Comparison of short-acting versus extended-release nifedipine: Effects on hemodynamics and sympathetic activity in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

We investigated the impact of short-acting and extended release nifedipine on sympathetic activity using radiotracer methodology in patients with stable coronary artery disease in order to more accurately document the response of the sympathetic nervous system to different formulations of this dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist. Participants were randomized to placebo, short-acting or extended release nifedipine for 7-10 days. On the final day, systemic blood pressure, cardiac filling pressures, cardiac output, plasma norepinephrine (NE) and total body NE spillover were measured at baseline (time 0) and repeated at intervals for 6 hours. There were no differences in baseline measures between groups. Following the morning dose of study medication there were no changes in hemodynamics or sympathetic activity in the placebo group. However, there was a significant fall in blood pressure and a significant increase in total body NE spillover in both nifedipine groups. Importantly, the increase in sympathetic activity in response to short-acting nifedipine began earlier (30 minutes) and was much greater than that observed in the extended release group, which occurred later (270 minutes). These findings confirm that sustained therapy with nifedipine is associated with activation of the sympathetic nervous system which is dependent on the pharmacokinetics of the formulation.

Long-acting dihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers and sympathetic nervous system activity in hypertension: a literature review comparing amlodipine and nifedipine GITS.

Calcium-channel blockers (CCBs) constitute a diverse group of compounds but are often referred to as a single homogeneous class of drug and the clinical responses indiscriminately summarized. Even within the dihydropyridine subgroup, there are significant differences in formulations, pharmacokinetics, durations of action and their effects on blood pressure, heart rate, end organs and the sympathetic nervous system. Amlodipine and nifedipine in the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation are the most studied of the once-daily CCBs. Amlodipine has an inherently long pharmacokinetic half-life, whereas, in contrast, nifedipine has an inherently short half-life but in the GITS formulation the sophisticated delivery system allows for once-daily dosing. This article is derived from a systematic review of the published literature in hypertensive patients. The following search terms in three main databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index) from 1990 to 2011 were utilized: amlodipine, nifedipine, sympathetic nervous system, sympathetic response, sympathetic nerve activity, noradrenaline, norepinephrine and heart rate. More than 1500 articles were then screened to derive the relevant analysis. As markers of sympathetic nervous system activation, studies of plasma norepinephrine concentrations, power spectral analysis, muscle sympathetic nerve activity and norepinephrine spillover were reviewed. Overall, each drug lowered blood pressure in hypertensive patients in association with only small changes in heart rate (i.e. <1 beat/min). Plasma norepinephrine concentrations, as the most widely reported marker of sympathetic nervous system activity, showed greater increases in patients treated with amlodipine than with nifedipine GITS. The evidence indicates that both these once-daily dihydropyridine CCBs lower blood pressure effectively with minimal effects on heart rate. There are small differences between the drugs in the extent to which each activates the sympathetic nervous system with an overall non-significant trend in favour of nifedipine GITS.

Once daily nifedipine: the formulation dictates the pharmacokinetic characteristics and the therapeutic responses.

Nifedipine as a pharmacologic agent for treating hypertension and angina pectoris has been available worldwide since the early 1980's. However, the formulation of nifedipine has undergone a number of modifications over time to improve the pharmacokinetic profile and administration regimen from 3 times daily to once daily. Nifedipine Gastrointestinal Therapeutic System (GITS) is the most widely studied of the once daily formulations from both a pharmacokinetic and clinical perspective. Nifedipine GITS was registered in most major countries worldwide based on both clinical pharmacology and clinical trial data in adequately powered studies. Moreover, outcome trials in both hypertension (INSIGHT) and angina pectoris (ACTION) have been completed and published. Other once daily modified release nifedipine formulations are available in a number of countries but limited published data is available on these formulations. A Pubmed (Medline) search using the terms "nifedipine pharmacokinetics" yielded 162 articles of which 7 provided detailed pharmacokinetic values in head to head comparisons of nifedipine GITS and another once a day formulation. These published pharmacokinetic studies have failed to show that any of the other formulations is consistently bioequivalent to the reference formulation, nifedipine GITS. In addition, other Pubmed searches yielded limited data from comparative clinical studies, which show significant differences in favor of the nifedipine GITS formulation in terms of blood pressure control and activation of the sympathetic nervous system. With limited data comparing once daily formulations of nifedipine to nifedipine GITS and no data comparing between other once a day formulations, for both pharmacokinetic and therapeutic reasons, the evidence indicates that patients should not be switched between once daily formulations of nifedipine.

Formulation of long-acting nifedipine tablets influences the heart rate and sympathetic nervous system response in hypertensive patients.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics studies are usually carried out separately with theoretical linking or interpretations. The pharmacokinetics of short- vs. long-acting formulations of nifedipine is well known, but the pharmacokinetics of different once-a-day formulations of nifedipine is generally not well known by the practising physician. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This study provides practical patient-based information linking pharmacokinetics to pharmacodynamics in one of the target populations of patients, those with hypertension, who might receive the two different drugs. AIMS The haemodynamic responses to nifedipine vary between short- and long-acting formulations. However, the latter have not been compared despite marked differences in their constitution. Our 1-month randomized, crossover study was designed to compare the 30-mg osmotic, constant-release nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (N-GITS) with an encapsulated mini-tablet Coracten XL. METHODS: Forty-four hypertensive patients aged 63 +/- 7 years were studied. The formulation was changed on day 15 and (for a single dose) day 30. At days 0, 14, 15, 29 and 30, patients were monitored for 6 h after dosing, during which blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) and plasma levels of norepinephrine (NE) and nifedipine were measured. The primary outcome was the difference in plasma NE between formulations at the time of peak nifedipine level. RESULTS: Systolic BP decreased rapidly after the first dose of Coracten, achieving nadir at 5 h. HR rose by 1.2 +/- 8.8 beats min(-1). After N-GITS HR fell by 2.4 +/- 7.7 beats min(-1) (P = 0.159). Plasma NE was higher in the Coracten- (480 +/- 38.3 pg ml(-1)) than N-GITS-treated patients (343 +/- 75.0 pg ml(-1)) at the time of peak nifedipine concentrations (4 and 5 h, respectively) and their change from baseline was significantly (P = 0.0046) different. A similar difference between the drugs was seen again at days 15 and 30, at 5 h after switching formulations. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that two different formulations of once-daily nifedipine result in different BP and plasma NE responses, and that switching between formulations causes opposite effects upon the sympathetic nervous response to falling BP.

Formulation dependent pharmacokinetics--does the dosage form matter for nifedipine?

This was an open-label, randomized, 3-way crossover study that compared in 25 healthy male subjects, the pharmacokinetics of a single 60-mg dose of nifedipine GITS tablet versus (1) 20-mg doses of nifedipine prolonged action tablets given q12h for a total of two doses and (2) 2 x 10 mg doses of nifedipine capsules given q8h for a total of three doses. Following capsule administration, there was a rapid rise in plasma concentration of drug achieving a peak concentration of 196(35) ng/mL (mean and coefficient of variation) within 0.7 (105) hours and an AUC(infinity) of 973(39) ng.hr/mL. After nifedipine PA there was also a rapid rise in plasma concentration of drug achieving a Cmax of 85.5 (36) ng/mL with a tmax of 1.7(58) hours and an AUC(infinity) of 879(46) ng.hr/mL. For the nifedipine GITS formulation, there was a lag in the plasma concentration time profile for approximately 2 to 3 hours, then it rose gradually achieving a Cmax of of 686(54) 30.5(63) ng/mL with a tmax of 15.0(50) hours and an AUC(infinity) ng.hr/mL. The AUC(infinity) and Cmax were significantly (P = 0.0001) greater in the capsule and PA formulations than for the GITS; however, the tmax for the GITS formulation was significantly (P = 0.001) longer than for the other formulations. This study suggests marked formulation-dependent pharmacokinetics, which may have important clinical implications.

Differential effects of once-daily antihypertensive drugs on blood pressure, left ventricular mass and sympathetic activity: Nifedipine-GITS versus felodipine-ER versus enalapril.

BACKGROUND: Recent meta-analyses suggest that once-daily dihydropyridines and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors cause similar decreases in left ventricular (LV) mass for comparable decreases in blood pressure (BP). However, some dihydropyridines, such as felodipine-extended release (ER), still increase sympathetic activity and may, therefore, be less effective in decreasing LV mass. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of long term antihypertensive treatment with nifedipine-gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) and felodipine-ER compared with enalapril on LV mass relative to the extent of BP control (assessed by 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring) and sympathetic activity (assessed by plasma catecholamine concentrations). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Enalapril was started at 10 mg/day, felodipine-ER at 5 mg/day and nifedipine-GITS at 30 mg/day, all once daily. Doses were increased to 20 mg/day, 10 mg/day or 60 mg/day, respectively, if the office BP remained 160/90 mmHg or greater at the end of the dosing interval. Evaluable echocardiograms were obtained for 116 patients at the end of the study (30 weeks of treatment). RESULTS: On 24 h ambulatory BP monitoring, nifedipine-GITS caused a consistent decrease in BP throughout the 24 h dosing interval, whereas felodipine-ER caused a more marked fall in BP during the day, and enalapril's effects diminished during the night and had disappeared by the morning. Only felodipine-ER significantly increased supine and standing plasma noradrenaline by more than 50% similarly after six, 18, and 30 weeks of treatment. In BP responders (decrease in systolic BP 10 mmHg or greater), enalapril and nifedipine-GITS caused clear decreases in LV mass by 12 to 16 g/m2, whereas felodipine-ER was less effective (decrease by only 6 g/m2, P<0.01 versus enalapril). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily dihydropyridines should not be regarded as one homogeneous class and, compared with felodipine-ER, nifedipine-GITS exhibits a better profile regarding 24 h BP control, sympathetic activation and regression of LV mass.