Impact of Frailty on Surgical Outcomes of Patients With Cushing Disease Using the Multicenter Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders Registry.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Despite growing interest in how patient frailty affects outcomes (eg, in neuro-oncology), its role after transsphenoidal surgery for Cushing disease (CD) remains unclear. We evaluated the effect of frailty on CD outcomes using the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID) data set from a collaboration of US academic pituitary centers. METHODS: Data on consecutive surgically treated patients with CD (2011-2023) were compiled using the 11-factor modified frailty index. Patients were classified as fit (score, 0-1), managing well (score, 2-3), and mildly frail (score, 4-5). Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted to examine outcomes. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 318 patients (193 fit, 113 managing well, 12 mildly frail). Compared with fit and managing well patients, mildly frail patients were older (mean ± SD 39.7 ± 14.2 and 48.9 ± 12.2 vs 49.4 ± 8.9 years, P < .001) but did not different by sex, race, and other factors. They had significantly longer hospitalizations (3.7 ± 2.0 and 4.5 ± 3.5 vs 5.3 ± 3.5 days, P = .02), even after multivariable analysis (ß = 1.01, P = .007) adjusted for known predictors of prolonged hospitalization (age, Knosp grade, surgeon experience, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, complications, frailty). Patients with mild frailty were more commonly discharged to skilled nursing facilities (0.5% [1/192] and 4.5% [5/112] vs 25% [3/12], P < .001). Most patients underwent gross total resection (84.4% [163/193] and 79.6% [90/113] vs 83% [10/12]). No difference in overall complications was observed; however, venous thromboembolism was more common in mildly frail (8%, 1/12) than in fit (0.5%, 1/193) and managing well (2.7%, 3/113) patients (P = .04). No difference was found in 90-day readmission rates. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that mild frailty predicts CD surgical outcomes and may inform preoperative risk stratification. Frailty-influenced outcomes other than age and tumor characteristics may be useful for prognostication. Future studies can help identify strategies to reduce disease burden for frail patients with hypercortisolemia.

Multicenter Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders: Initial Description of Cushing Disease Cohort, Surgical Outcomes, and Surgeon Characteristics.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To address the lack of a multicenter pituitary surgery research consortium in the United States, we established the Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID). The goals of RAPID are to examine surgical outcomes, improve patient care, disseminate best practices, and facilitate multicenter surgery research at scale. Our initial focus is Cushing disease (CD). This study aims to describe the current RAPID patient cohort, explore surgical outcomes, and lay the foundation for future studies addressing the limitations of previous studies. METHODS: Prospectively and retrospectively obtained data from participating sites were aggregated using a cloud-based registry and analyzed retrospectively. Standard preoperative variables and outcome measures included length of stay, unplanned readmission, and remission. RESULTS: By July 2023, 528 patients with CD had been treated by 26 neurosurgeons with varying levels of experience at 9 academic pituitary centers. No surgeon treated more than 81 of 528 (15.3%) patients. The mean ± SD patient age was 43.8 ± 13.9 years, and most patients were female (82.2%, 433/527). The mean tumor diameter was 0.8 ± 2.7 cm. Most patients (76.6%, 354/462) had no prior treatment. The most common pathology was corticotroph tumor (76.8%, 381/496). The mean length of stay was 3.8 ± 2.5 days. The most common discharge destination was home (97.2%, 513/528). Two patients (0.4%, 2/528) died perioperatively. A total of 57 patients (11.0%, 57/519) required an unplanned hospital readmission within 90 days of surgery. The median actuarial disease-free survival after index surgery was 8.5 years. CONCLUSION: This study examined an evolving multicenter collaboration on patient outcomes after surgery for CD. Our results provide novel insights on surgical outcomes not possible in prior single-center studies or with national administrative data sets. This collaboration will power future studies to better advance the standard of care for patients with CD.

The RAPID Consortium: A Platform for Clinical and Translational Pituitary Tumor Research.

Objectives Pituitary tumor treatment is hampered by the relative rarity of the disease, absence of a multicenter collaborative platform, and limited translational-clinical research partnerships. Prior studies offer limited insight into the formation of a multicenter consortium. Design The authors describe the establishment of a multicenter research initiative, Registry of Adenomas of the Pituitary and Related Disorders (RAPID), to encourage quality improvement and research, promote scholarship, and apply innovative solutions in outcomes research. Methods The challenges encountered during the formation of other research registries were reviewed with those lessons applied to the development of RAPID. Setting/Participants RAPID was formed by 11 academic U.S. pituitary centers. Results A Steering Committee, bylaws, data coordination center, and leadership team have been established. Clinical modules with standardized data fields for nonfunctioning adenoma, prolactinoma, acromegaly, Cushing's disease, craniopharyngioma, and Rathke's cleft cyst were created using a Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant cloud-based platform. Currently, RAPID has received institutional review board approval at all centers, compiled retrospective data and agreements from most centers, and begun prospective data collection at one site. Existing institutional databases are being mapped to one central repository. Conclusion The RAPID consortium has laid the foundation for a multicenter collaboration to facilitate pituitary tumor and surgical research. We sought to share our experiences so that other groups also contemplating this approach may benefit. Future studies may include outcomes benchmarking, clinically annotated biobank tissue, multicenter outcomes studies, prospective intervention studies, translational research, and health economics studies focused on value-based care questions.