Identification of common vaginal Lactobacilli immunoreactive proteins by immunoproteomic techniques.

Lactobacilli are considered as the most important microorganisms in regulating immune system and maintaining vaginal health. The uses and benefits of Lactobacilli as probiotics, particularly the regulation of immune system, are dependent on the strain used and a comprehensive understanding of their effects on the host. Several factors have been identified in Lactobacilli that influence the immune response, such as exopolysaccharides and proteins. The current study was designed to investigate the serum immunoreactivity of healthy women against common vaginal Lactobacilli immunoreactive proteins. Three common vaginal Lactobacillus strains (L. crispatus L1, L. gasseri L9, and L. fermentum L2) were compared for immune response. The ELISA results showed that the levels of total immunoglobulin (Ig-total) antibody for L. crispatus L1, L. fermentum L2, and L. gasseri L9 were 47%, 45% and 29%, respectively. Regarding the lower prevalence of L. fermentum L2 in comparison with the other two strains, the approximately equal levels of Ig-total compared to L. crispatus L1 and more than L. gasseri L9 indicate that L. fermentum L2 has the greater antigenicity ability. Accordingly, the immunoreactive proteins of L. fermentum L2 were identified using MALDI-TOF-MS detected by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. These proteins included 30s ribosomal protein S4 and 50s ribosomal protein L5. Antigenic epitopes on the 3D structure of these proteins was also predicted using bioinformatics analysis. The presence of antibody in serum of healthy pre-menopausal women indicates that Lactobacilli (normal flora) proteins can stimulate host immune response. Purification and further studies of the proteins may allow their potential use as an adjuvant to improve the efficacy of vaccines.

Urinary exosomal expression of long non-coding RNAs as diagnostic marker in bladder cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and exosomes have been regarded as components of cell signal transmission that modulate indigenous cellular microenvironments. Exosomes also participate in relocation of functional lncRNAs between cells. METHODS: In the present study, we evaluated expression of LINC00355, LINC00958, UCA1-201, UCA1-203, and MALAT1 lncRNAs in urinary exosomes isolated from transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of bladder, non-malignant urinary disorders, and normal subjects. RESULTS: LINC00355, UCA1-203, and MALAT1 expression was significantly higher in TCC patients compared to controls (non-malignant or normal samples). However, UCA1-201 expression was significantly decreased in TCC patients compared with controls. LINC00355 and MALAT1 expression was significantly lower in cigarette smokers and opium-addicted TCC patients, respectively. On the other hand, LINC00355 expression tended to be higher in opium-addicted TCC patients. The proposed panel of lncRNAs (composed of UCA1-201, UCA1-203, MALAT1, and LINC00355) had 92% sensitivity and 91.7% specificity for diagnosis of bladder cancer from normal samples. CONCLUSION: Transcript levels of lncRNAs in urinary exosomes are potential diagnostic bio-markers in bladder cancer.

Urine exosome gene expression of cancer-testis antigens for prediction of bladder carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Exosomes have been regarded as emerging tools for cancer diagnosis. Tumor-derived exosomes contain molecules that enhance cancer progression and affect immune responses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the present study, we evaluated expression of seven cancer-testis antigens (CTAs) that are regarded as putative biomarkers and immunotherapeutic targets along with NMP22 in urinary exosomes of bladder cancer patients, healthy subjects and patients affected with nonmalignant urinary disorders. RESULTS: Exosomal expression of MAGE-B4 was significantly higher in bladder cancer patients compared with normal samples (expression ratio=2.68, P=0.01). However, its expression was lower in bladder cancer patients compared with benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) patients (expression ratio=0.17, P=0.01). Exosomal expression of NMP22 was significantly higher in bladder cancer patients compared with BPH patients (expression ratio=9.22, P=0.02). Expressions of other genes were not significantly different between bladder cancer patients and normal/nonmalignant samples. We found significant correlation between MAGE-A3 and MAGE-B4 expressions in exosomes obtained from controls. In addition, TSGA10 expression was correlated with expression of NMP22 in both cancer patients and controls. CONCLUSION: The present study provides evidences for differential expression of CTAs in urinary exosomes of bladder cancer patients and urogenital disorders and warrants further studies for assessment of their significance in cancer diagnosis and immunotherapeutic approaches.