Evaluating COVID-19 Response Within a Tribal Health Care Organization.

INTRODUCTION: Health care organizations of all types have adapted in response to COVID-19. Responding to the pandemic has varied across organizations and there are few standardized frameworks from which to evaluate an organizational response. This article reports COVID-19 responses by a tribal health care organization using a synthesized evaluation framework that integrated the organizational values and allowed for timely implementation of responses during this COVID-19 public health emergency. METHODS: The authors categorized each COVID-19 response into six domains, including leadership practices, patient engagement, operations management, teamwork and communication, public health, and external partnerships. Responses were analyzed by domain and across time. RESULTS: COVID-19 responses included medical alerts, modifying delivery of care, establishing testing and vaccination sites, additional benefits for employees, as well as new processes for communication between employees and senior leadership. COVID-19 responses were most frequently categorized into the operation management domain (80%). Many responses, especially those that considered patients, employees, and the community, also fit other domains. DISCUSSION: Operation management was the most frequent domain because the pandemic emerged rapidly and required swift, agile, action-oriented responses from the tribal health care organization. The majority of COVID-19 responses involved multiple, not single, domains. CONCLUSION: Our evaluation approach captured areas of importance to the tribal health organization and may be pertinent for other indigenous organizations and rural communities. It is especially important to consider tribal perspectives in response to COVID-19 because of the prior history with Western medicine and infectious diseases, and health care limitations experienced due to rurality.

Depression management interests among Alaska Native and American Indian adults in primary care.

BACKGROUND: Depression remains the second leading cause of disability worldwide. Symptoms of depression are expressed and experienced differently across cultural groups, impacting treatment decisions. Patient preferences predict service utilization, treatment selection and persistence, as well as health outcomes for medical and behavioral health conditions, including depression. We identified depression management preferences of Alaska Native and American Indian (AN/AI) people who receive care within a comprehensive, integrated, tribally owned and operated healthcare facility in Anchorage, Alaska. METHODS: Adult AN/AI patients who screened positive for depression (10 or greater on the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9)) completed a culturally-tailored decision-support tool to assess their depression management interests. RESULTS: The 125 eligible patients, who screened positive for depression, preferred counseling and medications to peer support groups, herbal remedies, and spiritual support. Those 18-39 years of age were more likely to prefer medications and less likely to prefer spirituality and peer support than those 40 years of age and older. Patients with moderate and severe depression were more likely to prefer exercise, healthy eating, and stress reduction than individuals with mild depression. LIMITATIONS: Women comprised 78% of the sample. Responses may not adequately represent the views of men. CONCLUSIONS: Counseling and medications should consistently be made available earlier in the course of depression management. Patient interest in exercise, stress reduction, and healthy eating to manage depression, especially among those with moderate and severe depression, offers opportunity for additional collaboration in an integrated care setting.