Are elevated systemic bile acids involved in the pathophysiology of sarcopenia and liver injury following gastric bypass?

Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective treatment for sustained weight loss in severe obesity. However, recent data describe the development of liver damage and in particular massive steatosis and cholangitis in some patients, for which certain pathophysiological mechanisms are suggested such as bacterial overgrowth, malabsorption or sarcopenia. We describe the case of a patient presenting with a new liver dysfunction 6 years after a gastric bypass. The work-up revealed sarcopenic obesity characterised by low muscle mass and low muscle function as well as elevated fasting bile acids, severe liver steatosis and cholangitis. The pathophysiology of this disease is complex and multifactorial but could include bile acid toxicity. Bile acids are increased in cases of liver steatosis, but also in cases of gastric bypass and malnutrition. In our opinion, they may contribute to the loss of muscle mass and the vicious circle observed in this situation. Treatment with enteral feeding, intravenous albumin supplementation and diuretics reversed the liver dysfunction and the patient was discharged from hospital.

Comparison between abdominal fat measured by CT and anthropometric indices as prediction factors for mortality and morbidity after colorectal surgery.

AIM: This study aims to determine which anthropometric (body mass index (BMI), waist-hip-ratio (WHR) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR)) and radiological (visceral fat area (VFA) measured by CT scan) measurements of adiposity correlated better with postoperative outcome of colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. We also assessed which of these measurements best predicted overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). METHODS: Data from 90 consecutive Caucasian CRC patients who underwent surgery for colorectal cancer between 2010 and 2011 with a median follow-up of 53.25 months were analysed. The correlations of different adiposity measurements and postoperative outcomes were determined using logistic regression models and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Higher WHtR (p = 0.007) and VFA (p = 0.01) significantly increased the risk of overall morbidity, especially of Clavien-Dindo III or IV. The WHtR correlated best with VFA (p <0.0001), which is considered the gold standard for measuring visceral fat, whereas BMI (p = 0.15) was not a good predictor of postoperative morbidity. Multivariate analyses showed consistently significant results for postoperative complications for VFA in combination with all of the other variables analysed and for WHtR, confirming that VFA and WHtR were reliable independent prognostic factors of morbidity. VFA had a significant effect on OS (p = 0.012) but did not correlate with DFS (p = 0.51). CONCLUSIONS: Both VFA and WHtR independently provided predictive data for potential postoperative complications after CRC surgery. In case CT scan was used for diagnostic purposes, VFA should be used in routine clinical practice.

Mesenteric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: MRI and CT imaging correlated to anatomical pathology.

Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare tumor, classified by WHO of intermediate biological potential with tendency for local recurrence and small risk for distant metastasis. Histologically IMT is a mixture of inflamma- tory cells and myofibroblastic spindle cells proliferation. To our knowledge there is no MRI description of mesenteric IMT in the literature. We would like to emphasize the correlation between medical imaging and anatomical pathology based on our experience of a mesenteric IMT in a 28-year-old patient.

[Reticence to vaccination: an approach to the phenomenon through a literature review]. / Les réticences à la vaccination: approche du phénomène à travers les données de la littérature.

Although it exists since vaccination appeared, reticence towards vaccination seems to be increasing. Through a literature review, this article first analyses the reasons for this reticence. The decline of infectious diseases leads to greater attention to side effects of vaccines; on the other hand, the social evolution leads patients to search for zero risk in different aspects of life. Suspiciousness towards the State and the influence of media emphasizing potential deleterious effects of each vaccine are additional phenomena explaining people's hesitations. Anti-vaccination movements using Internet to disseminate their ideas are also responsible. Secondly, the article aims at assessing the public opinion about vaccination. It is still predominantly positive, even if questions remain. A typology of four patients' profiles based on statistical results is proposed. Finally, after having examined the medical doctors' opinion concerning vaccination, this article ends with some pieces of advice on how to deal with vaccination in the patient-doctor relationship.

[Evaluation of the vaccine coverage of the general practitioners in the French Community]. / Evaluation de la couverture vaccinale des médecins généralistes en Communauté Française et en Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.

The present inter-University study aims to analyze the vaccine statute of the Belgian French-speaking general practionners and the reasons of their possible non-vaccination. A questionnaire with an exhaustive list of vaccines was sent by postal way to a random sample of thousand two hundred and twenty general practitioners. The results were analyzed via SPSS 13. The rate of answer is 60.83%. Two thirds of the doctors (67%) considered themselves in order of vaccination anti-influenza. A majority of doctors (59.7%) is vaccinated systematically each year. The majority of the doctors (83%) considered themselves in antitetanus order of vaccination. Two thirds (67%) think that the vaccine protects from 5 to 10 years. Nearly 73% of the doctors considered themselves in order of vaccination against hepatitis B. More than 50% of the doctors received a vaccine HBV since less than 10 years. The majority of the doctors (79.2%) made a blood control of their protection after vaccination HBV Almost half of the doctors thinks that the vaccine protect for life, 23% from 10 to 20 years and 14% from 5 to 10 years. Two thirds (67%) of the doctors did not make a vaccine against rubella. In 80% of the cases vaccination dated from more than 20 years. In nearly two thirds of the cases the doctors did not make blood control of their protection. Nearly 60% of the questioned doctors think that vaccination offers a protection to life. About half of the doctors did not consider themselves in order of vaccination against the whooping-cough. In three quarter of the cases last vaccination dated from more than 20 years. The two principal durations of protection of the vaccine are with life and between 10 and 20 years. Three quarters of the questioned doctors are considered in order of vaccination against the poliomyelitis. However in 62% of the cases the last vaccine goes up with more than 20 years. More two thirds of the doctors think than the vaccine protects with life or from 10 to 20 years. Two thirds of doctors considered themselves in order of vaccination against the diphteria. For a third of the doctors the vaccine dated from less than 5 years, in more than one quarter of the cases to more than 20 years like between 5 and 10 years. About half of the doctors said they were vaccinated against other pathologies: hepatitis A (34.5%), the yellow fever (21.1%), the thyphoid fever (12.5%), the BCG (8.9%), the pneumococcus (6.6%), meningitis and variola (5%). In the French Community, the vaccine coverage of the general practitioners against the influenza (67%), tetanus (83%) and hepatitis B (73%) is, in this study, higher or equal to the other Belgian and international studies but remains insufficient. A bad vaccine coverage is observed concerning rubella, the whooping-cough, the poliomyelitis. The answers over the durations of protection of the vaccines are rather disparate and show a bad knowledge of these durations and diagrams of vaccination. An update of this knowledge could be carried out during the continuous medical trainings.

Recommendations for the use of the 23-valent polysaccharide pneumococcal vaccine in adults: a Belgian consensus report.

A multidisciplinary expert panel, appointed by the High Council for Public Health, evaluated the scientific evidence on which the recommendations for the appropriate use of the pneumococcal vaccine was based and reviewed the studies that became available since previous reports. The conclusions of the working group, presented in this manuscript, resulted in an update of the Belgian recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination.