment: pantoprazole once daily (x1), n=104; twice daily (x2), n=100. Eradication rates were 84% in both the pantoprazole x1 and pantoprazole x2 groups by modified intention-to-treat analysis and 89% and 87%, respectively, by per protocol analysis. Metronidazole resistance was found in 44% of pre-treatment cultures of H. pylori. Eradication rates were similar in susceptible (72%) and resistant (75%) strains. During follow-up, recrudescence of infection occurred in 3/118 patients. CONCLUSION: When using pantoprazole plus clarithromycin and metronidazole, the proton pump inhibitor can be used once daily without loss of efficacy.

Omeprazole is more effective than cimetidine in the prevention of recurrence of GERD-associated heartburn and the occurrence of underlying oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: There is documentation of the long-term use of omeprazole 10 mg o.d. in patients with reflux oesophagitis but not in the large number of gastrooesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients without oesophagitis. There is also a paucity of data on the long-term use of cimetidine in GERD patients. METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six patients (100 male) who previously had symptomatic non-ulcerative oesophagitis (81%) or symptoms without oesophagitis (19%), were recruited. All patients were in symptomatic remission following 4 weeks of omeprazole 20 mg o.d. or cimetidine 400 mg q.d.s. and, if required, a further 4 weeks of omeprazole 20 mg o.d. Patients were randomized to receive, double-blind, either omeprazole 10 mg o.m. (n = 77) or cimetidine 800 mg nocte (n = 79) for 24 weeks. RESULTS: A greater proportion of patients receiving omeprazole, compared with cimetidine, were in symptomatic remission after 12 (69 vs. 27%) and 24 weeks (60 vs. 24%) (each P < 0.0001). The median time to symptomatic relapse was longer for patients receiving omeprazole (169 vs. 15 days) (P = 0.0001). Of patients leaving the study in symptomatic remission, a greater proportion receiving omeprazole, compared with cimetidine, was free of oesophagitis (84 vs. 53%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Omeprazole 10 mg o.m. is more effective than cimetidine 800 mg nocte in the prevention of recurrence of GERD-associated heartburn and the occurrence of underlying oesophagitis.

Omeprazole is more effective than cimetidine for the relief of all grades of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease-associated heartburn, irrespective of the presence or absence of endoscopic oesophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated greater efficacy for omeprazole compared with cimetidine in patients with endoscopically verified oesophagitis, but excluded the substantial group of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients with reflux symptoms but without endoscopic abnormality. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared omeprazole and cimetidine in the treatment of GERD-associated heartburn both in patients with symptomatic non-ulcerative oesophagitis and in those with heartburn but without oesophagitis. METHODS: A total of 221 patients with heartburn and oesophageal mucosa grade 0 (normal, n = 51), 1 (no macroscopic erosions, n = 52), 2 (isolated erosions, n = 97) or 3 (confluent erosions, n = 21) were randomized to receive double-blind either omeprazole 20 mg daily or cimetidine 400 mg q.d.s. for a period of 4 weeks. Those still symptomatic after 4 weeks of treatment received omeprazole 20 mg daily for a further 4 weeks. RESULTS: There was no correlation between severity of heartburn and endoscopic grade at entry (correlation coefficient = 0.196). After 4 weeks of treatment, the proportion of patients in whom heartburn was controlled (no more than mild symptoms on no more than 1 day in the previous 7) on omeprazole (66%; 74/112) was more than double that on cimetidine (31%; 34/109) (P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the relief of heartburn in the 47% of patients without unequivocal oesophagitis (endoscopic grade 0 or 1) and in the 53% of patients with erosive oesophagitis (grade 2 or 3) (P = 0.31). Only treatment with omeprazole (P < 0.0001) and lower severity of heartburn at entry (P < 0.01) were significant in predicting heartburn relief. Amongst those patients requiring an additional 4 weeks of treatment with omeprazole, 67% (54/81) reported that their heartburn was controlled after 8 weeks of treatment. CONCLUSION: We conclude that omeprazole is superior to cimetidine for the relief of all grades of heartburn in GERD, whether or not the patient has unequivocal endoscopic oesophagitis.

Symptomatic and endoscopic duodenal ulcer relapse rates 12 months following Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment with omeprazole and amoxycillin with or without metronidazole.

AIM: To determine the effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication with omeprazole and amoxycillin, with or without metronidazole, on the 12-month course of duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: In a randomized; double-blind study, conducted in 19 hospitals, 105 H. pylori positive duodenal ulcer patients were healed and symptom-free following either omeprazole dual therapy (omeprazole 40 mg o.m.+amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., OA, eradication rate 46%, n = 52) or omeprazole triple therapy (omeprazole 40 mg o.m.+amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s.+metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s., OAM, eradication rate 92%, n = 53) for 2 weeks, followed by 2 weeks of omeprazole 20 mg o.m. and a 12-month untreated follow-up period, after which time all patients were endoscoped. Endoscopic and symptomatic relapse rates, and effect on H. pylori status measured using 13C-urea breath test, were determined. RESULTS: During the 12-month untreated follow-up period, the life-table endoscopic relapse rates were 12% (95% CI: 2-22%) and 2% (95% CI: 0-6%) for OA and OAM patients, respectively. By 12 months, life-table symptomatic relapse rates were 22% (95% CI: 13-37%) and 19% (95% CI: 8-30%) for OA and OAM, respectively. In the 12 months untreated follow-up period, 2/69 (3%, 95% CI: 0-7%) patients rendered H. pylori negative had an endoscopic relapse at the end of the 12-month follow-up period, compared with 5/31 (16%, 95% CI: 3-29%) patients remaining H. pylori positive (P = 0.03 between H. pylori positive and negative groups). Twelve of 69 (17%, 95% CI: 8-26%) patients rendered H. pylori negative relapsed symptomatically, compared with 9/31 (29%, 95% CI: 13-45%) patients remaining H. pylori positive (P = N.S. between groups). There was a significant improvement in epigastric pain (P = 0.0001), nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05) between entry to the study and 1, 6 and 12 months post-treatment for both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: OAM eradicates H. pylori in significantly more patients than OA, but successful H. pylori eradication with either OAM or OA predisposes to low endoscopic and symptomatic relapse rates for duodenal ulcer patients when followed up for 12 months.

GR122311X (ranitidine bismuth citrate), a new drug for the treatment of duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Ranitidine bismuth citrate (GR122311X) is a new drug which offers potential benefits in healing duodenal ulcers and prevention of relapse. METHODS: This randomized, multi-centre double-blind study of 1620 patients compared the effect of 4 weeks of treatment with GR122311X 200 mg b.d. (n = 401), 400 mg b.d. (n = 404) or 800 mg b.d. (n = 404) or ranitidine hydrochloride 150 mg b.d. (n = 411) on the rates of duodenal ulcer healing and of overall success (ulcers healed and remaining ulcer free in the 24-week follow-up phase). RESULTS: All four treatments were equally effective at ulcer healing (79%, 85%, 84% and 81% of patients, respectively). GR122311X 400 mg b.d. (38%) and 800 mg b.d. (37%) were significantly more effective than ranitidine hydrochloride 150 mg b.d. (32%) with respect to overall success (P = 0.050 and P = 0.030, respectively) but there was no difference with GR122311X 200 mg b.d. (31%). GR122311X caused effective, dose-related suppression of H. pylori (47%, 61% and 74%); H. pylori eradication rates were 18%, 21% and 22%. GR122311X was safe and well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that of ranitidine hydrochloride 150 mg b.d. Median week 4 trough plasma bismuth levels were 1.3 ng/mL, 2.3 ng/mL and 3.3 ng/mL with GR122311X 200 mg b.d., 400 mg b.d. and 800 mg b.d. respectively. No individual plasma bismuth concentrations were of clinical concern. CONCLUSIONS: GR122311X is a safe and effective ulcer healing drug, and provides a platform on which anti-H. pylori therapy can be based.

Addition of metronidazole to omeprazole/amoxycillin dual therapy increases the rate of Helicobacter pylori eradication: a double-blind, randomized trial.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of an omeprazole/amoxycillin (OA) dual therapy Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen with an omeprazole/amoxycillin/metronidazole (OAM) triple therapy regimen. METHODS: In this double-blind trial, conducted in 19 hospitals, 119 patients with symptomatic duodenal ulcer disease were randomized to receive either 14 days treatment with omeprazole 40 mg daily, amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s. and placebo followed by a further 14 days' treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily (n = 59) or 14 days treatment with omeprazole 40 mg daily, amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s., followed by a further 14 days' treatment with omeprazole 20 mg daily (n = 60). H. pylori status was assessed by 13C-urea breath test at entry and at 4 weeks post-treatment. RESULTS: H. pylori infection was eradicated in 46% of the OA treated patients and in 92% of the OAM treated patients, a mean difference of 46% (P < 0.0001, 95% CI for the difference: +30 to +62). In only one patient was the duodenal ulcer not endoscopically healed after 4 weeks of treatment (OA 100%; OAM 98% healed). There were no significant differences in speed of symptom relief or improvement in symptoms between the two groups. Both regimens were well tolerated, with 96% of patients completing the course, and only one patient withdrawing due to an adverse event. The only side-effect with a significantly higher incidence in the OAM group was diarrhoea, which occurred in 36% of patients compared to 16% of patients in the OA group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A regimen consisting of omeprazole 40 mg daily, amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. for 14 days gives an appreciably higher H. pylori eradication rate than omeprazole and amoxycillin alone, with acceptable tolerability.

Ranitidine in the treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

To assess the effect of 4 weeks' therapy with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily on the healing of symptomatic NSAID-associated gastric and duodenal ulcers, 149 arthritic patients were randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: ranitidine with NSAID continued, ranitidine with NSAID discontinued, and placebo with NSAID discontinued. The healing frequency in patients with gastric ulceration was 67, 68 and 47%, and in those with duodenal ulceration 61, 81 and 42%, respectively. Only the difference between the duodenal ulcer healing rates for ranitidine with NSAID discontinued and placebo was statistically significant (P = 0.02). Healing rates were uninfluenced by gender, age, smoking habits, alcohol consumption, ulcer frequency or size, arthritic disease, or participating country.

Prevention of gastroduodenal damage induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: controlled trial of ranitidine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prophylactic effect of ranitidine 150 mg twice daily in patients requiring one of the following non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: naproxen, piroxicam, diclofenac, and indomethacin. In addition, risk factors were studied in order to help in targeting of such treatment to specific groups of patients. DESIGN: Double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, parallel group with endoscopic assessments at 0, 4, and 8 weeks. SETTING: Multicentre outpatient study at secondary referral centres in five European countries. PATIENTS--297 patients with rheumatoid arthritis or osteoarthritis over the age of 18 without lesions in the stomach and duodenum at baseline endoscopy (after one week without taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Those taking other antirheumatic agents, concomitant ulcerogenic drugs, or treatment for peptic ulcers within the previous 30 days were excluded. Age, sex, arthritic disease, and type of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug used were comparable in the two treatment groups. In all, 263 patients completed the trial. INTERVENTIONS: Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily or placebo (plus the selected non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug) was prescribed within five days after the baseline endoscopy for two consecutive periods of four weeks. Paracetamol was permitted during the study, but not antacids. Patients were withdrawn if the most severe grade of damage (including ulceration) was found at the four week endoscopy or when indicated, or with lesser damage at the investigator's discretion. END POINT: Frequency of gastric and duodenal ulceration or lesions, or both. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of peptic ulceration by eight weeks was 10.3% (27/263); 2 out of 135 (1.5%) developed duodenal ulceration in the ranitidine group, compared with 10 out of 126 (8%) taking placebo. The frequency of gastric ulceration was the same (6%) for the two groups at eight weeks. Though significantly fewer gastric lesions developed in the ranitidine group by eight weeks. The frequency of non-ulcerative lesions in the duodenum did not differ greatly for the two groups at either time point. Twelve out of 75 (16%) patients taking piroxicam developed peptic ulceration, of whom two thirds had duodenal ulceration. Patients with a history of peptic ulcer were particularly susceptible to recurrent ulceration, against which ranitidine offered some protection. CONCLUSIONS: Ranitidine 150 mg twice daily significantly reduced the incidence of duodenal ulceration but not gastric ulceration when prescribed concomitantly with one of four commonly used non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.