Tracheobronchoplasty for severe tracheobronchomalacia: a case-series of patients with acute and chronic critical comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES: There are little data within the literature regarding tracheobronchoplasty in the setting of the acute and chronically ill, morbidly obese or ventilator-dependent patients with tracheobronchomalacia. Short- and long-term outcomes are studied. METHODS: The series represents 12 tracheobronchomalacia patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status scores of 3-5. Candidacy was based on bronchoscopic findings during spontaneous respirations with >90% collapse of the trachea and both mainstem bronchi. We used dynamic computed tomography scan as an adjunct in those not mechanically ventilated. Our operative approach was a complete portal robotic approach for those outpatients (wheelchair dependent) and right thoracotomy for those who were already mechanically ventilated with 100% fraction of inspired oxygen with high pressure. Extracorporeal support was used in 2 patients. RESULTS: Patients who underwent robotic repair were discharged without complications. Two patients who were critically ill and required extracorporeal support for their surgeries were separated from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation on postoperative day 2. Three patients died at the follow-up. In 1 patient, the prolene mesh migrated into trachea and caused obstruction of the trachea and required removal with endobronchial techniques. CONCLUSIONS: The repair of tracheobronchomalacia in patients with multiple comorbidities and with severe life-threatening problems in or outside the intensive care unit may have improvement due to the ability to wean from positive pressure ventilation. Surgical technique and the utilization of mesh support in tracheobronchoplasty operations may need to be debated due to duration of the surgery in patients with severe comorbidities.

Costal margin reconstruction for slipping rib syndrome: Outcomes of more than 500 cases and advancements beyond earlier sutured repair technique.

Objectives: To evaluate results of sutured repair for slipping rib syndrome (SRS), identify failure points, and discuss technique modifications to improve outcomes through costal margin reconstruction (CMR). Methods: Patients undergoing repair of SRS between February 2019 and February 2024 at an academic referral institution were retrospectively analyzed. Pain scores, quality of life, pain medication use, and reoperations were evaluated pre- and postoperatively at 1 and 6 months. In patients failing sutured repair we identified specific failure points and devised a new CMR technique to overcome them. Subsequent CMR patients were followed at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months using the same outcome measures. Results: Four hundred forty-nine patients underwent repair. Two hundred forty-one patients underwent sutured repair with revision required in 66. Median time to revision was 14 months. CMR was developed and performed in 247 patients. In CMR patients, preoperative mean pain score of 7.5 out of 10 dropped postoperatively to 4.0, 2.5, 1.9, 1.3, and 0.9 at 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively (P < .001). Mean quality of life of 38% improved to 73%, 83%, 88%, 93%, and 95% at the same intervals (P < .001). Preoperatively, 29% of patients chronically used opioid medications. Opioid use dropped postoperatively to 11%, 4%, 4%, 0%, and 0% at the same intervals. Use of nonopioid medications followed a similar pattern. One CMR patient required full revision. Conclusions: SRS is a debilitating, but correctable disorder. Improved pain and quality of life, reduction in chronic opioid use, and freedom from revision surgery suggest that CMR should be considered the standard operation for SRS.

The surgical outcome of standard lobectomy versus sleeve lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to compare the patients who underwent standard or sleeve lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer in terms of postoperative outcomes, prognostic factors and overall survival. METHODS: Between January 2002 and January 2020, the patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma who underwent standard lobectomy or sleeve lobectomy by thoracotomy in our clinic were analysed retrospectively. Standard and sleeve groups were compared after propensity score matching in terms of age, comorbidity, T status, N status and pathological stage. Primary outcomes were morbidity and mortality; the secondary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: The study included 476 patients, and sleeve lobectomy was performed in 196 (41.1%) patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that age over 61 years (P = 0.003 and P = 0.005, respectively), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) below 84% (P = 0.013 and P = 0.205, respectively) and the presence of perineural invasion (P = 0.052 and P = 0.001, respectively) were poor prognostic factors in the standard lobectomy and the sleeve groups. The propensity matching analysis included 276 patients (138 sleeve lobectomy and 138 standard lobectomy). Complications occurred in 96 (69.6%) and 92 (66.7%) patients in the standard and sleeve groups, respectively (P = 0.605). Three (2.2%) patients in the standard group and 5 (3.6%) patients in the sleeve group died within 90 days postoperatively (P = 0.723). CONCLUSIONS: Bronchial sleeve lobectomy is a safe procedure that can be applied in oncologically suitable cases without causing higher mortality than a standard lobectomy.

Potential Survival Benefit of Upfront Surgery for Lung Tumors Unconfirmed but Highly Suspicious for Stage I Lung Cancer.

Background: Patients with early-stage lung tumors that are highly suspicious for malignancy typically undergo a preoperative diagnostic workup, primarily through bronchoscopy or transthoracic biopsy. Those without a preoperative diagnosis may alternatively be treated with upfront surgery, contingent upon the potential for intraoperative diagnosis. Previous studies have yielded conflicting results regarding the impact of upfront surgery on the survival of these patients. Our study aimed to elucidate the effect of upfront surgery on the survival outcomes of patients undergoing surgery for early-stage lung cancer without a preoperative diagnosis. Methods: We analyzed the survival rate of 158 consecutive patients who underwent pulmonary resection for stage I lung cancer, either with or without a preoperative diagnosis. Results: A total of 86 patients (54%) underwent upfront surgery. This approach positively impacted both disease-free survival (p=0.031) and overall survival (p=0.017). However, no significant differences were observed across subgroups based on sex, smoking status, forced expiratory volume in 1 second, histologic tumor size, or histologic subtype. Univariate analysis identified upfront surgery (p=0.020), age (p=0.002), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) exceeding 7 (p=0.001), and histological tumor size greater than 20 mm (p=0.009) as independent predictors. However, multivariate analysis indicated that only SUVmax greater than 7 (p=0.011) was a significant predictor of unfavorable survival. Conclusion: Upfront surgery does not appear to confer a survival advantage in patients with stage I lung cancer undergoing surgical intervention.

Mortality index is more accurate than volume in predicting outcome and failure to rescue in Medicare beneficiaries undergoing robotic right upper lobectomy.

Background: Surgical volume is known to influence failure to rescue (FTR), defined as death following a complication. Robotic lung surgery continues to expand and there is variability in outcomes among hospitals. We sought to estimate the contribution of hospital-based factors on outcomes and FTR following robotic right upper lobectomy (RRUL). Methods: Using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims database, we evaluated all patients age ≥65 years with a diagnosis of lung cancer who underwent RRUL between January 2018 and December 2020. We excluded patients who had undergone segmentectomy, sublobar, wedge, or bronchoplastic resection; had metastatic or nonmalignant disease; or had a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Primary outcomes included FTR rate, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, conversion to open surgery, complications, and costs. We analyzed hospitals by tertiles of volume and Medicare Mortality Index (MMI). Defined as the institutional number of deaths per number of survivors, MMI is a marker of overall hospital performance and quality. Propensity score models were adjusted for confounding using goodness of fit. Results: Data for 4317 patients who underwent robotic right upper lobectomy were analyzed. Hospitals were categorized by volume of cases (low, <9; medium, 9-20; high, >20) and MMI (low, <0.04; medium, 0.04-0.13; high, >0.13). After propensity score balancing, patients from tertiles of lowest volume and highest MMI had higher costs ($34,222 vs $30,316; P = .006), as well as higher mortality (odds ratio, 7.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.67-28.2; P < .001). Compared to high-volume centers, low-volume centers had higher rates of conversion to open surgery, respiratory failure, hemorrhagic anemia, and death; longer LOS; and greater cost (P < .001 for all). The C-statistic for volume as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.6, and the FTR was 0.8. Hospitals in the highest tertile of MMI had the highest rates of conversion to open surgery (P = .01), pneumothorax (P = .02), and respiratory failure (P < .001). They also had the highest mortality and rate of readmission, longest LOS, and greatest costs (P < .001 for all) and the shortest survival (P < .001). The C-statistic for MMI as a predictor of overall mortality was 0.8, and FTR was 0.9. Conclusions: The MMI incorporates hospital-based factors in the adjudication of outcomes and is a more sensitive predictor of FTR rates than volume alone. Combining MMI and volume may provide a metric that can guide quality improvement and cost-effectiveness measures in hospitals seeking to implement robotic lung surgery programs.

Intersection of Race, Rurality, and Income in Defining Access to Minimally Invasive Lung Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Race is a potent influencer of health care access. Geography and income may exert equal or greater influence on patient outcomes. We sought to define the intersection of race, rurality, and income and their influence on access to minimally invasive lung surgery in Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were used to evaluate patients with lung cancer who underwent right upper lobectomy, by open, robotic-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS), or video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) between 2018 and 2020. International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition, was used to define diagnoses and procedures. We excluded sublobar, segmental, wedge, bronchoplasty, or reoperative patients with nonmalignant or metastatic disease or a history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Risk adjustment was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) propensity scores with generalized linear models and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 13,404 patients, 4291 open (32.1%), 4317 RATS (32.2%), and 4796 VATS (35.8%). Black/urban patients had significantly higher RATS and VATS rates (P < .001), longer long-term survival (P = .007), fewer open resections (P < .001), and lower overall mortality (P = .007). Low-income Black/urban patients had higher RATS (P = .002), VATS (P < .001), longer long-term survival (P = .005), fewer open resections (P < .001), and lower overall mortality compared with rural White patients (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Rural White populations living close to the federal poverty line may suffer a burden of disparity traditionally observed among poor Black people. This suggests a need for health policies that extend services to impoverished, rural areas to mitigate social determinants of health.

The Role of [18F]FDG PET/CT in the Characterization of Thymic Epithelial Tumors at Initial Stage.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of [18F]FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the characterization of thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). Materials and Methods: A total of 73 patients who underwent preoperative [18F]FDG PET/CT were included in this study. Visual total score (VTS), maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax), metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and heterogeneity index (HI) parameters were analyzed to investigate the prediction of histopathologic grade and advanced stage. Results: The cohort included 26 patients with low-grade thymoma (LGT), 36 patients with high-grade thymoma (HGT), and 11 patients with thymic carcinoma (TC). Ninety-one percent of TC had VTS >2, whereas 31% of LGT and 75% of HGT had VTS >2. SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were statistically significantly higher in the TC group than in both thymoma and HGT. Using the cutoff value of 7.25 for SUVmax, TC was differentiated from thymomas with 91% sensitivity and 74% specificity. TC had significantly lower HI values than thymomas. HI parameters showed good diagnostic ability to differentiate TC from thymoma and TC from HGT. SUVmax, MTV, and TLG were significantly higher in advanced-stage disease than in early-stage disease. Conclusions: Visual and quantitative parameters can reliably predict both advanced disease and the grade of primary tumor in TETs. Therefore, as a promising metabolic imaging method, [18F]FDG PET/CT makes important contributions to preoperative evaluation in routine clinical practice.

The relationship between body mass index and mortality is not linear in patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal support.

OBJECTIVE: Morbid obesity may influence candidacy for venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VVECMO) support. Indeed, body mass index (BMI) >40 is considered to be a relative contraindication due to increased mortality observed in patients with BMI above this value. There is scant evidence to characterize this relationship beyond speculating about the technical challenges of cannulation and difficulty in optimizing flows. We examined a national cohort to evaluate the influence of BMI on mortality in patients requiring VVECMO for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis on National COVID Cohort Collaborative data evaluating 1,033,229 patients with BMI ≤60 from 31 US hospital systems diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome virus coronavirus 2 infection from September 2019 to August 2022. We performed univariate and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analysis on data pertaining to those who required VVECMO support during their hospitalization. A subgroup risk-adjusted analysis comparing ECMO mortality in patients with BMI 40 to 60 with the 25th, 50th, and 75th BMI percentile was performed. Outcomes of interest included BMI, age, comorbidity score, body surface area, and ventilation days. RESULTS: A total of 774 adult patients required VVECMO. Of these, 542 were men, median age was 47 years, mean adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index was 1, and median BMI was 33. Overall mortality was 47.8%. There was a nonsignificant overall difference in mortality across hospitals (SD, 0.31; 95% CI, 0-0.57). After mixed multivariable logistic regression analysis, advanced age (P < .0001) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = .009) were each associated with increased mortality. Neither gender (P = .14) nor duration on mechanical ventilation (P = .39) was associated with increased mortality. An increase in BMI from 25th to 75th percentile was not associated with a difference in mortality (P = .28). In our multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression analysis, there exists a nonlinear relationship between BMI and mortality. Between BMI of 25 and 32, patients experienced an increase in mortality. However, between BMI of 32 and 37, the adjusted mortality in these patients subsequently decreased. Our subgroup analysis comparing BMIs 40 to 60 with the 25th, 50th, and 75th percentile of BMI found no significant difference in ECMO mortality between BMI values of 40 and 60 with the 25th, 50th, 75th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Advancing age and higher CCI are each associated with increased risk for mortality in patients requiring VVECMO. A nonlinear relationship exists between mortality and BMI and those between 32 and 37 have lower odds of mortality than those between BMI 25 and 32. This nonlinear pattern suggests a need for further adjudication of the contraindications associated with VVECMO, particularly those based solely on BMI.

Minimally invasive approaches for en-bloc anatomical lung and chest wall resection.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of en-bloc anatomical lung and chest wall resection via minimally invasive surgery. Methods: Between January 2013 and December 2021, a total of 22 patients (18 males, 4 females; mean age: 63±6.9 years; range, 48 to 78 years) who underwent anatomical lung and chest wall resection using minimally invasive surgery for non-small cell lung cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic, clinical, intra- and postoperative data of the patients, recurrence, metastasis, mortality, and overall survival rates were recorded. Results: The surgical technique was robot-assisted thoracic surgery in two, multiport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in 18, and uniport video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in two patients. Upper lobectomy was performed in 17 (77.3%) patients, lower lobectomy in three (13.6%) patients, and upper lobe segmentectomy in two (9.1%) patients. Five different techniques were used for chest wall resection. Nine (40.9%) patients had one, eight (36.4%) patients had two, four (18.2%) patients had three, and one (4.5%) patient had four rib resections. Chest wall reconstruction was necessary for only one of the patients. The mean operation time was 114±36.8 min. Complete resection was achieved in all patients. Complications were observed in seven (31.8%) patients without mortality. The mean follow-up was 24.4±17.9 months. The five-year overall survival rate was 55.3%. Conclusion: Segmentectomy/lobectomy and chest wall resection with minimally invasive surgery are safe and feasible in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. In addition, the localization of the area where chest wall resection would be performed should be considered the most crucial criterion in selecting the ideal technique.

The SUPER reporting guideline suggested for reporting of surgical technique.

Background: Existing reporting guidelines pay insufficient attention to the detail and comprehensiveness reporting of surgical technique. The Surgical techniqUe rePorting chEcklist and standaRds (SUPER) aims to address this gap by defining reporting standards for surgical technique. The SUPER guideline intends to apply to articles that encompass surgical technique in any study design, surgical discipline, and stage of surgical innovation. Methods: Following the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research) Network approach, 16 surgeons, journal editors, and methodologists reviewed existing reporting guidelines relating to surgical technique, reviewed papers from 15 top journals, and brainstormed to draft initial items for the SUPER. The initial items were revised through a three-round Delphi survey from 21 multidisciplinary Delphi panel experts from 13 countries and regions. The final SUPER items were formed after an online consensus meeting to resolve disagreements and a three-round wording refinement by all 16 SUPER working group members and five SUPER consultants. Results: The SUPER reporting guideline includes 22 items that are considered essential for good and informative surgical technique reporting. The items are divided into six sections: background, rationale, and objectives (items 1 to 5); preoperative preparations and requirements (items 6 to 9); surgical technique details (items 10 to 15); postoperative considerations and tasks (items 16 to 19); summary and prospect (items 20 and 21); and other information (item 22). Conclusions: The SUPER reporting guideline has the potential to guide detailed, comprehensive, and transparent surgical technique reporting for surgeons. It may also assist journal editors, peer reviewers, systematic reviewers, and guideline developers in the evaluation of surgical technique papers and help practitioners to better understand and reproduce surgical technique. Trial Registration: https://www.equator-network.org/library/reporting-guidelines-under-development/reporting-guidelines-under-development-for-other-study-designs/#SUPER.

Does Fissureless Videothoracoscopic Lobectomy Help for Postoperative Air Leak?

BACKGROUND: Postoperative air leak is a common problem in patients undergoing pulmonary resections. A conventional fissure dissection technique during videothoracoscopic lobectomy, particularly in patients with fused fissures is very likely to result in parenchymal damage and prolonged air leak (PAL). In contrast, fissureless video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy may have advantages regarding PAL and hospital stay. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study consisting of 103 consecutive patients who underwent a VATS lobectomy either with a conventional or fissureless technique and statistically analyzed the results particularly with respect to PAL, chest tube duration (CTD), and length of hospital stay (LOS). RESULTS: We had 21 (20.4%) cases with PAL. Gender (p = 0.009), histological size of tumor (p = 0.003), and surgical technique (p = 0.009) showed statistically significant differences for PAL in contingency tables. Significant predictors for PAL in univariate analysis were male sex (p = 0.017), histological size of tumor more than 24 mm (p = 0.005), and conventional technique (p = 0.017). Similarly, multivariate analysis revealed male sex (p = 0.036), histological size of tumor more than 24 mm (p = 0.043), and conventional technique (p = 0.029) as significant predictors for PAL. In addition, both the medians of CTD (p = 0.015) and LOS (p = 0.005) were comparably lesser as 3 days, in patients who underwent fissureless videothoracoscopic lobectomy. CONCLUSION: The fissureless technique helps for PAL in patients undergoing videothoracoscopic lobectomy.

Reporting guidelines for surgical technique could be improved: a scoping review and a call for action.

OBJECTIVES: To identify reporting guidelines related to surgical technique and propose recommendations for areas that require improvement. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A protocol-guided scoping review was conducted. A literature search of MEDLINE, the EQUATOR Network Library, Google Scholar, and Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations was conducted to identify surgical technique reporting guidelines published up to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: We finally included 55 surgical technique reporting guidelines, vascular surgery (n = 18, 32.7%) was the most common among the clinical specialties covered. The included guidelines generally showed a low degree of international and multidisciplinary cooperation. Few guidelines provided a detailed development process (n = 14, 25.5%), conducted a systematic literature review (n = 13, 23.6%), used the Delphi method (n = 4, 7.3%), or described post-publication strategy (n = 6, 10.9%). The vast majority guidelines focused on the reporting of intraoperative period (n = 50, 90.9%). However, of the guidelines requiring detailed descriptions of surgical technique methodology (n = 43, 78.2%), most failed to provide guidance on what constitutes an adequate description. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates significant deficiencies in the development methodology and practicality of reporting guidelines for surgical technique. A standardized reporting guideline that is developed rigorously and focuses on details of surgical technique may serve as a necessary impetus for change.

Prognostic Factors in Patients with Clinic Locally Advanced T4 Lung Cancer: Surgical Considerations.

BACKGROUND: Inclusion of surgery in the treatment of T4 lung cancer has been a debate for the last two decades. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential prognostic factors which could affect the outcome. METHODS: Fifty-seven clinical T4 non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients out of 716 lung resections, who were operated at a single institution in 7 years period, were included in this study. Patients are grouped into three groups as patients with neoadjuvant treatment group (group 1 n: 16), salvage surgery group (surgery after 3 months of definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy) (group 2 n: 14), and straightforward surgery group (group 3 n: 27) with adjuvant treatment. Groups were analyzed and compared in terms of postoperative complications, 30 days of mortality, disease free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS: Mean overall survival (OS) was 48.43 ± 4.4 months and mean disease-free survival (DFS) 40.55 ± 4.46 months for all patients. Thirty days mortality was 5.2% and complication rates were 63.1%. Two years OS was 61.4 ± 6.4%, DFS was 58.1 ± 7.8%. Group 1, Group 2, and Group 3 patients had mean 39.14 ± 5.6, 44.7 ± 7.1, and 62.9 ± 4.8 months for OS (p: 0.09), and 29.6 ± 7.2, 38.4 ± 9.1, and 46.9 ± 6 months for DFS (p: 0.27). Patients who received blood transfusion showed significantly worse outcomes (p: 0.001 for DFS and p: 0.004 for OS). CONCLUSION: According to our outcomes, surgery should be included in the treatment of clinical T4 lung cancer when physiologically and oncologically possible with careful patient selection. This study demonstrates that patients receiving straightforward surgery have longer survival, in spite of higher perioperative mortality rate. Risks and benefits should be considered carefully.

Early trends in ECMO mortality during the first quarters of 2019 and 2020: Could we have predicted the onset of the pandemic?

OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality trends in patients requiring Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) support between the first quarters of 2019 and 2020 and determine whether these trends might have predicted the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS)-Cov-2 pandemic in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed 5% Medicare claims data at aggregate, state, hospital, and encounter levels using MS-DRG (Medicare Severity-Diagnosis Related Group) codes for ECMO, combining state-level data with national census data. Necessity and sufficiency relations associated with change in mortality between the 2 years were modeled using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). Multilevel, generalized linear modeling was used to evaluate mortality trends. RESULTS: Based on state-level data, there was a 3.36% increase in mortality between 2019 and 2020. Necessity and sufficiency evaluation of aggregate data at state and institutional levels did not identify any association or combinations of risk factors associated with this increase in mortality. However, multilevel and generalized linear models using disaggregated patient-level data to evaluate institution mortality and patient death, identified statistically significant differences between the first (p = .019) and second (p = .02) months of the 2 years, the first and second quarters (p < .001 and p = .042, respectively), and the first 6 months (p < .001) of 2019 and 2020. CONCLUSION: Mortality in ECMO patients increased significantly during the first quarter of 2020 and may have served as an early warning of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic. Granular data shared in real-time may be used to better predict public health threats.