Thrombophilic risk factors in hemodialysis: Association with early vascular access occlusion and patient survival in long-term follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: Thrombophilic risk factors (TRFs) occur rather frequently in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, little is known about their significance in HD patients, besides their potential impact on arteriovenous (AV) access failure, with varying results. We examined the effects of a wide variety of TRFs on both early AV fistula occlusion and survival among HD patients in long-term follow-up. METHODS: In this single-center, observational study, 70 consecutive HD patients from our dialysis center were examined with respect to shunt occlusion within the first 2 years after fistula creation and patient survival in a long-term follow-up (at least 16 years). We examined the presence of factor V, prothrombin, and MTHFR mutations using real-time fluorescence polymerase chain reaction. Furthermore, antithrombin (AT), protein C, protein S, and antiphospholipid antibodies (APL-Abs) were assessed. RESULTS: Among the 70 patients, 32 had MTHFR mutations, 10 had heterozygous factor V Leiden mutations, 4 had prothrombin mutations, 4 had protein S deficiency, 2 had protein C deficiency, 9 had AT deficiency, and 14 had APL-Abs. 40 patients had shunt occlusion. TRFs were associated with a significantly increased risk for shunt thrombosis (P<0.02). Kaplan-Meier analysis with a log-rank test revealed significantly shorter survival in HD patients with TRFs (P<0.02). Cox regression analysis showed that the presence of TRFs (P<0.05; hazard ratio, 1.94; 95% CI: 1.07-3.56), but not early shunt occlusion, was associated with short patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: TRFs in hemodialysis patients have a strong impact on patient survival and early AV fistula failure; however, patient survival is not significantly affected by early shunt occlusion.

Impaired immune defense in hemodialysis patients: role of α-defensins?

The mechanisms underlying the impaired immune response in hemodialysis (HD) patients are not completely understood. The α-defensins human neutrophil peptides-1, 2, and 3 are low molecular weight peptides with antimicrobial activity and important effector molecules of innate immune responses. We now examined the expression of these peptides in HD patients. Seventy-six patients on chronic HD treatment (mean time on HD 5.8 years; mean age 70 years) were studied and compared with 38 healthy volunteers and 20 patients with infections and normal renal function. Expression of α-defensins was analyzed semiquantitatively in leukocytes on the messenger RNA (mRNA) level by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction; the α-defensin protein levels in serum were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. α-Defensin concentrations (140 ± 10.5 ng/mL; mean ± standard error of the mean) as well as mRNA levels in leukocytes (82.9 ± 7.9 arbitrary units [a.u.]) in HD patients were not significantly different from those in healthy volunteers (156 ± 15.2 ng/mL; 81.4 ± 11.3 a.u.). Defensin levels were independent of the time of the patient on HD and their age. During infection periods (mean increase of the C-reactive protein to 161 ± 17.3 mg/L), defensin serum levels increased to 321 ± 65 ng/mL (P < 0.005) and mRNA expression in leukocytes to 159 ± 19.2 a.u. (P < 0.05). These increases were not significantly different from those in patients with normal renal function (298 ± 46.8 ng/mL and 128 ± 9.1 a.u., respectively) suffering from infections (C-reactive protein 222 ± 26.6 mg/L). Our results suggest that the impaired immune defense in dialysis patients is not due to a deficiency in α-defensins in these patients as neither basal levels nor expression during infections were reduced compared with subjects with normal renal function.