A new freezing and storage procedure improves safety and viability of haematopoietic stem cells and neutrophil engraftment: a single institution experience.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation has recently become a standard therapeutic approach to virus-related or infected haematological malignancies. Collection, manipulation, storage and thawing of leukapheresis products in this subset of patients require strict monitoring to prevent infection risk for operators and risk of contamination for other stored bags. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a non-randomized retrospective observational study. In the 2000-2002 period, a single bag freezing procedure was used for autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bags were stored in tanks containing liquid and gas phase nitrogen. In 2002, the processing procedure was revised, and a second additional safety bag and a new storage tank containing jacketed liquid nitrogen have been used. RESULTS: A total of 524 bags were thawed, of which 121 processed with the single bag method and 403 with the double bag method. Forty-nine and 109 patients were infused respectively. The observed rupture rate with the single bag in liquid and gas phase nitrogen was 17 and 2.5%, respectively, against a rupture rate as little as 0.24% with the new methodology. Viability revealed levels of 84.4% +/- 6.1% and 96.9% +/- 2.4% for the single and double-bag respectively. This statistically significant (P < 0.0001) difference correlated with better neutrophil engraftment. CONCLUSIONS: The new proposed method, based on a double bag and storage freezer without liquid or gas phase nitrogen into a cryogenic chamber, significantly reduces bag rupture and bio-hazard and improves stem cell viability and neutrophil engraftment remarkably.

Pre-storage leucocyte depletion and transfusion reaction rates in cancer patients.

Passenger leucocytes transfused with allogenic blood are responsible for potential adverse effects. The impact of pre-storage leucodepletion (in-line filtration) of all whole blood units on transfusion reaction rate among patients suffering from cancer was retrospectively studied, comparing all reactions following red blood cell (RBC) transfusions during 2 years of pre-storage vs. 2 years of selective (bedside) leucodepletion. During selective leucodepletion, 5165 RBC units - of which 2745 were bedside filtered units- were transfused to 866 patients. Twenty-eight reactions were recorded: 22 (15 in the bedside group) febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTR) and six allergic reactions (five in the bedside group). The overall percentage of reactions was 0.54 (0.76 for bedside) and 0.42 for FNHTR (0.54 for bedside). During pre-storage leucodepletion, 4116 RBC units were transfused to 841 patients. Eleven reactions were recorded: four FNHTR and seven allergic reactions (urticaria). The percentage of reactions for transfused RBC units was 0.26 (0.09 for FNHTR). Comparison between pre-storage filtration and bedside filtration with regard to FNHTR showed an odds ratio of 2.80 (95% confidence interval = 0.83-14.87) for bedside filtration. The study suggests that, for transfused patients affected by cancer, pre-storage leucodepletion is more effective than selective (bedside) filtration in reducing the incidence of transfusion reactions (FNHTR).