Clear amniotic fluid aspiration syndrome: A novel description of an old entity.

BACKGROUND: Clear amniotic fluid aspiration syndrome (CAF-AS) is a very rare event occurring in 0.25% of our term clear amniotic fluids deliveries. The study's aims were: 1. to characterize the risk factors and outcomes associated with Clear Amniotic Fluid Aspiration Syndrome and 2. to compare the outcomes of Clear Amniotic Fluid Aspiration to Meconium Aspiration. METHODS: This was an observational study over a 22-year period in a single level-3 medical center. Compared were parturient/labor characteristics and neonatal outcomes in cases with suspected Clear Amniotic Fluid Aspiration to cases suspected for Meconium Aspiration. RESULTS: Out of 79,620 term deliveries there were 66,705 (83.8%) clear amniotic fluids and 12,915 (16.2%) meconium stained amniotic fluid (MSAF). Of neonates born with clear amniotic fluid, 166 (0.25%) were diagnosed with Clear Amniotic Fluid Aspiration Syndrome (CAF-AS), while 202 (15.7%) of those born with MSAF, were diagnosed with aspiration syndrome (MSAF-AS). Both conditions had comparable rates of mild manifestation (67.5% vs 69.2%, p = 0.63). Persistent pulmonary hypertension (PPH) occurred 5 times less in CAF-AS than MSAF-AS (4% vs 20%, OR 0.17, P< 0.0001) Both conditions presented similar rates of surfactant without PPH (11.1% vs 13.4%, p = 0.87). There was 1 postnatal death in CAF-AS vs 10 in MSAF. CONCLUSION: CAF-AS were quantitatively quite similar in terms of need of actual active intervention of the neonatologists in the delivery room (166 vs 202, i.e. in terms of numbers of cases and not prevalence) to MSAF-AS.We identified in these cases two major specific causes: hyperkinetic explosive deliveries in multiparas and long-lasting episodes of maternal hypotension due to epidural/spinal anaesthesia during labor. Out of 140 million births per year in the world, it should be of concern that 3 million cases are neglected nowadays. Future studies should evaluate if this CAF-AS should benefit from a more active intervention such as immediate endotracheal suction at birth, this clear fluid being very easy to suction.

Urinary protein to creatinine ratio during the first month of life in very preterm infants-a prospective cohort study (PROTIPREMA).

BACKGROUND: Preterm infants have physiological proteinuria and values of urine protein to creatinine ratio (UPr/Cr) are higher compared to full-term infants during the first week of life. Few investigations explored the changes of proteinuria in very preterm infants (VPI, ≤ 31 weeks of gestation) older than a week, and it is unclear whether high and persistent proteinuria is associated with kidney injury in this population. This study aimed to (1) observe the changes of UPr/Cr during the first month of life in VPI and (2) describe clinical and biological variables associated with the changes of UPr/Cr. METHODS: Spot urine samples for UPr/Cr were collected on the first day of life (DOL1) and then on DOL2-3, DOL5-6, second week of life (WOL2), WOL3, and WOL4 in VPI cared for in a third-level NICU. We tested the relationship of UPr/Cr with perinatal variables and diseases. RESULTS: A total of 1140 urine samples were obtained for 190 infants. UPr/Cr values (mg/mmol) (median with interquartile) at DOL1, DOL2, DOL3, WOL2, WOL3, and WOL4 were, respectively, 191 (114-399), 226 (152-319), 225 (156-350), 282 (200-488), 308 (188-576), and 325 (175-664). At the multivariate analysis, lower gestational age (GA) and increasing postnatal age were the only variables significantly associated with higher UPr/Cr values (p < 0.001). There was wide intra- and interindividual variability in UPr/Cr, especially in infants with higher GA and clinical stability. CONCLUSIONS: In VPI, UPr/Cr is higher at lower GA and increases with advancing postnatal age. High persistent proteinuria is not associated with clinical and biological variables reflecting kidney injury during the first month of life. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Distribution of proteinuria- and albuminuria-to-creatinine ratios in preterm newborns.

BACKGROUND: Urine protein assessment is important when glomerular disease or injury is suspected. Normal values of proteinuria already published for preterm newborns suffer from limitation, with small cohorts of patients. This prospective study was conducted to update the urine total protein- and albumin-to-creatinine ratio values. METHODS: Urine samples were collected from 231 preterm newborns within the first 48 h (D0-1) and/or between 72-120 h of life (D3-4). Total protein, albumin, and creatinine were measured, their distribution and upper-limit values determined. RESULTS: At D0-1 and D3-4, respectively, the median for the total protein-to-creatinine ratio were 80 and 107 mg/mmol (upper-limit values 223 and 289 mg/mmol) in the whole studied population, 149 and 214 mg/mmol in children born before 29 weeks of gestational age, 108 and 130 mg/mmol in those born between 29 and 33 weeks, and 61 and 93 mg/mmol in those born after 33 weeks. For the albumin-to-creatinine ratio, the median were 12 and 17 mg/mmol (upper-limit values 65 and 62 mg/mmol) in the whole studied population, 22 and 50 mg/mmol in children born before 29 weeks, 21 mg/mmol in those born between 29 and 33 weeks, and 8 and 12 mg/mmol in those born after 33 weeks. The use of nephrotoxic drugs and mechanical ventilation seems to influence proteinuria and albuminuria values. CONCLUSIONS: We report distribution of proteinuria- and albuminuria-to-creatinine in preterm newborns, including the upper-limit values. These values should be taken into account in the detection and diagnosis of glomerular disease and/or injury in daily clinical practice. Graphical abstract.

Stress: A Factor Explaining the Gap Between Simulated and Clinical Procedure Success.

BACKGROUND: Stress may impair the success of procedures in emergency medicine. The aims were to assess residents' stress during simulated and clinical lumbar punctures (LPs) and to explore the correlation of stress and performance. METHODS: A prospective study (2013-2016) was carried out in a pediatric emergency department. A mastery training and subsequently a just-in-time training were conducted immediately preceding each clinical LP. Stress was self-assessed by the Stress-O-Meter scale (0-10). Performance (checklist 0-6 points) and success rate (cerebrospinal fluid with <1000 red blood cells/mm3) were recorded by a trained supervisor. A survey explored self-confidence and potential causes of stress. RESULTS: Thirty-three residents performed 35 LPs. There was no stress during simulation procedure. Stress levels significantly increased for clinical procedure (P < 0.0001). Performance was similar in simulation and in clinic (respectively, 5.50 ± 0.93 vs 5.42 ± 0.83; P = 0.75). Success significantly decreased during clinical LP (P < 0.0001). The 2 most reported stress-related factors were fear of technical errors and personal fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Performance scores and success rates in simulation are insufficient to predict success in clinical situations. Stress level and stress-related factors (fear of technical errors and personal fatigue) might be different in simulated or real conditions and consequently impact success of a technical procedure even if a high-performance score is recorded.