Safety and efficacy of losmapimod in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (ReDUX4): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy is a hereditary progressive myopathy caused by aberrant expression of the transcription factor DUX4 in skeletal muscle. No approved disease-modifying treatments are available for this disorder. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of losmapimod (a small molecule that inhibits p38α MAPK, a regulator of DUX4 expression, and p38ß MAPK) for the treatment of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial at 17 neurology centres in Canada, France, Spain, and the USA. We included adults aged 18-65 years with type 1 facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (ie, with loss of repression of DUX4 expression, as ascertained by genotyping), a Ricci clinical severity score of 2-4, and at least one skeletal muscle judged using MRI to be suitable for biopsy. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to either oral losmapimod (15 mg twice a day) or matching placebo for 48 weeks, via an interactive response technology system. The investigator, study staff, participants, sponsor, primary outcome assessors, and study monitor were masked to the treatment allocation until study closure. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to either week 16 or 36 in DUX4-driven gene expression in skeletal muscle biopsy samples, as measured by quantitative RT-PCR. The primary efficacy analysis was done in all participants who were randomly assigned and who had available data for assessment, according to the modified intention-to-treat principle. Safety and tolerability were assessed as secondary endpoints. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT04003974. The phase 2b trial is complete; an open-label extension is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between Aug 27, 2019, and Feb 27, 2020, 80 people were enrolled. 40 were randomly allocated to losmapimod and 40 to placebo. 54 (68%) participants were male and 26 (33%) were female, 70 (88%) were White, and mean age was 45·7 (SD 12·5) years. Least squares mean changes from baseline in DUX4-driven gene expression did not differ significantly between the losmapimod (0·83 [SE 0·61]) and placebo (0·40 [0·65]) groups (difference 0·43 [SE 0·56; 95% CI -1·04 to 1·89]; p=0·56). Losmapimod was well tolerated. 29 treatment-emergent adverse events (nine drug-related) were reported in the losmapimod group compared with 23 (two drug-related) in the placebo group. Two participants in the losmapimod group had serious adverse events that were deemed unrelated to losmapimod by the investigators (alcohol poisoning and suicide attempt; postoperative wound infection) compared with none in the placebo group. No treatment discontinuations due to adverse events occurred and no participants died during the study. INTERPRETATION: Although losmapimod did not significantly change DUX4-driven gene expression, it was associated with potential improvements in prespecified structural outcomes (muscle fat infiltration), functional outcomes (reachable workspace, a measure of shoulder girdle function), and patient-reported global impression of change compared with placebo. These findings have informed the design and choice of efficacy endpoints for a phase 3 study of losmapimod in adults with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy. FUNDING: Fulcrum Therapeutics.

Phase 1 clinical trial of losmapimod in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy: Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and target engagement.

AIMS: Evaluate safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and target engagement (TE) of losmapimod in blood and muscle in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). METHODS: This study included Part A: 10 healthy volunteers randomized to single oral doses of losmapimod (7.5 mg then 15 mg; n = 8) or placebo (both periods; n = 2); Part B: 15 FSHD subjects randomized to placebo (n = 3), or losmapimod 7.5 mg (n = 6) or 15 mg (n = 6); and Part C: FSHD subjects received open-label losmapimod 15 mg (n = 5) twice daily for 14 days. Biopsies were performed in FSHD subjects at baseline and Day 14 in magnetic resonance imaging-normal appearing (Part B) and affected muscle identified by abnormal short-tau inversion recovery sequence + (Part C). PK and TE, based on pHSP27:total HSP27, were assessed in muscle and sorbitol-stimulated blood. RESULTS: PK profiles were similar between healthy volunteers and FSHD subjects, with mean Cmax and AUC0-12 for 15 mg in FSHD subjects (Part B) of 85.0 ± 16.7 ng*h/mL and 410 ± 50.3 ng*h/mL, respectively. Part B and Part C PK results were similar, and 7.5 mg results were approximately dose proportional to 15 mg results. Dose-dependent concentrations in muscle (42.1 ± 10.5 ng/g [7.5 mg] to 97.2 ± 22.4 ng/g [15 mg]) were observed, with plasma-to-muscle ratio from ~0.67 to ~1 at estimated tmax of 3.5 hours postdose. TE was observed in blood and muscle. Adverse events (AEs) were mild and self-limited. CONCLUSION: Losmapimod was well tolerated, with no serious AEs. Dose-dependent PK and TE were observed. This study supports advancing losmapimod into Phase 2 trials in FSHD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trial identifier ToetsingOnline: NL68539.056.18 Nederlands Trials Register NL8000.

Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and safety of deuterated L-DOPA (SD-1077)/carbidopa compared to L-DOPA/carbidopa following single oral dose administration in healthy subjects.

AIMS: SD-1077, a selectively deuterated precursor of dopamine (DA) structurally related to L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), is under development for treatment of motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Preclinical models have shown slower metabolism of central deuterated DA. The present study investigated the peripheral pharmacokinetics (PK), metabolism and safety of SD-1077. METHODS: Plasma and urine PK of drug and metabolites and safety after a single oral 150 mg SD-1077 dose were compared to 150 mg L-DOPA, each in combination with 37.5 mg carbidopa (CD) in a double-blind, two-period, crossover study in healthy volunteers (n = 16). RESULTS: Geometric least squares mean ratios (GMRs) and 90% confidence intervals (90% CI) of SD-1077 vs. L-DOPA for Cmax , AUC0-t , and AUC0-inf were 88.4 (75.9-103.1), 89.5 (84.1-95.3), and 89.6 (84.2-95.4), respectively. Systemic exposure to DA was significantly higher after SD-1077/CD compared to that after L-DOPA/CD, with GMRs (90% CI) of 1.8 (1.45-2.24; P = 0.0005) and 2.06 (1.68-2.52; P < 0.0001) for Cmax and AUC0-t and a concomitant reduction in the ratio of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid/DA confirming slower metabolic breakdown of DA by monoamine oxidase (MAO). There were increases in systemic exposures to metabolites of catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT) reaction, 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT) and 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) with GMRs (90% CI) for SD-1077/CD to L-DOPA/CD for 3-MT exposure of 1.33 (1.14-1.56; P = 0.0077) and 1.66 (1.42-1.93; P < 0.0001) for Cmax and AUC0-t , respectively and GMRs (90% CI) for 3-OMD of 1.19 (1.15, 1.23; P < 0.0001) and 1.31 (1.27, 1.36; P < 0.0001) for Cmax and AUC0-t . SD-1077/CD exhibited comparable tolerability and safety to L-DOPA/CD. CONCLUSIONS: SD-1077/CD demonstrated the potential to prolong exposure to central DA at comparable peripheral PK and safety to the reference L-DOPA/CD combination. A single dose of SD-1077 is safe for further clinical development in Parkinson's disease patients.

Pharmacokinetic study and evaluation of the safety of taurolidine for dogs with osteosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Osteosarcoma in dogs and humans share many similarities and the dog has been described as an excellent model to study this disease. The median survival in dogs has not improved in the last 25 years. Taurolidine has been shown to be cytotoxic to canine and human osteosarcoma in vitro. The goals of this study were to determine the pharmacokinetics and safety of taurolidine in healthy dogs and the safety of taurolidine in combination with doxorubicin or carboplatin in dogs with osteosarcoma. METHODS: Two percent taurolidine was infused into six healthy dogs (150 mg/kg) over a period of two hours and blood samples were taken periodically. One dog received taurolidine with polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) as its carrier and later received PVP-free taurolidine as did all other dogs in this study. Serum taurolidine concentrations were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) online coupled to ESI-MS/MS in the multiple reaction monitoring mode. Subsequently, the same dose of taurolidine was infused to seven dogs with osteosarcoma also treated with doxorubicin or carboplatin. RESULTS: Taurolidine infusion was safe in 6 healthy dogs and there were no significant side effects. Maximum taurolidine serum concentrations ranged between 229 to 646 µM. The dog that received taurolidine with PVP had an immediate allergic reaction but recovered fully after the infusion was stopped. Three additional dogs with osteosarcoma received doxorubicin and taurolidine without PVP. Toxicities included dilated cardiomyopathy, protein-losing nephropathy, renal insufficiency and vasculopathy at the injection site. One dog was switched to carboplatin instead of doxorubicin and an additional 4 dogs with osteosarcoma received taurolidine-carboplatin combination. One incidence of ototoxicity occurred with the taurolidine- carboplatin combination. Bone marrow and gastro-intestinal toxicity did not appear increased with taurolidine over doxorubicin or carboplatin alone. CONCLUSIONS: Taurolidine did not substantially exacerbate bone marrow or gastro-intestinal toxicity however, it is possible that taurolidine increased other toxicities of doxorubicin and carboplatin. Administering taurolidine in combination with 30 mg/m2 doxorubicin in dogs is not recommended but taurolidine in combination with carboplatin (300 mg/m2) appears safe.

A pharmacokinetic and safety study of intravenous arsenic trioxide in adult cancer patients with renal impairment.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of arsenic trioxide given twice per week in adult cancer patients with advanced malignancies and varying degrees of renal function. METHODS: Patients received intravenous arsenic trioxide 0.15 mg/kg twice weekly for 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. The pharmacokinetic profiles of the pharmacologically active arsenical species, arsenious acid (As(III)), and its metabolites, monomethylarsonic acid (MMA(V)) and dimethylarsinic acid (DMA(V)), were evaluated during the first cycle for 72 h following doses on days 1 and 22. Safety assessments were made at each treatment visit. RESULTS: Twenty patients received an average of 11 doses. Compared with normal renal function, mild to severe renal impairment decreased urinary excretion of As(III) and increased exposure to MMA(V) and DMA(V) 1.4- to 8-fold after multiple dose administration. Only severe renal impairment substantially increased exposure to As(III) (AUC(0-t ) increased by 18% after a single dose and 40% after multiple doses). The safety profile of arsenic trioxide after limited treatment on a twice-per-week schedule was comparable across all renal function groups. CONCLUSION: Renal impairment did increase the systemic exposure to arsenic and its methylated metabolites following standard daily dosing of arsenic trioxide. The data from the limited number of patients with severe renal dysfunction did not suggest that severe renal impairment affected the safety profile of arsenic trioxide in cancer patients who received limited treatment with arsenic trioxide.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of thalidomide.

Thalidomide is a racemic glutamic acid derivative approved in the US for erythema nodosum leprosum, a complication of leprosy. In addition, its use in various inflammatory and oncologic conditions is being investigated. Thalidomide interconverts between the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers in plasma, with protein binding of 55% and 65%, respectively. More than 90% of the absorbed drug is excreted in the urine and faeces within 48 hours. Thalidomide is minimally metabolised by the liver, but is spontaneously hydrolysed into numerous renally excreted products. After a single oral dose of thalidomide 200 mg (as the US-approved capsule formulation) in healthy volunteers, absorption is slow and extensive, resulting in a peak concentration (C(max)) of 1-2 mg/L at 3-4 hours after administration, absorption lag time of 30 minutes, total exposure (AUC( infinity )) of 18 mg. h/L, apparent elimination half-life of 6 hours and apparent systemic clearance of 10 L/h. Thalidomide pharmacokinetics are best described by a one-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Because of the low solubility of the drug in the gastrointestinal tract, thalidomide exhibits absorption rate-limited pharmacokinetics (the 'flip-flop' phenomenon), with its elimination rate being faster than its absorption rate. The apparent elimination half-life of 6 hours therefore represents absorption, not elimination. The 'true' apparent volume of distribution was estimated to be 16L by use of the faster elimination-rate half-life. Multiple doses of thalidomide 200 mg/day over 21 days cause no change in the pharmacokinetics, with a steady-state C(max) (C(ss)(max)) of 1.2 mg/L. Simulation of 400 and 800 mg/day also shows no accumulation, with C(ss)(max) of 3.5 and 6.0 mg/L, respectively. Multiple-dose studies in cancer patients show pharmacokinetics comparable with those in healthy populations at similar dosages. Thalidomide exhibits a dose-proportional increase in AUC at doses from 50 to 400 mg. Because of the low solubility of thalidomide, C(max) is less than proportional to dose, and t(max) is prolonged with increasing dose. Age, sex and smoking have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of thalidomide, and the effect of food is minimal. Thalidomide does not alter the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives, and is also unlikely to interact with warfarin and grapefruit juice. Since thalidomide is mainly hydrolysed and passively excreted, its pharmacokinetics are not expected to change in patients with impaired liver or kidney function.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of thalidomide

Thalidomide is a racemic glutamic acid derivative approved in the US for erythema nodosum leprosum, a complication of leprosy. In addition, its use in various inflammatory and oncologic conditions in being investigated. Thalidomide interconverts between the (R)- and (S)-enantiomers in plasma, with protein binding of 55% and 65%, respectively. More than 90% of the absorbed drug is excreted in the urine and faeces within 48 hours. Thalidomide is minimally metabolised by the liver, but is spontaneously hydrolysed into numerous renally excreted products. After a single oral dose of thalidomide 200mg (as the US-approved capsule formulation) in healthy volunteers, absorption is slow and extensive, resulting in a peak concentration (Cmax) of 1-2mg/L at 3-4 hours after administration, absorption lag time of 30 minutes, total exposure (AUCoo) of 18mg - h/L, apparent elimination half-life of 6 hours and apparent systemic clearence of 10 L/H. Thalidomide pharmacokinetics are best described by a one-comportment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Because of the low solubility of the drug in the gastrointestinal tract, thalidomide exhibits absorption rate-limited pharmacolinetics (the 'flip-flop' phenomenon), with its elimination rate being faster than in absorption rate. The apparent elimination half-life of 6 hours therefore represents absorption, not elimination. The 'true' apparent volume of distribution was estimated to be 16L by use of the faster elimination-rate half-life. Multiple doses of thalidomide 200 mg/day over 21 days cause no change in the pharmacokinetics, with a steady-state Cmax (Cssmax) of 1.2 mg/L. Simulation of 400 and 800 mg/day also shows no accululation, with Css of 3.5 and 6.0 mg/L, respectively. Multiple-dose studies in cancer patients show pharmacokinetics comparable with those in healthy populations at similar dosages. Thalidomide exhibits a dose-proportional increase in AUC at doses from 50 to 400mg. Because of the low solubility of thalidomide Cmax is less than proportional to dose, and tmax is prolonged with increasing dose. Age, sex and smoking have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of thalidomide, and the effect of food is minimal. Thalidomide does not alter the pharmacokinetics of oral contraceptives, and is also unlikely to interact with warfarin and grapefruit juice. Since thalidomide is mainly hydrolysed and passively excreted, its pharmacokonetics are not expected to change in patients with impaired liver...

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of aerosolized tobramycin in cystic fibrosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe the pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of inhaled tobramycin (TOBI; Chiron Corporation; Seattle, WA), 300-mg dose, delivered by a nebulizer (PARI LC Plus; Pari Respiratory; Richmond, VA) and a compressor (Pulmo-Aide, model 5650D; DeVilbiss Health Care; Somerset, PA) in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients during the pivotal phase III trials. DESIGN: Data from two identical, 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group studies. SETTING: US sites randomized 258 patients with CF to receive tobramycin, 300 mg twice daily, in three 28-day on/28-day off treatment cycles. MEASUREMENT: Tobramycin sputum concentrations were assessed 10 min after the first and last doses were administered in the 20-week study. Serum tobramycin concentrations were assessed before and 1 h after the first and last doses had been administered. The population estimate of the apparent clearance was used to estimate the bioavailability fraction. RESULTS: The mean peak sputum concentration was 1,237 microg/g. About 95% of patients achieved sputum concentrations > 25 times the minimum inhibitory concentration of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. One hour after the dose, the mean serum concentration was 0.95 microg/mL. Tobramycin did not accumulate in the sputum or serum over the course of the study. Pharmacokinetic data were best represented by a two-compartment model with biexponential decay and slope estimates comparable to those following parenteral administration. The estimated systemic bioavailability after aerosol administration was 11.7% of the nominal dose. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of tobramycin, 300 mg bid, in a 28-day off/28-day on regimen produced low serum tobramycin concentrations, reducing the potential for systemic toxicity. High sputum concentrations ensure efficacious antibiotic levels at the site of the infection. Inhaled tobramycin significantly improved the therapeutic ratio over that of parenteral aminoglycosides.

Effect of colesevelam on lovastatin pharmacokinetics.

OBJECTIVE: To assess potential interactions of colesevelam hydrochloride and lovastatin in healthy volunteers when lovastatin alone was administered with dinner, both lovastatin and colesevelam were administered with dinner, and colesevelam was administered with dinner and lovastatin was administered 4 hours later with a snack. METHODS: A single-center, open-label, 3-period, crossover drug interaction study was performed with 22 healthy volunteers. Blood samples were collected at specified intervals before and after dosing, and plasma concentrations of lovastatin and lovastatin hydroxyacid were measured using a liquid chromatography/mass spectroscopy/mass spectroscopy method. RESULTS: Maximal concentration (Cmax), AUC from time 0 to the last time point measured (AUC0-t), and AUC0-infinity values for lovastatin were 102%, 94%, and 104%, and for lovastatin hydroxyacid were 102%, 91%, and 92%, respectively, of control values when colesevelam and lovastatin were coadministered with dinner. Administration of colesevelam with dinner and lovastatin 4 hours later with a snack resulted in a decreased Cmax and AUC0-t for lovastatin (63% and 37%, respectively; p < 0.05) and an increased Cmax and AUC0-t for lovastatin hydroxyacid (61% and 50%, respectively; p < 0.05), both compared with lovastatin alone administered with dinner. CONCLUSIONS: Colesevelam had no significant effect on lovastatin pharmacokinetics when coadministered with lovastatin at dinner. A split-dosing regimen resulted in alterations in pharmacokinetic parameters for lovastatin and lovastatin hydroxyacid that are likely due to known differences in the pharmacokinetics of lovastatin when administered to patients with meals or in a fasting state.