Staged treatment response in status epilepticus: Lessons from the SENSE registry.

OBJECTIVES: Although in epilepsy patients the likelihood of becoming seizure-free decreases substantially with each unsuccessful treatment, to our knowledge this has been poorly investigated in status epilepticus (SE). We aimed to evaluate the proportion of SE cessation and functional outcome after successive treatment steps. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort (Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus [SENSE]), in which 1049 incident adult SE episodes were prospectively recorded at nine European centers. We analyzed 996 SE episodes without coma induction before the third treatment step. Rates of SE cessation, mortality (in ongoing SE or after SE control), and favorable functional outcome (assessed with modified Rankin scale) were evaluated after each step. RESULTS: SE was treated successfully in 838 patients (84.1%), 147 (14.8%) had a fatal outcome (36% of them died while still in SE), and 11 patients were transferred to palliative care while still in SE. Patients were treated with a median of three treatment steps (range 1-13), with 540 (54.2%) receiving more than two steps (refractory SE [RSE]) and 95 (9.5%) more than five steps. SE was controlled after the first two steps in 45%, with an additional 21% treated after the third, and 14% after the fourth step. Likelihood of SE cessation (p < 0.001), survival (p = 0.003), and reaching good functional outcome (p < 0.001) decreased significantly between the first two treatment lines and the third, especially in patients not experiencing generalized convulsive SE, but remained relatively stable afterwards. SIGNIFICANCE: The significant worsening of SE prognosis after the second step clinically supports the concept of RSE. However, and differing from findings in human epilepsy, RSE remains treatable in about one third of patients, even after several failed treatment steps. Clinical judgment remains essential to determine the aggressiveness and duration of SE treatment, and to avoid premature treatment cessation in patients with SE.

Refractory Status Epilepticus: Risk Factors and Analysis of Intubation in the Multicenter SENSE Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) bears significant morbidity and mortality. Therapy escalation and in some cases intubation are recommended. Most existing studies are retrospective and focus on intensive care units. We aimed to describe routine-care management and analyze determinants of RSE development and outcomes in a large multicenter cohort. METHODS: We performed post hoc analysis of an observational, cohort study, which prospectively registered all consecutive adults with SE at 9 centers from 3 central European countries. Only incident episodes were included. Ongoing SE despite 2 antiseizure medications was defined as RSE. Patients intubated during first-line or second-line treatments were excluded. Variables investigated included demographics, severity (Status Epilepticus Severity Score), etiology, and guideline-compliant treatment (defined as fixed minimum doses). Outcome parameters included survival and mRS at baseline, and discharge (good: 0-2, or absence of worsening compared with prehospitalization). RESULTS: Among 1,179 SE episodes from 1,049 adults, 996 patients were eligible (median age: 70 years, 52% female), of which 545 (54.7%) developed RSE. RSE was associated with higher baseline mRS (p < 0.001) and treatment deviation from guidelines (p < 0.001, OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.06-0.1). Good outcomes were observed in 52.7% of refractory patients, correlating with lower status epilepticus severity (p < 0.001), absence of acute etiology (p < 0.001, OR 0.5; 95% CI 0.3-0.7), adequate first-line benzodiazepine dose (p < 0.001, OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.6-4.0), shorter durations of SE and hospitalization (both p < 0.001), and lack of intubation (p < 0.001, OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.3-0.6). Most (71.7%) refractory patients were not intubated. Intubation was associated with younger age (p = 0.006), more severe consciousness disturbances (p < 0.001, OR 3.2; 95% CI 2.1-4.8), more severe SE types (p < 0.001), higher severity score (p = 0.009), acute etiologies (p = 0.01, OR 1.6; 95% CI 1.1-2.4), more antiseizure medications (p < 0.001), initial treatment after shorter latency (p = 0.01), worse outcomes (p < 0.001, OR 0.4; 95% CI 0.4-0.6), and longer hospitalizations (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Variables associated with RSE were identified, some potentially preventable. More than 70% of RSE were treated without intubation, suggesting that focal RSE without deep impairment of consciousness, in older patients, may be successfully treated outside ICUs. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: Original cohort study registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00000725).

[Epilepsy in the elderly]. / Epilepsie im Alter.

The incidence rate of epilepsy has importantly increased during the last decades due to the rising expectation of life. Special clinical aspects have to be considered for the correct diagnosis and differential diagnosis of epileptic seizures in the elderly: On one hand, the etiology of epilepsy in the elderly is different from epilepsies of younger people with a higher rate of symptomatic epilepsies compared to younger people. On the other hand, seizures are more often clinically inconclusive as they frequently appear without motor symptoms and therefore require an accurate diagnostic differentiation from other attacks of unconsciousness. The most accurate diagnostic tool for the correct diagnosis of such seizures is the registration of the seizures by longtime-video-EEG-monitoring (LTVEM). If LTVEM cannot be performed also home-video-registration could be useful. Medical treatment of epilepsies in the elderly has to be done with special consideration of comorbidity and metabolic changes in this age group.

Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus (SENSE) - A multicenter prospective observational registry.

Status epilepticus (SE) is an important neurological emergency lacking adequate evidence for efficacy and safety of treatment beyond the application of benzodiazepines as first treatment step. To bridge the gap between the few pivotal trials and retrospective uncontrolled case series, we established a prospective multicenter registry recruiting patients in experienced centers in German-speaking countries. We could document 1179 episodes of 1049 patients over a period of 5 years. First data analysis showed that in the majority of the episodes, established treatment guidelines were not followed. Latency between status onset and different treatment steps were longer, and bolus doses lower than recommended. Moreover, a relevant proportion of the patients did not receive a benzodiazepine but levetiracetam as first treatment step. Although SE could be controlled in more than 90% of the episodes, lower bolus dose and longer treatment latency were associated with refractoriness of the SE in multivariate analysis. This article is part of the Special Issue "Proceedings of the 7th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures.

Factors predicting cessation of status epilepticus in clinical practice: Data from a prospective observational registry (SENSE).

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the initial termination rate of status epilepticus (SE) in a large observational study and explore associated variables. METHODS: Data of adults treated for SE were collected prospectively in centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, during 4.5 years. Incident episodes of 1,049 patients were analyzed using uni- and multivariate statistics to determine factors predicting cessation of SE within 1 hour (for generalized convulsive SE [GCSE]) and 12 hours (for non-GCSE) of initiating treatment. RESULTS: Median age at SE onset was 70 years; most frequent etiologies were remote (32%) and acute (31%). GCSE was documented in 43%. Median latency between SE onset and first treatment was 30 minutes in GCSE and 150 minutes in non-GCSE. The first intravenous compound was a benzodiazepine in 86% in GCSE and 73% in non-GCSE. Bolus doses of the first treatment step were lower than recommended by current guidelines in 76% of GCSE patients and 78% of non-GCSE patients. In 319 GCSE patients (70%), SE was ongoing 1 hour after initiating treatment and in 342 non-GCSE patients (58%) 12 hours after initiating treatment. Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated that use of benzodiazepines as first treatment step and a higher cumulative dose of anticonvulsants within the first period of treatment were associated with shorter time to cessation of SE for both groups. INTERPRETATION: In clinical practice, treatment guidelines were not followed in a substantial proportion of patients. This underdosing correlated with lack of cessation of SE. Our data suggest that sufficiently dosed benzodiazepines should be used as a first treatment step. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:421-432.

SENSE registry for status epilepticus.

Evidence is scarce regarding the treatment of status epilepticus (SE). Only a few large randomized controlled trials have been published. Therefore, we set up a multicenter registry to prospectively document treatment practice in several different large hospitals in German-speaking countries. Over a period of more than 4 years, we were able to document 1179 episodes of 1049 patients who were treated for SE in 1 of the 8 participating centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Median age was 70 years. The most frequent etiology was remote (32%), followed by acute (31%), or a mixture of acute and remote factors (10%). Semiology was generalized convulsive in 44%, focal motor in 27%, and nonconvulsive in 30%. Only a few patients did not have relevant comorbidities. Median latency between SE onset and first treatment was 1 hour (median). Three hundred ninety-three (32%) of the patients were treated within 30 minutes after onset. The first treatment step consisted of benzodiazepines in more than 80%, and in levetiracetam in 15%. Five hundred eleven patients (49%) were refractory (defined as ongoing SE after application of benzodiazepine and 1 intravenous anticonvulsant). Further analysis of these registry data may be important for hypothesis generation and trial design for treatment of status epilepticus.

Making SENSE--Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus as a multicenter prospective registry.

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the different treatment options of status epilepticus (SE) in adults is scarce. Large randomized trials cover only one treatment at early stage and suggest the superiority of benzodiazepines over placebo, of intravenous lorazepam over intravenous diazepam or over intravenous phenytoin alone, and of intramuscular midazolam over intravenous lorazepam. However, many patients will not be treated successfully with the first treatment step. A large randomized trial covering the treatment of established status (ESETT) has just been funded recently by the NIH and will not start before 2015, with expected results in 2018; a trial on the treatment of refractory status with general anesthetics was terminated early due to insufficient recruitment. Therefore, a prospective multicenter observational registry was set up; this may help in clinical decision-making until results from randomized trials are available. METHODS/DESIGN: SENSE is a prospective, multicenter registry for patients treated for SE. The primary objective is to document patient characteristics, treatment modalities and in-house outcome of consecutive adults admitted for SE treatment in each of the participating centres and to identify predictors of outcome. Pre-treatment, treatment-related and outcome variables are documented systematically. To allow for meaningful multivariate analysis in the patient subgroups with refractory SE, a cohort size of 1000 patients is targeted. DISCUSSION: The results of the study will provide information about risks and benefits of specific treatment steps in different patient groups with SE at different points of time. Thus, it will support clinical decision-making and, furthermore, it will be helpful in the planning of treatment trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS00000725.

Successful treatment for refractory convulsive status epilepticus by non-parenteral lacosamide.

Lacosamide (Vimpat) is a newly licensed novel antiepileptic drug. We report a case of refractory convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) that was successfully controlled with lacosamide. The 38-year-old male patient was admitted for a series of complex partial seizures with secondary generalization leading to refractory CSE. During the transport to the hospital the patient was given 22.5 mg diazepam, 12.5 mg etomidate, and 5 mg midazolam without success. An additional dose of 4 mg lorazepam and a dose of 1,500 mg levetiracetam after admission were yet without clinical effect. A further treatment with lacosamide (300 mg via percutaneous gastric fistula) resulted in complete clinical remission of the epileptic activity within 30 min. The application of lacosamide resulted in cessation of CSE and was well tolerated. To our knowledge, this is the first case of successful treatment of refractory CSE with lacosamide. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lacosamide in treatment of SE.

Onset of action of levetiracetam: a RCT trial using therapeutic intensive seizure analysis (TISA).

OBJECTIVES: To correlate the onset of clinical effects of add-on levetiracetam (LEV) therapy with daily serum LEV concentration, in pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies, using the TISA method. METHODS: 25 adult patients (aged>6 years) with pharmaco-resistant focal epilepsies undergoing presurgical evaluation at the Epilepsy Center Erlangen were enrolled in the study. Eligible patients on a maximum of one other antiepileptic drug (AED) were recruited into the 48-hour baseline phase. Those who had at least two seizures during this phase were randomized into the seven-day treatment phase, when they received either LEV or placebo, under continuous day-and-night video-EEG monitoring. The starting daily dose of LEV was 500 mg bid, titrated from the second treatment day to 1,000 mg bid. The peak serum concentration of LEV was monitored daily at 8:00 am (one hour after drug administration) for every patient. The number and duration of seizures per 24h (N/24h and D/24h respectively) were investigated. RESULTS: 23 patients completed the study (LEV group n=11 and placebo group n=12). Seven patients in the LEV group and two patients in the placebo group achieved seizure-freedom during the treatment phase. The intergroup comparison of the decrease in N/24h and D/24h from the baseline phase to the treatment phase was in favor of the LEV group (p<0.05). A significant effect of LEV on D/24h was seen as early as the second treatment day (p=0.013), becoming more apparent on the third treatment day (p=0.009). CONCLUSION: The present study objectively quantified the correlation between the anticonvulsant effects of LEV in focal epilepsies and the peak serum concentration of the drug. For the first time, direct measurement was used to demonstrate the onset of action of LEV to be two days after drug initiation.

Influence of lamotrigine and topiramate on MDR1 expression in difficult-to-treat temporal lobe epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Overexpression of the multiple drug resistance gene 1 (MDR1) was quantified in brain tissue from Coriaria lactone (CL)-kindled Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats after treatment with lamotrigine (LTG) or topiramate (TPM) and compared with that found in rats treated with carbamazepine (CBZ) and valproate (VPA). METHODS: Twenty-five CL-kindled SD rats were randomized into five groups (n = 5 for each group) to receive once-daily feeding of CBZ, VPA, TPM, and LTG as the monotherapy equivalent of maximum human adult dosage, or normal saline (NS control) for 1 month. The expression of P-gp in brain tissues of all rats was quantified by using an image analysis and measuring system (Image Pro-plus 4.0). Mean area and mean integrated optical density (mean IOD) of P-gp expression were calculated. In addition, the changes in seizure severity were analyzed via video-camera monitoring. RESULTS: A significant decrease in the number and duration of seizures with antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment was observed in the TPM and LTG groups. The mean area and mean IOD of P-gp expression were highest in the CBZ group and next highest in the VPA group; much lower values were measured in the TPM and LTG groups, and the lowest in the NS control group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TPM and LTG significantly inhibited seizures in this CL model. The expression of P-gp was not significantly increased by TPM or LTG treatment in this study.