RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Antroduodenal manometry (ADM) measures antral and small bowel motility and is clinically used to evaluate upper gastrointestinal (UGI) symptoms. We aimed to evaluate its utility in guiding treatment, predicting response, and association with clinical findings. METHODS: Retrospective review of 200 children undergoing ADM. ADM interpretation and parameters were compared to outcomes (response to first therapy after ADM and overall response), predominant symptom (group A, abdominal distention and/or vomiting and group B, abdominal pain and/or nausea), etiology (idiopathic or with known comorbidity), and ADM indication [suspected chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (CIPO) or unexplained UGI symptoms]. RESULTS: We found an association between a normal intestinal phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC) and idiopathic etiology, group B symptoms and unexplained UGI symptoms. No variable was associated with initial successful response. However, normal small bowel phase III of the MMC and idiopathic etiology were associated with overall successful response to treatment (including feeding tolerance and weaning of parenteral nutrition). No antral ADM parameter was associated with outcomes or other comparisons. The time to overall successful treatment response was significantly shorter in patients with a normal ADM and presence of a normal phase III of the MMC. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of the phase III of the MMC was the single ADM parameter predictive of overall treatment response, also associated to group B symptoms and idiopathic etiology. Our findings suggest that small bowel ADM parameters are more useful to predict outcomes and ADM should be performed primarily in patients presenting with abdominal distention and/or vomiting and those being evaluated for CIPO.