Community Perspectives on Contraception in the Context of Zika Virus in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.

The prevention of unintended pregnancy was identified as a primary prevention strategy to reduce Zika-related adverse birth outcomes during the 2016-2017 Zika virus outbreak. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in partnership with local health agencies conducted formative research to guide the development of culturally appropriate messages and materials to increase awareness of the prevention of unintended pregnancy as a strategy to decrease Zika-related adverse outcomes in American Samoa and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (CNMI). Nine focus groups (N=71) were conducted with women and men aged 18-44 years living in American Samoa and CNMI. Semi-structured interview guides were used to explore participants' knowledge and perceptions of Zika, family planning, and contraception; barriers and facilitators to access contraception and use; and information sources and contraception decision-making. Trained staff from local organizations co-moderated each focus group. Thematic analysis was conducted with NVivo 10. Participants had mixed knowledge about Zika virus and its relation to pregnancy and birth defects. Women and men had varied knowledge of the full range of contraceptive methods available in their jurisdiction and identified barriers to contraceptive access. Social factors including stigma, gender roles, and religion often deterred participants from accessing contraceptive services. Participants highlighted the need for culturally appropriate and clear messaging about contraceptive methods. Results demonstrate the feasibility of conducting formative research as an effective strategy for understanding community perspectives on unintended pregnancy prevention in the context of the Zika virus outbreak to develop health communication materials.

The rising relative and absolute incidence of uterine cancer in specific populations.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the contemporary incidence of cancers using American Samoa as a learning set for insights into similar populations. METHODS: A retrospective observational analysis of de-identified data held in public-access databases (2004-2014) and data on uterine cancer from a hospital, both in American Samoa (2015-2016). RESULTS: There were 341 new cases of cancer in 2004-2014 (111 per 100 000 women/year), including breast (20.2%), uterine (19.4%), and cervical (5.0%); and 287 in 2011-2015 (103 per 100 000 women/year), including uterine (24.0%), breast (18.5%), and cervical (5.2%). Uterine cancer increased from 21.4 to 60.3 per 100 000 women/year, becoming the most common cancer in American Samoa. In 2011-2015, the incidence-rate ratio of uterine cancer to other cancers in American Samoa was 1.3-, 3.8-, 4.6-, 7.7-, and 23-fold higher than breast, colon, cervical, ovarian, and lung cancer, respectively. Among the most recent cases (n=33), median age was 55 years (10 [30.3%] <50 years), median BMI was 38.2; and 11 (33.3%) cases had grade 3 histology. CONCLUSION: The pattern of cancers in American Samoa differs from that in the US mainland. The findings reflect significant changes in cancer incidence. Cancer control programs should evaluate the potential of uterine screening in accordance with their community's needs and characteristics.