ESMO Consensus Conference on testicular germ cell cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) consensus conference on testicular cancer was held on 3-5 November 2016 in Paris, France. The conference included a multidisciplinary panel of 36 leading experts in the diagnosis and treatment of testicular cancer (34 panel members attended the conference; an additional two panel members [CB and K-PD] participated in all preparatory work and subsequent manuscript development). The aim of the conference was to develop detailed recommendations on topics relating to testicular cancer that are not covered in detail in the current ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) and where the available level of evidence is insufficient. The main topics identified for discussion related to: (1) diagnostic work-up and patient assessment; (2) stage I disease; (3) stage II-III disease; (4) post-chemotherapy surgery, salvage chemotherapy, salvage and desperation surgery and special topics; and (5) survivorship and follow-up schemes. The experts addressed questions relating to one of the five topics within five working groups. Relevant scientific literature was reviewed in advance. Recommendations were developed by the working groups and then presented to the entire panel. A consensus vote was obtained following whole-panel discussions, and the consensus recommendations were then further developed in post-meeting discussions in written form. This manuscript presents the results of the expert panel discussions, including the consensus recommendations and a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation. All participants approved the final manuscript.

The effect of pulmonary function testing on bleomycin dosing in germ cell tumours.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The utility of pulmonary function testing (PFT) to detect bleomycin-induced pneumonitis is controversial. We describe its impact on bleomycin dosing in a phase 2 trial of accelerated BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, cisplatin) for advanced germ cell tumours. METHODS: There were 12 planned weekly bleomycin doses for intermediate-risk and poor-risk disease and nine for good-risk disease. Clinical assessments, chest X-ray, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and forced vital capacity (FVC) were performed bi-weekly. Bleomycin was ceased for predefined clinical/radiological evidence of pulmonary toxicity and a >25% reduction in DLCO or FVC. We determined doses planned, received and omitted and patients receiving all, ≥two-thirds, two-thirds of planned bleomycin doses. RESULTS: Of 43 eligible patients, 30% had lung metastases. Of 471, 375 (80%) of planned bleomycin doses were received, and 30% received 25% reduction in DLCO (35 vs 24%, P = 0.4) and 1.5 times as likely to receive

A phase Ib/II translational study of sunitinib with neoadjuvant radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used to treat localised soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Hypoxia is an important determinant of radioresistance. Whether antiangiogenic therapy can 'normalise' tumour vasculature, thereby improving oxygenation, remains unknown. METHODS: Two cohorts were prospectively enrolled. Cohort A evaluated the implications of hypoxia in STS, using the hypoxic tracer (18)F-azomycin arabinoside (FAZA-PET). In cohort B, sunitinib was added to preoperative RT in a dose-finding phase 1b/2 design. RESULTS: In cohort A, 13 out of 23 tumours were hypoxic (FAZA-PET), correlating with metabolic activity (r(2)=0.85; P<0.001). Two-year progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival were 61% (95% CI: 0.44-0.84) and 87% (95% CI: 0.74-1.00), respectively. Hypoxia was associated with radioresistance (P=0.012), higher local recurrence (Hazard ratio (HR): 10.2; P=0.02), PFS (HR: 8.4; P=0.02), and OS (HR: 41.4; P<0.04). In Cohort B, seven patients received sunitinib at dose level (DL): 0 (50 mg per day for 2 weeks before RT; 25 mg per day during RT) and two patients received DL: -1 (37.5 mg per day for entire period). Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in 4 out of 7 patients at DL 0 and 2 out of 2 patients at DL -1, resulting in premature study closure. Although there was no difference in PFS or OS, patients receiving sunitinib had higher local failure (HR: 8.1; P=0.004). CONCLUSION: In STS, hypoxia is associated with adverse outcomes. The combination of sunitinib with preoperative RT resulted in unacceptable toxicities, and higher local relapse rates.

Testosterone deficiency and quality of life in Australasian testicular cancer survivors: a prospective cohort study.

This is the first prospective study in a contemporary Australian/New Zealand population to determine the prevalence of testosterone deficiency in testicular cancer survivors at 12 months from treatment, and any association with poorer quality of life. Hormone assays from 54 evaluable patients in a prospective cohort study revealed biochemical hypogonadism in 18 patients (33%) and low-normal testosterone in 13 patients (24%). We found no association between testosterone levels and quality of life (all P > 0.05). Hypogonadal patients should be considered for testosterone replacement to prevent long-term morbidity.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory germ cell tumours: outcomes and prognostic variables in a case series of 17 patients.

BACKGROUND: Optimal therapy for men relapsing after initial chemotherapy for germ cell tumours (GCT) is poorly defined. Both conventional dose salvage regimens and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (HDCT-ASCT) have been utilised. AIMS: To examine patients who received HDCT-ASCT for relapsed GCT within a single Australian centre. METHODS: Records between 2000 and 2012 were analysed for baseline characteristics, treatment-related toxicity and survival. Prognosis at the time of HDCT-ASCT was classified according to the International Prognostic Factors Study Group (IPFSG). RESULTS: Seventeen patients received HDCT-ASCT, median age 34 (21-46), with 41% having primary refractory disease and 53% with high/very high risk disease by IPFSG. The most common regimen utilised was paclitaxel/ifosfamide followed by high-dose carboplatin/etoposide (TI-CE; n = 12). The median duration of grade 4 (G4) neutropenia was 11 days (range 9-17) with febrile neutropenia in 90% resulting in four intensive care unit admissions (8%). Median duration of G4 thrombocytopenia was 10 days (range 8-19) requiring a median of two pooled platelets bags (range 0-33) per episode. Transplant-related mortality occurred in one patient (veno-occlusive disease). Twenty-seven per cent of HDCT-ASCT cycles were associated with grade 3 mucositis (median total parenteral nutrition days = 5 (0-23)). Two-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 59% and 71%. Patients who received HDCT-ASCT as second or subsequent relapse fared worse than those treated with HDCT-ASCT at first relapse (hazard ratio 0.23 (95% confidence interval: 0.04, 1.37; P-value 0.09). Three-year OS for those who received TI-CE at first relapse was 90%. CONCLUSIONS: HDCT-ASCT for relapsed GCT is effective with acceptable toxicity. There was encouraging PFS/OS, particularly in a poor-prognosis cohort.

Accelerated BEP for metastatic germ cell tumours: a multicenter phase II trial by the Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group (ANZUP).

BACKGROUND: This Australian single-arm, multicenter, phase II trial evaluated feasibility, tolerability and activity of accelerated bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic germ cell tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were planned to receive cisplatin 20 mg/m(2) and etoposide 100 mg/m(2) days 1-5, and pegfilgrastim 6 mg day 6, all repeated every 2 weeks for four cycles (three cycles for good prognosis). Bleomycin was given at 30 000 IU weekly to a total of 12 doses (9 doses for good prognosis). Primary end point was feasibility, defined as the proportion of patients able to complete the etoposide and cisplatin components of BEP and be eligible to receive a fourth cycle of BEP by day 50. RESULTS: Twelve poor, 16 intermediate and 15 good prognosis (n = 43) eligible patients were enrolled. Two patients aged >40 years were ineligible and excluded from analyses. The regimen was feasible in 86%, not feasible in 7% and not assessable in 7% of patients. Most common grade 3/4 adverse events were non-neutropenic infection (16%) and febrile neutropenia (12%). Complete response (CR) to chemotherapy and surgery was achieved in 33% poor-prognosis, 81% intermediate-prognosis and 100% good-prognosis patients. At median follow-up of 27 months (range 6-42), the 2-year progression-free survival was 50% for poor-prognosis, 94% for intermediate-prognosis and 92% for good-prognosis patients. CONCLUSION: Accelerated BEP is feasible and tolerable. Efficacy data appear to be promising. This trial and a similar UK study provide the rationale for a randomised trial comparing accelerated versus standard BEP. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Registration number. ACTRN 12607000294459.

Results of a 7-day aprepitant schedule for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in 5-day cisplatin-based germ cell tumor chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of adding a 7-day aprepitant schedule to a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone for patients with germ cell tumors receiving first-line 5-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy. METHODS: In a single-arm, open-label, multi-center, phase 2 trial, chemo-naive patients received aprepitant 125 mg PO (per oral) on day 1 and 80 mg PO on days 2 to 7, a 5HT3 receptor antagonist on days 1 to 5, and dexamethasone 8 mg on days 1 to 8. The primary endpoint was no emesis (vomiting or dry retching) during days 1 to 7 of cycle 1. RESULTS: Fifty patients were recruited. For cycle 1, proportions reporting no emesis on day 1, no emesis on days 1 to 7, no nausea on day 1, and no nausea on days 1 to 7 were 96, 82, 71, and 27%, respectively. The efficacy was maintained in all cycles with over 80% of patients reporting no emesis on any given day of any given cycle. Emesis was more common on days 4 to 7 (68% episodes) than on days 1 to 3 (32% episodes). Over any 24-h period, 49% of patients with emesis reported no more than two episodes, and 62% of patients with nausea reported intensity as 3 or less on a scale from 0 to 10. There were no unexpected or serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: Adding 7 days of aprepitant to a 5HT3 receptor antagonist and dexamethasone effectively controlled acute and delayed emesis with 5-day cisplatin regimens. Days of nausea were more common than days of vomiting.

Phase II study of vinflunine in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: An open-label, multicentre, non-comparative phase II trial to determine the response rate of intravenous vinflunine as first line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic RCC were treated with vinflunine 350 mg/m2 (n = 11) or 320 mg/m2 (n = 22) administered intravenously every 21 days. RESULTS: Out of 33 patients included in this study, one partial response was observed in the group treated at 350 mg/m2 and none in the group receiving 320 mg/m2 resulting in a response rate in this population of 9.1% (95% CI: 0.2-41.3). Median progression free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI: 2.8-14.4) for patients treated at 350 mg/m2, and 3.3 months (95% CI: 1.6-6.4) for those treated at 320 mg/m2.The median survival time was 10.4 months (95% CI: 6.8-12.4) for the whole study population. The principal toxicities were grade 3/4 neutropaenia -90.9% at 350 mg/m2 and 68.1% at 320 mg/m2, febrile neutropaenia was recorded in 3 patients (27.3%) at 350 mg/m2 and in 5 patients (22.7%) at 320 mg/m2. One episode of thromboembolic event was reported in 1 patient at each dose level. CONCLUSION: Vinflunine given intravenously once every 3 weeks has not shown any clinically relevant activity in the management of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma; tolerance of the treatment was better at a dose of 320 mg/m2 than at 350 mg/m2.

Thallium-201 scintigraphy--a predictor of tumour necrosis in soft tissue sarcoma following preoperative radiotherapy?

AIM: Thallium-201 (Tl-201) scintigraphy in patients with malignant soft tissue tumours was evaluated to determine whether the images correlated with histological response to preoperative radiotherapy. METHODS: We studied 54 patients, median age 32 (range 17-84) years, with non-metastatic, malignant soft tissue tumours diagnosed between 1996 and 2001. Thirty-eight patients had unoperated tumours and 16 patients had previous incomplete excisions. All patients received preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery. No patient received chemotherapy as part of their initial management. Qualitative analyses of early phase (30 min) and late phase (4 h) Tl-201 scintigraphic images before and after preoperative radiotherapy were compared with the degree of tumour necrosis determined histologically. RESULTS: In the previously unoperated group, all 38 patients had increased TL-201 uptake in the late phase of scanning prior to radiotherapy suggesting metabolically active tissue. In the previously excised group 11 patients had increased Tl-201 uptake in the late phase of scanning prior to radiotherapy. Following radiotherapy, patients with Tl-201 retention on late phase scans had a lower rate of necrosis than patients with minimal retention, p<0.0001. Following radiotherapy, 28 of 29 patients with minimal uptake on the late phase had 80% or more necrosis, while 24 of 25 patients with increased uptake on the late phase had less than 80% necrosis (p<0.0001). Patients with previously excised tumours who had thallium retention following radiotherapy demonstrated evidence of residual disease at surgery. All patients with incompletely excised tumours who had no thallium retention on late phase scanning after radiotherapy demonstrated no evidence of residual disease at surgery. CONCLUSION: Thallium scintigraphy is a readily available investigative tool, which when used in conjunction with other imaging modalities in the assessment of primary and incompletely excised malignant soft tissue tumours, may predict histological tumour response to preoperative radiotherapy.

Comparison of neutropenia in a randomized, crossover trial of 3-, 6-, and 24-h infusions of paclitaxel.

OBJECTIVE: Paclitaxel is most commonly infused over 3 hs rather than the original schedule of 24 h as the briefer infusion duration results in greater convenience, similar efficacy, significantly less myelosuppression, and less cost. While differences in toxicity between 3- and 24-h infusions are well described, there is little information about the effect of modest prolongation of infusion duration, which is often employed in patients who develop hypersensitivity reactions. To assess whether prolonging a 3-h infusion significantly increases the degree of neutropenia, we reviewed our data from a randomized, crossover trial of 3-h versus 6-h versus 24-h regimens of paclitaxel. METHODS: Results from 12 patients who were randomized to receive one 3-h, one 6-h and one 24-h infusion of paclitaxel in varied sequences during their first three cycles of treatment were analysed. The blood counts were monitored closely throughout each cycle of treatment. RESULTS: Crossover trial methodology was used to assess the differences in the degree of neutropenia caused by the three different infusion regimens. The 24-h infusion regimen resulted in significantly worse neutropenia than the 3- or 6-h infusion regimens. There was no statistically significant difference between the 3- and 6-h infusion regimens with respect to all endpoints. The estimated mean difference in the duration of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia between the 3- and 6-h infusion regimens (6 h - 3-h) was 1.1 day (95% CI: -0.9, 3.2), and for grade 4 neutropenia, the estimated mean difference in the duration was 0.8 day (95% CI: -0.4, 2.0). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the duration of paclitaxel infusions from 3 to 6 h does not result in a statistically significant increase in the degree of neutropenia. Any additional neutropenia is likely to be of brief duration.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide in advanced cancer: dose escalation possible with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, but not with prophylactic antibiotics.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this phase I trial was to determine the maximally tolerated doses of the combination of docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status 0 to 2, who had received up to one prior chemotherapy regimen were treated with docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide repeated every 21 days. The cyclophosphamide dose was fixed at 600 mg/m(2) and the dose levels studied were: docetaxel/epirubicin; 60/60, 75/60, 75/75, 75/90, 85/90 and 85/105 mg/m(2). There was provision for the addition of prophylactic ciprofloxacin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in separate steps if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia related. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were entered and all were assessable for toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity, predominantly febrile neutropenia, was surprisingly seen at the first dose level. The addition of prophylactic ciprofloxacin did not permit dose escalation, but dose escalation was possible with the addition of G-CSF. The highest administered dose level with G-CSF was docetaxel 85 mg/m(2) and epirubicin 105 mg/m(2) with DLTs in five of six patients. Treatment was well tolerated in 10 patients treated at the recommended dose level (85/90) with only one patient experiencing DLT. Responses were seen in a range of malignancies including breast and anaplastic thyroid cancers. No significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed, but a transient increase in epirubicinol plasma concentration occurred during and after docetaxel infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended dose level of docetaxel 85 mg/m(2), epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2) with G-CSF support has a favorable toxicity profile and is suitable for further investigation in phase II and III trials.

Treatment with the novel anti-angiogenic agent PI-88 is associated with immune-mediated thrombocytopenia.

BACKGROUND: The novel molecule PI-88 is a highly sulfonated oligosaccharide which inhibits heparanase activity and competes with heparan sulfate binding of growth factors such as FGF and VEGF. Preclinical data demonstrates that PI-88 inhibits angiogenesis and has anti-metastatic effects. The aim of this phase I study was to determine the recommended dose and toxicity profile of PI-88. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PI-88 was given intravenously in increasing duration of administration (0.57 mg/kg for 2 h, 0.57 mg/kg/day for 1 day, 4, 7 and 14 consecutive days) and then increasing dose for 14 consecutive days (1.14 mg/kg/day and 2.28 mg/kg/day) in patients with advanced malignancies until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. Fourteen assessable patients with advanced malignancies received PI-88 intravenously. RESULTS: DLT was thrombocytopenia. The thrombocytopenia appeared to be immunologically mediated with the development of anti-heparin platelet factor 4 complex antibodies. There were no other significant toxicities. At the final dose and schedule (2.28 mg/kg/day for 14 days), there was limited evidence of biological activity as measured by the surrogate marker activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), although two patients had stabilisation of disease. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, PI-88 at a dose of 2.28 mg/kg/day for 14 days resulted in dose-limiting thrombocytopenia which appeared to be immune related. Limited evidence of biological activity was noted. Alternate scheduling and routes of administration are now being explored.

Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy.

BACKGROUND: We have previously reported that repeated cycles of high-dose therapy (HDT), can be supported by unmanipulated autologous PBPC. Here we investigate whether purified CD34+ cells, obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the Isolex 300i device, can support such therapy. METHODS: Twenty-nine consecutive patients with metastatic breast cancer had PBPC mobilized and harvested following chemotherapy and G-CSF (10 microg/kg per day). Patients with > 4.0 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells in the apheresis product underwent CD34-selection using the Isolex 300i (v2.0) device. All cells collected were equally divided into three aliquots and cryopreserved. Patients who did not achieve this threshold had unmanipulated cells collected and stored. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and either ifosfamide (10 g/m2) or cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2). It was intended for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e 1/3 for each cycle) and to compare hemopoietic recovery between patients receiving CD34-selected cells or unmanipulated cells. RESULTS: Thirteen of the 29 patients (45%) did not mobilize sufficient CD34+ cells to undergo CD34-selection. The remaining 16 patients underwent CD34-selection with a median purity of 84.3% (range: 16.3-96.1%) and yield of 34% (range: 1-60%). Fifteen of these patients proceeded to HDT and 42 of the planned 45 cycles were administered. Nine patients had all three HDT cycles supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (x 10(6)/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (range: 0.04-3.01). Three of the 15 patients required infusion of 'back-up' unmanipulated cells because of delayed neutrophil recovery. Of the 13 patients whose PBPCs did not undergo CD34+ cell selection, 11 proceeded to HDT with a median of 3.2 x 10(6)/kg (range: 2.0-4.4) unselected cells infused per cycle and 31 of 33 planned cycles were delivered. When hemopoietic recovery was compared between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n = 34) and unmanipulated cells (n = 31), there was a modest slowing in the patients receiving CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 x 10(9)/L = 11 days versus 10 days (P = 0.0122) and platelets > 20 x 10(9)/L = 14 days versus 13 days (P = 0.0009). No difference in recovery to 50 x 10(9)/L was observed (P = 0.54). CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated that Isolex 300i CD34-selected cells are capable of supporting multiple cycles of HDT. However, we were unable to acquire sufficient CD34+ cells to perform this processing in 45% (13/29) of patients and further improvements in yield are required to overcome the modest delay in neutrophil and platelet recovery.

CliniMACS CD34-selected cells to support multiple cycles of high-dose therapy.

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, following high-dose therapy (HDT), unmanipulated autologous PBPC are infused. Alternatively, purified CD34+ cells can now be obtained by immunomagnetic separation using the CliniMACS device. Limited data currently exist examining hemopoietic recovery with such cells. METHODS: Ten patients with advanced breast cancer had PBPC mobilized with docetaxel (100 mg/m2) and G-CSF (10 microg/kg per day), harvested and processed using the CliniMACS CD34-selection device and equally divided into three aliquots for cryopreservation. Unmanipulated 'back-up' cells were also collected on a separate day of the same mobilization, divided into three and cryopreserved. Patients subsequently received three cycles of HDT with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2). The intent was for patients to receive CD34-selected cells to support each of the three cycles of HDT (i.e., 1/3 for each cycle). If, however, hemopoietic recovery was delayed after Cycle 1, 1/3 of the unmanipulated cells were infused following Cycle 2 and the remaining CD34-selected cells (2/3) were used to support Cycle 3. RESULTS: PBPC from 10 patients underwent CD34-selection with a resulting median purity of 93% (range: 76-98%) and yield of 62% (range: 16-93%). Of the 10 patients, only two were able to be supported with CD34-selected cells for all three cycles of HDT. The remaining eight patients required unmanipulated 'back-up' cells to support Cycle 2. Three patients also required infusion of 'back-up' unmanipulated cells because of persistent neutropenia (n = 1) or thrombocytopenia (n = 2) following cycles initially supported by CD34-selected cells. The median number of CD34-selected cells (x 10(6)/kg) infused per cycle was 1.5 (0.7-2.6) (n = 20) and unselected cells was 1.7 (1.4-2.8) (n = 10). Comparing hemopoietic recovery between cycles of HDT supported by CD34-selected (n = 20) and unmanipulated cells (n = 10) there was a significant slowing with the CD34-selected cells; time to ANC > 1.0 = 13 days versus 10 days, platelets > 20 = 17 days versus 13 days, > 50 = 25 versus 17 days (all P values < 0.001). There was no correlation between the dose of CD34-selected cells infused and neutrophil/platelet recovery. DISCUSSION: We have demonstrated that, although unmanipulated PBPC achieve rapid hemopoietic recovery (at modest CD34 doses of < or = 2.8 x 10(6)/kg), CliniMACS-selected CD34+ cells (in the doses utilized in this study of < or = 2.6 x 10(6)/kg) result in significantly prolonged recovery.

Significant impairment of high-dose methotrexate clearance following vancomycin administration in the absence of overt renal impairment.

BACKGROUND: Methotrexate is an antimetabolite cytotoxic drug which is predominantly renally excreted. Vancomycin, a glycopeptide antibiotic that is used in the febrile neutropaenic patient, can be nephrotoxic. There are no previous reports of any interactions between these two drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe two patients with osteosarcoma treated with high-dose methotrexate-containing chemotherapy who had significantly delayed methotrexate clearance several weeks following exposure to vancomycin. RESULTS: These patients were treated with alternating chemotherapy consisting of 12 g/m2 methotrexate, 60 mg/m2 cisplatin, 75 mg/m2 adriamycin and 15 g/m2 ifosfamide. In both patients, serum methotrexate levels fell to below 0.2 micromol/l within 48-96 h during initial treatment cycles. However, following recent exposure to therapeutic vancomycin in the preceding 10 days and in the absence of overt renal impairment, both patients manifested markedly prolonged methotrexate clearance, requiring 170-231 h to reach serum levels of less than 0.2 microM. Subclinical renal impairment was documented by impaired glomerular filtration rates in both cases by technetium 99 m diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid scanning. Subsequent methotrexate cycles using an unmodified schedule were cleared within 72 h. Both cases had their glomerular filtration rate re-assessed, which showed marked improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Recent exposure to vancomycin, even in the absence of overt renal impairment, may adversely affect methotrexate excretion, which can subsequently lead to increased toxicity of the antimetabolite. The glomerular filtration rate should be measured in such cases so that appropriate dose modification of methotrexate can be made.

The management of testicular cancer in Victoria, 1988-1993. Urology Study Committee of the Victorian Co-operative Oncology Group.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the patterns of care and management of testicular cancer in Victoria. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective analysis of all cases of testicular cancer in Victoria from 1988 to 1993 identified through the Victorian Cancer Registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Description of patient characteristics, staging investigations, initial management, and outcome. RESULTS: 667 eligible cases of testicular cancer were identified and questionnaires were returned for 633 of these patients (94.9% response rate). There were 357 (56.4%) patients with pure seminoma; 271 (42.8%) with non-seminomatous germ cell tumours, 3 (0.5%) with stromal tumours, and 2 (0.3%) with other tumours. The median age was 32 years (range, 0-80 years). Preoperative marker levels were not available for 8% of patients, and initial staging was considered inadequate in 6%. Surveillance programs used for patients with Stage I disease were considered inadequate in most. Relative survival at five years was 99% for patients with seminoma and 91% for non-seminoma. CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable variation in the investigation, treatment, and follow-up of these patients, which is likely to have resulted in unnecessary morbidity. Clinical practice guidelines should be developed and implemented to promote optimal management.

Comparison of two standard chemotherapy regimens for good-prognosis germ-cell tumours: a randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Germ Cell Trial Group.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with metastatic germ-cell tumours are cured with chemotherapy. However, the optimum chemotherapy regimen is uncertain, and there is variation in international practice. We did a multicentre randomised trial to compare two standard chemotherapy regimens for men with good-prognosis germ-cell tumours. METHODS: Good prognosis was defined by modified Memorial Sloan-Kettering criteria. The first regimen (regimen A) was based on treatment recommendations from Indiana University and comprised three cycles of 20 mg/m2 cisplatin on days 1-5, 100 mg/m2 etoposide on days 1-5, and 30 kU bleomycin on days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 21 days. The second regimen (regimen B) was based on the control regimen of a published randomised clinical trial and comprised four cycles of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 120 mg/m2 etoposide on days 1-3, and 30 kU bleomycin on day 1, repeated every 21 days. The primary outcome measure was overall survival. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 166 patients were randomised, 83 to each regimen. The trial was stopped when the second planned interim analysis met predefined stopping rules. The median follow-up was 33 months. Overall survival was substantially better with regimen A (three vs 13 deaths, hazard ratio 0.22 [95% CI 0.06-0.77], p=0.008). This difference was due to deaths from cancer (one vs nine), and not deaths from treatment (two vs two) and remained significant after adjustment for other prognostic factors (0.25 [0.07-0.88], p=0.03). INTERPRETATION: In men with good-prognosis germ-cell tumours, the regimen developed at Indiana University is superior to the alternative regimen studied in this trial. The lower total dose and dose-intensity of bleomycin and the lower dose-intensity of etoposide in regimen B could be responsible for the worse outcome.

Repetitive high-dose therapy with cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel with peripheral blood progenitor cell and filgrastim support for metastatic and locally advanced breast cancer: results of a phase I study.

This phase I study was designed to determine the optimal dosages of a novel repetitive high-dose therapy regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The planned treatment was three cycles of high-dose cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and docetaxel delivered every 35 days with progressive dose-escalation in successive cohorts. Each cycle was supported by peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and filgrastim. Eighteen patients were entered into this trial. Of the planned 54 treatment cycles, 44 were delivered and 11 patients completed all three cycles. The dose-limiting toxicities were interstitial pneumonitis and mucositis with moderately severe diarrhea (n = 3) and rash (n = 3). There were no treatment-related deaths. Of the 17 patients with evaluable disease, 16 patients responded with six patients achieving a complete remission and an additional four patients achieving no detectable disease (negative restaging including PET scan) but a persistently abnormal bone scan. At a median follow-up of 12 months, median progression-free survival was 11 months with the median overall survival not reached. The recommended doses for phase II/III studies are cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2), thiotepa (300 mg/m2) and docetaxel (100 mg/m2).