Long-Term Outcomes and Revision Rates in Laryngeal Reinnervation.

OBJECTIVES: Nonselective laryngeal reinnervation is an effective procedure to improve voice quality after unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Few studies have captured long-term outcome data, and the revision rate for this operation is currently unknown. The objective of this study is to describe the long-term outcomes and revision rates of unilateral, nonselective reinnervation in pediatric and adult patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent laryngeal reinnervation from 2000 to 2022 with a single surgeon were identified for inclusion. Patients who underwent bilateral, super selective, deinnervation and reinnervation, and/or concurrent arytenoid adduction procedures were excluded. Outcome measures included maximum phonation time [MPT], voice handicap index score [VHI], patient-reported percent normal voice, revision procedures, and complications. Data were compiled and analyzed using paired t-tests, repeated measures analysis of covariance, and binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two patients underwent unilateral, nonselective ansa-recurrent laryngeal nerve [RLN] laryngeal reinnervation. Reinnervation significantly improved MPT and patient-reported percentage of normal voice and significantly decreased VHI. Eleven patients underwent revision procedures, corresponding to a revision rate of 8.3%. Additional procedures included medialization laryngoplasty [n = 3], medialization laryngoplasty with arytenoid adduction [n = 3] and injection augmentation greater than 1 year after reinnervation [n = 5]. The only factor associated with the need for additional surgery was time lapse from nerve injury to reinnervation. The overall complication rate was 6.8%; no patient required reintubation or tracheostomy. CONCLUSION: Unilateral, nonselective laryngeal reinnervation can provide reliable improvement in vocal symptoms after recurrent laryngeal nerve injury. The revision rate after laryngeal reinnervation is favorable and comparable to framework surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:3187-3192, 2024.

Deductible Status in the Pediatric Population: A Barrier to Appropriate Care?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of high-deductible health plans on elective surgery (tonsillectomy) in the pediatric population. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Health claims database from a third-party payer. METHODS: Data were reviewed for children up to 18 years of age who underwent tonsillectomy or arm fracture repair (nonelective control) from 2016 to 2019. Incidence of surgery by health plan deductible (high, low, or government insured) and met or unmet status of deductibles were compared. RESULTS: A total of 10,047 tonsillectomy claims and 9903 arm fracture repair claims met inclusion and exclusion criteria. The incidence of tonsillectomy was significantly different across deductible plan types. Patients with met deductibles were more likely to undergo tonsillectomy. In patients with deductibles ≥$4000, a 1.75-fold increase in tonsillectomy was observed in those who had met their deductible as compared with those who had not. These findings were not observed in controls (nonelective arm fracture). For those with met deductibles, those with high deductibles were much more likely to undergo tonsillectomy than those with low, moderate, and government deductibles. Unmet high deductibles were least likely to undergo tonsillectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Health insurance plan type influences the incidence of pediatric elective surgery such as tonsillectomy but not procedures such as nonelective repair of arm fracture. High deductibles may discourage elective surgery for those deductibles that are unmet, risking inappropriate care of vulnerable pediatric patients. However, meeting the deductible may increase incidence, raising the question of overutilization.

What Is the Impact of Prior Authorization on the Incidence of Pediatric Tonsillectomy?

OBJECTIVE: Third-party payers advocate for prior authorization (PA) to reduce overutilization of health care resources. The impact of PA in elective surgery is understudied, especially in cases where evidence-based clinical practice guidelines define operative candidacy. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of PA on the incidence of pediatric tonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Health claims database from a third-party payer. METHODS: Any pediatric patient who had evaluation for tonsillectomy from 2016 to 2019 was eligible for inclusion. A time series analysis was used to evaluate the change in incidence of tonsillectomy before and after PA. Lag time from consultation to surgery before and after PA was compared with segmented regression. RESULTS: A total of 10,047 tonsillectomy claims met inclusion and exclusion criteria. Female patients made up 51% of claims, and the mean age was 7.9 years. Just 1.5% of claims were denied after PA implementation. There was no change in the incidence of tonsillectomy for all plan types (P = .1). Increased lag time from consultation to surgery was noted immediately after PA implementation by 2.38 days (95% CI, 0.23-4.54; P = .030); otherwise, there was no significant change over time (P = .98). CONCLUSION: A modest number of tonsillectomy claims were denied approval after implementation of PA. The value of PA for pediatric tonsillectomy is questionable, as it did not result in decreased incidence of tonsillectomy in this cohort.