Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Front Immunol ; 10: 1782, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31456796

RESUMO

Ovarian cancer (OC) is diagnosed in ~22,000 women in the US each year and kills 14,000 of them. Often, patients are not diagnosed until the later stages of disease, when treatment options are limited, highlighting the urgent need for new and improved therapies for precise cancer control. An individual's immune function and interaction with tumor cells can be prognostic of the response to cancer treatment. Current emerging therapies for OC include immunotherapies, which use antibodies or drive T cell-mediated cancer recognition and elimination. In OC, these have been limited by adverse side effects and tumor characteristics including inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, lack of targetable antigens, loss of tumor human leukocyte antigen expression, high levels of immunosuppressive factors, and insufficient immune cell trafficking. Natural killer (NK) cells may be ideal as primary or collateral effectors to these nascent immunotherapies. NK cells exhibit multiple functions that combat immune escape and tumor relapse: they kill targets and elicit inflammation through antigen-independent pathways and detect loss of HLA as a signal for activation. NK cells are efficient mediators of tumor immune surveillance and control, suppressed by the tumor microenvironment and rescued by immune checkpoint blockade. NK cells are regulated by a variety of activating and inhibitory receptors and already known to be central effectors across an array of existing therapies. In this article, we highlight interactions between NK cells and OC and their potential to change the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and participate in durable immune control of OC.


Assuntos
Imunoterapia , Células Matadoras Naturais/imunologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/terapia , Animais , Feminino , Humanos , Tolerância Imunológica , Neoplasias Ovarianas/imunologia , Microambiente Tumoral/imunologia
2.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther ; 363(2): 196-210, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28904004

RESUMO

Jadomycins are natural products that kill drug-sensitive and multidrug-resistant (MDR) breast cancer cells. To date, the cytotoxic activity of jadomycins has never been tested in MDR breast cancer cells that are also triple negative. Additionally, there is only a rudimentary understanding of how jadomycins cause cancer cell death, which includes the induction of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS). We first created a paclitaxel-resistant, triple-negative breast cancer cell line [paclitaxel-resistant MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells (231-TXL)] from drug-sensitive control MDA-MB-231 cells (231-CON). Using thiazolyl blue methyltetrazolium bromide cell viability-measuring assays, jadomycins B, S, and F were found to be equipotent in drug-sensitive 231-CON and MDR 231-TXL cells; and using ROS-detecting assays, these jadomycins were determined to increase ROS activity in both cell lines by up to 7.3-fold. Jadomycins caused DNA double-strand breaks in 231-CON and 231-TXL cells as measured by γH2AX Western blotting. Coincubation with the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine or pro-oxidant auranofin did not affect jadomycin-mediated DNA damage. Jadomycins induced apoptosis in 231-CON and 231-TXL cells as measured by annexin V affinity assays, a process that was retained when ROS were inhibited. This indicated that jadomycins are capable of inducing MDA-MB-231 apoptotic cell death independently of ROS activity. Using quantitative polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and direct topoisomerase inhibition assays, it was determined that jadomycins inhibit type II topoisomerases and that jadomycins B and F selectively poison topoisomerase IIß We therefore propose novel mechanisms through which jadomycins induce breast cancer cell death independently of ROS activity, through inhibition or poisoning of type II topoisomerases and the induction of DNA damage and apoptosis.


Assuntos
Apoptose/efeitos dos fármacos , Dano ao DNA/efeitos dos fármacos , DNA Topoisomerases Tipo II/metabolismo , Isoquinolinas/farmacologia , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/farmacologia , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/metabolismo , Apoptose/fisiologia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Sobrevivência Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Sobrevivência Celular/fisiologia , Dano ao DNA/fisiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos/efeitos dos fármacos , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos/fisiologia , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/efeitos dos fármacos , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/fisiologia , Humanos , Isoquinolinas/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Mama Triplo Negativas/patologia
3.
Endocr Connect ; 5(6): 70-81, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27881447

RESUMO

Prochemerin is the inactive precursor of the adipokine chemerin. Proteolytic processing is obligatory for the conversion of prochemerin into active chemerin and subsequent regulation of cellular processes via the chemokine-like receptor 1 (CMKLR1). Elevated plasma or serum chemerin concentrations and differential processing of prochemerin have been reported in obese humans. The impact of these changes on CMKLR1 signalling in humans is unknown. The objective of this pilot study was to develop a cellular bioassay to measure CMKLR1 activation by chemerin present in human serum and to characterise how obesity modifies serum activation of CMKLR1 under fasted and fed conditions. Blood samples were collected from control (N = 4, BMI 20-25) and obese (N = 4, BMI >30) female subjects after an overnight fast (n = 2) and at regular intervals (n = 7) following consumption of breakfast over a period of 6 h. A cellular CMKLR1-luminescent reporter assay and a pan-chemerin ELISA were used to determine CMKLR1 activation and total chemerin concentrations, respectively. Serum total chemerin concentration (averaged across all samples) was higher in obese vs control subjects (17.9 ± 1.8 vs 10.9 ± 0.5 nM, P < 0.05), but serum activation of CMKLR1 was similar in both groups. The CMKLR1 activation/total chemerin ratio was lower in obese vs control subjects (0.33 ± 0.04 vs 0.58 ± 0.05, P < 0.05). After breakfast, serum total chemerin or CMKLR1 activation did not differ from baseline values. In conclusion, the unexpected observation that obese serum activation of CMKLR1 did not match increased total chemerin concentrations suggests impaired processing to and/or enhanced degradation of active chemerin in serum of obese humans.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA