Accuracy of Maternal Self-Report of Recent Preeclampsia among Healthy Women.

Background: Preeclampsia history signals a higher risk for cardiovascular disease, but its value as a risk marker relies primarily on self-report. To identify the accuracy of maternal self-reports of recent preeclampsia, we conducted a validation study among women recruited to a web-based trial. Methods: Women with preeclampsia in the past 5 years were recruited to Heart Health 4 Moms. Preeclampsia was self-reported through an online recruitment questionnaire and affirmed via phone screen. Accuracy of maternal self-report was quantified using positive predictive value (PPV) versus medical record evidence of preeclampsia using three definitions: (1) documentation of clinician diagnosis, (2) American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) 2002 diagnostic criteria (gestational hypertension and proteinuria), and (3) ACOG 2013 diagnostic criteria (gestational hypertension and proteinuria or systemic symptoms). Results: Complete medical records were received for 290 women who delivered from 2011 to 2016 and were predominantly non-Hispanic White (81.7%) with a mean age of 31.2 ± 4.8 years. Mean length of recall was 13.6 ± 14.7 months. The majority of women (92.1%) had medical record evidence of preeclampsia using ≥1 of the definitions. Maternal self-report of preeclampsia was validated for 88.3% based on clinician diagnosis, 59.0% with ACOG 2002, and 65.2% with ACOG 2013. Conclusions: In this validation study of U.S. women, the majority accurately self-reported their preeclampsia diagnosis based on medical record review. A higher proportion of self-reports validated by clinician diagnosis than ACOG criteria, suggesting women remember the diagnosis given by their provider and providers may not always follow or document criteria when making a diagnosis.

Risk factors for pre-eclampsia in clinical practice guidelines: Comparison with the evidence.

OBJECTIVE: To compare pre-eclampsia risk factors identified by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with risk factors from hierarchical evidence review, to guide pre-eclampsia prevention. DESIGN: Our search strategy provided hierarchical evidence of relationships between risk factors and pre-eclampsia using Medline (Ovid), searched from January 2010 to January 2021. SETTING: Published studies and CPGs. POPULATION: Pregnant women. METHODS: We evaluated the strength of association and quality of evidence (GRADE). CPGs (n = 15) were taken from a previous systematic review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pre-eclampsia. RESULTS: Of 78 pre-eclampsia risk factors, 13 (16.5%) arise only during pregnancy. Strength of association was usually 'probable' (n = 40, 51.3%) and the quality of evidence was low (n = 35, 44.9%). The 'major' and 'moderate' risk factors proposed by 8/15 CPGs were not well aligned with the evidence; of the ten 'major' risk factors (alone warranting aspirin prophylaxis), associations with pre-eclampsia were definite (n = 4), probable (n = 5) or possible (n = 1), based on moderate (n = 4), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 1) quality evidence. Obesity ('moderate' risk factor) was definitely associated with pre-eclampsia (high-quality evidence). The other ten 'moderate' risk factors had probable (n = 8), possible (n = 1) or no (n = 1) association with pre-eclampsia, based on evidence of moderate (n = 1), low (n = 5) or very low (n = 4) quality. Three risk factors not identified by the CPGs had probable associations (high quality): being overweight; 'prehypertension' at booking; and blood pressure of 130-139/80-89 mmHg in early pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-eclampsia risk factors in CPGs are poorly aligned with evidence, particularly for the strongest risk factor of obesity. There is a lack of distinction between risk factors identifiable in early pregnancy and those arising later. A refresh of the strategies advocated by CPGs is needed.

Patient and provider perception of home blood pressure monitoring kits.

BACKGROUND: Pregnant patients of racial/ethnic minorities have higher preeclampsia rates. Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) has been investigated for disparity reduction. Smaller studies showed patients find HBPM to be a helpful intervention postpartum. Further investigation is needed to define the role of HPBM in an at-risk and diverse population antepartum. OBJECTIVE: To assess patient perception of HBPM among diverse patients at high risk of disease development. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study conducted from April 2020-September 2021. HBPM kits were advertised and interested parties across the United States responded. Cuff Kits were then distributed to participating providers. Providers distributed the kits to patients meeting high-risk criteria for disease development, prioritizing those of racial/ethnic minorities. Surveys were distributed quarterly to providers and patients to assess HBPM perception. RESULTS: 2910 Cuff Kits were distributed to patients at 179 sites in 14 states. Of those, 1160 were distributed to Black patients, 1045 to White patients, and 500 to Hispanic patients. 117 patients completed surveys, with most patients finding Cuff Kits "very valuable" or "valuable" (68.4% and 19.7%, respectively). Most providers (73.4%) felt the Cuff Kits influenced patient care. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients receiving Cuff Kits reported a beneficial impact on disease understanding and most belonged to racial/ethnic groups at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Providers found HBPM had a beneficial impact on care. Though more research is needed to illustrate the impact of HBPM on outcomes, this study suggests that among racial/ethnic minorities and those at the high risk, HBPM is a well-received intervention.

Care plan for individuals at risk for preeclampsia: shared approach to education, strategies for prevention, surveillance, and follow-up.

Preeclampsia is a multisystemic disorder of pregnancy that affects 250,000 pregnant individuals in the United States and approximately 10 million worldwide per annum. Preeclampsia is associated with substantial immediate morbidity and mortality but also long-term morbidity for both mother and offspring. It is now clearly established that a low dose of aspirin given daily, beginning early in pregnancy modestly reduces the occurrence of preeclampsia. Low-dose aspirin seems safe, but because there is a paucity of information about long-term effects on the infant, it is not recommended for all pregnant individuals. Thus, several expert groups have identified clinical factors that indicate sufficient risk to recommend low-dose aspirin preventive therapy. These risk factors may be complemented by biochemical and/or biophysical tests that either indicate increased probability of preeclampsia in individuals with clinical risk factors, or more importantly, identify increased likelihood in those without other evident risk. In addition, the opportunity exists to provide this population with additional care that may prevent or mitigate the short- and long-term effects of preeclampsia. Patient and provider education, increased surveillance, behavioral modification, and other approaches to improve outcomes in these individuals can improve the chance of a healthy outcome. We assembled a group with diverse, relevant expertise (clinicians, investigators, advocates, and public and private stakeholders) to develop a care plan in which providers and pregnant individuals at risk can work together to reduce the risk of preeclampsia and associated morbidities. The plan is for care of individuals at moderate to high risk for developing preeclampsia, sufficient to receive low-dose aspirin therapy, as identified by clinical and/or laboratory findings. The recommendations are presented using the GRADE methodology with the quality of evidence upon which each is based. In addition, printable appendices with concise summaries of the care plan's recommendations for patients and healthcare providers are provided. We believe that this shared approach to care will facilitate prevention of preeclampsia and its attendant short- and long-term morbidity in patients identified as at risk for development of this disorder.

An evidence review and nutritional conceptual framework for pre-eclampsia prevention.

Pre-eclampsia is a serious complication of pregnancy, and maternal nutritional factors may play protective roles or exacerbate risk. The tendency to focus on single nutrients as a risk factor obscures the complexity of possible interactions, which may be important given the complex nature of pre-eclampsia. An evidence review was conducted to compile definite, probable, possible and indirect nutritional determinants of pre-eclampsia to map a nutritional conceptual framework for pre-eclampsia prevention. Determinants of pre-eclampsia were first compiled through an initial consultation with experts. Second, an expanded literature review was conducted to confirm associations, elicit additional indicators and evaluate evidence. The strength of association was evaluated as definite relative risk (RR) < 0·40 or ≥3·00, probable RR 0·40-0·69 or 1·50-2·99, possible RR 0·70-0·89 or 1·10-1·49 or not discernible RR 0·90-1·09. The quality of evidence was evaluated using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Twenty-five nutritional factors were reported in two umbrella reviews and twenty-two meta-analyses. Of these, fourteen were significantly associated with pre-eclampsia incidence. Higher serum Fe emerged as a definite nutritional risk factors for pre-eclampsia incidence across populations, while low serum Zn was a risk factor in Asia and Africa. Maternal vitamin D deficiency was a probable risk factor and Ca and/or vitamin D supplementation were probable protective nutritional factors. Healthy maternal dietary patterns were possibly associated with lower risk of developing pre-eclampsia. Potential indirect pathways of maternal nutritional factors and pre-eclampsia may exist through obesity, maternal anaemia and gestational diabetes mellitus. Research gaps remain on the influence of household capacities and socio-cultural, economic and political contexts, as well as interactions with medical conditions.

Recruiting and retaining nulliparous individuals with a family history of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy to participate in scientific research prior to pregnancy: The Sisterhood Study.

Introduction: Recruiting women with a family history (FH) of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) to participate in research before pregnancy could offer insight into genetic and lifestyle factors that incur higher risk of cardiovascular disease during pregnancy and throughout the life course. Methods: The Sisterhood Study piloted low-touch, remote recruitment strategies that relied on women with a history of preeclampsia to share study information with family and friends. It aimed to enroll 150 women with a FH of HDP and 150 controls. Results: The study recruited 328 women (104 with a FH of HDP, 131 without a FH, and 93 with unknown FH) prior to pregnancy. The majority identified as non-Hispanic White (74.7%) and had > high school education (91.8%). Discussion: Although the population was enriched with nulliparous women with a FH of HDP, it was not sufficient to recruit a diverse cohort large enough to meet the study aim.

Patient journey during and after a pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy: a cross-sectional patient registry study.

OBJECTIVES: To gain insight into the patient journey through a pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy. DESIGN: Cross-sectional patient registry study. SETTING: Online patient registry initiated by the Preeclampsia Foundation. PARTICIPANTS: Women with a history of pre-eclampsia enrolled in The Preeclampsia Registry (TPR). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Retrospective patient-reported experience measures concerning awareness of pre-eclampsia, timing and type of information on pre-eclampsia received, involvement in decision making regarding medical care, mental/emotional impact of the pre-eclampsia-complicated pregnancy and impact on future pregnancy planning. RESULTS: Of 3618 TPR-participants invited to complete the Patient Journey questionnaire, data from 833 (23%) responders were available for analysis. Most responders were white (n=795, 95.4%) and lived in the USA (n=728, 87.4%). Before their pre-eclampsia diagnosis, 599 (73.9%) responders were aware of the term 'pre-eclampsia', but only 348 (43.7%) were aware of its associated symptoms. Women with a lower level of education were less likely to have heard of pre-eclampsia (OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.62). Around the time of diagnosis, 29.2% of responders did not feel involved in the decision making, which was associated with reporting a serious mental/emotional impact of the pre-eclampsia experience (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.58 to 3.84). Over time, there was an increase in the proportion of women who were aware of the symptoms of pre-eclampsia (32.2% before 2011 to 52.5% after 2016; p<0.001) and in the proportion of responders stating they received counselling about the later-life health risks associated with pre-eclampsia (14.2% before 2011 to 25.6% after 2016; p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that improved patient education regarding pre-eclampsia is needed, that shared decision making is of great importance to patients to enhance their healthcare experience, and that healthcare providers should make efforts to routinely incorporate counselling about the later-life health risks associated with pre-eclampsia. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02020174.

Patient-reported preconceptional characteristics in the prediction of recurrent preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia using patient-reported preconceptional characteristics, which can be used for risk stratification of subsequent pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from The Preeclampsia Registry™ of 1028 women with a history of preeclampsia and at least one subsequent pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Candidate predictors were included in a multivariable logistic regression analysis and a backward selection procedure was used to select the final predictors. Internal validation took place by internally validating the model in 500 simulated samples (bootstrapping), which provided a shrinkage factor to create the final model. This final model was evaluated for performance by a calibration plot and the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC). Missing data was handled by multiple imputation. RESULTS: Recurrent preeclampsia occurred in 467 (45.4%) women. Predictors in the final model were: a history of migraine, first degree relative with cardiovascular disease, first degree relative with placenta-related pregnancy complication, gestational age at delivery of index pregnancy, birthweight of the previous child, history of placental abruption, multiparity, chronic hypertension, interval between index and subsequent pregnancy, paternal non-white ethnicity and maternal age. AUC of the model was 0.63 (95% CI 0.59-0.66). In a subset of women who used aspirin prior or during their subsequent pregnancy, performance of the model was similar (AUC 0.60; 95% CI 0.50-0.71). CONCLUSIONS: In this study we developed a prediction model for recurrent preeclampsia with moderate performance after internal validation. Early risk stratification of subsequent pregnancies that allows for customization of antenatal care and personalized prevention strategies, is not yet possible.

The 2021 International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy classification, diagnosis & management recommendations for international practice.

All units managing hypertensive pregnant women should maintain and review uniform departmental management protocols and conduct regular audits of maternal & fetal outcomes. The cause(s) of pre-eclampsia and the optimal clinical management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy remain uncertain; therefore, we recommend that every hypertensive pregnant woman be offered an opportunity to participate in research, clinical trials and follow-up studies.

The Preeclampsia Foundation: the voice and views of the patient and her family.

Preeclampsia is a disease exclusive to pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period, occurring in 4.6% of pregnancies worldwide. Preeclampsia and other gestational hypertensive disorders can affect any pregnant woman. The consequences of developing this disease can lead to severe maternal and neonatal morbidities and mortalities, including fetal growth restriction, placental abruption, preterm birth, stillbirth, and maternal death. When pregnant women recover, they are at higher risk of long-term complications such as hypertension, stroke, heart failure, renal disease, and Alzheimer disease. The consequences extend to the offspring because they are at higher risk of cardiovascular diseases, and female offspring are at greater risk of developing preeclampsia when they become pregnant. For society, preeclampsia presents an economic burden related to the additional healthcare costs associated with low birthweight, prematurity, and adverse outcomes to the mother and baby. This article shares the unique perspective of affected women and their families, the effect preeclampsia has on us, and what we hope the healthcare system can deliver for our sisters and daughters in the future. Patients and their families established the Preeclampsia Foundation 21 years ago. Devoted to education and patient advocacy to raise awareness, improve healthcare practices, and catalyze research, we share some of the Foundation's realized strategies and achievements. We tell you our stories and struggles, and we issue a call to action for all stakeholders to help fulfill our vision for a world where hypertensive disorders of pregnancy no longer threaten the lives of mothers and their babies.

Information needs and experiences from pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders: a qualitative analysis of narrative responses.

BACKGROUND: Incorporation of the patient voice is urgently needed in a broad array of health care settings, but it is particularly lacking in the obstetrical literature. Systematically derived information about patients' experience with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), most notably preeclampsia, is necessary to improve patient-provider communication and ultimately inform patient-centered care and research. We sought to examine the information needs and experiences of individuals with pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative content analysis of narrative-responses to an open-ended question from the Preeclampsia Registry (TPR), an online registry hosted by the Preeclampsia Foundation. Individuals were invited to enroll in TPR via social media, web searches, and newsletters. We restricted our analysis to participants who self-reported a history of HDP and responded to the open-ended question, "Is there any information that you could have had at the time of this pregnancy that would have been helpful?". Available responses from July 2013 to March 2017 were included. Narrative responses were coded, reconciled, and thematically analyzed by multiple coders using an inductive approach. Our main outcome measures included participants' expressed needs and additional concerns with respect to their HDP pregnancy. RESULTS: Of 3202 enrolled participants, 1850 completed the survey and self-reported having at least one pregnancy complicated by HDP, of which 895 (48.4%) responded to the open-ended question. Participants delivered in the United States (83%) and 27 other countries. Compared to non-responders, responders reported more severe HDP phenotypes and adverse offspring outcomes. We identified three principal themes from responses: patient-identified needs, management and counseling, and potential action. Responses revealed that participants' baseline understanding of HDP, including symptoms, management, therapeutic strategies, and postpartum complications, was demonstrably lacking. Responders strongly desired improved counseling so that both they and their providers could collaboratively diagnose, appropriately manage, and robustly and continuously communicate to facilitate a partnership to address any HDP complications. CONCLUSIONS: Participants' responses regarding their HDP experience provide indispensable insight into the patient's perspectives. Our study suggests that improved education regarding possible HDP complications and transparency about the consideration of HDP and its associated outcomes during an evaluation are needed, and efforts to implement these strategies should be sought. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Preeclampsia Registry: NCT02020174.

Women's attitudes, beliefs and values about tests, and management for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Advances in research suggest the possibility of improving routine clinical care for preeclampsia using screening (predictive) and diagnostic tests. The views of women should be incorporated into the way in which such tests are used. Therefore, we explored the views of women with experience of preeclampsia and other hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDPs) about predictive and diagnostic tests, treatment risks, and expectant management. METHOD: Eight hundred and seven women with experience of preeclampsia or other HDPs completed an online questionnaire. These women were participants in the Preeclampsia Registry (USA). The questionnaire contained 22 items to elicit women's views about predictive tests (n = 8); diagnostic tests (n = 5); treatment risks (n = 7), and expectant management (n = 2). An optional text box allowed participants to add qualitative open-ended comments. Levels of agreement with the statements were reported descriptively for the sample as a whole, and a preliminary investigation of the role of lived experience in shaping women's views was conducted by comparing subgroups within the sample based on time of HDP delivery (preterm/term). The qualitative data provided in the optional text box was analysed using inductive thematic analysis to examine participants' responses. RESULTS: Women generally favored predictive and diagnostic testing, although not because they would opt for termination of pregnancy. Participants generally disagreed that taking daily low-dose aspirin (LDA) would make them nervous, with disagreement significantly higher in the preterm delivery subgroup. A high proportion of participants, especially in the preterm delivery subgroup, would take LDA throughout pregnancy. The majority of participants would be more worried about the possibility of preeclampsia than about the risks of treatments to their health (60%), and that proportion was significantly higher in the preterm delivery subgroup. There were no differences between subgroups in the views expressed about expectant management, although opinion was divided in both groups. Overall, most participants opted to put the baby's interests first. CONCLUSION: Women with experience of hypertensive disorders were enthusiastic about improved predictive and diagnostic tests. However, varied views about treatment options and expectant management suggest the need for a shared decision-making tool to enable healthcare professionals to support pregnant women's decision-making to maximize the utility of these tests and interventions.

Cardiovascular Health After Preeclampsia: Patient and Provider Perspective.

Background: Preeclampsia predicts future cardiovascular disease (CVD) yet few programs exist for post-preeclampsia care. Methods: The Health after Preeclampsia Patient and Provider Engagement Network workshop was convened at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study in June 2018. The workshop sought to identify: 1) patient perspectives on barriers and facilitators to CVD risk reduction; 2) clinical programs specialized in post-preeclampsia care; 3) recommendations by national organizations for risk reduction; and 4) next steps. Stakeholders included the Preeclampsia Foundation, patients, clinicians who had initiated CVD risk reduction programs for women with prior preeclampsia, researchers, and national task force members. Results: Participants agreed there is insufficient awareness and action to prevent CVD after preeclampsia. Patients suggested a clinician checklist to ensure communication of CVD risks, enhanced training for clinicians on the link between preeclampsia and CVD, and a post-delivery appointment with a clinician knowledgeable about this link. Clinical programs primarily served patients in the first postpartum year, bridging obstetrical and primary care. They recommended CVD risk modification with periodic blood pressure, weight, lipid and diabetes screening. Barriers included the paucity of programs designed for this population and gaps in insurance coverage after delivery. The American Heart Association, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Preeclampsia Foundation have developed guidelines and materials for patients and providers to guide management of women with prior preeclampsia. Conclusions: Integrated efforts of patients, caregivers, researchers, and national organizations are needed to improve CVD prevention after preeclampsia. This meeting's recommendations can serve as a resource and catalyst for this effort.

Randomized Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk in Women with Recent Preeclampsia.

Background: To reduce cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, we tested an online intervention to improve healthy lifestyle for women with recent preeclampsia. Materials and Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled 9-month clinical trial, Heart Health 4 Moms (HH4M), among 151 U.S. women with preeclampsia within 5 years. Sample size was planned to detect differences of 0.5 standard deviation units in primary outcomes between study arms. Preeclampsia history was validated by medical records; women with chronic hypertension were excluded. The intervention included online educational modules, a community forum, and communication with a lifestyle coach. The control group received internet links to CVD risk reduction information. Primary outcomes were self-efficacy to eat a healthy diet and increase physical activity; change in physical in/activity; adherence to the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) diet; and knowledge of and personal control over CVD risk. Secondary outcomes were weight and blood pressure. Results: In the intervention arm, 84% of participants accessed at least one online educational module; 89% completed at least three scheduled calls with the coach. At 9 months, intervention participants reported significantly greater knowledge of CVD risk factors (corrected p = 0.01), increased self-efficacy for healthy eating (p = 0.03), and less physical inactivity than controls (p = 0.0006). The groups did not differ in sense of personal control of CVD risk factors, adherence to the DASH diet, self-efficacy for physical activity, or reported physical activity. There were no differences in secondary outcomes between groups. Conclusions: The HH4M program improved CVD risk knowledge, self-efficacy to achieve a healthy diet, and reduced physical inactivity among women with recent preeclampsia.

Cardiomyopathy and Preeclampsia.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is associated with diastolic dysfunction, peripartum cardiomyopathy, and both pre-existing and subsequent maternal cardiovascular disease. Gene mutations causing idiopathic cardiomyopathy were recently implicated in peripartum cardiomyopathy. We sought to determine whether cardiomyopathy gene mutations are also a contributory factor in preeclampsia. METHODS: Subjects were participants in The Preeclampsia Registry and Biobank. After providing informed consent, subjects with a history of preeclampsia completed a detailed questionnaire and provided medical records for diagnostic confirmation. Saliva samples were collected for DNA isolation. Whole exome sequencing was performed to detect rare variants (minor allele frequency of <0.1%) in 43 genes associated with cardiomyopathy. Missense variants were deemed damaging missense if so classified by any of 7 standard function prediction algorithms. Variants were defined as loss-of-function if they caused a stop-gain, splicing, or frame-shift insertion or deletion. Results were compared with data from 2 control groups: unrelated women with a gynecologic disorder sequenced using the same methods and instruments (n=530) as well as published variant data from 33 000 subjects in the Exome Aggregation Consortium. Preeclampsia was not excluded in control groups. RESULTS: Of 181 subjects with confirmed preeclampsia, 96% were white. Seventy-two percent had ≥1 preterm preeclampsia delivery <37 weeks. Among preeclampsia subjects, whole exome sequencing demonstrated 10 rare loss-of-function variants and 228 rare damaging missense variants in the 43 cardiomyopathy genes considered. The prevalence of these loss-of-function variants was significantly higher in preeclampsia subjects (5.5%) compared with the local control (2.5%) population ( P=0.014). Sixty-eight percent of women with preeclampsia carried ≥1 loss-of-function or damaging missense variant (mean of 1.94 mutations). As seen with peripartum cardiomyopathy, most mutations (55%) were found in the TTN gene. Seventy-three percent of preeclampsia subjects had TTN mutations in the preeclampsia cohort versus 48% in local controls ( P=1.36E-11). DISCUSSION: Women who develop preeclampsia are more likely to carry protein-altering mutations in genes associated with cardiomyopathy, particularly in TTN. Mutations promoting cardiomyopathy are prevalent in preeclampsia, idiopathic cardiomyopathy, and peripartum cardiomyopathy, and they are important risk factors for a widening spectrum of cardiovascular disorders. Detecting these variants should allow more specific diagnosis, classification, counseling, and management of women at risk.

Associating Symptom Phenotype and Genotype in Preeclampsia.

Preeclampsia is a complex genetic disorder with an incompletely understood pathogenesis. Its phenotype may be better elucidated by integrating symptoms. This study aimed to identify symptoms by gestational age and associations with novel preeclampsia candidate genes. Women with a history of preeclampsia recruited from The Preeclampsia Registry completed clinical/demographic, symptom surveys and provided medical records. DNA extracted from saliva was processed with multiplexed assays for eight single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) selected to tag candidate genes and/or located in symptom susceptibility regions. Groups with versus without symptoms were compared using χ2. Associations between SNPs and symptoms were analyzed as genotype categories and presence/absence of the variant allele. Logistic regression modeling was conducted with exploratory p = .05. In 114 participants, 113 reported at least 1 of the 18 symptoms. Symptoms varied by trimester. Nine symptoms were associated with seven SNPs. Visual disturbances were associated with three SNPs and nausea/vomiting with two SNPs. Modeling adjustment for maternal age and parity resulted in 15 associations between 9 symptoms and 8 SNPs. Medical records demonstrated 100% concordance with self-reported diagnosis and 48% concordance with reported severity. Findings indicated novel symptom-genotype associations in preeclampsia. The small sample was self-selected, but results support future studies including medical records review. When validated, these results may lead to holistic phenotyping of women to characterize subsets of preeclampsia. This approach may optimize health in pregnancy and later life for mothers and offspring through prediction, prevention, and precision nursing care.

National Partnership for Maternal Safety: Consensus Bundle on Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.

National Partnership for Maternal Safety: Consensus Bundle on Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.

Consensus Bundle on Severe Hypertension During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

Complications arising from hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are among the leading causes of preventable severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Timely and appropriate treatment has the potential to significantly reduce hypertension-related complications. To assist health care providers in achieving this goal, this patient safety bundle provides guidance to coordinate and standardize the care provided to women with severe hypertension during pregnancy and the postpartum period. This is one of several patient safety bundles developed by multidisciplinary work groups of the National Partnership for Maternal Safety under the guidance of the Council on Patient Safety in Women's Health Care. These safety bundles outline critical clinical practices that should be implemented in every maternity care setting. Similar to other bundles that have been developed and promoted by the Partnership, the hypertension safety bundle is organized into four domains: Readiness, Recognition and Prevention, Response, and Reporting and Systems Learning. Although the bundle components may be adapted to meet the resources available in individual facilities, standardization within an institution is strongly encouraged. This commentary provides information to assist with bundle implementation.