Evaluation of a pharmacist-led antibiotic stewardship program and implementation of prescribing order sets.

BACKGROUND: It is established that pharmacists can play a role in antibiotic stewardship in inpatient settings; however, there remains a paucity of data regarding pharmacist impact on antibiotic stewardship in outpatient care. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of an outpatient pharmacist antimicrobial stewardship program involving the implementation of prescribing order sets on the rate of compliance with guideline-recommended antibiotic use. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective study conducted at a resident-run, adult medicine clinic evaluating the implementation of a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship education program and prescribing order sets. Adult patients were included if they were treated for a diagnosis of urinary tract infection or Helicobacter pylori infection. The primary outcome was a composite of the proportion of antibiotic prescribing that was compliant with guideline-recommended treatment, including indication, antibiotic selection, dose, and duration. The secondary outcomes included an analysis of the individual components of the primary outcome and a subgroup analysis according to infection type. RESULTS: A total of 115 and 43 patients were included in the preintervention and intervention groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed in the proportion of complete guideline-recommended antibiotic regimens after the implementation of the stewardship intervention (P = 0.703) or in any individual component of the composite outcome. However, a subgroup analysis of each infection type demonstrated statistically significant improvements in both complete H pylori regimens and antibiotic selection. CONCLUSIONS: Although the implementation of a pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program at an adult medicine clinic did not lead to an improvement in complete guideline-recommended antibiotic prescribing, notable improvements were observed after subgroup analyses.

A decade of reversal: an analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices.

OBJECTIVE: To identify medical practices that offer no net benefits. METHODS: We reviewed all original articles published in 10 years (2001-2010) in one high-impact journal. Articles were classified on the basis of whether they addressed a medical practice, whether they tested a new or existing therapy, and whether results were positive or negative. Articles were then classified as 1 of 4 types: replacement, when a new practice surpasses standard of care; back to the drawing board, when a new practice is no better than current practice; reaffirmation, when an existing practice is found to be better than a lesser standard; and reversal, when an existing practice is found to be no better than a lesser therapy. This study was conducted from August 1, 2011, through October 31, 2012. RESULTS: We reviewed 2044 original articles, 1344 of which concerned a medical practice. Of these, 981 articles (73.0%) examined a new medical practice, whereas 363 (27.0%) tested an established practice. A total of 947 studies (70.5%) had positive findings, whereas 397 (29.5%) reached a negative conclusion. A total of 756 articles addressing a medical practice constituted replacement, 165 were back to the drawing board, 146 were medical reversals, 138 were reaffirmations, and 139 were inconclusive. Of the 363 articles testing standard of care, 146 (40.2%) reversed that practice, whereas 138 (38.0%) reaffirmed it. CONCLUSION: The reversal of established medical practice is common and occurs across all classes of medical practice. This investigation sheds light on low-value practices and patterns of medical research.

Low bone mass in premenopausal women with depression.

BACKGROUND: An increased prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) has been reported in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), mostly women. METHODS: Study recruitment was conducted from July 1, 2001, to February 29, 2003. We report baseline BMD measurements in 89 premenopausal women with MDD and 44 healthy control women enrolled in a prospective study of bone turnover. The BMD was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at the spine, hip, and forearm. Mean hourly levels of plasma 24-hour cytokines, 24-hour urinary free cortisol, and catecholamine excretion were measured in a subset of women. We defined MDD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition). RESULTS: The prevalence of low BMD, defined as a T score of less than -1, was greater in women with MDD vs controls at the femoral neck (17% vs 2%; P = .02) and total hip (15% vs 2%; P = .03) and tended to be greater at the lumbar spine (20% vs 9%; P = .14). The mean +/- SD BMD, expressed as grams per square centimeters, was lower in women with MDD at the femoral neck (0.849 +/- 0.121 vs 0.866 +/- 0.094; P = .05) and at the lumbar spine (1.024 +/- 0.117 vs 1.043 +/- 0.092; P = .05) and tended to be lower at the radius (0.696 +/- 0.049 vs 0.710 +/- 0.055; P = .07). Women with MDD had increased mean levels of 24-hour proinflammatory cytokines and decreased levels of anti-inflammatory cytokines. CONCLUSIONS: Low BMD is more prevalent in premenopausal women with MDD. The BMD deficits are of clinical significance and comparable in magnitude to those resulting from established risk factors for osteoporosis, such as smoking and reduced calcium intake. The possible contribution of immune or inflammatory imbalance to low BMD in premenopausal women with MDD remains to be clarified.