Timing and risk of mood disorders requiring psychotropics in long-term survivors of adult cancers: A nationwide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The increasing number of long-term cancer survivors over the past few decades poses the challenge of mental health care needs. However, little is known about risks of mood disorders in long-term cancer survivors. METHODS: Long-term survivors (≥5 years) of adult cancers (LSAC) (n = 190,748) newly diagnosed between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2007 were matched with one control. The primary outcome was diagnosis of mood disorders requiring psychotropics. Cumulative incidences and sub-hazard ratios (SHR) were calculated and multivariate analyses were conducted after accounting for mortality. RESULTS: The mood disorder risk was significantly higher in the LSAC cohort than in the control cohort (adjusted SHR = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-1.18, P < 0.001). Patients with certain cancer types were at increased risk, particularly in the first 2 years after diagnosis. However, patients with head and neck cancers or esophageal cancers had a higher risk after the 5-year follow-up period. Multivariate analysis indicated that being female, aged 40-59 years, with more than two primary cancers, receiving two or more treatment modalities, having CCI scores higher than 3, a higher urbanization level, and lower monthly income were independently associated with an increased risk of mood disorders. LIMITATIONS: Some potential confounders such as lifestyle factors were not available in the study. CONCLUSION: These findings call for increased mental health awareness not only in the early years after the cancer diagnosis, but also during long-term follow-up for certain cancer subtypes.

Clinical practice and evaluation of electronic portal imaging device for VMAT quality assurance.

Volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is a novel extension of the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique, which has brought challenges to dose verification. To perform VMAT pretreatment quality assurance, an electronic portal imaging device (EPID) can be applied. This study's aim was to evaluate EPID performance for VMAT dose verification. First, dosimetric characteristics of EPID were investigated. Then 10 selected VMAT dose plans were measured by EPID with the rotational method. The overall variation of EPID dosimetric characteristics was within 1.4% for VMAT. The film system serving as a conventional tool for verification showed good agreement both with EPID measurements ([94.1 ± 1.5]% with 3 mm/3% criteria) and treatment planning system (TPS) calculations ([97.4 ± 2.8]% with 3 mm/3% criteria). In addition, EPID measurements for VMAT presented good agreement with TPS calculations ([99.1 ± 0.6]% with 3 mm/3% criteria). The EPID system performed the robustness of potential error findings in TPS calculations and the delivery system. This study demonstrated that an EPID system can be used as a reliable and efficient quality assurance tool for VMAT dose verification.

Randomized trial of surgical staging (extraperitoneal or laparoscopic) versus clinical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To define the role of pretreatment surgical staging for locally advanced cervical carcinoma. METHODS: A two-step randomized trial was conducted to compare clinical staging (arm A) versus surgical staging (arm B) and to compare the laparoscopic (LAP) with the extraperitoneal (EXP) approach in previously untreated locally advanced cervical carcinoma. After the first randomization, those in arm B were randomly allocated to either LAP or EXP. An interim analysis was planned to evaluate the feasibility of LAP versus EXP, which led to the current report. RESULTS: A total of 61 patients were eligible (arm A, 29; arm B, 32). The operation time, blood loss, and lymph node yield of LAP and EXP were not significantly different. Serious acute and late toxicity was not different between arm A and arm B, or LAP versus EXP. Para-aortic node metastasis was documented in 25% (95% confidence interval, 10% to 40%) of patients on arm B. An interim analysis was performed in January 2000. Patients on arm B had significantly worse progression-free survival than those on arm A. Hazard ratios of relapse/persistent or death were 3.13 (P = 0.005) and 1.76 (P = 0.150), respectively. Patient accrual was terminated according to the early stopping rules. With further follow-up till December 2001, the difference in progression-free survival remained significant (P = 0.003), and the difference in overall survival became significant (P = 0.024) as the data matured. CONCLUSION: The benefit of pretreatment surgical staging for cervical carcinoma remained unproven. The detrimental effects of surgical staging observed in this study must be considered in the design of clinical guidelines or future trials.