Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
JMIR Med Educ ; 10: e55048, 2024 Apr 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686550

RESUMO

Background: The deployment of OpenAI's ChatGPT-3.5 and its subsequent versions, ChatGPT-4 and ChatGPT-4 With Vision (4V; also known as "GPT-4 Turbo With Vision"), has notably influenced the medical field. Having demonstrated remarkable performance in medical examinations globally, these models show potential for educational applications. However, their effectiveness in non-English contexts, particularly in Chile's medical licensing examinations-a critical step for medical practitioners in Chile-is less explored. This gap highlights the need to evaluate ChatGPT's adaptability to diverse linguistic and cultural contexts. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the performance of ChatGPT versions 3.5, 4, and 4V in the EUNACOM (Examen Único Nacional de Conocimientos de Medicina), a major medical examination in Chile. Methods: Three official practice drills (540 questions) from the University of Chile, mirroring the EUNACOM's structure and difficulty, were used to test ChatGPT versions 3.5, 4, and 4V. The 3 ChatGPT versions were provided 3 attempts for each drill. Responses to questions during each attempt were systematically categorized and analyzed to assess their accuracy rate. Results: All versions of ChatGPT passed the EUNACOM drills. Specifically, versions 4 and 4V outperformed version 3.5, achieving average accuracy rates of 79.32% and 78.83%, respectively, compared to 57.53% for version 3.5 (P<.001). Version 4V, however, did not outperform version 4 (P=.73), despite the additional visual capabilities. We also evaluated ChatGPT's performance in different medical areas of the EUNACOM and found that versions 4 and 4V consistently outperformed version 3.5. Across the different medical areas, version 3.5 displayed the highest accuracy in psychiatry (69.84%), while versions 4 and 4V achieved the highest accuracy in surgery (90.00% and 86.11%, respectively). Versions 3.5 and 4 had the lowest performance in internal medicine (52.74% and 75.62%, respectively), while version 4V had the lowest performance in public health (74.07%). Conclusions: This study reveals ChatGPT's ability to pass the EUNACOM, with distinct proficiencies across versions 3.5, 4, and 4V. Notably, advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have not significantly led to enhancements in performance on image-based questions. The variations in proficiency across medical fields suggest the need for more nuanced AI training. Additionally, the study underscores the importance of exploring innovative approaches to using AI to augment human cognition and enhance the learning process. Such advancements have the potential to significantly influence medical education, fostering not only knowledge acquisition but also the development of critical thinking and problem-solving skills among health care professionals.


Assuntos
Avaliação Educacional , Licenciamento em Medicina , Chile , Humanos , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Competência Clínica/normas , Masculino , Feminino
2.
Rev. cir. (Impr.) ; 75(2)abr. 2023.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1441459

RESUMO

La diverticulitis apendicular es una enfermedad poco frecuente, con una incidencia aproximada de 1%. Se define por la presencia de divertículos verdaderos o falsos en la pared del apéndice cecal. Durante la fase aguda posee una clínica indistinguible a la apendicitis, sin embargo en ocasiones presenta características clínicas particulares que la distinguen de la apendicitis aguda, tales como la presencia de dolor abdominal insidioso o intermitente y/o ausencia de sintomatología gastrointestinal (náuseas, vómitos o anorexia). En la diverticulitis apendicular las técnicas imagenológicas son de utilidad limitada al otorgar información inespecífica, por lo que el diagnóstico tiende a realizarse mediante el estudio anatomopatológico del apéndice posterior a una intervención quirúrgica en paciente con cuadro clínico compatible con apendicitis aguda. El tratamiento de elección corresponde a la apendicectomía, lo que permite evitar complicaciones futuras como por ejemplo perforación apendicular, neoplasias, entre otros. Se obtuvieron los datos de fuentes como Pubmed y Scielo. Específicamente la búsqueda de artículos originales y de revisiones sistemáticas, preferentemente menores a 15 años de publicación en revistas científicas de alto índice de impacto, con las palabras "diverticulitis apendicular", "diverticulosis" y "complicaciones diverticulares".


Appendiceal diverticulitis is a rare disease with an incidence of approximately 1%. It is defined by the presence of true or false diverticula in the wall of the cecal appendix. During the acute phase, it has symptoms that are indistinguishable from appendicitis, however, it sometimes presents particular clinical characteristics that distinguish it from acute appendicitis, such as the presence of insidious or intermittent abdominal pain and/or the absence of gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, or anorexia). In appendiceal diverticulitis, imaging techniques are of limited utility as they provide non-specific information, so the diagnosis tends to be made through the pathology study of the treatment after surgery in a patient with a clinical picture compatible with acute appendicitis. The treatment of choice corresponds to appendectomy, which allows avoiding future complications such as appendiceal perforation, neoplasms, among others. Data were obtained from sources such as Pubmed and Scielo, specifically searching for original articles and systematic reviews with the words "apendicular diverticulitis", "diverticulosis" and "diverticular complications". The criteria used were articles mainly under 5 years of publication in high-impact scientific journals.

3.
Redox Rep ; 26(1): 35-44, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33622196

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The extent of the damage following surgery has been subject of study for several years. Numerous surgical complications can impact postoperative quality of life of patients and even can cause mortality. Although these complications are generally due to multifactorial mechanisms, oxidative stress plays a key pathophysiological role. Moreover, oxidative stress could be an unavoidable effect derived even from the surgical procedure itself. METHODS: A systematic review was performed following an electronic search of Pubmed and ScienceDirect databases. Keywords such as sepsis, oxidative stress, organ dysfunction, antioxidants, outcomes in postoperative complications, among others, were used. Review articles were preferably used between the years 2015 onwards, not excluding older ones. RESULTS: The vast majority point to the role of oxidative stress in generating greater damage and worse prognosis in postoperative patients without the necessary care and precautions, taking importance on the use of antioxidants to prevent this problem. DISCUSSIONS: Oxidative stress represents a common final pathway related to pathological processes such as inflammation or ischemia-reperfusion, among others. The expression of greater severity of these complications can result in multiple organ dysfunction or sepsis. The aim of this study was to present an update of the role of oxidative stress on surgical postoperative complications.


Assuntos
Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos , Qualidade de Vida , Antioxidantes/metabolismo , Humanos , Estresse Oxidativo , Complicações Pós-Operatórias
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA