RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To correlate the resistance mechanisms and the susceptibility to new antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RECENT FINDINGS: Definition of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa is still debated. Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (DTR-PA) are used but which of them better correlate with the risk of mortality remains debated. Mechanisms underlying resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa are complex and may be combined, resulting in unpredictable phenotype and cross-resistance. Thus, not all CRPA are alike and tailoring antibiotic therapy on resistance mechanisms is challenging. SUMMARY: Current guidelines recommend the use of new antipseudomonal agents for CRPA or DTR-PA infections but they don't provide specific information on how tailoring antibiotic therapy on underlying resistance mechanisms. This review may be useful to understand which mechanisms are involved in CRPA and may have practical implications helping clinicians to select an appropriate antibiotic regimen. Several antibiotics are now available for Pseudomonas aeruginosa but their rational use is important to avoid development of future resistance. The knowledge of local epidemiology and most common resistance mechanisms may guide empirical therapy, but targeted antibiotic therapy should be re-evaluated as soon as susceptibility testing profile is available and selected according to Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenotype.
RESUMO
We emulated a hypothetical target trial in which hematological subjects cared at the University Hospital of Pisa (Italy) received or not SARS-CoV-2 prophylaxis with tixagevimab/cilgavimab. Subjects who received prophylaxis (cases) were compared to those who did not (controls). The main outcome was SARS-CoV-2 infection in the subsequent 6 months. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was used to adjust for confounders. A multivariable analysis was performed to identify variables associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. We recruited 462 patients: 228 received prophylaxis, 234 were controls. COVID-19 was lower in cases compared to controls (16.7% vs 24.8%, p = 0.03, after IPW 14.3% vs 24.6%, p = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, B-cell depleting therapies (HR 2.09, 95%CI 1.05-4.18, p = 0.037) were associated with increased risk of COVID-19, while tixagevimab/cilgavimab prophylaxis (HR 0.45, 95%CI 0.27-0.73, p = 0.001) and previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (HR 0.27, 95%CI 0.14-0.51, p < 0.001) were protective. In conclusion, prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies may reduce the risk of COVID-19 in hematological patients.
RESUMO
Background: In vitro-in vivo discordance in ß-lactams' activities against metallo-ß-lactamase (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales has been described. We aimed to assess whether this discordance is attributed to the supra-physiologic zinc concentration in in vitro testing media. Methods: A clinical and microbiological observational study of patients with bloodstream infections due to New Delhi metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae was performed. Outcomes of patients treated empirically with non-MBL-active ß-lactam therapy (carbapenems and ceftazidime/avibactam) and MBL-active ß-lactam therapy (ceftazidime/avibactam + aztreonam) were documented. The patients' isolates were used to induce septicemia in mice, and survival upon meropenem treatment was recorded. Meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined in standard media and in the presence of physiological zinc concentrations. Results: Twenty-nine patients receiving empiric non-MBL-active ß-lactams (median duration, 4 days) were compared with 29 receiving MBL-active ß-lactams. The 14-day mortality rates were 21% and 14%, respectively. In the murine septicemia model, meropenem treatment resulted in protection from mortality (P < .0001). Meropenem MICs in the physiologic zinc concentration broth were 1- to >16-fold lower vs MICs in zinc-unadjusted broth (≥64â mg/L). Conclusions: Our data provide foundational support to establish pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships using MICs derived in physiologic zinc concentration, which may better predict ß-lactam therapy outcome.
RESUMO
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are one of the most important classes of biologics with high therapeutic and diagnostic value, but traditional methods for mAbs generation, such as hybridoma screening and phage display, have limitations, including low efficiency and loss of natural chain pairing. To overcome these challenges, novel single B cell antibody technologies have emerged, but they also have limitations such as in vitro differentiation of memory B cells and expensive cell sorters. In this study, we present a rapid and efficient workflow for obtaining human recombinant monoclonal antibodies directly from single antigen-specific antibody secreting cells (ASCs) in the peripheral blood of convalescent COVID-19 patients using ferrofluid technology. This process allows the identification and expression of recombinant antigen-specific mAbs in less than 10 days, using RT-PCR to generate linear Ig heavy and light chain gene expression cassettes, called "minigenes", for rapid expression of recombinant antibodies without cloning procedures. This approach has several advantages. First, it saves time and resources by eliminating the need for in vitro differentiation. It also allows individual antigen-specific ASCs to be screened for effector function prior to recombinant antibody cloning, enabling the selection of mAbs with desired characteristics and functional activity. In addition, the method allows comprehensive analysis of variable region repertoires in combination with functional assays to evaluate the specificity and function of the generated antigen-specific antibodies. Our approach, which rapidly generates recombinant monoclonal antibodies from single antigen-specific ASCs, could help to identify functional antibodies and deepen our understanding of antibody dynamics in the immune response through combined antibody repertoire sequence analysis and functional reactivity testing.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais , Células Produtoras de Anticorpos , COVID-19 , Proteínas Recombinantes , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais/genética , Anticorpos Monoclonais/biossíntese , Proteínas Recombinantes/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Células Produtoras de Anticorpos/imunologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , COVID-19/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , FemininoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and the development of new antibiotics have complicated the selection of optimal regimens. International guidelines are valuable tools, but are limited by the scarcity of high-quality randomized trials in many situations. METHODS: A panel of experts from the French and Italian Societies of Infectious Diseases aimed to address unresolved issues in clinical practice based on their experience, an updated literature review and open discussions. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus for the following 'first choices': (i) cefepime for ventilator-acquired pneumonia due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (ii) the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination most active in vitro, or cefiderocol combined with fosfomycin, and aerosolized colistin or aminoglycosides, for severe pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam; (iii) high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam (including loading dose and continuous infusion) for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L; (iv) high-dose cefepime for cUTIs due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales other than Enterobacter spp. if cefepime MIC ≤2 mg/L; (v) ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales; (vi) ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam plus metronidazole for IAIs due to metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (vii) ampicillin-sulbactam plus colistin for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; (viii) meropenem-vaborbactam for BSIs caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; and (ix) ceftazidime-avibactam plus fosfomycin for neurological infections caused by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: These expert choices were based on the necessary balance between antimicrobial stewardship principles and the need to provide optimal treatment for individual patients in each situation.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bactérias Gram-Negativas/efeitos dos fármacos , Itália , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/microbiologia , Combinação de Medicamentos , França , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Urinárias/microbiologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/microbiologia , Cefepima/uso terapêutico , Cefepima/farmacologia , Fosfomicina/uso terapêutico , Fosfomicina/farmacologia , Colistina/uso terapêutico , Colistina/farmacologia , Tazobactam , Ceftazidima , Compostos AzabicíclicosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Real-world experience with meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) is limited. Our aim is to report a clinical experience of M/V in the treatment of resistant Gram-negative bacilli. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study including patients hospitalized in the University Hospital of Pisa (March 2021-Jan 2023) with infections by both extended-spectrum ß-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (Kp) treated with M/V. The primary outcome measure was clinical success, defined as a composite of survival, resolution of signs and symptoms and absence of microbiological failure at day 30 from infection onset. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with clinical failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients who received M/V were included: 24/104 (23.1%) infections were caused by ESBL non-hypervirulent Enterobacterales, 17/104 (16.3%) by ESBL-producing hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae (hvKp) and 63/104 (60.6%) by CRE. The most common infections were bloodstream infections, followed by urinary tract infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, intra-abdominal infections and others. Septic shock occurred in 16/104 (15.4%) patients. Clinical success was achieved in 77% of patients, and 30-day mortality rate was 15.4%. In patients with KPC-producing Kp infections, clinical success and 30-day mortality rates were 82% and 11.5%, respectively. On multivariable analysis, SOFA score (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.02-1.7, p=0.032) was independently associated with clinical failure, while source control (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.03-0.89, p=0.036) was protective. CONCLUSIONS: M/V is a promising therapeutic option against infections caused by difficult-to-treat ESBL-producing Enterobacterales and CR-Kp.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Metallo-ß-lactamases (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales are increasing worldwide. Our aim was to describe clinical features, treatments and outcomes of infections by MBL-Enterobacterales. METHODS: Prospective observational study conducted in the Pisa University Hospital (Jan 2019-Oct 2022) including patients with MBL-producing Enterobacterales infections. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. A multivariable Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) (95% confidence intervals, CI) were calculated. RESULTS: 343 patients were included: 15 VIM- and 328 NDM-producing Enterobacterales infections. Overall, 199 (58%) were bloodstream infections, 60 (17.5%) hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonias, 60 (17.5%) complicated urinary tract infections, 13 (3.8%) intra-abdominal infections, 11 (3.2%) skin and soft tissue infections. Thirty-day mortality was 29.7%. Thirty-two patients did not receive in vitro active antibiotic therapy, 215/343 (62.7%) received ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) plus aztreonam (ATM), 33/343 (9.6%) cefiderocol-containing regimens, 26/343 (7.6%) colistin-containing regimens and 37 (10.8%) other active antibiotics. On multivariable analysis, septic shock (aHR 3.57, 95% CI 2.05-6.23, p<0.001) and age (aHR 1.05, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, p<0.001) were independently associated with 30-day mortality, while in vitro active antibiotic therapy within 48 hours from infection (aHR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26-0.8, p=0.007) and source control (aHR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26-0.72, p=0.001) were protective factors. Sensitivity analysis showed that CZA plus ATM compared to colistin was independently associated with reduced 30-day mortality (aHR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.86, p=0.019). Propensity score analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSIONS: MBL-CRE infections are associated with high 30-day mortality rates. Patients with MBL-producing Enterobacterales infections should received early active antibiotic therapy.
RESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this study was to discuss the potential clinical significance of heteroresistance in nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, heteroresistance has been considered potentially responsible for clinical failure in Acinetobacter baumannii infections. This raised a scientific debate, still open, about the potential clinical significance of heteroresistance in nonfermenting GNB. SUMMARY: We reviewed the literature of last 20âyears and found a limited number of studies evaluating the relationship between heteroresistance and clinical outcome in nonfermenting GNB. Unlike Gram-positive bacteria, heteroresistance is reported in a significant proportion of nonfermenting GNB with some studies describing it in all tested strains and for several antibiotics (including tigecycline, carbapenems, levofloxacin, cefiderocol, colistin). One important issue is the need for validated detection method since the population analysis profile test, that is considered the gold standard, requires high costs and time. Studies evaluating the correlation between heteroresistance and clinical outcome are contrasting and have several limitations. Although in-vitro detection of heteroresistance in nonfermenting GNB has not been associated with in-vivo treatment failure, its presence may suggest to prefer combination regimens instead monotherapy when treating infections by nonfermenters. Further studies are needed to clarify the clinical significance of heteroresistance.
Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Relevância Clínica , Humanos , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Colistina , Bactérias Gram-NegativasRESUMO
Despite recent advances in the transplant field, infectious complications after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) are major causes of morbidity and mortality. Bacterial intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are predominant during the first month post-transplantation and affect patient and graft survival. Recently, the emergence of multidrug resistant bacteria has generated great concern in OLT patients. We performed this narrative review of the literature in order to propose a "ready-to-use" flowchart for reasoned empirical antibiotic therapy in the case of suspected post-OLT IAIs. The review was ultimately organized into four sections: "Epidemiology and predisposing factors for IAI"; "Surgical-site infections and perioperative prophylaxis"; "MDRO colonization and infections"; and "Reasoned-empirical antibiotic therapy in early intra-abdominal infections post OLT and source control". Multidisciplinary teamwork is warranted to individualize strategies for the prevention and treatment of IAIs in OLT recipients, taking into account each patient's risk factors, the surgical characteristics, and the local bacterial epidemiology.
RESUMO
Purpose: Haemorrhagic cystitis may be due to different etiologies with infectious diseases representing an insidious cause to diagnose. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a comprehensive overview of less common but difficult-to-diagnose causes of infectious haemorrhagic cystitis of bacterial, mycobacterial, and parasitic origin, Moreover, we highlight possible diagnostic tools and currently available treatment options in order to give an updated tool for urologists to use in daily practice. Patients and Methods: The search engine PubMed was used to select peer-reviewed articles published from 1/Jan/2010 to 31/Aug/2022. Results: Bacteria, fungal, TB and schistosomiasis are uncommon causes of haemorrhagic cystitis burdened by high morbidity, especially if not promptly diagnosed. Conclusion: Because haemorrhagic cystitis ranges in severity from mild dysuria associated with pelvic discomfort to severe life-threatening haemorrhage, punctual diagnosis, and immediate treatment are essential to avoid further complications.
Assuntos
Aztreonam , Infecções por Klebsiella , Humanos , Meropeném/uso terapêutico , Aztreonam/farmacologia , Aztreonam/uso terapêutico , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , beta-Lactamases , Combinação de Medicamentos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Background: Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) infections are associated with high mortality rates. The optimal treatment regimen for CRAB has not been defined. Cefiderocol has been recently introduced in the armamentarium against CRAB but there is concern about treatment-emergent resistance. Since mortality rates in CRAB infections remain high, further antibiotic options are needed. Methods: We report a case of severe infection by CRAB resistant to both colistin and cefiderocol treated with sulbactam/durlobactam and describe the molecular features of the strain. Susceptibility to cefiderocol was detected by disc diffusion according to EUCAST breakpoints. Susceptibility to sulbactam/durlobactam was determined by Etest according to preliminary breakpoints provided by Entasis Therapeutics. Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) of the CRAB isolate was performed. Results: A burn patient with ventilator-associated pneumonia by CRAB resistant to colistin and cefiderocol received sulbactam/durlobactam as compassionate use. She was alive after 30â days from the end of therapy. Complete microbiological eradication of CRAB was achieved. The isolate harboured blaADC-30, blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-66. A missense mutation in PBP3 was detected. The isolate harboured a mutation in the TonB-dependent siderophore receptor gene piuA that showed a frameshift mutation causing a premature stop codon (K384fs). Moreover, the fepA gene, which is orthologous to pirA, was interrupted by a transposon insertion P635-ISAba125 (IS30 family). Conclusions: Further treatment options for severe infections by CRAB resistant to all available antibiotics are urgently needed. Sulbactam/durlobactam may be a future option against MDR A. baumannii.
RESUMO
We aimed to compare the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) versus the best available therapy (BAT) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients with bloodstream infection caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP-BSI). A retrospective (2016-2021) observational cohort study was performed in 14 INCREMENT-SOT centers (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02852902; Impact of Specific Antimicrobials and MIC Values on the Outcome of Bloodstream Infections Due to ESBL- or Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Solid Organ Transplantation: an Observational Multinational Study). Outcomes were 14-day and 30-day clinical success (complete resolution of attributable manifestations, adequate source control, and negative follow-up blood cultures) and 30-day all-cause mortality. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses adjusted for the propensity score to receive CAZ-AVI were constructed. Among 210 SOT recipients with CPKP-BSI, 149 received active primary therapy with CAZ-AVI (66/149) or BAT (83/149). Patients treated with CAZ-AVI had higher 14-day (80.7% vs 60.6%, P = .011) and 30-day (83.1% vs 60.6%, P = .004) clinical success and lower 30-day mortality (13.25% vs 27.3%, P = .053) than those receiving BAT. In the adjusted analysis, CAZ-AVI increased the probability of 14-day (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-6.84; P = .044) and 30-day clinical success (aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.17-8.40; P = .023). In contrast, CAZ-AVI therapy was not independently associated with 30-day mortality. In the CAZ-AVI group, combination therapy was not associated with better outcomes. In conclusion, CAZ-AVI may be considered a first-line treatment in SOT recipients with CPKP-BSI.
Assuntos
Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Infecções por Klebsiella , Sepse , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Estudos Retrospectivos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecções por Klebsiella/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Ceftobiprole is approved in Europe for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in adults. Real-world data are limited. METHODS: This multi-centre, observational, ambispective investigator-initiated study was undertaken in Italy from January 2018 to December 2019 in order to evaluate the use of ceftobiprole in a real-world setting. RESULTS: Overall, 195 patients from 10 centres were evaluated (68% retrospectively). Male sex was prevalent (n=121, 62%). Median age was 67 [interquartile range (IQR) 53-75] years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index score was 5 (IQR 3-7). The most common indication was pneumonia (151/195, 77%), especially HAP. Other uses were skin and soft tissue infections (5%), endocarditis (4%) and bone infections (4%). Ceftobiprole was usually an empiric choice (65%), in combination with other drugs (66%) and as second-line therapy (58%). A causative agent was found in 39% of cases. A diagnosis of sepsis was made in 59 cases (30%). Success in the clinically evaluable population (excluding 12 cases due to isolation of pathogens outside ceftobiprole's spectrum of activity) was obtained in 79% of cases, with all-cause mortality of 20%. On multi-level analysis, three predictors were positively associated with clinical success: male gender, pneumonia and detection of causal agent. Sepsis was a negative predictor. Nine factors were independently associated, favourably or unfavourably, with fatal outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftobiprole is a safe and effective therapeutic choice, even in a real-world setting. More data are needed to establish its efficacy in patients with sepsis.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar , Pneumonia , Sepse , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Cefalosporinas/uso terapêutico , Pneumonia/tratamento farmacológico , Itália , Sepse/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The effect of remdesivir on COVID-19 mortality remains conflicting. Elderly individuals are at risk for poor COVID-19 outcomes. We aimed to assess the effect of remdesivir on COVID-19 mortality among elderly individuals, using real-world data. METHODS: Retrospective multinational cohort of individuals aged ≥65 years, hospitalized with COVID-19 in six medical centres between January 2020 and May 2021. Associations with in-hospital mortality were evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression model with propensity score adjustment for remdesivir therapy and while implementing generalized estimating equations to control for centre effect. Sensitivity analysis was performed by stratification according to the degree of respiratory support. RESULTS: Of 3010 individuals included, 2788 individuals required either oxygen supplementation or non-invasive/invasive mechanical ventilation, 489 (16%) were treated with remdesivir, and 836 (28%) died. Median age was 77 (IQR 70-84) years and 42% were women. Remdesivir was the only therapeutic intervention associated with decreased mortality [adjusted OR (aOR) 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.66, Pâ<â0.001]. This protective effect was shown for individuals requiring oxygen support and non-invasive mechanical ventilation, while no association was found among individuals necessitating invasive mechanical ventilation.Risk factors for mortality included invasive ventilation (aOR 5.18, 95% CI 2.46-10.91, Pâ<â0.001), higher serum creatinine (aOR 1.25, 95% CI 1.09-1.43, Pâ=â0.001) and dyspnoea (aOR 1.40, 95% CI 1.07-1.84, Pâ=â0.015) on presentation, and other non-modifiable factors, such as comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly individuals hospitalized with COVID-19, remdesivir carries survival benefit for those with moderate to severe disease. Its role among individuals with critical illness should be further assessed.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Idoso , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Estudos Retrospectivos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Alanina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The estimated number of people deprived of liberty is increasing, with 11.55 million incarcerated globally in 2021. Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains is facilitated in over-crowded, poorly ventilated settings, such as jails and penitentiaries. Moreover, inmates may show individual risk factors for the development of tuberculosis disease. Treatment regimens for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) may require up to 9 months of drug exposure and are characterized by adverse events (AE) and low completion rates. OBJECTIVES: To describe current scientific evidence on feasibility, acceptability, and completion rate of LTBI treatment in prison or correctional institutes. DATA SOURCES: Articles were retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, no time restriction was applied. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Human retrospective and prospective studies published on LTBI treatment in incarcerated populations were included. ASSESSMENT OF RISK OF BIAS: Bias assessment plots and Egger weighted regression test were used to determine the risk of bias. METHODS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: Absolute and relative frequencies were assessed for qualitative data. Pooled proportion of included study groups and 95% confidence interval estimates, weighted for sample sizes, were illustrated in forest plots. I2 indicator association were used for true variability and overall variation. Fixed and random-effects models were chosen depending on the estimated between-study heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of the 11 selected studies, only 1 was conducted in a high tuberculosis incidence country. Overall, completion rates ranged from 26% to 100% across the included studies. Reason for the discontinuation of treatment were transfer to other facilities, release, or loss to follow-up (range, 0-74%), incidence of AEs (range, 0-18%), and refusal or withdrawal from treatment (range, 0-16%). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of short-course regimens in prisons should be considered given the low incidence of AEs observed; however, inmates consistently refused to complete LTBI treatment, thus underlining the need for improvement in retention in care.
Assuntos
Tuberculose Latente , Prisioneiros , Tuberculose , Humanos , Tuberculose Latente/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose Latente/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tuberculose/tratamento farmacológico , Tuberculose/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections (ABSSSIs) are a common source of morbidity in both the community and hospital settings. The current standard of care (SoC) requires multiple-dose intravenous (IV) regimens, which are associated with high hospitalisation rates, concomitant event risks and costs. Dalbavancin is a lipoglycopeptide, long-acting antibiotic that is effective against Gram-positive microorganisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Dalbavancin allows treatment of ABSSSIs with a single-shot IV administration or once weekly for 2 weeks, enabling clinicians to treat patients in an outpatient setting or to shorten the length of hospital stay. METHODS: This multicentre, observational, retrospective study compared hospitalised patients who received dalbavancin and patients treated with the three most used IV antibiotics of the same or similar class: vancomycin, teicoplanin and daptomycin. The primary outcome was the time to discharge after starting the study antibiotics. RESULTS: The primary endpoint, time to discharge from the study therapy start, was measured for both groups: the median number of days was 6.5 in the dalbavancin group vs. 11.0 days in the SoC group. Moreover, in subpopulations of patients receiving one or more concomitant antibiotics active for Gram-positives, MRSA and patients with the most prevalent comorbidity (i.e., diabetes), the advantage of dalbavancin in terms of length of stay was confirmed, with a halved time to discharge or more. Safety data on dalbavancin were consistent with data collected in clinical trials. No serious adverse drug reactions related to dalbavancin were reported and most of them were classified as skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders. One serious ADR was reported for daptomycin. CONCLUSIONS: Although the analysis was only descriptive, it can be concluded that dalbavancin may enable a remarkable reduction in length of hospital stay, also confirming the clinical effectiveness and good safety profile demonstrated in clinical trials in a real-world setting.
Assuntos
Daptomicina , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Dermatopatias Bacterianas , Humanos , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Teicoplanina/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Daptomicina/efeitos adversos , Padrão de Cuidado , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatopatias Bacterianas/microbiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Our aim was to analyze mortality attributable to carbapenem-resistant (CR) gram-negative bacilli (GNB) in patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). METHODS: Prospective multicentric study including patients with GNB-BSI from 19 Italian hospitals (June 2018-January 2020). Patients were followed-up to 30 days. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and attributable mortality. Attributable mortality was calculated in the following groups: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing Enterobacterales, metallo-ß-lactamases (MBL)-producing Enterobacterales, CR-Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA), CR-Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). A multivariable analysis with hospital fixed-effect was built to identify factors associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted OR (aORs) were reported. Attributable mortality was calculated according to the DRIVE-AB Consortium. RESULTS: Overall, 1276 patients with monomicrobial GNB BSI were included: 723/1276 (56.7%) carbapenem-susceptible (CS)-GNB, 304/1276 (23.8%) KPC-, 77/1276 (6%) MBL-producing CRE, 61/1276 (4.8%) CRPA, and 111/1276 (8.7%) CRAB BSI. Thirty-day mortality in patients with CS-GNB BSI was 13.7% compared to 26.6%, 36.4%, 32.8% and 43.2% in patients with BSI by KPC-CRE, MBL-CRE, CRPA and CRAB, respectively (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, age, ward of hospitalization, SOFA score, and Charlson Index were factors associated with 30-day mortality, while urinary source of infection and early appropriate therapy resulted protective factors. Compared to CS-GNB, MBL-producing CRE (aOR 5.86, 95% CI 2.72-12.76), CRPA (aOR 1.99, 95% CI 1.48-5.95) and CRAB (aOR 2.65, 95% CI 1.52-4.61) were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Attributable mortality rates were 5% for KPC-, 35% for MBL, 19% for CRPA, and 16% for CRAB. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with BSIs, carbapenem-resistance is associated with an excess of mortality, with MBL-producing CRE carrying the highest risk of death.
Assuntos
Carbapenêmicos , Sepse , Humanos , Carbapenêmicos/farmacologia , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Bactérias Gram-Negativas , Sepse/tratamento farmacológico , Itália/epidemiologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight the peculiarity of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in elderly patients and to provide useful elements for their optimal management. RECENT FINDINGS: In the COVID-19 era, early discharge from the hospital and implementation of outpatient management is of key importance. SUMMARY: Elderly patients are at high risk of SSTIs due to several factors, including presence of multiple comorbidities and skin factors predisposing to infections. Clinical presentation may be atypical and some signs of severity, such as fever and increase in C-reactive protein, may be absent or aspecific in this patients population. An appropriate diagnosis of SSTIs in the elderly is crucial to avoid antibiotic overtreatment. Further studies should explore factors associated with bacterial superinfections in patients with pressure ulcers or lower limb erythema. Since several risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) may coexist in elderly patients, these subjects should be carefully screened for MRSA risk factors and those with high risk of resistant etiology should receive early antibiotic therapy active against MRSA. Physicians should aim to several objectives, including clinical cure, patient safety, early discharge and return to community. SSTIs in the elderly may be managed using long-acting antibiotics, but clinical follow-up is needed.