Defining accurate terminology for post-injury weightbearing instructions - a multidisciplinary, nationally approved consensus policy.

Aims: Weightbearing instructions after musculoskeletal injury or orthopaedic surgery are a key aspect of the rehabilitation pathway and prescription. The terminology used to describe the weightbearing status of the patient is variable; many different terms are used, and there is recognition and evidence that the lack of standardized terminology contributes to confusion in practice. Methods: A consensus exercise was conducted involving all the major stakeholders in the patient journey for those with musculoskeletal injury. The consensus exercise primary aim was to seek agreement on a standardized set of terminology for weightbearing instructions. Results: A pre-meeting questionnaire was conducted. The one-day consensus meeting, including patient representatives, identified three agreed terms only to be used in defining the weightbearing status of the patient: 1) non-weightbearing; 2) limited weightbearing; and 3) unrestricted weightbearing. Conclusion: This study represents the first and only exercise in standardizing rehabilitation terminology in orthopaedics, as agreed by all major stakeholders in the patient pathway and the patients themselves. The standardization of language allows for higher-quality and more accurate research to be conducted, and is one small part of the bigger picture in increasing the mobility of patients after orthopaedic injury or surgery.

The feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of early weight bearing in humeral fractures - a scoping review.

PURPOSE: Non-weight bearing is often recommended after humeral fractures. This review aims to summarise the extent and nature of the evidence for the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of early weight bearing (EWB) in people with humeral fractures, treated operatively or non-operatively. . METHODS: Data sources identified published (PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL) and unpublished (ClinicalTrials.gov, CENTRAL, NIHR Open Research, OpenGrey) literature. Independent data extraction was conducted by two reviewers. RESULTS: 13 901 records were retrieved. Ten studies, involving 515 post-operative patients and 351 healthcare professionals, were included. EWB was found to be feasible in nine studies. There was limited evidence regarding adherence to EWB. Trauma and orthopaedic surgeons reported that EWB was acceptable. This depended on surgery type and whether it was a post-operative polytrauma case. No acceptability data was reported from patients' perspectives. Only one study reported two patients who developed unsatisfactory outcomes from excessive post-operative EWB. Positive effects of EWB were reported on disability level, pain, shoulder and elbow motion, and union. CONCLUSION: There is some evidence for the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of post-operative EWB after humeral fractures. There was limited data on the acceptability of EWB. Heterogeneous study designs, and variations in EWB protocols limit conclusions.

There is some evidence to support the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of early weight bearing following operative management of humeral fractures.Early weight bearing after some humeral fractures is acceptable to some subspecialities of orthopaedic surgeons but is not universally accepted.Rehabilitation professionals should discuss the option of early weight bearing after operative management of humeral fracture with patients and their multidisciplinary team.

Consensus on managing open ankle fractures in the frail patient.

Aims: Ankle fractures are common injuries and the third most common fragility fracture. In all, 40% of ankle fractures in the frail are open and represent a complex clinical scenario, with morbidity and mortality rates similar to hip fracture patients. They have a higher risk of complications, such as wound infections, malunion, hospital-acquired infections, pressure sores, veno-thromboembolic events, and significant sarcopaenia from prolonged bed rest. Methods: A modified Delphi method was used and a group of experts with a vested interest in best practice were invited from the British Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), Orthopaedic Trauma Society (OTS), British Association of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons (BAPRAS), British Geriatric Society (BGS), and the British Limb Reconstruction Society (BLRS). Results: In the first stage, there were 36 respondents to the survey, with over 70% stating their unit treats more than 20 such cases per year. There was a 50:50 split regarding if the timing of surgery should be within 36 hours, as per the hip fracture guidelines, or 72 hours, as per the open fracture guidelines. Overall, 75% would attempt primary wound closure and 25% would utilize a local flap. There was no orthopaedic agreement on fixation, and 75% would permit weightbearing immediately. In the second stage, performed at the BLRS meeting, experts discussed the survey results and agreed upon a consensus for the management of open elderly ankle fractures. Conclusion: A mutually agreed consensus from the expert panel was reached to enable the best practice for the management of patients with frailty with an open ankle fracture: 1) all units managing lower limb fragility fractures should do so through a cohorted multidisciplinary pathway. This pathway should follow the standards laid down in the "care of the older or frail orthopaedic trauma patient" British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) guideline. These patients have low bone density, and we should recommend full falls and bone health assessment; 2) all open lower limb fragility fractures should be treated in a single stage within 24 hours of injury if possible; 3) all patients with fragility fractures of the lower limb should be considered for mobilisation on the day following surgery; 4) all patients with lower limb open fragility fractures should be considered for tissue sparing, with judicious debridement as a default; 5) all patients with open lower limb fragility fractures should be managed by a consultant plastic surgeon with primary closure wherever possible; and 6) the method of fixation must allow for immediate unrestricted weightbearing.

The Effect of Prone and Supine Limb Positioning on the Radiographic Evaluation of Posterolateral Plate Fixation of the Posterior Malleolus.

Aim: To facilitate the posterolateral approach to the posterior malleolus patients are often positioned prone initially, then turned supine to complete fixation at the medial malleolus. We sought to define observed differences in the radiographic appearance of implants relative to the joint line, in prone and supine positions. Methods: A 3.5 mm tubular plate and a 3.5 mm posterior distal tibial periarticular plate were applied sequentially to 3 individual cadaveric legs, via a posterolateral approach. The tubular plate was positioned to simulate buttress fixation and the posterolateral plate placed more distally. Each limb was secured on a custom jig and radiographs were taken on a mobile c-arm fluoroscopy machine with a calibration ball. A series of prone AP, supine PA and mortise radiographs were taken. Prone radiographs were also taken in different degrees of caudal tilt to simulate knee flexion which occurs in practice, during intraoperative positioning. Plate tip-joint line distances were measured and Mann-Whitney U tests performed. Results: There was no statistically significant difference in plate tip-joint line distance when comparing equivalent prone and supine views (PA/AP or mortise). However, significant differences in apparent implant position were noted with alterations in caudal tilt. When taking a prone image, when the knee is flexed to 20 degrees, the plate tip will appear 6.5-8.5 mm more proximal than in the equivalent supine image where the knee is extended and the fluoroscopy beam is orthogonal to the anatomic axis of the tibia. Conclusion: Observed differences in radiographic appearance of metalwork in the prone and supine position are most likely due to knee flexion and the resulting variation in the angle of the fluoroscopy beam, rather than projectional differences between supine and prone views. Surgeons should be alert to this when analysing intraoperative images.

A systematic review of tourniquet use in paediatric orthopaedic surgery: can we extrapolate from adult guidelines?

Purpose: Tourniquets are commonly used intraoperatively in orthopaedic surgery to control bleeding and improve visibility in the surgical field. Recent evidence has thrown into question the routine use of tourniquets in the adult population resulting in a British Orthopaedic Association standard for intraoperative use. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on the practice, benefits, and risks of the intraoperative use of tourniquets for trauma and elective orthopaedic surgery in the paediatric population. Methods: A prospectively registered systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42022359048). A search of MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library and a Grey literature search was performed from their earliest record to 23 March 2023. Studies reporting tourniquet data in paediatric patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery were included. Data extracted included demographics, involved limb, trauma versus elective use, tourniquet use as primary or secondary measure, and tourniquet parameters and complications. Results: Thirty-nine studies were included. Tourniquet practices and information reporting varied considerably. Tourniquets were used uneventfully in the majority of patients with no specific benefits reported. Several physiological and biochemical changes as well as complications including nerve injury, compartment syndrome, skin burns, thrombosis, post-operative limb swelling, and pain were reported. Conclusions: Tourniquets are routinely used in both trauma and elective paediatric orthopaedic surgery with no high-quality research affirming benefits. Severe complications associated with their use are rare but do occur. High-quality studies addressing their benefits, the exact indication in children, and the safest way to use them in this population are necessary.

Lack of regional pathways impact on surgical delay: Analysis of the Orthopaedic Trauma Hospital Outcomes-Patient Operative Delays (ORTHOPOD) study.

INTRODUCTION: Current practice following injury within the United Kingdom is to receive surgery, at the institution of first contact regardless of ability to provide timely intervention and inconsiderate of neighbouring hospital resource and capacity. This can lead to a mismatch of demand and capacity, delayed surgery and stress within hospital systems, particularly with regards to elective services. We demonstrate through a multicentre, multinational study, the impact of this at scale. METHODOLOGY: ORTHOPOD data collection period was between 22/08/2022 and 16/10/2022 and consisted of two arms. Arm 1 captured orthopaedic trauma caseload and capacity in terms of sessions available per centre and patients awaiting surgery per centre per given week. Arm 2 recorded patient and injury demographics, time of decision making, outpatient and inpatient timeframes as well as time to surgery. Hand and spine cases were excluded. For this regional comparison, regional trauma networks with a minimum of four centres enroled onto the ORTHOPOD study were exclusively analysed. RESULTS: Following analysis of 11,202 patient episodes across 30 hospitals we found no movement of any patient between hospitals to enable prompt surgery. There is no current system to move patients, between regional centres despite clear discrepancies in workload per capacity across the United Kingdom. Many patients wait for days for surgery when simple transfer to a neighbouring hospital (within 10 miles in many instances) would result in prompt care within national guidelines. CONCLUSION: Most trauma patients in the United Kingdom are managed exclusively at the place of first presentation, with no consideration of alternative pathways to local hospitals that may, at that time, offer increased operative capacity and a shorter waiting time. There is no oversight of trauma workload per capacity at neighbouring hospitals within a regional trauma network. This leads to a marked disparity in waiting time to surgery, and subsequently it can be inferred but not proven, poorer patient experience and outcomes. This inevitably leads to a strain on the overall trauma system and across several centres can impact on elective surgery recovery. We propose the consideration of inter-regional network collaboration, aligned with the Major Trauma System.

Use of 3D Printing Technology in Fracture Management: A Review and Case Series.

SUMMARY: Three-dimensional (3D) offers exciting opportunities in medicine, particularly in orthopaedics. The boundaries of 3D printing are continuously being re-established and have paved the way for further innovations, including 3D bioprinting, custom printing refined methods, 4D bioprinting, and 5D printing potential. The quality of these applications have been steadily improving, increasing their widespread use among clinicians. This article provides a review of the current literature with a brief introduction to the process of additive manufacturing, 3D printing, and its applications in fracture care. We illustrate this technology with a case series of 3D printing used for correction of complex fractures/nonunion. Factors limiting the use of this technology, including cost, and potential solutions are discussed. Finally, we discuss 4D bioprinting and 5D printing and their potential role in fracture surgery.

Fracture-related infections.

Fracture-related infection is a serious complication which can occur following musculoskeletal injury and is associated with significant morbidity. These complications can be challenging to recognise, and experts have provided a clearer definition of fracture-related infection to help with the diagnosis and detection of these infections. This system includes clinical, radiological and laboratory-based diagnostic features which are either confirmatory or suggestive of fracture-related infection. Treatment requires a multifaceted approach with multidisciplinary involvement, and generally a combination of surgical techniques and prolonged antibiotics, the timing and choice of which should be optimised. This article provides an evidence-based review of the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma for the diagnosis and management of fracture-related infections.

Shear's role in non-union. Measuring mean angle of long bone multi-fragmentary non-unions.

INTRODUCTION: Both mechanical and biological theories have been proposed in the development of non-union. The mechanical theory suggests that a high strain environment in a fracture will predispose it to non-union. While in simple fractures and wedge fractures there are only one and two primary fracture planes respectively, in multi-fragmentary fractures there are many and a non-union may form along any of the original fracture lines, however the plane which experiences the highest strain is at 45O - the shear plane. We hypothesise that in multi-fragmentary fractures the initial fracture line that most often fails to unite will tend towards the plane with the highest strain. OBJECTIVES: 1) Define the mean non-union angle in a cohort of multi-fragmentary tibial and femoral fractures. 2) In wedge-like fractures within the cohort, define and compare the mean angle of initial fracture planes which go on to form a non-union to those that unite 3) In comminuted fractures within the cohort, define the mean non-union angle DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SETTING: Level-1 trauma centre METHODOLOGY: Fractures were categorised into wedge-like and comminuted. A published technique was utilised to measure fracture and non-union angles. In wedge-like fractures, united and non-united initial planes were compared. In comminuted fractures only the mean non-union angle was defined. Demographic patient data was also collected. RESULTS: 183 non-unions were screened, 68 patients were included. The mean non-union angle was 56°(SD 18) across all fractures. In wedge-like fractures the mean non-union angle was 59°(SD 18). In comminuted fractures the mean non-union angle was 50°(SD 19). Non-united initial fracture planes in wedge-like fractures showed a peaked distribution about a mean of 58° while united fracture planes were distributed at the extremities of the range. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with multi-fragmentary fractures resulting in non-union, the mean tibial non-union angle was 52° while the mean femoral non-union angle was 65°. In wedge-like fractures, non-unions occurred more commonly than appropriate union in fractures between 41°-80°. The non-union angle is closer to 45° in comminuted fractures than in wedge-like fractures. These results support the mechanical theory that strain from the shear plane is an important factor in the formation of non-unions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level 3.

Use of a non-anatomic mini-fragment fixation system for foot fractures.

BACKGROUND: Plating techniques for the fixation of foot fractures can utilize pre-contoured region-specific plates or non-anatomic non-specific mini-fragment plating systems, however there is limited published data describing complication rates. METHODS: This study reviewed the complication rates and performed a cost analysis of 45 foot fractures that had fixation with the use of mini-fragment non-anatomic implants, comparing them to a series from the same centre fixed using anatomic implants and the published literature. RESULTS: Complication rates seemed equivalent. Cost analysis demonstrated that non-anatomic implants were more expensive on average. CONCLUSIONS: Non-anatomic mini-fragment fixation is an appropriate method for use in a variety of foot trauma situations, with comparable complication rates to pre-contoured implants, although the potential for cost savings has not been realized in this patient cohort.

The ORthopaedic Trauma Hospital Outcomes - Patient Operative Delays (ORTHOPOD) study.

Aims: This is a multicentre, prospective assessment of a proportion of the overall orthopaedic trauma caseload of the UK. It investigates theatre capacity, cancellations, and time to surgery in a group of hospitals that is representative of the wider population. It identifies barriers to effective practice and will inform system improvements. Methods: Data capture was by collaborative approach. Patients undergoing procedures from 22 August 2022 and operated on before 31 October 2022 were included. Arm one captured weekly caseload and theatre capacity. Arm two concerned patient and injury demographics, and time to surgery for specific injury groups. Results: Data was available from 90 hospitals across 86 data access groups (70 in England, two in Wales, ten in Scotland, and four in Northern Ireland). After exclusions, 709 weeks' of data on theatre capacity and 23,138 operations were analyzed. The average number of cases per operating session was 1.73. Only 5.8% of all theatre sessions were dedicated day surgery sessions, despite 29% of general trauma patients being eligible for such pathways. In addition, 12.3% of patients experienced at least one cancellation. Delays to surgery were longest in Northern Ireland and shortest in England and Scotland. There was marked variance across all fracture types. Open fractures and fragility hip fractures, influenced by guidelines and performance renumeration, had short waits, and varied least. In all, nine hospitals had 40 or more patients waiting for surgery every week, while seven had less than five. Conclusion: There is great variability in operative demand and list provision seen in this study of 90 UK hospitals. There is marked variation in nearly all injuries apart from those associated with performance monitoring. There is no evidence of local network level coordination of care for orthopaedic trauma patients. Day case operating and pathways of care are underused and are an important area for service improvement.

Digitalising patient reported outcome collection tools in orthopaedic trauma-A scoping review.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to provide a scoping review to the role of digital technology in the collection of orthopaedic trauma related patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) extension for scoping reviews and Arksey and O'Malley frameworks were followed. A search strategy identified relevant literature, with the identified criteria screened for acceptability for inclusion. Data was extracted to form a descriptive analysis. RESULTS: Six studies met the criteria for inclusion. All were quantitative, the majority were published in the United States of America and the use of iPads was the commonest form of digital technology used. Heterogeneity existed in the type of outcomes collected between studies. All studies aimed to compare traditional methods of PROMs collection to digital methods, with an overall thematic summary suggestive of the positive impact of electronic methods of collecting patient reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: This paper has demonstrated the dearth of ePROM implementation in the orthopaedic trauma setting, however its use has proved successful and therefore further evidence is needed to demonstrate its effectiveness. Furthermore, the types of PROMs in orthopaedic trauma varies significantly, and efforts to standardise the type of digital trauma PROMs used are recommended.

ORthopaedic trauma hospital outcomes - Patient operative delays (ORTHOPOD) Study: The management of day-case orthopaedic trauma in the United Kingdom.

INTRODUCTION: ORTHOPOD: Day Case Trauma is a multicentre prospective service evaluation of day-case trauma surgery across four countries. It is an epidemiological assessment of injury burden, patient pathways, theatre capacity, time to surgery and cancellation. It is the first evaluation of day-case trauma processes and system performance at nationwide scale. METHODS: Data was prospectively recorded through a collaborative approach. Arm one captured weekly caseload burden and operating theatre capacity. Arm two detailed patient and injury demographics, and time to surgery for specific injury groups. Patients scheduled for surgery between 22/08/22 and 16/10/22 and operated on before 31/10/22, were included. For this analysis, hand and spine injuries were excluded. RESULTS: Data was obtained from 86 Data Access Groups (70 in England, 2 in Wales, 10 in Scotland and 4 in Northern Ireland). After exclusions, 709 weeks worth of data representing 23,138 operative cases were analysed. Day-case trauma patients (DCTP) accounted for 29.1% of overall trauma burden and utilised 25.7% of general trauma list capacity. They were predominantly adults aged 18 to 59 (56.7%) with upper limb Injuries (65.7%). Across the four nations, the median number of day-case trauma lists (DCTL) available per week was 0 (IQR 1). 6 of 84 (7.1%) hospitals had at least five DCTLs per week. Rates of cancellation (13.2% day-case; 11.9% inpatient) and escalation to elective operating lists (9.1% day-case; 3.4% inpatient) were higher in DCTPs. For equivalent injuries, DCTPs waited longer for surgery. Distal radius and ankle fractures had median times to surgery within national recommendations: 3 days and 6 days respectively. Outpatient route to surgery was varied. Dominant pathways (>50% patients listed at that episode) in England and Wales were uncommon but the most frequently seen was listing patients in the emergency department, 16 of 80 hospitals (20%). CONCLUSION: There is significant mismatch in DCTP management and resource availability. There is also considerable variation in DCTP route to surgery. Suitable DCTL patients are often managed as inpatients. Improving day-case trauma services reduces the burden on general trauma lists and this study demonstrates there is considerable scope for service and pathway development and improved patient experience.

Open fractures of the upper limb - do the BOAST guidelines need an update?

AIMS: This scoping review aims to explore the published literature on the current management strategies and outcomes of open upper limb injuries using the BOAST 4 guidelines as a structure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and OrthoSearch computerised literature databases (from January 2012 through April 2022) was performed. The medical subject headings used were "open fracture"/ "Gustilo Anderson" and "forearm" or "radius" or "ulna" or "elbow" or "humerus" or "clavicle" or "shoulder" or "scapula". Abstract titles were reviewed for relevance. If the article was deemed eligible, the article was retrieved and reviewed in full. RESULTS: The literature reveals lower rates of infection for upper limb injuries compared to their lower limb counterparts. Early antibiotic administration remains a key component of their management. Those without significant soft tissue injury (Gustilo Anderson 1) can often be treated as per their closed counterparts and timing to definitive fixation can be safely delayed in selected cases. DISCUSSION: There is limited high quality evidence available on the management of open upper limb injuries with guidelines built on borrowed principles from the more studied open tibia fractures. What the available evidence does show is that with lower infection rates and a more forgiving soft tissue envelope it may be safe to diverge from the current BOAST guidelines in certain cases. This has relevance in complex fracture patterns requiring specialist input where it is not possible to achieve definitive fixation in 72 h and when there are other life threatening injuries to manage. Despite this early antibiotic administration and debridement within 24 h remains a key component of the early management.

Preoperative vascular assessment of patients with a supracondylar humeral fracture and a perfused, pulseless limb.

The 'pink, pulseless hand' is often used to describe the clinical situation in which a child with a supracondylar fracture of the humerus has normal distal perfusion in the absence of a palpable peripheral pulse. The management guidelines are based on the assessment of perfusion, which is difficult to undertake and poorly evaluated objectively. The aim of this study was to review the available literature in order to explore the techniques available for the preoperative clinical assessment of perfusion in these patients and to evaluate the clinical implications. A systematic literature review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered prospectively with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. Databases were explored in June 2022 with the search terms (pulseless OR dysvascular OR ischaemic OR perfused OR vascular injury) AND supracondylar AND (fracture OR fractures). A total of 573 papers were identified as being suitable for further study, and 25 met the inclusion criteria for detailed analysis. These studies included a total of 504 patients with a perfused, pulseless limb associated with a supracondylar humeral fracture. Clinical examination included skin colour (23 studies (92%)), temperature (16 studies (64%)), and capillary refill time (13 studies (52%)). Other investigations included peripheral oxygen saturation (SaO2) (six studies (24%)), ultrasound (US) (14 (56%)), and CT angiogram (two studies (8.0%)). The parameters of 'normal perfusion' were often not objectively defined. The time to surgery ranged from 1.5 to 12 hours. A total of 412 patients (82%) were definitively treated with closed or open reduction and fixation, and 92 (18%) required vascular intervention, ranging from simple release of entrapped vessels to vascular grafts. The description of the vascular assessment of the patient with a supracondylar humeral fracture and a pulseless limb in the literature is variable, with few objective criteria being used to define perfusion. The evidence base for decision-making is limited, and further research is required. We were able, however, to make some recommendations about objective criteria for the assessment of these patients, and we suggest that these are performed frequently to allow the detection of any deterioration of perfusion.

Talar neck and body fracture outcomes: a multicentre retrospective review.

PURPOSE: Talar neck and body fractures are uncommon injuries that are challenging to manage with high reported complication rates, including post-traumatic arthritis, avascular necrosis, and poor functional outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the complication rates for patients with talus fractures across three major trauma centres (MTCs) in England. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of prospectively collected trauma databases. Data were collected from three English MTCs. Patients with talar neck and/or body fractures sustained between August 2015 and August 2019 were identified and their clinical course reviewed radiologically and clinically. Isolated process fractures, osteochondral defects and paediatric patients were excluded. Patients were analysed by fracture type and for definitive treatment method with separation into non-operative and operative management groups. Procedure type was identified in the operative group. Superficial infection, deep infection, non-union, avascular necrosis, post-traumatic arthritis and removal of metalwork rates were analysed. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients with talar neck and/or body fractures were included. Seventy-five patients received operative management, 10 non-operative. The overall AVN rate was 5.9% (five patients), overall post-traumatic arthritis rate was 18.8% (16 patients), deep infection rate 1.2% (one patient), non-union rate 4.7% (four patients). Removal of metalwork rate was 9.4% (eight patients). CONCLUSION: Our reported outcomes and complication rates are generally lower than those previously described. This may be a result of improved techniques, a higher frequency of open reduction with direct visualisation or by surgery occurring in centralised specialist centres.

Intramedullary application of local antibiotic bullets for the treatment of long bone fracture related infection.

PURPOSE: The optimal means of local antibiotic delivery for fracture related infection is unknown. Until now, intramedullary application of calcium sulphate based local antibiotics has been challenging. We report on the use of a newly available mode of preparation and delivery: the Stimulan Bullet Mat and Introducer (Biocomposites Ltd, Staffordshire, England). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for infection cases at two separate tertiary referral institutions was performed. We included cases of long bone FRI with a retained intramedullary nail, treated with a single stage protocol of metalwork removal, debridement, local antibiotic application using the novel mould and applicator, with additional bony stabilisation and soft tissue reconstruction where required. RESULTS: All 13 patients achieved infection remission rate with an average follow-up of 19.7 months (range 12-28). All 6 patients with infection around an unhealed fracture achieved union at an average 8 months (range 4-12) from debridement. No patients developed aseptic wound leak. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic impregnated calcium sulphate can be used safely as part of a single stage treatment protocol for the treatment of long bone fracture related infection following intramedullary nailing. We have demonstrated high rates of infection remission and union, using a newly available intramedullary applicator.

Nailing distal tibial fractures: does entry technique affect distal alignment?

PURPOSE: In treating distal third tibial fractures, restoration of the axial alignment and therefore accurate reduction of the distal fragment minimise the risk of tibiotalar joint malalignment. The aim of this study is to investigate whether there was a difference in accuracy of reduction and axial alignment, when nailing distal third tibial fractures using either the suprapatellar or the infrapatellar tibial nailing entry technique. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study compared alignment of intramedullary nails performed for distal third tibial fractures between 2015 and 2018 through the suprapatellar and infrapatellar approach at a UK Level 1 trauma centre. It compared a consecutive series of 74 suprapatellar nails and 51 infrapatellar nails, with radiographic assessment of tibial alignment in the antero-posterior and sagittal planes. It included inter- and intra-observer analyses of radiographic measurements. RESULTS: In the coronal plane, mean malalignment in the suprapatellar technique group was 2.8 ± 0.7° and 4.7 ± 0.9° in the infrapatellar technique group (P < 0.01). In the sagittal plane, mean malalignment in the suprapatellar technique group was 4.0 ± 0.8° and 3.5 ± 0.9° in the infrapatellar technique group (P = 0.42). Intra- and inter-observer analysis showed strongly positive correlations between observers. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that the suprapatellar technique may improve coronal plane alignment when intramedullary nailing distal tibial fractures. There was no significant difference in alignment in the sagittal plane. We conclude that the suprapatellar technique may be superior in preventing malalignment when treating distal third tibial fractures, potentially improving clinical outcome.