Sleep-disordered breathing diagnosis: a comprehensive audit of home sleep testing in real clinical settings.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the indications and outcomes of Home Sleep Testing (HST) for patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), aligning with guidelines set forth by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and the European Sleep Research Society. Specifically, we aimed to audit whether validated type 3 polygraphy could effectively ensure patient care while optimizing resource utilization. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients undergoing type 3 polygraphy for suspected OSA in a tertiary referral hospital between January 2022 and December 2022. Demographic, clinical, and management data were collected. The efficacy of HST in guiding management plans was evaluated, with outcomes categorized as effective or ineffective based on subsequent need for in-laboratory polysomnography. RESULTS: While 85% of patients received a reliable diagnosis, 44.4% of them still required subsequent polysomnography, primarily due to adherence to funding regulations, rather than clinical need for further testing. Factors impacting the efficacy of HST included patient age, severity of apnea, and referral by a certified sleep specialist physician. CONCLUSION: Our study highlighted the potential of type 3 polygraphy, as a valuable tool for diagnosing OSA in an outpatient setting. However, having the result interpreted by a certified sleep specialist doctor was not enough. To streamline the care pathway, the referral for polygraphy had also to be made by a trained specialist. Challenges related to funding regulations, patient demographics and physician training stress the need for optimized diagnostic pathways to improve patient care and resource utilization.

Benralizumab in severe eosinophilic asthma in real life: confirmed effectiveness and contrasted effect on sputum eosinophilia versus exhaled nitric oxide fraction - PROMISE.

Background: Randomised controlled trials have shown that benralizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 receptor monoclonal antibody, reduces exacerbations and oral corticosteroid dose and improves asthma control and lung function in severe eosinophilic asthma. The aim of this study was to confirm results of randomised controlled trials in real life in a population of 73 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with benralizumab for at least 12 months. Methods: Patients underwent careful monitoring of asthma exacerbations, exhaled nitric oxide fraction, lung function, asthma control and quality of life questionnaire responses and sputum induction, and gave a blood sample at baseline, after 6 months and then every year. Results: We found significant reductions in exacerbations (by 92%, p<0.0001) and oral corticosteroid dose (by 83%, p<0.001) after 6 months that were maintained over time, with 78% of patients able to stop oral corticosteroid therapy. Patients improved their Asthma Control Test (ACT) score (from 11.7±5.1 to 16.9±5.35, p<0.0001), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score (from 2.88±1.26 to 1.77±1.32, p<0.0001) and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire score (+1.04, p<0.0001) at 6 months and this was maintained during follow-up. Only 35% and 43% of patients reached asthma control according to an ACT score ≥20 and ACQ score <1.5, respectively. We observed stable post-bronchodilation lung function over time and a significant reduction in sputum eosinophil count, with 85% of patients exhibiting sputum eosinophil counts <3% after 6 months (p<0.01) with no effect on exhaled nitric oxide fraction. Conclusion: In our real-life study, we confirm the results published in randomised controlled trials showing a sharp reduction in exacerbations and oral corticosteroid therapy, an improvement in asthma control and quality of life, and a dramatic reduction in sputum eosinophil count.

Use of Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotation Test to Predict Practical Performance of Sinus Endoscopy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of the Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotation Test (MRT) on performance of novice medical students for manipulation of a nasal endoscope on a cadaveric model. MATERIAL AND METHOD: We randomly selected 39 medical students who had never handled a nasal endoscope and subjected them to the MRT. General information including experience in manual, technical, or surgical activities and testing of anatomical knowledge were collected to exclude possible confounding factors. They were then asked to perform series of cadaveric model exercises using a nasal endoscope. Their cadaver performance was evaluated by 2 blinded observers, using a standardized scale. RESULTS: We found that medical students with higher mental rotation skills had significantly increased endoscopic sinus performance (P = .0002 using multivariate regression adjusted for specialty choice, previous surgical exposure, and anatomy knowledge). Higher anatomy knowledge was also associated with better endoscopic sinus performance (P = .0141). Other parameters had no impact on endoscopic sinus performance measured by the endoscopic scale (P > .05). CONCLUSION: The score obtained on the MRT was correlated with the practical performance of manipulating the nasal endoscope in cadaver. It could therefore be a useful spatial ability tool for directing targeted training in rhinology.

Responsiveness of acoustic rhinometry to septorhinoplasty by comparison with rhinomanometry and subjective instruments.

OBJECTIVES: Nose patency measures and instruments assessing subjective health are increasingly being used in rhinology. However, there is very little evidence of comparing existing methods' responsiveness to change. We evaluated the responsiveness of acoustic rhinometry to nasal valve surgery by comparison with rhinomanometry and patient-reported outcome instruments. DESIGN: Prospective case-control study. SETTING: Tertiary referral University Hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty consecutive patients with internal nasal valve dysfunction and 20 healthy volunteers as control group were enrolled. Prospectively collected data included acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, NOSE scale, SNOT-23 questionnaire, visual analogue scale and demographics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoint was the responsiveness of acoustic rhinometry to functional septorhinoplasty surgery at 3 months. Secondary endpoints were ability of acoustic rhinometry to reflect "known group" differences and correlation to subjective symptoms. RESULTS: Acoustic rhinometry was highly responsive to septorhinoplasty (P < 0.0001) while anterior rhinomanometry was not (P = 0.08). Based on the quartiles of the postoperative change in NOSE score, patients were classified as, respectively, non-responders, mild, moderate and good responders to surgery. Logistic regression model showed that acoustic rhinometry was able to discriminate non-responders to responders to surgery (P = 0.019), while anterior rhinomanometry failed (P = 0.611). Sensitivity and specificity of acoustic rhinometry were significantly higher (ROC area = 0.76) than rhinomanometry (ROC area = 0.48). Acoustic rhinometry was also superior than rhinomanometry to discriminate patients from control subjects and agreed better with patients-based subjective questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms and quantifies the responsiveness of acoustic rhinometry to nasal valve surgery, with a higher sensitivity and specificity than rhinomanometry.