Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 409(1): 265, 2024 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39212789

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this randomized controlled trial was to evaluate whether early urinary catheter removal is feasible during epidural anesthesia during gastrointestinal surgery in male patients at high risk for urinary retention. METHODS: Male patients who underwent radical surgery for gastric or colon cancer were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized 1:1 into 2 groups: the early group, in which the urinary catheter was removed before removal of the epidural catheter on the second or third postoperative day, and the late group, in which the urinary catheter was removed after removal of the epidural catheter. The randomization adjustment factors were age (≥ 65 or < 65 years) and operative site (gastric or colon). The primary endpoint was urinary retention. The secondary endpoints were the incidence of urinary tract infection and length of postoperative hospital stay. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were enrolled between March 2020 and February 2024 and assigned to the Early (n = 37) and Late (n = 36) groups. Four patients withdrew their consent after randomization. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that urinary retention occurred in 4 patients (11.1%) in the early group and 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group (P = 0.20). Urinary tract infection occurred in 1 patient (3.0%) in the late group. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9 days in both groups. CONCLUSION: Early urinary catheter removal in male patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery with epidural anesthesia could increase urinary retention within the expected acceptable range. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000040468, Date of registration: May 21, 2020.


Assuntos
Anestesia Epidural , Remoção de Dispositivo , Retenção Urinária , Humanos , Masculino , Anestesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Retenção Urinária/etiologia , Cateteres Urinários/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Infecções Urinárias/etiologia , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Tempo de Internação , Cateterismo Urinário/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos do Sistema Digestório/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia
2.
Cancer Diagn Progn ; 4(3): 333-339, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707734

RESUMO

Background/Aim: A cutoff value for lymph node diameter in colorectal cancer lymph node metastases has not been established. This prospective study aimed to investigate the direct association between swollen lymph nodes identified on preoperative computed tomography (CT) and pathological findings and proposed a cutoff value. Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients scheduled to undergo curative surgery with lymph node dissection for colorectal adenocarcinoma who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and had swollen lymph nodes ≥7 mm in diameter. Two gastrointestinal surgeons intraoperatively identified the target lymph nodes to assess the association between lymph node diameter and pathological findings. The diagnostic performance for lymph node metastasis was determined using multi-level logistic modelling. Results: A total of 109 patients were enrolled, and 225 swollen lymph nodes were pathologically evaluated. Using a cutoff value of ≥9 mm for the short diameter, the positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity were 100.0% (99.6%-100.0%), 99.9% (99.1%-100.0%), 62.0% (45.6%-76.0%), and 84.9% (67.0%-94.0%), respectively. Conclusion: The cutoff value for improving the positive predictive value for the preoperative lymph node metastasis diagnosis in colorectal cancer patients should be at least 9 mm in diameter.

3.
Am Surg ; 89(12): 5768-5774, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37159935

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Decompression of the intestine with a long tube or nasogastric tube is the first-choice treatment for adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). Scheduling surgery while weighing the risks of surgery against conservative care is a crucial factor in clinical decision-making. Whenever feasible, unnecessary surgeries should be avoided, and it is essential to provide clinical markers for this. This study aimed to obtain evidence regarding the optimal timing of ASBO and when conservative treatment options are not successful. METHODS: The data of patients diagnosed with ASBO and receiving long tube insertion for more than 7 days were reviewed. We investigated transit ileal drainage volume and recurrence. The primary outcomes were the change in the drainage volume from the long tube over time and the percentage of patients who required surgery. We evaluated some cutoff values to determine the indication for surgery based on the insertion duration and volume of long tube drainage. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were enrolled in this study. Fifty-one patients showed improvement with conservative treatment, whereas 48 ultimately required surgery. When a daily drainage volume of ≥500 mL was considered an indication for surgery, 13-37 cases (25%-72%) would be judged unnecessary within 6 days of long tube insertion, while 5 cases (9.8%) would be judged unnecessary on day 7. DISCUSSION: Unnecessary surgical interventions for ASBO might be avoided by assessing the drainage volume on day 7 after inserting a long tube.


Assuntos
Obstrução Intestinal , Humanos , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia , Aderências Teciduais/diagnóstico , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado/patologia , Íleo , Tratamento Conservador , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Support Care Cancer ; 31(1): 19, 2022 Dec 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36513863

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The prevention of osteoporosis is a particularly relevant issue for gastric cancer survivors. We investigated the relationship between postoperative physical activity and the change of bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer were enrolled in this single-center prospective cohort study. Physical activity was evaluated using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form at postoperative month (POM) 6 and patients were classified into high, middle, and low physical activity groups accordingly. The primary outcome was the change in BMD from baseline at POM 12, which was expressed as a percentage of the young adult mean (YAM). The YAM of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were enrolled in this study. The physical activity level at POM 6 was classified as high (n = 50; 45%), middle (n = 25; 23%), and low (n = 35; 32%). The mean decrease of YAM% was 5.1% in the lumbar spine and 4.2% in the femoral neck at POM 12. A multivariable-adjusted logistic regression model revealed that low physical activity at POM 6 was a significant risk factor for BMD loss at POM 12 (odds ratio, 3.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.48-9.55; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Low physical activity after gastrectomy is an independent risk factor for decreased BMD at POM 12. The introduction of exercise may prevent osteoporosis after the surgical treatment of gastric cancer.


Assuntos
Osteoporose , Neoplasias Gástricas , Adulto Jovem , Humanos , Densidade Óssea , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Gastrectomia/efeitos adversos , Absorciometria de Fóton , Osteoporose/etiologia , Osteoporose/prevenção & controle , Vértebras Lombares , Exercício Físico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA