Intrathoracic Lymph Node Microcalcifications are Associated With a High Prevalence of Malignancy and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement: The "Calce" Study.

BACKGROUND: Microcalcifications are acknowledged as a malignancy risk factor in multiple cancers. However, the prevalence and association of intrathoracic lymph node (ILN) calcifications with malignancy remain unexplored. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we enrolled patients with known/suspected malignancy and an indication for endosonography for diagnosis or ILN staging. We assessed the prevalence and pattern of calcified ILNs and the prevalence of malignancy in ILNs with and without calcifications. In addition, we evaluated the genomic profile and PD-L1 expression in lung cancer patients, stratifying them based on the presence or absence of ILN calcifications. RESULTS: A total of 571 ILNs were sampled in 352 patients. Calcifications were detected in 85 (24.1%) patients and in 94 (16.5%) ILNs, with microcalcifications (78/94, 83%) being the predominant type. Compared with ILNs without calcifications (214/477, 44.9%), the prevalence of malignancy was higher in ILNs with microcalcifications (73/78, 93.6%; P<0.0001) but not in those with macrocalcifications (7/16, 43.7%; P=0.93). In patients with lung cancer, the high prevalence of metastatic involvement in ILNs displaying microcalcifications was independent of lymph node size (< or >1 cm) and the clinical stage (advanced disease; cN2/N3 disease; cN0/N1 disease). The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement was significantly more prevalent in patients with than in those without calcified ILNs (17.4% vs. 1.7%, P<0.001), and all of them exhibited microcalcifications. CONCLUSION: ILN microcalcifications are common in patients undergoing endosonography for suspected malignancy, and they are associated with a high prevalence of metastatic involvement and ALK rearrangement.

Radiation Principles, Protection and Reporting for Interventional Pulmonology.

The use and availability of diverse advanced X-ray based imaging and guidance systems in the field of interventional pulmonology is rapidly growing. This popularity links inextricably to an increase in ionizing radiation use. Knowing ionizing radiation is hazardous, knowledge and competent use of X-ray imaging and guidance systems are important. The globally implemented As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) principle demands careful attention to minimizing radiation exposure while achieving the precise goals of the intervention and imaging therein. To allow careful and targeted weighing of risk against reward while using X-ray based equipment, proper background knowledge of physics as well as imaging system aspects are needed. This white paper summarizes the principles of ionizing radiation which are crucial to enhance awareness and interpretation of dosimetric quantities. Consecutively, a consensus on standards for reporting radiation exposure in interventional pulmonology procedures is indicated to facilitate comparisons between different systems, approaches and results. Last but not least, it provides a list of practical measures, considerations and tips to optimize procedural imaging as well as reduce radiation dose to patients and staff.

World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (WABIP) guidelines on airway stenting for malignant central airway obstruction.

Malignant Central Airway Obstruction (MCAO) encompasses significant and symptomatic narrowing of the central airways that can occur due to primary lung cancer or metastatic disease. Therapeutic bronchoscopy is associated with high technical success and symptomatic relief and includes a wide range of airway interventions including airway stents. Published literature suggests that stenting practices vary significantly across the world primarily due to lack of guidance. This document aims to address this knowledge gap by addressing relevant questions related to airway stenting in MCAO. An international group of 17 experts from 17 institutions across 11 countries with experience in using airway stenting for MCAO was convened as part of this guideline statement through the World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (WABIP). We performed a literature and internet search for reports addressing six clinically relevant questions. This guideline statement, consisting of recommendations addressing these six PICO questions, was formulated by a systematic and rigorous process involving the evaluation of published evidence, augmented with expert experience when necessary. Panel members participated in the development of the final recommendations using the modified Delphi technique.

Diagnostic yield of cone beam CT based navigation bronchoscopy in patients with metastatic lesions: A propensity score matched case-control study.

BACKGROUND: Cone beam CT based Navigation Bronchoscopy (CBCT-NB) has predominantly been investigated as a diagnostic tool in (suspected) primary lung cancers. Small metastatic lesions are clinically considered more challenging to diagnose, but no study has explored the yield of navigation bronchoscopy in patients with pulmonary metastatic lesions (ML) compared to primary lung cancers (PL), correcting for known lesion characteristics affecting diagnostic yield. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, propensity score-matched case-control study. We matched a subset of patients who underwent CBCT-NB and received a final diagnosis of pulmonary metastases of solid tumors between December 2017 and 2021 against confirmed primary lung cancer lesions subjected to CBCT-NB in the same time period. The lesions were propensity score matched based on known characteristics affecting yield, including location (upper lobe, lower lobe), size, bronchus sign, and lesion solidity. RESULTS: Fifty-six metastatic pulmonary lesions (mean size 14.7 mm) were individually case-matched to a selection of 297 available primary lung cancer lesions. Case-matching revealed non-significant differences in navigation success rate (PL: 89.3 % vs. ML: 82.1 %, 95%CI on differences: -21.8 to +7.5) and yield (PL: 60.7 % vs. ML: 55.4 %, 95%CI on differences: -25.4 to +14.7). The overall complication rate was comparable (5.4 % in PL vs. 5,4 % in ML). CONCLUSION: After matching primary and metastatic lesions based on CT assessable lesions characteristics, CBCT-NB showed no clinically relevant or significantly different navigation success or yield in either group. We recommend a careful assessment of CT characteristics to determine procedural difficulty rather than selecting based on the suspicion of lesion origin.