Phase 2 trial of crizotinib in Japanese patients with advanced NSCLC harboring a MET gene alteration: a Co-MET study.

BACKGROUND: MET exon 14 skipping mutations occur in 3-4% and MET high amplifications occur in < 1% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Crizotinib, a selective ATP-competitive small-molecule inhibitor of c-Met, ALK, and ROS1 tyrosine kinases, has shown activity in cancer models with various types of MET activation. METHODS: The Co-MET study is a single-arm phase 2 trial to assess the safety and efficacy of crizotinib in MET inhibitor-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (cohort 1) or high MET gene copy number of ≥ 7 (cohort 2). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 by independent radiology review in cohort 1. The key secondary endpoints were the duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients (23 in cohort 1 and 5 in cohort 2) were enrolled between March 2018 and February 2020. The primary endpoint was met as the ORR (90% confidence interval: CI) in cohort 1 was 38.1% (20.6-58.3). Median DoR, PFS, and OS (95% CI) were 7.6 (1.9-NE), 5.7 (2.1-11.3), 9.1 (4.0-19.9) months, respectively, in cohort 1. ORR in cohort 2 was 40.0% (18.9-92.4). The safety signals were generally consistent with the known safety profile of crizotinib. CONCLUSIONS: Crizotinib showed a clinical activity similar to that of tepotinib and capmatinib in patients with NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutations. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: UMIN000031623.

Clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions in the near-loop and far-loop: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia.

OBJECTIVES: In this study, we explored the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions (Exon20ins), and the impact of the location of Exon20ins on these clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The efficacies of current systemic therapies in NSCLC patients harboring Exon20ins were investigated using a large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, and compared with that of amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial. RESULTS: Of the 11,397 patients enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia, Exon20ins were detected in 189 patients (1.7 %). Treatment with classical EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (classical TKIs) was associated with a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins as compared with Exon19 deletions and L858R. Post platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were associated with a shorter PFS than with docetaxel in patients with Exon20ins (HR [95 % CI]; TKIs vs docetaxel, 2.16 [1.35-3.46]; ICIs vs docetaxel, 1.49 [1.21-1.84]). Patients treated with amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial showed a risk reduction in PFS and overall survival as compared with LC-SCRUM-Asia patients treated with docetaxel, classical TKIs, or ICIs. Among the 189 patients, Exon20ins were classified as near-loop or far-loop insertions in 115 (61 %) and 56 (30 %) patients, respectively. Treatment with osimertinib was associated with a longer PFS in patients with Exon20ins in near-loop as compared with far-loop (median, 5.6 vs. 2.0 months; HR [95 % CI], 0.22 [0.07-0.64]). CONCLUSIONS: After platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and ICIs are less effective in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins, and amivantamab may be a promising targeted therapy. There is a possibility that the location of Exon20ins has an impact on the efficacy of TKIs.

Five Cases of Cytokine Release Syndrome in Patients Receiving Cytotoxic Chemotherapy Together With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab: A Case Report.

We conducted a phase 3 clinical trial to compare the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy together with nivolumab plus ipilimumab relative to that of platinum-based combination chemotherapy together with pembrolizumab in previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. The trial was terminated prematurely after treatment of 295 patients because of a high proportion of treatment-related deaths, three of which were due to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab treatment arm. In addition, we encountered two cases of CRS that were effectively managed, for a total of five cases (3.4%) among the 148 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab arm. We here provide details of these five cases. Although patient background and timing of CRS onset differed, fever was observed before the emergence of CRS in all five cases. Oncologists should thus be aware that the development of fever during treatment of patients with nivolumab plus ipilimumab may herald the onset of CRS.

Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab With Primary Prophylactic Pegylated Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor Support for Elderly Patients With Advanced NSCLC: A Multicenter Prospective Single Arm Phase 2 Trial: DRAGON Study (WJOG9416L).

Introduction: Docetaxel plus ramucirumab could be a promising treatment for chemo-naive elderly patients with NSCLC, but high incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) is a critical concern. We thus adopted a routine primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF) to reduce FN and maximize the efficacy of docetaxel plus ramucirumab in elderly patients. Methods: This is a single arm phase 2 trial for chemo-naive elderly patients (aged ≥75 y) with advanced NSCLC. Docetaxel (60 mg/m2, d 1) plus ramucirumab (10 mg/kg, d 1) with PEG-G-CSF (3.6 mg, d 2) was administered every 3 weeks until progression. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) (expected ORR: 35%). Results: Between February 2018 and January 2021, 54 patients were enrolled. Median age was 78 (range: 75-86). A total of 21 (38.9%) partial response, 22 (40.7%) stable disease, nine (16.7%) progressive disease, and two (3.7%) not assessable were confirmed, resulting in ORR of 38.9% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 27.7%-51.0%) and disease control rate of 79.6%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.2 (95% CI: 4.2-6.9) and 12.7 (95% CI: 10.2-18.9) months, respectively. There were one (1.9%) FN, two (3.7%) bleeding grade greater than or equal to 3, and one (1.9%) treatment-related death (pneumonitis). Pneumonitis occurred in five patients (9.3%). Main adverse events grade greater than or equal to 3 were observed: four (7%) thrombocytopenia; three (5.6%) neutropenia; six (11.1%) hyposodium; five (9.3%) infection; five (9.3%) hypertension; four (7.4%) anorexia; and three (5.6%) oral mucositis. Conclusions: Docetaxel plus ramucirumab with PEG-G-CSF revealed efficacy and safety for chemo-naive elderly patients with NSCLC. Primary prophylactic PEG-G-CSF highly prevented FN.

Brigatinib in Japanese patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: Final results of the phase 2 J-ALTA trial.

The phase 2, single-arm, multicenter, open-label J-ALTA study evaluated the efficacy and safety of brigatinib in Japanese patients with advanced ALK+ non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). One expansion cohort of J-ALTA enrolled patients previously treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); the main cohort included patients with prior alectinib ± crizotinib. The second expansion cohort enrolled patients with TKI-naive ALK+ NSCLC. All patients received brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-day lead-in at 90 mg daily). Among 47 patients in the main cohort, 5 (11%) remained on brigatinib at the study end (median follow-up: 23 months). In this cohort, the independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR) was 34% (95% CI, 21%-49%); median duration of response was 14.8 months (95% CI, 5.5-19.4); median IRC-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-12.9). Among 32 patients in the TKI-naive cohort, 25 (78%) remained on brigatinib (median follow-up: 22 months); 2-year IRC-assessed PFS was 73% (90% CI, 55%-85%); IRC-assessed ORR was 97% (95% CI, 84%-100%); the median duration of response was not reached (95% CI, 19.4-not reached); 2-year duration of response was 70%. Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 68% and 91% of TKI-pretreated and TKI-naive patients, respectively. Exploratory analyses of baseline circulating tumor DNA in ALK TKI-pretreated NSCLC showed associations between poor PFS and EML4-ALK fusion variant 3 and TP53. Brigatinib is an important treatment option for Japanese patients with ALK+ NSCLC, including patients previously treated with alectinib.

Phase 1 study of DS-1205c combined with gefitinib for EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), but responses are not durable as tumors develop resistance. DS-1205c is a novel, specific, orally bioavailable, small-molecule AXL receptor TKI. In preclinical studies, DS-1205c restored TKI antitumor activity in a TKI acquired-resistance EGFR-mutant NSCLC tumor xenograft model. METHODS: This first-in-human, multicenter, open-label Phase 1 study (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03599518) primarily evaluated the safety and tolerability of combination therapy with DS-1205c and gefitinib in Japanese patients with metastatic or unresectable EGFR-mutant NSCLC and tumor progression during treatment with EGFR-TKIs. Patients (n = 20) received DS-1205c monotherapy (200-1200 mg twice daily [BID]) in a 7-day safety monitoring period before combination DS-1205c/gefitinib (250 mg once daily) in 21-day cycles. RESULTS: The observed common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were increased aspartate aminotransferase (35%), increased alanine aminotransferase (30%), rash maculo-papular (30%), and diarrhea (25%). No serious TEAEs were reported. Plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of DS-1205a (free form of DS-1205c) were unaffected by concomitant administration of gefitinib. No patient achieved a complete or partial response and 5 patients (25%) had stable disease. CONCLUSION: DS-1205c was generally safe and well tolerated at all dose levels, but the safety profile of ≤800 mg BID was more favorable than 1200 mg BID. The recommended dose for dose-expansion cohorts of DS-1205c in combination therapy with gefitinib was 800 mg BID.

Necitumumab plus gemcitabine and cisplatin in previously treated lung squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of the anti-EGFR antibody necitumumab combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin (N + GC) in the first-line treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) have been proven. However, the efficacy and safety of N + GC in the second line or later treatment remain unclear. METHODS: Eleven patients who received N + GC for advanced-stage or recurrent LSCC were enrolled. We retrospectively assessed the patients' clinical characteristics and efficacy and safety of treatment. RESULTS: The median patient age was 73 years (range, 63-77 years). The cohort included nine (81.8%) men and two (18.2%) women. Two (18.2%) patients had postoperative recurrence, and one (9.1%), three (27.3%), one (9.1%), and four (36.4%) patients were diagnosed with stage IIIA, IIIB, IVA, and IVB disease, respectively. Concerning the best overall response, partial response was achieved in five (45.5%) patients, four (36.4%) patients displayed stable disease, and two (18.2%) patients were not evaluable. Median progression-free survival was 6.8 months (range, 1.4-10.3 months). The grade 3 or higher neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia occurred in six (54.5%), three (27.3%), and two (18.2%) patients, respectively. Additionally, grade 3 skin reaction, rash, lung infection, duodenal ulcer, and febrile neutropenia were observed in one (9.1%) patient each. Two (18.2%) patients required treatment interruption because of adverse events. CONCLUSION: N + GC displayed good efficacy in the second line or later treatment among patients with LSCC. This study suggested that N + GC is a useful option even after second-line treatment of advanced-stage or recurrent LSCC, although the management of adverse events is essential.

Case report: Success of tepotinib therapy in overcoming resistance to osimertinib in a patient with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with a potential acquired MET exon 14 skipping mutation.

Osimertinib is a standard therapy for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations, but most patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC develop secondary resistance to osimertinib. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition gene (MET) alterations and oncogene fusions have been identified as the most common mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib. However, MET exon 14 skipping mutation (METex14del) as an acquired resistance to osimertinib has rarely been reported. A non-smoking 76-year-old woman was diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma in the right lower lobe (cT2bN2M1c [pulmonary and bone metastases], cStage IVB). The primary tumor was submitted to cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 (Roche Diagnostics Ltd.), next generation sequencing (Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3; Thermo Fisher Scientific), the AmoyDx® Essential NGS panel (Amoy Diagnostics, Xiamen, China), all of which were positive for EGFR L858R and de novo T790M. We administered daily osimertinib (80 mg/day), and achieved a partial response. However, after 14.0 months, computed tomography showed progression of the primary tumor and lung metastases. Re-biopsy of the primary tumor was conducted, and the specimen was submitted to Archer®MET companion diagnostic for detection of METex14del. Although the primary tumor was negative for METex14del, the re-biopsy specimen was positive for METex14del. We validated that the biopsy specimen of the primary tumor at diagnosis before osimertinib administration was negative for METex14del using local reverse transcription PCR. We administered daily tepotinib (500 mg/day) to the patient as a further-line treatment, and achieved a partial response (tumor shrinkage rate: 34.5%) after 2.0 months, who responded to tepotinib therapy for 8.0 months. We described a patient with lung adenocarcinoma harboring METex14del as a potential acquired resistance to osimertinib, who responded to subsequent tepotinib therapy. Re-biopsy and re-analysis of genetic profiles should be considered in NSCLC patients who develop osimertinib resistance.

Management of Peripheral Edema in Patients with MET Exon 14-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Small Molecule MET Inhibitors.

Small molecule mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) inhibitors, such as crizotinib, capmatinib, and tepotinib, are treatment options for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in adult patients whose tumors have a mutation that leads to MET exon 14 skipping. In clinical trials, these MET inhibitors were associated with a high incidence of peripheral edema, although this was generally mild-to-moderate in severity. There is limited information about the mechanism involved in MET inhibitor-induced peripheral edema. Perturbation of hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/MET signaling may disrupt the permeability balance in the vascular endothelium and thus promote edema development. Another potential mechanism is through effects on renal function, although this is unlikely to be the primary mechanism. Because edema is common in cancer patients and may not necessarily be caused by the cancer treatment, or other conditions that have similar symptoms to peripheral edema, a thorough assessment is required to ascertain the underlying cause. Before starting MET-inhibitor therapy, patients should be educated about the possibility of developing peripheral edema. Patient limb volume should be measured before initiating treatment, to aid assessment if symptoms develop. Since the exact mechanism of MET inhibitor-induced edema is unknown, management is empiric, with common approaches including compression stockings, specific exercises, massage, limb elevation, and/or diuretic treatment. Although not usually required, discontinuation of MET inhibitor treatment generally resolves peripheral edema. Early diagnosis and management, as well as patient information and education, are vital to decrease the clinical burden associated with edema, and to reinforce capmatinib treatment adherence.

[Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Selpercatinib in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Results from the Japanese Subset of a Global Phase 1/2 Study].

PURPOSE: Selpercatinib is a highly selective, potent, rearranged during transfection(RET)inhibitor. A global, multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 study of selpercatinib(LIBRETTO-001, NCT03157128)has been ongoing since 2017. We evaluated the data of Japanese patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)using 30 March 2020 cut-off data. METHODS: Phase 2 of LIBRETTO-001 started after confirming the safety of the recommended phase 2 dose(160 mg bid, orally, 28-day cycles)in Japanese. The primary endpoint was the independently assessed objective response rate(RECIST v1.1). RESULTS: Japanese NSCLC patients, including 44 patients in cohort 1 who had previously received platinum-based(or other)chemotherapy, programmed cell death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 immunotherapy, or both, and four previously untreated patients in cohort 2, were analyzed. The objective response rate was 55.3%(95% confidence interval: 38.3, 71.4; one confirmed complete response, 20 confirmed partial responses)in 38 evaluable patients in cohort 1 who could be followed for ≥2 post-baseline scans. The only evaluable patient in cohort 2 had no response. The most frequent treatment- emergent adverse events were increased alanine aminotransferase, increased aspartate aminotransferase, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Selpercatinib appeared to be effective in Japanese patients with RET fusion-positive NSCLC, and the safety profile was not substantially different from published results.

Nazartinib for treatment-naive EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: Results of a phase 2, single-arm, open-label study.

INTRODUCTION: Nazartinib, a novel third-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, previously demonstrated antitumor activity and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ≤ 3 prior lines of systemic therapy. Herein, we report phase 2 efficacy and safety of first-line nazartinib. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, global study enrolled treatment-naive adult patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC harboring EGFR-activating mutations (eg, L858R and/or ex19del). Patients with neurologically stable and controlled brain metastases were also eligible. Patients received oral nazartinib 150 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was Blinded Independent Review Committee (BIRC)-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. RESULTS: Forty-five patients received ≥ 1 dose of nazartinib. The median follow-up time from enrollment to data cutoff (November 1, 2019) was 30 months (range: 25-34). The BIRC-assessed ORR was 69% (95% CI, 53-82). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18 months (95% CI, 15-not estimable [NE]). The median overall survival was NE. In patients with baseline brain metastases (n = 18), the ORR and median PFS (95% CIs) were 67% (41-87) and 17 months (11-21). Seventeen of 18 patients had brain metastases as non-target lesions; the CNS lesions were absent/normalized in 9 of 17 (53%). Only 2 of 27 patients without baseline brain metastases developed new brain metastases postbaseline. Most frequent adverse events (≥ 25%, any grade, all-causality) were diarrhea (47%), maculopapular rash (38%), pyrexia (29%), cough, and stomatitis (27% each). CONCLUSIONS: First-line nazartinib demonstrated promising efficacy, including clinically meaningful antitumor activity in the brain, and manageable safety in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02108964.

Artificial intelligence-derived gut microbiome as a predictive biomarker for therapeutic response to immunotherapy in lung cancer: protocol for a multicentre, prospective, observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Immunotherapy is the fourth leading therapy for lung cancer following surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recently, several studies have reported about the potential association between the gut microbiome and therapeutic response to immunotherapy. Nevertheless, the specific composition of the gut microbiome or combination of gut microbes that truly predict the efficacy of immunotherapy is not definitive. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The present multicentre, prospective, observational study aims to discover the specific composition of the gut microbiome or combination of gut microbes predicting the therapeutic response to immunotherapy in lung cancer using artificial intelligence. The main inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) pathologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic or postoperative recurrent lung cancer including non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer; (2) age≥20 years at the time of informed consent; (3) planned treatment with immunotherapy including combination therapy and monotherapy, as the first-line immunotherapy; and (4) ability to provide faecal samples. In total, 400 patients will be enrolled prospectively. Enrolment will begin in 2021, and the final analyses will be completed by 2024. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of each participating centre in 2021 (Kyushu Cancer Center, IRB approved No. 2021-13, 8 June 2021 and Kyushu Medical Center, IRB approved No. 21-076, 31 August 2021). Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and national and international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: UMIN000046428.

Randomized Phase 2 Study of Osimertinib Plus Bevacizumab Versus Osimertinib for Untreated Patients With Nonsquamous NSCLC Harboring EGFR Mutations: WJOG9717L Study.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 2 study at 21 institutions in Japan. Previously untreated patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-sensitizing mutations received either osimertinib (80 mg, daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 wk) or osimertinib monotherapy, and were stratified according to sex, stage, and EGFR mutation status. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population, assessed by means of blinded, independent central radiologic review. RESULTS: Between January 2018 and September 2018, a total of 122 patients were enrolled (osimertinib + bevacizumab arm, 61 patients; osimertinib monotherapy arm, 61 patients). At a median follow-up duration of 19.8 months, the median PFS was 22.1 months for osimertinib plus bevacizumab and 20.2 months for osimertinib monotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.862 (60% confidence interval: 0.700-1.060, 95% confidence interval: 0.531-1.397, one-sided stratified log-rank p = 0.213). Adverse events of grade 3 or worse were observed in 34 patients (56%) in the osimertinib plus bevacizumab arm and 29 (48%) in the osimertinib monotherapy arm. In addition, two (3%) and 11 patients (18%) experienced any grade pneumonitis, respectively, and grade 3 pneumonitis was observed in one patient (2%) in each arm. CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to exhibit the efficacy of osimertinib plus bevacizumab for improving the PFS among patients with nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations as first-line treatment.

Phase II study of atezolizumab with bevacizumab for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer with high PD-L1 expression (@Be Study).

BACKGROUND: PD-L1 expression on tumor cells is a marker of PD-1/PD-L1 antibody treatment efficacy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PD-L1 antibody (atezolizumab) prolongs overall survival (OS) compared with platinum doublet as first-line treatment for NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression. Bevacizumab enhanced cytotoxic agent and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor efficacy in non-squamous (NS)-NSCLC, and PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in preclinical models. METHODS: This single-arm phase II study investigated clinical benefits of adding bevacizumab 15 mg/kg to atezolizumab 1200 mg fixed dose in a first-line setting for advanced NS-NSCLC patients with PD-L1 expression ≥50% without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 alterations. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by central review committee. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), OS, and safety. RESULTS: Of 39 enrolled patients, 33 (84.6%) had stage IV NSCLC and 36 (92.3%) had smoking history. As of March 31, 2020, no patient had a complete response and 25 patients had a partial response (ORR=64.1%, 95% CI 47.18 to 78.80). Twelve-month PFS and OS rates were 54.9% (35.65 to 70.60) and 70.6% (50.53 to 83.74), respectively. The median DOR in 25 responders was 10.4 months (4.63-not reached). The median treatment cycle was 12 (1 to 27). Nineteen patients discontinued study treatment because of disease progression (N=17) or immune-related adverse events (AEs) (N=2) (sclerosing cholangitis or encephalopathy). There were 23 serious AEs in 12 patients, but no grade 4/5 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Atezolizumab with bevacizumab is a potential treatment for NS-NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: JapicCTI-184038.

Prospective observational study of nutritional/immunologic indices as predictive biomarkers for the response to anti-PD-1 drugs in non-small cell lung cancer (ICI-PREDICT study).

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have markedly improved the prognosis of many patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the relationship between the patient's nutritional/immunologic status and the outcomes of ICI treatment remains unclear. In previous retrospective studies, we reported that the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score, skeletal muscle area, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio were independent predictors of the response of NSCLC patients to anti-PD-1 drugs. The aim of this prospective multi-center study is to investigate the clinical impact of pre-treatment nutritional/immunologic indices and early post-treatment changes in the indices on treatment outcomes in advanced NSCLC. The main inclusion criteria are: (1) stage IV NSCLC, or stage III NSCLC not applicable for definitive chemoradiotherapy; (2) treatment with ICIs (monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy) as first-line therapy; and (3) available data on PD-L1 expression on tumor cells. A total of 300 patients will be enrolled prospectively. Enrollment will begin in 2020 and the final analyses will be completed by 2025.

Successful treatment of locally advanced lung cancer using late concurrent chemoradiation therapy administered after immune checkpoint inhibitor plus platinum chemotherapy.

Concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CRT) is the standard of care for patients with unresectable stage II/III lung cancer. However, systemic chemotherapy is required for patients who are ineligible for radical radiation therapy. There is little evidence to date for the safety and efficacy of CRT administered after treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The cases reported here had inoperable stage III lung cancer (non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer) and were ineligible for radical radiation therapy. They were administered ICIs plus chemotherapy and subsequently underwent late concurrent CRT. Because of the remarkable tumor shrinkage achieved by the ICIs plus chemotherapy, adverse events of CRT were tolerable. They were alive without tumor progression as of this report, over 1 year after CRT was terminated. CRT is administered with curative intent, while the intent of immunochemotherapy is palliative. Late concurrent CRT after immunochemotherapy is probably effective and tolerable. After treatment with systemic chemotherapy in patients judged ineligible for radical radiation therapy, radiation therapy should be reconsidered because of its importance once tumor shrinkage has been achieved.

Targeted Therapy for RET Fusion Lung Cancer: Breakthrough and Unresolved Issue.

Molecular drugs targeting mutated or rearranged oncogene drivers have become one of the standard recognized treatments in patients with advanced and recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. RET is located in the long arm of human chromosome 10 and encodes a receptor tyrosine kinase protein, and RET fusion-positive lung adenocarcinoma occurs in 1%-2% of cases. Clinical trials of multikinase inhibitors, including cabozantinib, vandetanib, sorafenib, and lenvatinib, that inhibit RET oncogene activity have shown their antitumor efficacy. Recently, RET inhibitors such as pralsetinib and selpercatinib that are specialized for RET kinase have also been developed, and their efficacy was investigated in previous clinical trials (BLU-667 and LOXO-292). In this review, we summarized the effects and adverse events of multikinase and selective RET inhibitors and the various diagnostic techniques for RET gene fusion. In the perspective part, we focused on the unsolved issues on treatment for RET fusion-positive lung cancer and future developments.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of budigalimab with rovalpituzumab tesirine in patients with small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Agents targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) have been approved as monotherapy for patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). In preclinical models, the combined targeting of PD-1 and delta-like protein 3 resulted in enhanced antitumor activity. Herein, we report results from the expansion arm of study NCT03000257 evaluating the combination of the anti-PD-1 antibody budigalimab and the targeted antibody-drug conjugate rovalpituzumab tesirine (Rova-T) in patients with previously treated SCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This expansion arm of a multicenter, open-label, multi-arm, first-in-human phase 1 clinical trial enrolled adult patients with progressive SCLC. The primary objective was to assess safety and tolerability. Patients received budigalimab 375 mg via intravenous infusion every 3 weeks, and Rova-T was administered as a dose of 0.3 mg/kg intravenously, on day 1 of the first and third 3-week cycle. RESULTS: As of October 2019, 31 patients with SCLC were enrolled and treated with budigalimab plus Rova-T. The combination was tolerated, with the most common treatment-emergent adverse events (in >30%) being pleural effusion, fatigue, and cough. The overall response rate was 24.1%, with one confirmed complete response and six confirmed partial responses. The overall response rate in patients with high delta-like protein 3 expression was similar (21.1%). The median progression-free survival was 3.48 months. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with budigalimab and Rova-T had promising efficacy and appeared to be tolerated in patients with SCLC. Although Rova-T development has been discontinued, development of budigalimab combined with other anticancer agents is ongoing. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03000257 Statement on originality of the work The manuscript represents original work and has not been submitted for publication elsewhere nor previously published. Statement of prior presentation Data from this study were previously presented at the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Congress 2019.

Sarcoid-like reaction of the extrathoracic lymph node in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma treated with pembrolizumab.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the standard of care for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With the increasing use of ICIs, clinicians should be familiar with their immune-related adverse events, including sarcoid-like reactions, which have been associated with the use of ICIs in patients with cancer. Sarcoid-like reactions are caused by uncontrolled T helper 1-mediated immune responses resulting from ICIs, but their pathophysiology is not fully understood. Sarcoid-like reactions are often clinically important because they mimic metastases from treated cancer. According to previous reports, sarcoid-like reactions are typically observed in intrathoracic locations (lung and/or mediastinal lymph nodes) and the skin. In this study, we report an extremely rare case of extrathoracic sarcoid-like reaction in the right external iliac lymph node following two cycles of pembrolizumab therapy in a patient with lung adenocarcinoma. The laboratory data and computed tomography images suggested that infectious and autoimmune diseases were not considered to be the causative agents. Residual bone metastasis might have caused T helper 1-mediated immune responses by pembrolizumab, and contributed to sarcoid-like reactions in the right external iliac lymph node. Sarcoid-like reactions should be considered in the differential diagnosis of patients with lung cancer treated with ICIs who exhibit worsening extrathoracic lymph node swelling. Clinicians should be cautious not to mistake extrathoracic sarcoid-like reactions of the lymph nodes for progression of the treated disease.

Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy for Advanced NSCLC Patients with Older Age or Those with Poor Performance Status.

PURPOSE: Anti-programmed death 1 (PD-1) antibodies have emerged as frontline treatments for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) on the basis of global Phase III trials. However, current data regarding responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in older patients with NSCLC or those with poor performance status (PS) are limited. Therefore, we examined the therapeutic effect of anti PD-1 antibody in these patients. PATIENTS: We retrospectively examined consecutive patients treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (pembrolizumab or nivolumab) from January 2016 to September 2018. RESULTS: We enrolled 125 patients (median age, 60 years), 80.8% of whom were men. Patients aged ≥75 years were considered older patients (n = 15), and those with PS 2-3 were regarded as having poor PS (n = 11). The objective response and disease control rates were 15.4% and 46.2%, respectively, in older patients and 9.1% and 27.3%, respectively, in those with poor PS. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not significantly differ between older and younger patients. However, poor PS was significantly associated with poor survival. High programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor specimens (≥50%) was associated with favorable survival in the entire cohort as well as patients with poor PS. Safety analyses demonstrated no significant difference in the occurrence of any adverse event, including grade ≥3 adverse events, between patients with poor PS or older age and the remaining patients. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 therapy had similar efficacy in older and younger patients with NSCLC, whereas survival was significantly worse in patients with poor PS. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors may be considered for patients with poor PS harboring positive PD-L1 expression.