Simulation-based training for embryo transfer for clinicians with differing levels of expertise: an application of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Embryo Transfer Simulator.

Objective: To compare the learning curve of clinicians with different levels of embryo transfer (ET) experience using the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) Embryo Transfer Simulator. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Single large university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. Patients: Participants with 3 levels of expertise with ET were recruited: "group 1" (Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility attendings), "group 2" (Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility nurses, advance practice providers, or medical assistants), and "group 3" (Obstetrics and Gynecology resident physicians). Interventions: All participants completed ET simulation training using uterine cases A, B, and C (easiest to most difficult) of the ASRM ET Simulator. Participants completed each case 5 times for a total of 15 repetitions. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was ET simulation scores analyzed at each attempt for each uterine case, with a maximum score of 155. Secondary outcomes included self-assessed comfort levels before and after the completion of the simulation and total duration of ET. Comfort was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: Twenty-seven participants with 3 different levels of expertise with ET were recruited from December 2020 to February 2021. For cases A and B, median total scores were not significantly different between groups 1 and 3 at first or last attempts. Group 2 did not perform as well as group 3 at the beginning of case A or group 1 at the end of case B. All groups demonstrated a decrease in total time from the first attempt to the last attempt for both cases. For case C, the "difficult" uterus, groups 2 and 3 exhibited the greatest improvement in total median score: from 0 to 75 from the first to last attempt. Group 1 scored equally well from first through last attempts. Although no one from group 2 or 3 achieved a passing score with the first attempt (80% of the max score), approximately 30% had passing scores at the last attempt. Groups 1 and 3 showed a significant decrease in total time across attempts for case C. Following simulation, 100% of groups 2 and 3 reported perceived improvement in their skills. Group 3 showed significant improvement in comfort scores with Likert scores of 1.71 ± 0.76 and 1.0 ± 0.0 for the "Easy" and "Difficult" cases, respectively, before simulation and 4.57 ± 0.53 and 2.4 ± 1.1 after simulation. Conclusions: The ASRM ET Simulator was effective in improving both technical skill and comfort level, particularly for those with little to no ET experience and was most marked when training on a difficult clinical case.

Modified natural and optimized programmed frozen embryo transfers have equivalent live birth rates: an analysis of 6,682 cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the live birth rates (LBRs) in modified natural and programmed single blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University-affiliated fertility practice. PATIENT(S): Patients who underwent single blastocyst FETs between January 2014 and December 2019. A total of 15,034 FET cycles from 9,092 patients were reviewed; 1,186 modified natural and 5,496 programmed FET cycles from 4,532 patients met the inclusion criteria for analysis. INTERVENTION(S): No intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcome measure was the LBR. RESULT(S): There was no difference in live birth after programmed cycles using intramuscular (IM) progesterone or a combination of vaginal progesterone and IM progesterone compared with that after modified natural cycles (adjusted relative risks, 0.94 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.85-1.04] and 0.91 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02], respectively). The relative risk of live birth decreased in programmed cycles that used exclusively vaginal progesterone compared with that in modified natural cycles (adjusted relative risk, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.69-0.86]). CONCLUSION(S): The LBR decreased in programmed cycles that used only vaginal progesterone. However, no difference in the LBRs existed between modified natural and programmed cycles if programmed cycles used either IM progesterone or a combination of IM and vaginal progesterone protocols. This study demonstrates that modified natural FET cycles and optimized programmed FET cycles have equivalent LBRs.

The effect of interpregnancy interval on preterm birth and low birth weight in singleton pregnancies conceived without assistance or by infertility treatments.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of interpregnancy interval on perinatal outcomes and whether this was influenced by mode of conception. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's natality national database. PATIENT(S): Patients who had an index singleton live birth with a preceding live birth. Index pregnancies from 2016 to 2019 were conceived with in vitro fertilization (IVF) (n = 32,829) or ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination (OI/IUI) (n = 23,016) or without assistance (n = 7,564,042). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The primary outcomes evaluated were preterm birth (<37 weeks) and low birth weight (<2,500 g). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of interpregnancy intervals with perinatal outcomes stratified by mode of conception. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were presented. RESULT(S): Compared with the interpregnancy interval reference group of 12 to <18 months, a <12 month interpregnancy interval was associated with an increase in preterm birth (<37 weeks) for pregnancies conceived with OI/IUI or without assistance (aOR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.16-1.74, and aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.13-1.15, respectively), whereas IVF was not associated with an increase (aOR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.77-1.04). A <12 month interpregnancy interval was associated with an increase in low birth weight for pregnancies conceived with IVF or OI/IUI or without assistance (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.09-1.64; aOR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.01-1.76; and aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.24-1.27, respectively). CONCLUSION(S): An interpregnancy interval of at least 12 months reduces adverse perinatal outcomes for pregnancies conceived with and without infertility treatment.

Endometrial compaction does not predict live birth in single euploid frozen embryo transfers: a prospective study.

STUDY QUESTION: Is there a relationship between endometrial compaction and live birth in euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles? SUMMARY ANSWER: Live birth rates (LBRs) were similar in both patients that demonstrated endometrial compaction or no compaction in single euploid FETs. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: There has been increasing interest in the correlation between endometrial compaction and clinical outcomes but there has been conflicting evidence from prior investigations. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a prospective observational study from 1 September 2020 to 9 April 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: This study was performed at a single, academically affiliated fertility center in which patients who had an autologous single euploid FET using a programmed or modified natural cycle protocol were included. All embryos had trophectoderm biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy followed by vitrification at the blastocyst stage. Two ultrasound measurements of endometrial thickness (EMT) were obtained. The first measurement (T1) was measured transvaginally within 1 day of initiation of progesterone or ovulation trigger injection, and a second EMT (T2) was measured transabdominally at the time of embryo transfer (ET). The primary outcome (LBR) was based on the presence and proportion of compaction (percentage difference in EMT between T1 and T2). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of the 186 participants included, 54%, 45%, 35%, 28% and 21% of women exhibited >0%, ≥5%, ≥10%, ≥15% and ≥20% endometrial compaction, respectively. Endometrial compaction was not predictive of live birth at any of the defined cutoffs. A sub-analysis stratified by FET protocol type (n = 89 programmed; n = 97 modified natural) showed similar results. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: There was the potential for measurement error in the recorded EMTs. The T2 measurement was performed transabdominally, which may cause potential measurement error, as it is generally accepted that transvaginal measurements of EMT are more accurate, though, any bias is expected to be non-differential. The sub-analysis performed looking at FET protocol type was underpowered and should be interpreted with caution. Our study, however, represents a pragmatic approach, as it allowed patients to avoid having to come in for an extra transvaginal ultrasound the day before or on the day of ET. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Assessing endometrial compaction may lead to unnecessary cycle cancellation. However, further studies are needed to determine if routine screening for endometrial compaction would improve clinical outcomes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No authors report conflicts of interest or disclosures. There was no study funding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04330066.

Placental pathology of term singleton live births conceived with fresh embryo transfer compared with those conceived without assisted reproductive technology.

OBJECTIVE: To compare placental pathology from term singleton live births conceived with fresh embryo transfer vs. those conceived without assisted reproductive technology (ART). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic fertility center. PATIENT(S): Women with a term singleton live birth who conceived after fresh autologous in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles (ART group) and those who conceived without ART. INTERVENTION(S): An experienced placental pathologist categorized placental pathology as anatomic, inflammatory, or vascular. Patient characteristics were compared by chi-squared tests, Student's t-test, or nonparametric tests. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to compare placental pathology between pregnancies conceived with and without ART. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Incidence of anatomic, inflammatory, and vascular placental pathology. RESULT(S): There was a higher incidence of placental pathology in the ART group (n = 511) than in the non-ART group (n = 121), specifically anatomic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.42-4.40) and vascular (aOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.13-3.53) pathology. These findings were driven primarily by the significantly higher odds of anatomic (aOR 2.97, 95% CI 1.55-5.66) and vascular (aOR 1.98, 95% CI 1.04-3.75) pathology observed in ICSI pregnancies. Single blastocyst transfers remained associated with increased anatomic pathology (ART: aOR 4.89, 95% CI 2.28-10.49; ICSI: aOR 3.38, 95% CI 1.49-7.71). CONCLUSION(S): Fresh embryo transfer is associated with increased anatomic and vascular placental pathology in term singleton live births compared with conception without ART. This finding should be investigated prospectively in a larger cohort of patients.

The psychological impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on women who become pregnant after receiving treatment for infertility: a longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the psychological health of patients with infertility who have become pregnant with that of women who have not. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study conducted from April 2020 to June 2020. The participants completed three questionnaires over this period. SETTING: A single large, university-affiliated infertility practice. PATIENTS: A total of 443 pregnant women and 1,476 women still experiencing infertility who completed all three questionnaires. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient-reported primary stressor over three months of the first major COVID-19 surge; further data on self-reported sadness, anxiety, loneliness, and the use of personal coping strategies. RESULTS: Pregnant participants were significantly less likely to report taking an antidepressant or anxiolytic medication, were less likely to have a prior diagnosis of depression, were more likely to cite COVID-19 as a top stressor, and overall were less likely to practice stress-relieving activities during the first surge. CONCLUSIONS: Women who became pregnant after receiving treatment for infertility cited the pandemic as their top stressor and were more distressed about the pandemic than their nonpregnant counterparts but were less likely to be engaging in stress-relieving activities. Given the ongoing impact of the pandemic, patients with infertility who become pregnant after receiving treatment should be counseled and encouraged to practice specific stress-reduction strategies.

Multifoetal gestations mediate the effect of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) on ischaemic placental disease in autologous oocyte IVF more than donor oocyte IVF.

BACKGROUND: Ischaemic placental disease (IPD) affects 16%-23% of pregnancies in the United States. In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is a risk factor for IPD, and the magnitude of increase in risk differs for individuals using donor oocytes (donor IVF) versus their own oocytes (autologous IVF). In addition, multifoetal gestations, which are more common in IVF than non-IVF pregnancies, also are a risk factor for IPD. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the contribution of multifoetal gestations to the association between IVF and IPD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital from 1 January, 2000 to 1 August 2018 using electronic medical records and state vital statistics data. IPD was defined as preeclampsia, placental abruption, small for gestational age (SGA) birth or an intrauterine foetal demise due to placental insufficiency. We used mediation analysis to decompose the total effect of IVF on IPD into a natural direct effect and an indirect effect through multifoetal gestations. We repeated the analyses separately for donor and autologous IVF. All models were adjusted for maternal age, race, parity, insurance, year of delivery and account for multiple pregnancies per person. RESULTS: We identified 86,514 deliveries, of which 281 resulted from donor IVF and 4173 resulted from autologous IVF. IVF pregnancies had 1.99 (95% CI 1.88, 2.10) times the risk of IPD compared to non-IVF pregnancies, and 75.5% of this increased risk was mediated by multifoetal gestations. Autologous IVF pregnancies had 1.95 (95% CI 1.84, 2.07) times the risk of IPD compared to non-IVF pregnancies, and the per cent mediated was 78.8%. Donor IVF pregnancies had 2.50 (95% CI 2.09, 2.92) times the risk of IPD, but the per cent mediated was 37.5%. CONCLUSION: The majority of the association between autologous IVF and IPD was mediated through multifoetal gestations; however, this was not the case for donor IVF pregnancies.

Long-term reproductive outcomes in patients with unexplained infertility: follow-up of the Fast Track and Standard Treatment Trial participants.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term reproductive outcomes in couples who were enrolled in a large randomized controlled trial that studied optimal treatment for unexplained infertility. DESIGN: Telephone survey, administered between March 2019 and February 2020. SETTING: Large urban university-affiliated fertility center. PATIENT(S): Couples who enrolled in the Fast Track and Standard Treatment Trial (FASTT). INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S): Number of live births, methods of conception, adoption, and satisfaction regarding family size. RESULT(S): Of the 503 couples enrolled in FASTT, 311 (61.8%) were contacted and 286 (56.9%) consented to participate. The mean age and follicle-stimulating hormone level at the time of enrollment in FASTT were 33.1 ± 3.2 years and 6.8 ± 2.2 mIU/mL, respectively, for those who participated in this study. The mean age at follow-up was 49.5 ± 3.4 years. Of the 286 women, 194 (67.8%) had a live birth during the trial and 225 (78.7%) continued to try to conceive after FASTT. Of those who tried to conceive without treatment, 101 of 157 (64.3%) had a successful live birth, whereas 12 (5.3%) women had a live birth via intrauterine insemination and 82 (36.4%) via autologous oocyte in vitro fertilization. Overall, 182 (80.9%) women achieved a live birth after FASTT. CONCLUSION(S): The majority of couples were able to achieve a live birth after FASTT. Only 19 (6.6%) never achieved a live birth during their reproductive years. Moving to treatment sooner allows the opportunity to achieve >1 live birth, which is associated with increased satisfaction regarding family size. This further supports access to care and insurance coverage for infertility treatment.

Clinical outcomes and utilization from over a decade of planned oocyte cryopreservation.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the clinical experience of patients who have undergone planned oocyte cryopreservation and oocyte thawing and warming? DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study. All women who completed planned oocyte cryopreservation at a single large university-affiliated fertility centre between June 2006 and October 2020 were identified, including the subset who returned to use their oocytes. Patients who underwent oocyte cryopreservation for medical reasons were excluded. Baseline demographics, oocyte cryopreservation and thawing-warming cycle parameters, and clinical outcomes, were extracted from the electronic medical record. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth rate (LBR), and secondary outcomes were cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and CPR and LBR per transfer. Results were stratified by age at time of cryopreservation (<38 and ≥38 years). RESULTS: Of 921 patients who underwent planned oocyte cryopreservation, 68 (7.4%) returned to use their oocytes. Forty-six patients (67.6%) completed at least one embryo transfer. The CPR per transfer was 47.5% and LBR was 39.3%. The cumulative LBR per patient who initiated thawing-warming was 32.4%. Cycle outcomes were not significantly different in patients aged younger than 38 years and those aged 38 years or over. No patient aged 40 years or older (n = 6) was successful with their cryopreserved oocytes. Ten patients (14.7%) who were unsuccessful with their cryopreserved oocytes achieved a live birth using donor oocytes, with most (7/10) of these patients aged 38 years and older. CONCLUSION: Only a small percentage of patients returned to use their oocytes, and 32% of those were able to achieve a live birth.

Low cryoprotectant concentration rapid vitrification of mouse oocytes and embryos.

Vitrification of mammalian oocytes and embryos is typically a two-step procedure involving two solutions of increasing concentrations of cryoprotectants. In the present study, we report a simple vitrification protocol that uses low cryoprotectant concentration and a single medium (LCSM). This medium, along with the traditional high concentration two media (HCTM) protocol, was used to vitrify mouse oocytes, zygotes, and blastocysts using silica capillary, cryotop, cryolock, and 0.25 ml straws. Survival rates, two-cell rates, and blastocyst formation rates were compared for oocytes and zygotes vitrified using both protocols. Results show that the LCSM protocol was as good as or better than the traditional HCTM protocol for vitrifying mouse MII oocytes and zygotes using silica capillary, cryotop, and cryolock. On the other hand, for blastocysts, only silica capillary using LCSM had comparable results with the traditional HCTM protocol while cryolock and cryotop had significantly lower percentages of re-expanded and hatched blastocysts. Collapsing blastocysts prior to vitrification or longer duration for better cryoprotectant distribution in multicellular embryos may improve the outcome. In conclusion, the LCSM protocol, with one medium of much lower cryoprotectant concentrations and shorter equilibration time, reduces exposure to cryoprotectant toxicity while improves efficiency, consistency and reliability for mammalian oocyte and embryo preservation.

Placenta Accreta Spectrum: In Vitro Fertilization and Non-In Vitro Fertilization and Placenta Accreta Spectrum in a Massachusetts Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) has been increasing in the United States. In addition, there has also been an increase in the utilization of in vitro fertilization (IVF). The IVF pregnancies confer an increased risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes, but there is limited data on whether IVF is associated with PAS. The aim of this study is to assess the association between IVF and the risk of PAS. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of deliveries from January 1, 2013 to August 1, 2018 at a tertiary hospital in the Massachusetts. IVF pregnancies were compared with non-IVF pregnancies, and PAS diagnosis was confirmed by histopathology reports. Hospital administrative data and medical record review were used, and supplemented with data from birth certificates from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. RESULTS: We identified 28,344 pregnancies that met inclusion criteria, of which 1,418 (5.0%) were IVF pregnancies. The overall incidence of PAS was 0.4% (2.2% in the IVF group and 0.3% in the non-IVF group). Women who underwent IVF had 5.5 times the risk of PAS (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.4-8.7) compared with women in the non-IVF group, adjusted for maternal age, nulliparity, and year of delivery (Table 5). Compared with women in the non-IVF group, the IVF group had fewer prior cesarean deliveries (22.6 vs. 64.2%) and a lower prevalence of placenta previa (19.4 vs. 44.4%). CONCLUSION: Women with an IVF pregnancy carry an increased risk of PAS compared with non-IVF. Among women who underwent IVF, there was a lower prevalence of prior cesarean deliveries and placenta previa. Future work is needed to identify the mechanism of association for this increased risk as well as a reliable tool for antenatal detection in this cohort of women. KEY POINTS: · IVF pregnancies have higher risk of PAS than non-IVF pregnancies.. · IVF pregnancies with PAS do not exhibit common risk factors.. · IVF may be an independent risk factor for PAS..

Infertility remains a top stressor despite the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on infertility patients? DESIGN: An anonymous cross-sectional online survey was sent to patients who attended a large university-affiliated infertility practice in the USA between 1 January 2019 and 1 April 2020. At three different time-points respondents were asked to note their top three stressors, from a list of 10 commonly reported life stressors. RESULTS: The questionnaire was sent to 10,481 patients, with 3604 responses (response rate 34%) received. A total of 2202 non-pregnant female respondents were included in the final analysis. One-third of respondents had a prior diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, and 11% reported taking anxiolytic medications; over one-quarter had a prior diagnosis of a depressive disorder and 11% reported taking antidepressant medications. At all three time-points, infertility was noted to be the most frequent top stressor. Coronavirus was noted to be the third most common stressor among the respondents in early March but, at the time of writing, is similar to that of infertility (63% and 66%, respectively). A total of 6% of patients stated that infertility treatment, including IVF, should not be offered during the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSION: Despite the unprecedented global pandemic of COVID-19, causing economic and societal uncertainty, the stress of infertility remains significant and is comparable a stressor to the pandemic itself.

The importance of mediation in reproductive health studies.

A mediator is a factor that occurs after the exposure of interest, precedes the outcome of interest (i.e. between the exposure and the outcome) and is associated with both the exposure and the outcome of interest (i.e. is on the pathway between exposure and outcome). Mediation analyses can be valuable in many reproductive health contexts, as mediation analysis can help researchers to better identify, quantify and understand the underlying pathways of the association they are studying. The purpose of this commentary is to introduce the concept of mediation and provide examples that solidify understanding of mediation for valid discovery and interpretation in the field of reproductive medicine.

Vanishing Twins Conceived Through Fresh In Vitro Fertilization: Obstetric Outcomes and Placental Pathology.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the obstetric outcomes and placental pathology in live births arising from vanishing twin pregnancies compared with nonreduced in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancies. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of live births resulting from fresh embryo transfers after IVF cycles with autologous oocytes from 2004 through 2017 at a large academic fertility center. Clinical information and pathology reports were reviewed. Placental diagnoses were coded using established nosology by expert placental pathologists. Analysis of variance, Kruskal-Wallis, Pearson's χ, and Fisher exact tests were used, as appropriate, to compare pathology categories between pregnancy outcomes. Mixed effects logistic regression models were generated to reveal the association between pregnancy outcome and placenta pathology, controlling for pregnancies arising in the same woman and various suspected confounders. RESULTS: Of 905 fresh autologous IVF cycles with placental pathology available for review, we identified 73 vanishing twin pregnancies (8.1%), 556 singleton pregnancies (61.4%), and 276 twin pregnancies (30.5%). Vanishing twin syndrome was not associated with preterm delivery, route of delivery, growth restriction or other obstetric outcomes as compared with IVF singleton pregnancies. However, vanishing twin syndrome pregnancies showed distinctive placental pathologies including an increased rate of small placentas (less than the 10th percentile by weight), with more anatomical abnormalities than IVF singleton pregnancies (odds ratio 1.73, 95% CI 0.94-3.19; adjusted odds ratio 2.15, 95% CI 1.08-4.28). The frequency of placental vascular and inflammatory pathologies associated with IVF vanishing twin syndrome pregnancies were similar to that of IVF singleton pregnancies. Loss of a twin after 8 weeks of gestation was not associated with greater risks of placental pathologies. CONCLUSION: In vitro fertilization pregnancies affected by vanishing twin syndrome did not have significant differences in obstetric or perinatal outcomes as compared with twin or singleton gestations. However, early twin loss was potentially associated with differences in placental development associated with a higher rate of small placentas and other anatomic pathologies.

Employee benefit or occupational hazard? How employer coverage of egg freezing impacts reproductive decisions of graduate students.

OBJECTIVE: To better understand if employer-based financial coverage of non-medical oocyte cryopreservation impacts the way women make decisions about their reproduction, including the decision to pursue oocyte cryopreservation and the time frame in which they plan to begin family building. DESIGN: Prospective survey study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Female graduate students at five different institutions in the Boston area. INTERVENTIONS: A 27-question electronic survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood of pursuing oocyte cryopreservation and time frame in which intend to build family, based on presence or absence of employer-based financial coverage. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 171 female graduate students: 63% cited professional goals as their primary reason for delaying childbearing, and 54% indicated that oocyte cryopreservation would allow them to focus more on their career for the next several years. For 59% their main concern about egg freezing was the cost; 81% indicated that they would be more likely to consider egg banking if it were covered by their insurance or paid for by their employer. The majority of participants would not change when they would start building their family based on the presence or absence of employer financial coverage for egg freezing. CONCLUSIONS: The primary concern of female graduate students about egg freezing is the cost. More women would consider elective egg freezing if financial coverage was provided by their employer, but the vast majority would ultimately not change their plans for and timing of family building based on this coverage.

To test or not to test? A framework for counselling patients on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A).

STUDY QUESTION: What is the treatment path and cumulative live birth (CLB) rate from a single oocyte retrieval of patients who intend to pursue PGT-A at the start of an IVF cycle compared to matched controls? SUMMARY ANSWER: The choice of PGT-A at the start of the first IVF cycle decreases the CLB per oocyte retrieval for patients <38 years of age, however patients ≥38 years of age benefit significantly per embryo transfer (ET) when live birth (LB) is evaluated. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: PGT-A has been shown to reduce the practice of transferring multiple embryos and to confer a higher live birth rate per transfer. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This is a retrospective cohort study from December 2014 to September 2016, involving 600 patients: those intending PGT-A for their first IVF cycle (N = 300) and their matched controls. Post-hoc power calculations (alpha of 0.05, power of 0.80) indicated that our study was powered adequately to demonstrate significant differences in CLB per retrieval and LB per transfer. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: The study was performed at a large academically affiliated infertility practice where approximately 80% of patients have insurance coverage for fertility care. Patients were identified through electronic medical records, and those who intended to pursue PGT-A at the start of stimulation were assessed. Patients were matched by age, time of oocyte retrieval and oocyte yield to the same number of controls. CLB outcomes per single retrieval, including the fresh and frozen transfers arising from the initial stimulation cycle, were calculated. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: PGT-A was not beneficial when CLB rate was assessed per retrieval, however its benefits were significant when LB rate was assessed per transfer. First cycle, <38 year-old patients who intended to have PGT-A had a significantly (P < 0.001) lower CLB rate per oocyte retrieval compared to controls (49.4% vs. 69.1%). Conversely, patients ≥ 38 years in the PGT-A group had similar CLB rates compared to controls per oocyte retrieval, while LB rates per transfer were doubled compared to controls (62.1% vs. 31.7%; P < 0.001). Of the first-cycle PGT-A and control patients, 25.3% and 2.3% failed to achieve a transfer, respectively. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is not a true intention-to-treat study, due to its retrospective nature. Additionally, the number of patients with two or more previous miscarriages was significantly greater in the PGT-A group as compared to controls, however a sub-analysis showed that this failed to impact outcomes. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The findings indicate that PGT-A may be detrimental for those <38 years old undergoing their first IVF cycle. PGT-A has the greatest clinical impact when a transfer is achieved in the ≥38 years old population. This study evaluates the typical treatment path following a patient's choice to pursue PGT-A at the cycle start, and can be used as a guide for counselling patients in relation to age and cycle number. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

On-chip oocyte denudation from cumulus-oocyte complexes for assisted reproductive therapy.

Human infertility can be treated using assisted reproductive technology (ART) such as intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). But current ART techniques suffer from multiple cumbersome processes requiring technically skilled personnel. Microfluidics technologies offer unique opportunities to streamline ART procedures, reduce stress imposed upon gametes and embryos, and minimize the operator-to-operator variability. However, there have been no automated and continuous processing systems that can reduce the dependence on well-trained embryologists to obtain ICSI-ready oocytes from patients. In this study, using mouse models, we developed a microfluidic device to denude oocytes from the surrounding cumulus-corona cell mass, facilitating the evaluation of oocyte quality and the injection of sperm. Enzyme-treated cumulus-oocyte complexes pass through a series of jagged-surface constriction microchannels of optimized geometries. The jagged inner wall of constriction channels facilitates stripping off of the cumulus-corona cell mass. Oocytes that were denuded by the device showed comparable fertilization and developmental competence compared with mechanical pipetting. The device developed in this study achieves the automation of a manual process for oocyte denudation in a continuous flow, as well as improving standardization and ease-of-use. Our denudation-on-a-chip approach requires inexpensive and simple equipment, which represents one step forward towards improving the accessibility and affordability of assisted reproductive therapy.

The Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study: A Prospective Preconception Cohort.

BACKGROUND: The Environment and Reproductive Health (EARTH) Study is an ongoing prospective preconception cohort designed to investigate the impact of environmental, nutritional, and lifestyle factors among both women and men on fertility and pregnancy outcomes. METHODS: The EARTH Study recruits women 18 to 45 years and men 18 to 55 years seeking fertility evaluation and treatment at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) Fertility Center, Boston, USA. Women and men are eligible to join either independently or as a couple. Participants are followed from study entry throughout each fertility treatment cycle, once per trimester of pregnancy (for those achieving pregnancy), and up to labor and delivery, or until they discontinue treatment or withdraw from the study. The study collects biological samples, self-reported questionnaire data (including a food frequency questionnaire) and clinically abstracted information. RESULTS: As of June 2017, the study cohort included 799 women and 487 men (447 couples; 40 men joined without female partners). Women were on average 34.7 years old at time of enrolment and predominantly Caucasian (81%), educated (49% have a graduate degree), and nulliparous (83%). Men were on average 36.6 years at baseline and mostly Caucasian (86%) and never-smokers (67%). CONCLUSIONS: The EARTH Study is one of the few cohorts designed to examine multiple potentially critical windows of vulnerability, including the paternal and maternal preconception windows and the periconception and prenatal windows in pregnancy. It is also one of the few human studies that has assessed potential interactions between environmental exposures and dietary factors.

Impact of transfer time on pregnancy outcomes in frozen-embryo transfer cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the impact of embryo transfer time (total seconds from the loading of the transfer catheter to the expulsion of the embryo(s) into the uterine cavity) on clinical pregnancy (CPR), implantation (IR), and live birth (LBR) rates. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Academic hospital practice. PATIENT(S): A total of 465 women undergoing 571 frozen-embryo transfers with the use of cryopreserved blastocysts in a single academic institution from 2007 through 2014. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): CPR, IR, and LBR. RESULT(S): The cohort was divided into tertiles according to transfer time in seconds (T1: 33-55; T2: 57-81; T3: 82-582) with mean (SD) transfer times of 47.4 (5.7), 67.1 (7.3), and 121.9 (55.1) seconds, respectively. Crude CPRs were 43.9%, 48.7%, and 48.7% among the respective tertiles, crude IRs were 36.9%, 39.9%, and 38.6%, and crude LBRs were 34.8%, 39.6%, and 36.0%. In univariate analysis, inferior cohort score, blood inside catheter, difficult mock transfer, and use of an outer sheath were negatively associated with CPR. No association was seen between physician performing the transfer (including fellows) and CPR. In multivariate regression, longer transfer time was not associated with CPR. With T1 as reference, adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.28 (0.77-2.11) and 1.52 (0.85-2.71) for transfer time groups T2 and T3, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): After adjusting for potential confounders, this analysis found that contrary to commonly held belief, longer embryo transfer times do not negatively affect CPR, IR, or LBR.