SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Capacity in Hemodialysis Patients with and without a Fifth Vaccination with the Updated Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 Vaccine.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients have reduced serologic immunity after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination compared to the general population and an increased risk of morbidity and mortality when exposed to SARS-CoV-2. METHODS: Sixty-six hemodialysis patients immunized four times with the original SARS-CoV-2 vaccines (BNT162b2, mRNA-1273) either received a booster with the adapted Comirnaty Original/Omicron BA.4-5 vaccine 8.3 months after the fourth vaccination and/or experienced a breakthrough infection. Two months before and four weeks after the fifth vaccination, the live-virus neutralization capacities of Omicron variants BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 were determined, as well as neutralizing and quantitative anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgG antibodies. RESULTS: Four weeks after the fifth vaccination with the adapted vaccine, significantly increased neutralizing antibodies and the neutralization of Omicron variants BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 were observed. The increase was significantly higher than after the fourth vaccination for variants BQ.1.1 and BA.5. Of all analyzed variants, BA.5 was neutralized best after the fifth vaccination. We did not see a difference in humoral immunity between the group with an infection and the group with a vaccination as a fifth spike exposure. Fivefold-vaccinated patients with a breakthrough infection showed a significantly higher neutralization capacity of XBB.1.5. CONCLUSION: A fifth SARS-CoV-2 vaccination with the adapted vaccine improves both wild-type specific antibody titers and the neutralizing capacity of the current Omicron variants BA.5, BQ.1.1, and XBB.1.5 in hemodialysis patients. Additional booster vaccinations with adapted vaccines will likely improve immunity towards current and original SARS-CoV-2 variants and are, therefore, recommended in hemodialysis patients. Further longitudinal studies must show the extent to which this booster vaccination avoids a breakthrough infection.

Longitudinal SARS-CoV-2 neutralization of Omicron BA.1, BA.5 and BQ.1.1 after four vaccinations and the impact of breakthrough infections in haemodialysis patients.

Background: Individuals on haemodialysis (HD) are more vulnerable to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection than the general population due to end-stage kidney disease-induced immunosuppression. Methods: A total of 26 HD patients experiencing SARS-CoV-2 infection after a third vaccination were matched 1:1 with 26 of 92 SARS-CoV-2-naïve patients by age, sex, dialysis vintage and immunosuppressive drugs receiving a fourth vaccination with a messenger RNA-based vaccine. A competitive surrogate neutralization assay was used to monitor vaccination success. To determine infection neutralization titres, Vero-E6 cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoCs), Omicron sublineage BA.1, BA.5 and BQ.1.1. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50, serum dilution factor 1:x) was determined before, 4 weeks after and 6 months after the fourth vaccination. Results: A total of 52 HD patients received four coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccinations and were followed up for a median of 6.3 months. Patient characteristics did not differ between the matched cohorts. Patients without a SARS-CoV-2 infection had a significant reduction of real virus neutralization capacity for all Omicron sublineages after 6 months (P < .001 each). Those patients with a virus infection did not experience a reduction in real virus neutralization capacity after 6 months. Compared with the other Omicron VoC, the BQ.1.1 sublineage had the lowest virus neutralization capacity. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2-naïve HD patients had significantly decreased virus neutralization capacity 6 months after the fourth vaccination, whereas patients with a SARS-CoV-2 infection had no change in neutralization capacity. This was independent of age, sex, dialysis vintage and immunosuppression. Therefore, in infection-naïve HD patients a fifth COVID-19 vaccination might be reasonable 6 months after the fourth vaccination.

Improved SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization of Delta and Omicron BA.1 Variants of Concern after Fourth Vaccination in Hemodialysis Patients.

Hemodialysis patients are exposed to a markedly increased risk when infected with SARS-CoV-2. To date, it is unclear if hemodialysis patients benefit from four vaccinations. A total of 142 hemodialysis patients received four COVID-19 vaccinations until March 2022. RDB binding antibody titers were determined in a competitive surrogate neutralization assay. Vero-E6 cells were infected with SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VoC), Delta (B.1.617.2), or Omicron (B.1.1.529, sub-lineage BA.1) to determine serum infection neutralization capacity. Four weeks after the fourth vaccination, serum infection neutralization capacity significantly increased from a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50, serum dilution factor 1:x) of 247.0 (46.3−1560.8) to 2560.0 (1174.0−2560.0) for the Delta VoC, and from 37.5 (20.0−198.8) to 668.5 (182.2−2560.0) for the Omicron VoC (each p < 0.001) compared to four months after the third vaccination. A significant increase in the neutralization capacity was even observed for patients with high antibody titers after three vaccinations (p < 0.001). Ten patients with SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection after the first blood sampling had by trend lower prior neutralization capacity for Omicron (p = 0.051). Our findings suggest that hemodialysis patients benefit from a fourth vaccination in particular in the light of the highly infectious SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-variants. A routinely applied four-time vaccination seems to broaden immunity against variants and would be recommended in hemodialysis patients.

A cluster of Pneumocystis infections among renal transplant recipients: molecular evidence of colonized patients as potential infectious sources of Pneumocystis jirovecii.

BACKGROUND: Eighteen renal transplant recipients (RTRs) developed Pneumocystis jirovecii infections at the renal transplantation unit of Brest University Hospital (Brest, Brittany, France) from May 2008 through April 2010, whereas no cases of P. jirovecii infection had been diagnosed in this unit since 2002. This outbreak was investigated by identifying P. jirovecii types and analyzing patient encounters. METHODS: The identification of P. jirovecii internal transcribed spacer (ITS) types was performed on P. jirovecii isolates from the 18 RTRs (12 patients with Pneumocystis pneumonia [PCP], 6 colonized patients), 22 unlinked control patients (18 patients with PCP, 4 colonized patients), and 69 patients (34 patients with PCP, 35 colonized patients) with contemporaneously diagnosed P. jirovecii infections in the Brest geographic area. A transmission map was drawn up. Its analysis was combined with the results of P. jirovecii typing. RESULTS: P. jirovecii ITS type identification was successful in 14 of 18 RTRs, 15 of 22 control patients, and 48 of the 69 patients. Type Eg was the most frequent type in the 3 patient groups. However, its frequency was significantly higher in the first patient group than in the 2 other groups (P < .05 and P < .01, respectively). Fourteen encounters between RTRs who harbored an identical type were observed. Ten patients were considered as possible index patients, of whom 3 were colonized by the fungus, and 7 presented PCP. CONCLUSIONS: The results provide to our knowledge the first data on the role of colonized patients as potential sources of P. jirovecii in a context of nosocomial acquisition of the fungus.