Risk of Corneal Graft Rejection and Vaccination: A Matched Case-Control Study From a United States Integrated Health Care System.

PURPOSE: Data on vaccine-associated corneal transplant rejections are limited. We examined the association between graft rejection and vaccination. DESIGN: Matched case-control METHODS: We used electronic health records to identify corneal transplant recipients between January 2008 and August 2022 at Kaiser Permanente Southern California. Cases were transplant recipients who experienced a graft rejection (outcome) during the study period. Randomly selected controls who did not experience a corneal graft rejection at their matched cases' index date (rejection date) were matched in a 3:1 ratio to cases. For controls, index date was determined by adding the number of days between transplant and graft rejection of their matched case to the control's transplant date. RESULTS: The study included 601 cases and 1803 matched controls (mean age 66 years [s.d. 17.0], 52% female, 47% non-Hispanic white). Twenty-three% of cases and 22% of controls received ≥1 vaccinations within 12 weeks prior to the index date. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for vaccination in the 12 weeks prior to index date, comparing cases to controls was 1.17 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.50]). The aOR was 1.09 (0.84, 1.43) for 1 vaccination, 1.53 (0.90, 2.61) for 2 vaccinations, and 1.79 (0.55, 5.57) for ≥3 vaccinations. The aOR was 1.60 (0.81, 3.14) for mRNA vaccines, and 1.19 (0.80, 1.78) for adjuvanted/high dose vaccines. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence to suggest an association between vaccination and graft rejection. Our findings provide support for the completion of recommended vaccinations for corneal transplant recipients, without significantly increasing the risk of graft rejection.

Convolutional-neural-network-based radiographs evaluation assisting in early diagnosis of the periodontal bone loss via periapical radiograph.

Background/Purpose: The preciseness of detecting periodontal bone loss is examiners dependent, and this leads to low reliability. The need for automated assistance systems on dental radiographic images has been increased. To the best of our knowledge, no studies have quantitatively and automatically staged periodontitis using dental periapical radiographs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate periodontal bone loss and periodontitis stage on dental periapical radiographs using deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Materials and methods: 336 periapical radiographic images (teeth: 390) between January 2017 and December 2019 were collected and de-identified. All periapical radiographic image datasets were divided into training dataset (n = 82, teeth: 123) and test dataset (n = 336, teeth: 390). For creating an optimal deep CNN algorithm model, the training datasets were directly used for the segmentation and individual tooth detection. To evaluate the diagnostic power, we calculated the degree of alveolar bone loss deviation between our proposed method and ground truth, the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC), and the diagnostic accuracy of the proposed method in the test datasets. Results: The periodontal bone loss degree deviation between our proposed method and the ground truth drawn by the three periodontists was 6.5 %. In addition, the overall PCC value of our proposed system and the periodontists' diagnoses was 0.828 (P < 0.01). The total diagnostic accuracy of our proposed method was 72.8 %. The diagnostic accuracy was highest for stage III (97.0 %). Conclusion: This tool helps with diagnosis and prevents omission, and this may be especially helpful for inexperienced younger doctors and doctors in underdeveloped countries. It could also dramatically reduce the workload of clinicians and timely access to periodontist care for people requiring advanced periodontal treatment.

Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins for scalp angiosarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Scalp angiosarcomas (AS) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas that present with outcomes different from other AS of the head and neck region. Due to the rarity of the disease, limited data on the clinical outcome of scalp AS are available. In particular, the prognostic significance of surgical margins remains controversial and the impact of margin status on survival has not been documented. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 41 scalp AS patients, including 30 patients with localized disease and 11 patients with initial distant metastasis, treated in our institution between 1997 and 2017. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. In the 30 patients without distant metastasis (localized disease), univariate and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine clinicopathologic characteristics associated with recurrence free survival (RFS), locoregional control (LRC), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Totally 41 patients diagnosed with scalp AS were identified, including 30 patients with localized disease and 11 patients with initial distant metastasis on diagnosis. Overall, the median follow-up period was 19.3 (range 0.3-128.5) months. The median survival time was 16.6 (range 0.3-144.3) months and the 5-year OS (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) rate was 22% (12%-42%). In the 30 patients with localized disease, univariate analysis showed that positive margins, either lateral-side or deep-side, were significant prognostic factors for RFS, LRC, and OS (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, positive margins emerged as adverse prognostic factors for RFS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.29, 95% CI, 1.71-10.75, p = 0.002), LRC (HR 6.35, 95% CI, 2.19-18.37, p = 0.001), and OS (HR 4.73, 95% CI, 1.71-13.07, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Scalp AS is associated with high local recurrence rates and poor survival outcomes. Positive surgical margins are adverse prognostic factors for survival.

The impacts of intra-arterial chemotherapy on head and neck microvascular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: For locally advanced head and neck cancers, intra-arterial (IA) chemotherapy is utilized for locoregional control with favorable results. The study aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes of microsurgical reconstruction in head and neck cancer patients with IA chemotherapy METHODS: This cohort study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent head and neck microsurgical reconstruction from January 2014 to August 2018. Patients with prior history of chemotherapy were included and categorized into two groups according to history of IA chemotherapy (IA group)/intravenous chemotherapy (IV group). Flap survival was evaluated along with microsurgical revision rates and complications. Recipient vessel specimens were analyzed by histological examination. A 1:1 propensity score matched analysis was performed. RESULTS: The study cohort included 45 patients with IA chemotherapy and 201 patients with IV chemotherapy. After propensity score matching, the difference in total flap loss and microsurgical revision rates were nonsignificant between two groups. However, the IA group had significantly higher rates of arterial thrombosis (Odds ratio [OR] 4.98; 95%CI, 1.28-19.38; p = 0.021), wound-related complications (OR 3.30; 95%CI, 1.21-9.02; p = 0.02) and revision surgery within one month (OR 3.73; 95%CI, 1.10-12.64; p = 0.035). Based on histology, IA group vessels showed a higher intima/media ratio than the IV group (0.45 ± 0.06 versus 0.23 ± 0.03, p = 0.02) CONCLUSION: Despite treating local advanced head and neck cancers with good results, IA chemotherapy may cause subsequent deleterious effects on local tissue due to the high concentration of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents. Surgeons should be cautious in selection of recipient vessels when performing microvascular reconstruction.