Kidney Outcomes Following Utilization of Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System.

Introduction: Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) is an extracorporeal system combining conventional veno-venous hemodiafiltration and adsorption to provide rescue support in fulminant hepatic failure. Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with hepatic failure warranting continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT). Our primary aim was to characterize a cohort of patients who received MARS therapy and examine kidney events given the current paucity of available data. Methods: Patients initiating MARS in a tertiary care setting from January 2014 through December 2020 were assessed for treatment indications, transplantation, CKRT, kidney recovery, and death. Data was collected using the REDCAP software. Results: A total of 49 patients (67% female; 75% White) received MARS therapy with 29 patients (59%) requiring concomitant CKRT. Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was the most common indication for MARS initiation (55%). In-hospital mortality was 41% (12/29) among patients who received CKRT versus 10% (2/20) among those not requiring CKRT (relative risk [RR] 4.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.04 to 16.52, P = 0.044); this persisted following adjustment for prespecified patient characteristics (all RR ≥ 3.76, all P ≤ 0.060). One-year mortality post-MARS initiation was high overall but highest among the CKRT group (59% [17/29] vs. 25% [5/20] unadjusted RR 2.92, 95% CI 1.08 to 7.94, P = 0.035). Liver transplant after MARS occurred in 41% of patients (20/49). After CKRT, 39% of patients (9/29) recovered kidney function prior to hospital discharge. Conclusions: Patients requiring MARS frequently have AKI warranting the use of concomitant CKRT, which is associated with a high rate of in-hospital and 1-year mortality.

Kidney Transplantation and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance.

Plasma cell disorders are one of the most common hematologic malignancies. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is defined by a serum monoclonal protein <3 g/dL, bone marrow plasma cell infiltration <10%, and most importantly absence of end-organ damage. The prevalence of MGUS in general population is estimated to be 1%-4% and its frequency increases with age with 3% among people above 50 y of age. The risk of progression to clinically significant plasma cell dyscrasia is estimated to be 1% per year. With aging population and increasing use of transplantation for the management of kidney disease in older adults, MGUS is being identified during the evaluation for kidney transplant candidacy or during the postkidney transplant follow-up. MGUS in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing evaluation for kidney transplant can pose a complex management dilemma. In this article, we review the current state of knowledge about the prevalence of MGUS in ESRD population and the impact of kidney transplantation on the progression of MGUS to clinically significant plasma cell disorder. We make recommendations for the screening of ESRD patients undergoing kidney transplant evaluation and the management of MGUS after renal transplant.

Impact on urinary oxalate levels with use of ezetimibe.

Background: Calcium oxalate stones are the most common cause of nephrolithiasis in the United States. Smaller studies of <15 patients investigating ezetimibe, a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, have suggested increased urine oxalate levels with use of the drug. We attempt to better define this relationship of ezetimibe on urinary oxalate using a larger patient sample analysing multiple urine collections on and off treatment. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients from 01/2018 through 04/2019 evaluated for nephrolithiasis with use of ezetimibe documented in their medical record at Mayo Clinic Florida. Primary outcomes included increase in urinary oxalate with use of ezetimibe and reduction in urinary oxalate with discontinuation of medication. Results: Of 57 reviewed patients, 30 (53%) met inclusion criteria yielding 117 24-h urine measurements either on ezetimibe (72 measurements) or off ezetimibe (41 measurements). The mean urinary oxalate level off ezetimibe was 39.86 mg versus 40.45 mg with ezetimibe. After adjusting for age and sex, the estimated difference was 1.239 mg (95% CI, -4.856 to 7.335 mg; p = 0.93). A subset of six patients with urinary oxalate values both on and off ezetimibe showed a difference in 24-h urinary oxalate levels ranged from -16.40 to 14.95 mg (mean difference = 0.93 mg; median difference = 3.84 mg). Conclusion: Use of ezetimibe does not provide clear evidence of a difference in urinary oxalate levels.