Hospital outcomes of acute COVID-19 infection among patients with neurological conditions: a single-center study.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection has been associated with severe neurological consequences, including stroke or seizures, and less severe neurological sequelae, including headaches, dizziness, and anosmia. Earlier COVID-19 variants were associated with high morbidity and mortality; however, knowledge of the impact of neurological conditions in the setting of COVID-19 on healthcare outcomes is limited. We sought to determine the impact of acute neurological conditions and acute COVID-19 infection on inpatient hospitalization outcomes. Methods: This was a retrospective, observational study of adult patients who were admitted to a large academic medical center in the Southeastern US between April 2020 and December 2021 with acute COVID-19 infection and a neurological diagnosis. Patient demographics, medical history, neurological diagnoses, and hospitalization outcomes were obtained from the medical record. Descriptive statistics and unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed. Results: Of the 1,387 patients included in this study, 27% died and 23% were kept under ventilation during hospitalization. The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) age was 64.6+/-16.9 years, with 52.8% women and 30.1% identifying as Black/African American. The most common neurological conditions included ischemic stroke (35.0%), movement disorder (12.0%), and hemorrhagic stroke (10.7%). In-hospital death was most common among those with epilepsy (p = 0.024), headache (p = 0.026), and dementia (p < 0.0001) compared to individuals without those conditions. Ventilation support was given more commonly to dementia patients (p = 0.020). Age was a significant risk factor for death (p < 0.001) and hospital length of stay (LOS) for ventilation (p < 0.001), but no neurological condition was a significant factor in adjusted logistic regression analyses. Discussion: Mortality was high in this study, with more than one-quarter of patients dying in the hospital. Death was the most common among those with epilepsy, headache, or dementia, but no neurological condition increased the risk of in-hospital mortality or ventilation. Future studies would determine the long-term neurological sequelae of those discharged from the hospital with COVID-19 and a neurological condition.

Combined rapid sequence MRI protocol and skull radiography as an alternative to head CT in the evaluation of abusive head trauma in children: a pilot study.

The aim of our pilot study was to compare the performance of the RS-MRI protocol combined with skull radiography versus CT for the detection of skull fractures, scalp hematomas, and intracranial hemorrhage in patients with abusive head trauma (AHT). Additionally, our study aimed to determine whether the presence of scalp hematoma predicts concurrent skull fracture. We conducted a pilot study through retrospective chart review of 24 patients between ages 0 and 15 months who experienced AHT and who received CT, MRI, and skull radiography between May 2020 and August 2021. Two blinded board certified neuroradiologists reviewed the skull radiographs alongside the rapid trauma MRI. Their impressions were documented and compared with findings derived from CT. Combination imaging detected ten out of the 12 skull fractures noted on CT (sensitivity 83.3%, specificity 100%, p=0.48). RS-MRI detected 15 out of the 16 intracranial hemorrhages detected by CT (sensitivity 93.75%, p >0.9). When scalp hematoma was detected on RS-MRI, nine out of the 12 had associated skull fractures when reviewed by radiologist 1 (sensitivity 75%, specificity 100%, p=0.22), and seven out of the 12 had associated skull fractures when reviewed by radiologist 2 (sensitivity 58%, specificity 92%, p=0.25). In pediatric patients with suspected AHT, we found that RS-MRI combined with skull radiographs was not significantly different than CT for the detection of skull fractures, scalp hematomas, and intracranial hemorrhage. This combination has the potential to replace the use of CT as a screening tool for abusive head trauma, while avoiding the risks of sedation often required for routine MRI.

Disparities in Postoperative Endocrine Outcomes After Endoscopic-Assisted Transsphenoidal Pituitary Adenoma Resection.

Objectives Socioeconomic factors can influence morbidity in patients with pituitary adenoma. This study aims to identify associations between socioeconomic factors and postoperative outcomes in patients with pituitary adenomas. Methods A retrospective medical chart review was conducted on adult patients who underwent resection of purely sellar nonfunctional and functional pituitary adenomas between May 1, 2014, and May 31, 2020, at the University of North Carolina Medical Center. The main outcome measures included the incidence of postoperative diabetes insipidus (PDI), postoperative hyponatremia (PHN), and postoperative hypopituitarism (PHP). Outcome measures were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses against preoperative tumor volume as well as socioeconomic and demographic factors (self-identified race/ethnicity, age, gender, address assessed by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and insurance status). Results On univariate analysis, patients of Hispanic race/ethnicity and patients living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods had an increased incidence of postoperative diabetes insipidus. Patients who experienced PDI were significantly younger on average in both univariate and multivariate analyses. When analyzed further, patients of Hispanic race/ethnicity were significantly younger and more likely to be uninsured compared to their respective racial/ethnic counterparts. No significant correlations were found for PHN or PHP. Conclusions Patients of Hispanic race/ethnicity and patients living in more disadvantaged neighborhoods were more likely to experience PDI. This finding, when combined with findings regarding age and insurance status, suggests complex disparities in medical care that are confirmed or corroborated by prior literature. These results may enhance clinicians' management of patients from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds through increased awareness of disparities and the provision of resources for assistance.