Difference in the impact of coinfections and secondary infections on antibiotic use in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 between the Omicron-dominant period and the pre-Omicron period.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the effect of coinfections and/or secondary infections on antibiotic use in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHOD: Days of therapy per 100 bed days (DOT) in a COVID-19 ward were compared between 2022 (Omicron period) and 2021 (pre-Omicron period). Antibiotics were categorized as antibiotics predominantly used for community-acquired infections (CAIs) and antibiotics predominantly used for health care-associated infections (HAIs). Bacterial and/or fungal infections which were proved or assumed on admission were defined as coinfections. Secondary infections were defined as infections that occurred following COVID-19. RESULTS: Patients with COVID-19 during the Omicron period were older and had more comorbidities. Coinfections were more common in the Omicron period than in the pre-Omicron period (44.4% [100/225] versus 0.8% [2/257], respectively, p < 0.001), and the mean DOT of antibiotics for CAIs was significantly increased in the Omicron period (from 3.60 to 17.84, p < 0.001). Secondary infection rate tended to be higher in the Omicron period (p = 0.097). Mean DOT of antibiotics for HAIs were appeared to be lower in the COVID-19 ward than in the general ward (pre-Omicron, 3.33 versus 6.37, respectively; Omicron, 3.84 versus 5.22, respectively). No multidrug-resistant gram-negative organisms were isolated in the COVID-19 ward. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic use for CAIs was limited in the pre-Omicron period but increased in the Omicron period because of a high coinfection rate on admission. With the antimicrobial stewardship, excessive use of antibiotics for HAIs was avoided in the COVID-19 ward during both periods.

Comparison of antibiotic use and antibiotic resistance between a community hospital and tertiary care hospital for evaluation of the antimicrobial stewardship program in Japan.

Assessment of risk-adjusted antibiotic use (AU) is recommended to evaluate antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). We aimed to compare the amount and diversity of AU and antimicrobial susceptibility of nosocomial isolates between a 266-bed community hospital (CH) and a 963-bed tertiary care hospital (TCH) in Japan. The days of therapy/100 bed days (DOT) was measured for four classes of broad-spectrum antibiotics predominantly used for hospital-onset infections. The diversity of AU was evaluated using the modified antibiotic heterogeneity index (AHI). With 10% relative DOT for fluoroquinolones and 30% for each of the remaining three classes, the modified AHI equals 1. Multidrug resistance (MDR) was defined as resistance to ≥ 3 anti-Pseudomonas antibiotic classes. The DOT was significantly higher in the TCH than in the CH (10.85 ± 1.32 vs. 3.89 ± 0.93, p < 0.001). For risk-adjusted AU, the DOT was 6.90 ± 1.50 for acute-phase medical wards in the CH, and 8.35 ± 1.05 in the TCH excluding the hematology department. In contrast, the DOT of antibiotics for community-acquired infections was higher in the CH than that in the TCH. As quality assessment of AU, higher modified AHI was observed in the TCH than in the CH (0.832 ± 0.044 vs. 0.721 ± 0.106, p = 0.003), indicating more diverse use in the TCH. The MDR rate in gram-negative rods was 5.1% in the TCH and 3.4% in the CH (p = 0.453). No significant difference was demonstrated in the MDR rate for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae species between hospitals. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were used differently in the TCH and CH. However, an increased antibiotic burden in the TCH did not cause poor susceptibility, possibly because of diversified AU. Considering the different patient populations, benchmarking AU according to the facility type is promising for inter-hospital comparisons of ASPs.