Efficacy and Safety of Candidate Biosimilar CT-P43 Versus Originator Ustekinumab in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: 28-Week Results of a Randomised, Active-Controlled, Double-Blind, Phase III Study.

BACKGROUND: CT-P43 is a candidate ustekinumab biosimilar in clinical development. OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to demonstrate equivalent efficacy of CT-P43 to originator ustekinumab in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS: This double-blind, phase III trial randomised patients (1:1) to receive subcutaneous CT-P43 or originator ustekinumab (45/90 mg for patients with baseline body weight ≤ 100 kg/> 100 kg) at week 0 and week 4 in Treatment Period I. Prior to week 16 dosing in Treatment Period II, patients receiving originator ustekinumab were re-randomised (1:1) to continue originator ustekinumab or switch to CT-P43; patients initially randomised to CT-P43 continued receiving CT-P43 (at weeks 16, 28 and 40). The primary endpoint of the trial was mean per cent improvement from baseline in Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score at week 12. Equivalence was concluded if confidence intervals (CIs) for the estimate of treatment difference were within pre-defined equivalence margins: ± 10% [90% CI; modified intent-to-treat set; Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approach] or ± 15% [95% CI; full analysis set for patients only receiving 45 mg doses in Treatment Period I; European Medicines Agency (EMA) approach]. Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity endpoints were evaluated through week 52. Results to week 28 are reported here. RESULTS: In Treatment Period I, 509 patients were randomised (CT-P43: N = 256; originator ustekinumab: N = 253). The mean per cent improvement in PASI score at week12 was 77.93% and 75.89% for CT-P43 and originator ustekinumab, respectively (FDA approach); per the EMA approach, corresponding values were 78.26% and 77.33%. Estimated treatment differences were 2.05 (90% CI -0.23, 4.32) and 0.94 (95% CI -2.29, 4.16); equivalence was achieved for both sets of assumptions. Further efficacy parameters and pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity outcomes were comparable between treatment groups, including after switching from originator ustekinumab to CT-P43. CONCLUSIONS: CT-P43 demonstrated equivalent efficacy to originator ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, with comparable pharmacokinetic, safety and immunogenicity profiles. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04673786; date of registration: 17 December, 2020.

Efficacy and safety of switching from reference adalimumab to CT-P17 (100 mg/ml): 52-week randomized, double-blind study in rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of switching from reference adalimumab to adalimumab biosimilar CT-P17 with continuing reference adalimumab/CT-P17 in active RA. METHODS: This double-blind, phase III study randomized (1:1) subjects with active RA to receive 40 mg (100 mg/ml) CT-P17 or European Union-sourced reference adalimumab subcutaneously every 2 weeks (Q2W) until week (W) 24 [treatment period (TP) 1]. Thereafter, subjects receiving reference adalimumab were randomized (1:1) to continue reference adalimumab or switch to CT-P17 from W26 (both Q2W until W48; TP2). Subjects receiving CT-P17 in TP1 continued CT-P17. W0-W24 results were previously reported; we present W26-W52 findings. End points were efficacy (including joint damage progression), pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity. RESULTS: Of 607 subjects who initiated TP2 treatment, 303 continued CT-P17, 153 continued reference adalimumab and 151 switched to CT-P17. Efficacy improvements up to W24 were maintained during TP2; efficacy was comparable among groups. At W52, 20% improvement in ACR response rates were 80.5% (continued CT-P17), 77.8% (continued reference adalimumab) and 82.2% (switched to CT-P17). Joint damage progression was minimal. Mean trough serum adalimumab concentrations were similar among groups. CT-P17 and reference adalimumab safety profiles were numerically similar and switching did not affect immunogenicity. At W52, 28.4% (continued CT-P17), 27.0% (continued reference adalimumab) and 28.3% (switched to CT-P17) of subjects were anti-drug antibody-positive. CONCLUSION: Efficacy, pharmacokinetics, safety and immunogenicity of CT-P17 and reference adalimumab were comparable after 1 year of treatment, including after switching from reference adalimumab to CT-P17. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03789292.

Efficacy and safety of biosimilar CT-P17 versus reference adalimumab in subjects with rheumatoid arthritis: 24-week results from a randomized study.

BACKGROUND: To demonstrate equivalent efficacy of the proposed high-concentration (100 mg/ml), citrate-free adalimumab biosimilar CT-P17 to European Union-approved adalimumab (EU-adalimumab) in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: This randomized, double-blind phase III study ( ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03789292) randomized (1:1) subjects with active RA at 52 centers to receive CT-P17 or EU-adalimumab 40 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks until week 52. Results to week 24 are reported here. The primary endpoint was 20% improvement by American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) response rate at week 24. Equivalence was concluded if the corresponding confidence intervals (CIs) for the estimate of treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins: - 15 to 15% (95% CI; European Medicines Agency assumption); - 12 to 15% (90% CI; Food and Drug Administration assumption). Additional efficacy, pharmacokinetic, usability, safety, and immunogenicity endpoints were evaluated. RESULTS: 648 subjects were randomized (324 CT-P17; 324 EU-adalimumab). The ACR20 response rate at week 24 was 82.7% (n = 268/324) in both groups (intention-to-treat population). The 95% CI (- 5.94 to 5.94) and 90% CI (- 4.98 to 4.98) were within predefined equivalence margins for both assumptions and equivalent efficacy was concluded. Additional endpoints and overall safety were comparable between groups. Mean trough serum concentrations of CT-P17 were slightly higher than those of EU-adalimumab. Immunogenicity was slightly lower numerically for the CT-P17 group than for the EU-adalimumab group. CONCLUSIONS: CT-P17 and EU-adalimumab have equivalent efficacy and comparable safety and immunogenicity in subjects with active RA. Overall safety of CT-P17 is consistent with the known safety profile of reference adalimumab. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03789292 . Registered 28 December 2018-retrospectively registered.

Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous CT-P13 in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized phase I/III trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess non-inferiority of s.c. to i.v. CT-P13 in RA. METHODS: Patients with active RA and inadequate response to MTX participated in this phase I/III double-blind study at 76 sites. Patients received CT-P13 i.v. 3 mg/kg [week (W) 0 and W2] before randomization (1:1) at W6 to CT-P13 s.c. via pre-filled syringe (PFS) 120 mg biweekly until W28, or CT-P13 i.v. 3 mg/kg every 8 weeks until W22. Randomization was stratified by country, W2 serum CRP and W6 body weight. From W30, all patients received CT-P13 s.c. In a usability sub-study, patients received CT-P13 s.c. via auto-injector (W46-54) then PFS (W56-64). The primary endpoint was change (decrease) from baseline in disease activity score in 28 joints (DAS28)-CRP at W22 (non-inferiority margin: -0.6). RESULTS: Of 357 patients enrolled, 343 were randomized to CT-P13 s.c. (n = 167) or CT-P13 i.v. (n = 176) at W6. The least-squares mean change (decrease) from baseline (standard error) in DAS28-CRP at W22 was 2.21 (0.22) for CT-P13 s.c. (n = 162) and 1.94 (0.21) for CT-P13 i.v. [n = 168; difference 0.27 (95% CI: 0.02, 0.52)], establishing non-inferiority. Efficacy findings were similar between arms at W54. Safety was similar between arms throughout: 92 (54.8%; CT-P13 s.c.) and 117 (66.9%; CT-P13 i.v.) patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (from W6). There were no treatment-related deaths or new safety findings. Usability was similar for CT-P13 s.c. via auto-injector or PFS. CONCLUSION: CT-P13 s.c. was non-inferior to CT-P13 i.v. in active RA. The convenience of s.c. administration could benefit patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03147248.

[Influence of genetic factors on development and severity of rheumatoid arthritis--part I]. / Wplyw czynników genetycznych na rozwój i ciezkosc przebiegu reumatoidalnego zapalenia stawów--czesc I.

Both genetic and environmental factors affect susceptibility, severity and probably drugs' efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). After initial completion of the Human Genome Project on the 16th February 2001, significant progress has been made in identifying other than HLA genome regions linked to the increased RA susceptibility. As an effect several new genes have been recognized as an HLA-independent genetic risk factors of RA. PTPN22 gene polymorphism, C5/TRAF1 genes region polymorphism and TNFAIP3-OLIG3 genes region polymorphism(s) are among newly identified and already confirmed genetic risk factors, whereas STAT 4, CTLA4, PADI4 and IRF5 genes polymorphisms are listed among probable RA development genetic risk factors.

[Influence of genetic factors on development and severity of rheumatoid arthritis--part II]. / Wplyw czynników genetycznych na rozwój i ciezkosc przebiegu reumatoidalnego zapalenia stawów--czesc II.

In our previous paper we have presented recent advances in the knowledge of the genetic risk factors predisposing to rheumatoid arthritis development. In contrast to the progress that has been made in identification of genes responsible for susceptibility to RA, there is still little known about genetic risk factors of the more aggressive and (or) refractory RA. In this part of our review we present a detailed knowledge of the role of genetic factors in severity of RA. Gene polymorphisms of the TNF-alpha gene (-238G/A, -308G/A, +489G/ A), IL-1beta gene (-11C/T, +3953C/T), IL-4 gene (-590C/T), MMP genes (-1607 ins1G/del2G, -1612 ins/del A) and TRAF1/C5 genes region (rs 10818488) are among the most intensively investigated HLA independent genetic risk factors of the severe course of RA.

Does low-dose and short-term glucocorticoids treatment increase the risk of osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis female patients?

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is frequently complicated by peri-articular and generalized osteoporosis due to increased bone resorption by activated osteoclasts. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-alpha, interleukin 1 (IL1), and interleukin 6 (IL6) are thought, among other factors, to be directly responsible for this extra-articular complication of RA. Glucocorticoids (GCS) commonly prescribed in RA due to their strong anti-inflammatory effect are also well known for causing secondary osteoporosis during a prolonged use. An influence of low-dose GCS therapy (8.7 mg per day) on a bone turnover in female RA patients with or without previous history of GCS treatment was investigated by measuring bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and various biochemical markers of inflammation and bone metabolism in comparison to results obtained from: (1) RA patients who have not been treated with GCS and (2) the control group of healthy individuals. Sixty-two female patients with established active RA and 178 healthy individuals from the control group have been investigated. The RA patients were divided into three groups: 21 treated with GCS before the trial--these patients have continued GCS therapy using low doses during the observation; 21 with low-dose GCS therapy launched at the beginning of the trial; and 20 left without GCS treatment. All patients have been assessed twice: at the beginning and after 12 months of observation. BMC and BMD have been measured in all patients in a distal part of forearm. Additionally, several different biochemical markers of osteoporosis and inflammation have been determined. We did not notice any increase in bone metabolism between RA patients receiving GCS therapy for the first time and those treated without GCS after 12 months of observation. Results of BMC, BMD osteocalcin level, total and bone alkaline phosphatase, carboxy-terminal collagen cross links, carboxy-terminal propeptides of type 1 collagen, deoxypyridynoline, and calcium/creatinine ratio were comparable in both groups at the end of the study. There was a significant decrease of the level of IL-6 in patients who had GCS therapy launched at the beginning of observation (p<0.01). However, levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and alpha1-acid-glycoprotein (AGP) have not changed; the level of ESR dropped significantly (p<0.05) in this group. In contrast, in the group of patients with the previous history of prolonged GCS treatment receiving low doses of GCS during the trial, statistically significant increase of CRP and AGP could be observed (p<0.05) along with further significant worsening of the primary low BMD (p<0.05). Based on the obtained data, we came to the conclusion that anti-inflammatory effect of the low-dose GCS therapy in RA patients without previous history of their use may balance their direct negative effect on BMC and BMD. In this group of RA patients, benefits resulting from the 12-month GCS therapy prevail over adverse effects, even if calcium with vitamin D3 supplementation, biphosphonians, or estrogens have not been introduced. On the other hand, low-dose GCS therapy could have no benefit for RA patients with the previous history of their prolonged use, as a rise of markers of inflammation and bone turnover, resulting in the further bone loss, has been observed.

[Cyclophosphamide in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis and its complications]. / Rola cyklofosfamidu w leczeniu reumatoidalnego zapalenia stawów i jego powiklan.

Cyclophosphamide has been used in the therapy of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for nearly fifty years. An experience gathered throughout that time helped to identify indications, profits, restrictions and side effects related to its use. As a result of the progress in RA therapy in the recent years, including introduction of anti - TNF alpha therapy, the importance of cyclophosphamide significantly decreased. However, despite all restrictions related to its use, there are still RA patients for whom cyclophosphamide can be considered as a first choice drug. In this article we review the current knowledge on the issue.

[Amyloidosis--life threatening complication in rheumatoid arthritis patients]. / Skrobiawica--zagrazajace zyciu powiklanie u chorych na reumatoidalne zapalenie stawów.

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic, inflammatory, autoimmune disease leading to severe disability. A secondary amyloidosis (AA amyloidosis) affecting RA patient is a life threatening clinical complication of the illness. The most common symptoms of secondary amyloidosis include: proteinuria, erythrocyturia, abdominal pain and chronic diarrhoea. It is essential to carry out regular screening tests, especially abdominal fat tissue biopsy, to early diagnose and properly manage patients with the condition. Effective anti-inflammatory therapy of RA and eradication of coexisting infections seem to be the best way to decrease the risk of development and prevent progression of the secondary amyloidosis.