Safety evaluation of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer in Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: While breast reconstruction often improves the quality of life of patients with locally advanced breast cancer, there is still no consensus on its safety. This retrospective report aimed to verify the safety of immediate breast reconstruction for locally advanced breast cancer. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 500 breast cancer surgeries performed between January 2005 and December 2019 at our hospital, including 120 immediate breast reconstructions. The following five items were analyzed: the patients' choice of reconstruction method, rate of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, surgical margin positivity rate, complications associated with surgery, overall survival rate, and breast cancer-free survival rate. RESULTS: Sixty-three of the 120 patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction. Of those who underwent reconstruction surgery, 95.8% received chemotherapy and 78.3% underwent post-mastectomy radiation therapy. Reconstruction failed in 8 cases with tissue expander and in 1 case with free TRAM flap. Breast reconstruction surgery was not a factor in delaying adjuvant therapy, but complications requiring intervention tended to increase the duration of adjuvant therapy. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of surgical margin positivity, overall survival rate, or breast cancer-free survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Although complications associated with reconstructive surgery occurred, appropriate intervention prevented delays in breast cancer treatment, and the complications did not negatively affect the overall or breast cancer-free survival rates. Our study found no evidence to avoid primary breast reconstruction in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Metastasis of breast cancer to liver through direct lymphatic drainage: a case report.

Breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) is considered to occur by hematogenous spread of primary breast cancer cells. We herein present a case of lymphatic BCLM that was confirmed by preoperative imaging for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). A woman in her early 70s was diagnosed with clinical stage T2N0M0 invasive lobular cancer of the left breast. She underwent mastectomy with SLNB. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy showed intense accumulation of isotope in the upper abdomen, corresponding to segment IV of the liver on single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT). However, no abnormalities were detected on magnetic resonance imaging. At 2.5 years postoperatively, the patient's serum CA15-3 concentration was elevated, and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) showed a solitary liver metastasis. The PET/CT findings were similar to the SPECT/CT findings obtained 2.5 years earlier, indicating that the BCLM had developed lymphatically. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of lymphatic BCLM proven by imaging examination.

Safety and Effectiveness of Areola-sparing Mastectomy for Breast Cancer With Intraductal Lesions.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Areola-sparing mastectomy (ASM), a conservative mastectomy with nipple hollowing, can be applied to intraductal breast cancer with a tumour-nipple-areola complex (NAC) distance of ≤2 cm. Here, we evaluated the safety and effectiveness of ASM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the surgical outcomes of 61 patients (64 breasts) who underwent ASM between 2016 and 2020. RESULTS: Of the 64 breasts, 33 (51.6%) underwent ASM because the tumour-NAC distance on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging was ≤2 cm. Two patients had positive excisional margins but these were at the posterior areola surface therefore additional resection was possible. Over a median postoperative observation period of 16 months (range=3-52 months), one patient developed chest wall recurrence that was resected and did not recur again. CONCLUSION: For breast cancer with an extensive intraductal component, ASM is a good alternative to nipple-sparing mastectomy because it allows safe resection while maintaining aesthetics.