A new novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold: Present status and future clinical perspectives.

The DESolve® scaffold (Elixir Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, California, USA) is manufactured from a poly-l-lactide based polymer and elutes an anti-proliferative, anti-inflammatory drug, Novolimus from a poly-l-lactide based topcoat mixture. The strut thickness is 150µm and the scaffold has platinum-iridium radiopaque markers at both ends. Radial support is available during the early time period to prevent recoil. The scaffold biodegrades within 1year (>90% reduction in molecular weight) and then completely bioresorbs within 2years. The DESolve® scaffold permits a wide range of expansion with a consequently reduced risk for strut fracture. Lumen and scaffold enlargement is observed within 3-6months in both preclinical and clinical studies potentially allowing for the scaffolded region to respond to vasoactive stimuli. The device has a unique property of self-correction observed in bench top studies, which in clinical practice has the potential to eliminate minor malapposition following deployment.

Serial Multimodality Imaging and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Novel DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System for the Treatment of Single De Novo Coronary Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report the late multimodality imaging and clinical outcomes of the novel poly-l-lactic-acid-based DESolve novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds are an alternative to drug-eluting metallic stents and provide temporary vascular scaffolding, which potentially may allow vessel restoration and reduce the risk of future adverse events. METHODS: Overall, 126 patients were enrolled at 13 international sites between November 2011 and June 2012. The primary endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss at 6 months. Major adverse cardiac events, the main safety endpoint, were defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. All patients underwent angiography at 6 months. Serial intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography were performed in a subset of patients. RESULTS: The scaffold device success rate was 97% (n = 122 of 126), and procedural success was 100% (n = 122 of 122). The major adverse cardiac event rate was 3.3% (n = 4 of 122) at 6 months and 7.4% (n = 9 of 122) at 24 months, including 1 probable stent thrombosis within the first month. At 6-month angiographic follow-up, in-scaffold late lumen loss was 0.20 ± 0.32 mm. Paired intravascular ultrasound analysis demonstrated a significant increase in vessel, lumen and scaffold dimensions between post-procedure and 6-month follow-up, and strut-level optical coherence tomography analysis showed full strut coverage in 99 ± 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed favorable performance of the DESolve scaffold, effective inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, and for the first time, early luminal and scaffold growth at 6 months with sustained efficacy and safety through 2 years. (Elixir Medical Clinical Evaluation of the DESolve Novolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System-The DESolve Nx Trial; NCT02086045).

DESyne novolimus-eluting coronary stent is superior to Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting coronary stent at five-year follow-up: final results of the multicentre EXCELLA II randomised controlled trial.

AIMS: Newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have been shown to be superior to first-generation DES. Current-generation DES have zotarolimus, everolimus or biolimus as antiproliferative drugs. Novolimus, a metabolite of sirolimus, has been specifically developed to provide efficacy similar to currently available agents at a lower dose and thus requires a lower polymer load. We report the final five-year outcomes of the EXCELLA II trial comparing a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) with a novolimus-eluting stent (NES). METHODS AND RESULTS: EXCELLA II is a prospective, multicentre, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients (n=210) with a maximum of two de novo lesions in two different epicardial vessels were randomised (2:1) to treatment with either NES (n=139) or ZES (n=71). At five-year follow-up, patients in the NES group had a significantly lower incidence of the patient-oriented (HR 0.53, 95% CI: 0.32-0.87, p=0.013) and device-oriented (HR 0.38, 95% CI: 0.17-0.83, p=0.011) composite endpoints. There was no difference in cardiac death and definite/probable stent thrombosis between the two groups; however, there was a trend towards reduction in myocardial infarction and repeat revascularisation in the NES group at five-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: At five-year follow-up, the incidence of device- and patient-oriented events was significantly lower in the NES group. Further studies, adequately powered for clinical outcomes, are warranted.

Serial multimodality imaging and 2-Year clinical outcomes of the novel DESolve novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold system for the treatment of single de novo coronary lesions

OBJECTIVES:This study sought to report the late multimodality imaging and clinical outcomes of the novel poly-l-lactic-acid-based DESolve novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds are an alternative to drug-eluting metallic stents and provide temporary vascular scaffolding, which potentially may allow vessel restoration and reduce the risk of future adverse events...

A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform clinical and imaging assessments of the DESolve Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold (BCS). BACKGROUND: BCS, which is drug eluting, may have potential advantages compared with conventional metallic drug-eluting stents. The DESolve system, designed to provide vessel support and neointimal suppression, combines a poly-l-lactic acid-based scaffold with the antiproliferative myolimus. METHODS: The DESolve First-in-Man (a non-randomized, consecutive enrollment evaluation of the DESolve myolimus eluting bioresorbable coronary stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions) trial was a prospective multicenter study enrolling 16 patients eligible for treatment. The principal safety endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. The principal imaging endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at 6 months. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6 months; multislice computed tomography (MSCT) was performed at 12 months. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 15 of 15 patients receiving a study scaffold. At 12 months, there was no scaffold thrombosis and no major adverse cardiac events directly attributable to the scaffold. At 6 months, in-scaffold LLL (by QCA) was 0.19 ± 0.19 mm; neointimal volume (by IVUS) was 7.19 ± 3.56%, with no evidence of scaffold recoil or late malapposition. Findings were confirmed with OCT and showed uniform, thin neointimal coverage (0.12 ± 0.04 mm). At 12 months, MSCT demonstrated excellent vessel patency. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of the DESolve BCS. Results showing low in-scaffold LLL, low % neointimal volume at 6 months, no chronic recoil, and maintenance of lumen patency at 12 months prompt further study. (DESolve First-in-Man; EudraCT number 2011-000027-32).

A Next-Generation Bioresorbable CoronaryScaffold System: From Bench toFirst Clinical Evaluation

This study sought to perform clinical and imaging assessments of the DESolveBioresorbable Coronary Scaffold (BCS).Background BCS, which is drug eluting, may have potential advantages compared with conventionalmetallic drug-eluting stents. The DESolve system, designed to provide vessel support and neointimalsuppression, combines a poly-L-lactic acid–based scaffold with the antiproliferative myolimus.Methods The DESolve First-in-Man (A NON-RANDOMIZED, CONSECUTIVE ENROLLMENT EVALUATIONOF THE DESolve MYOLIMUS ELUTING BIORESORBABLE CORONARY STENT IN THE TREATMENT OFPATIENTS WITH DE NOVO NATIVE CORONARY ARTERY LESIONS) trial was a prospective multicenterstudy enrolling 16 patients eligible for treatment. The principal safety endpoint was a composite ofcardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. Theprincipal imaging endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) assessed by quantitative coronaryangiography (QCA) at 6 months. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography(OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6 months; multislice computed tomography (MSCT) wasperformed at 12 months.Results Acute procedural success was achieved in 15 of 15 patients receiving a study scaffold. At12 months, there was no scaffold thrombosis and no major adverse cardiac events directly attributableto the scaffold. At 6 months, in-scaffold LLL (by QCA) was 0.19 0.19 mm; neointimal volume (by IVUS)was 7.19 3.56%, with no evidence of scaffold recoil or late malapposition. Findings were confirmedwith OCT and showed uniform, thin neointimal coverage (0.12 0.04 mm). At 12 months, MSCTdemonstrated excellent vessel patency.

A randomised comparison of novolimus-eluting and zotarolimuselutingcoronary stents: 9-month follow-up results of the EXCELLA II study

Aims: Novolimus, a macrocyclic lactone with anti-proliferative properties, has asimilar efficacy to currently available agents; however it requires a lower dose,and less polymer, and is therefore conceivably safer.Methods and results: The EXCELLA II study was a prospective, multicentre,single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial which randomised 210 patients with a maximum of two de novo coronary artery lesions in two different epicardialvessels in a ratio of 2:1 to treatment with either the Elixir DESyne NovolimusEluting Coronary Stent System (NES n=139, Elixir Medical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA)or the Endeavor zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES n=71, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA,USA). The primary endpoint was in-stent mean late lumen loss (LLL) at 9-monthsfollow-up. In-stent percent volume obstruction (%VO) was measured in asub-group of 65 patients having 9-month intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up.Clinical secondary endpoints included a device orientated composite of cardiacdeath, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated target lesionrevascularisation (CI-TLR) assessed at 9-months follow-up. At 9-months, thein-stent LLL was 0.11±0.32 mm in the NES arm, as compared to 0.63±0.42 mm inthe ZES (p<0.0001 non-inferiority, p<0.0001 superiority). In-stent%VO was4.5±5.1% and 20.9±11.3% for NES and ZES, respectively (p<0.001). There wasno significant difference between stent groups in the device orientated compositeendpoint (NES 2.9% vs. ZES 5.6%, –2.8% [-8.8%, 3.3%], p=0.45) or its individualcomponents of cardiac death, target vessel MI and CI-TLR.Conclusions: This non-inferiority randomised study not only met its primaryendpoint, but also demonstrated superiority of NES compared to the ZES in terms of in-stent LLL.

A randomised comparison of novolimus-eluting and zotarolimus-eluting coronary stents: 9-month follow-up results of the EXCELLA II study.

AIMS: Novolimus, a macrocyclic lactone with anti-proliferative properties, has a similar efficacy to currently available agents; however it requires a lower dose, and less polymer, and is therefore conceivably safer. METHODS AND RESULTS: The EXCELLA II study was a prospective, multicentre, single-blind, non-inferiority clinical trial which randomised 210 patients with a maximum of two de novo coronary artery lesions in two different epicardial vessels in a ratio of 2:1 to treatment with either the Elixir DESyne Novolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System (NES n=139, Elixir Medical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) or the Endeavor zotarolimus eluting stent (ZES n=71, Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA, USA). The primary endpoint was in-stent mean late lumen loss (LLL) at 9-months follow-up. In-stent percent volume obstruction (%VO) was measured in a?sub-group of 65 patients having 9-month intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up. Clinical secondary endpoints included a device orientated composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation (CI-TLR) assessed at 9-months follow-up. At 9-months, the in-stent LLL was 0.11+/-0.32 mm in the NES arm, as compared to 0.63+/-0.42 mm in the ZES (p<0.0001 non-inferiority, p<0.0001 superiority). In-stent%VO was 4.5+/-5.1% and 20.9+/-11.3% for NES and ZES, respectively (p<0.001). There was no significant difference between stent groups in the device orientated composite endpoint (NES 2.9% vs. ZES 5.6%, -2.8% [-8.8%, 3.3%], p=0.45) or its individual components of cardiac death, target vessel MI and CI-TLR. CONCLUSIONS: This non-inferiority randomised study not only met its primary endpoint, but also demonstrated superiority of NES compared to the ZES in terms of in-stent LLL.