RESUMO
When there are no precise indications or contraindications, the choice between general anaesthesia and locoregional anaesthesia is not clear-cut, especially in paediatrics where there are not enough prospective studies about the safety and main complications with the two techniques. This study aims at providing some clarification concerning this problem by outlining the practice of anaesthetics in the Children's Orthopaedic Ward of Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute which, for logistical reasons and based on past experience, was carried out by the exclusive use of general anaesthesia. The organizational aspects of pre- and post-operative management of the patients are described. In addition, the data of 836 general anaesthetics carried out in the year 2000 were recorded prospectively on a daily basis. The data included the characteristics of the patient, type of surgery, anaesthesiological methods, and intra- and postoperative complications (first 24 hours). No major complications occurred. There was a small incidence of minor complications (13,3%), which all resolved without sequelae. In the group of younger children, where the lowest number of adverse events were recorded (9,7%), halothane was prevalently used, analgesic opiates were excluded, and breathing was maintained spontaneously. The authors deem the results satisfactory with regards to safety and morbidity, and recommend that anaesthetists use the anaesthesiological methods with which they are more experienced and that are most compatible with the logistical and organisational conditions in which they must work.