Psychosocial characteristics of alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver disease recipient candidates in liver transplantation: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: There are long-standing controversies about the transplant indications for alcoholic liver disease (ALD), because of the recognition that ALD is fundamentally self-inflicted. However, it is unclear whether psychosocial characteristics of ALD are different from that of non-alcoholic liver disease (NALD) in the selection of liver transplantation (LT) recipients. We aimed to clarify the psychosocial characteristics of ALD recipients (ALD-R)/ALD recipient candidates (ALD-RC) and NALD recipients (NALD-R)/ NALD recipient candidates (NALD-RC). METHODS: From 2011 to 2019, 75 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational study (ALD-RC, n = 19; NALD-RC, n = 56), LT were carried out as follow; ALD-R, n = 6; NALD-R, n = 52. We evaluated psychosocial characteristics in the preoperative period and 3, 12 months after LT (ALD-R, n = 3/3; NALD-R, n = 28/25). The following scales were used to evaluate psychosocial characteristics: Visual Analogue Scale, Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, Brief Evaluation of Medication Influences and Beliefs, Social Support Questionnaire (SSQ), Temperament and Character Inventory, Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI), the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). RESULTS: When evaluating on the basis of abstinence rule, a comparison of ALD-RC and NALD-RC in the preoperative period identified similar patterns of psychosocial characteristics, except that the NALD-RC scored higher on the PBI item "overprotection from mother" (P < 0.05). The only significant difference between ALD-R and NALD-R after liver transplantation was in SSQ scores at 3 months. CONCLUSION: The psychosocial characteristics of ALD-RC and NALD-RC may be similar when evaluated on the basis of Japan's abstinence rule. This result also imply that the psychosocial characteristics of ALD-RC may differ from the previously reported psychosocial characteristics of alcohol dependent patients. These findings have the potential to provide helpful information for the evaluation of ALD-RC.

Successful Post-Transplant Psychiatric Interventions During Long-Term Follow-Up of Patients Receiving Liver Transplants for Alcoholic Liver Disease.

BACKGROUND Around 20-30% of patients who undergo liver transplantation (LT) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD) will resume heavy drinking after LT. It is crucial to control post-transplant relapse of alcohol use, because alcoholic recidivism has been shown to have a negative impact on post-transplant compliance and long-term outcomes of LT recipients. However, there is currently no specific, effective psychiatric intervention for preventing additional alcohol consumption in clinical practice. CASE REPORT We present 3 patients who underwent LT for ALD at Nagoya University Hospital who were followed up for prolonged periods (7.2, 8.8, and 11.3 years, respectively), and review the psychiatric interventions employed to address critical situations. Additional alcohol consumption was noted in Case 1, but prompt collaborative care led to stable abstinence. In Case 2, marked anger and irritation were exacerbated as a result of work, but the anger was controlled by anger management. Case 3 abused a minor tranquilizer, but limit-setting resulted in adequate medical adherence. CONCLUSIONS Transplant teams need to provide comprehensive treatment for alcoholic recidivism to improve long-term health after LT for ALD.

Risk of alcohol use relapse after liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease.

AIM: To investigate factors, including psychosocial factors, associated with alcoholic use relapse after liver transplantation (LT) for alcoholic liver disease (ALD). METHODS: The clinical records of 102 patients with ALD who were referred to Nagoya University Hospital for LT between May 2003 and March 2015 were retrospectively evaluated. History of alcohol intake was obtained from their clinical records and scored according to the High-Risk Alcoholism Relapse scale, which includes duration of heavy drinking, types and amount of alcohol usually consumed, and previous inpatient treatment history for alcoholism. All patients were assessed for eligibility for LT according to comprehensive criteria, including Child-Pugh score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and psychosocial criteria. RESULTS: Of the 102 patients with ALD referred for LT, seven (6.9%) underwent LT. One (14.3%) of these seven patients returned to heavy drinking, but that patient was able to successfully quit drinking following an immediate intervention, consisting of psychotherapeutic education and supportive psychotherapy, by a psychiatrist. A comparison between the transplantation/registration (T/R) group, consisting of the seven patients who underwent LT and 10 patients listed for deceased donor LT, and 50 patients who did not undergo LT and were not listed for deceased donor LT (non-T/R group), showed statistically significant differences in duration of abstinence period (P < 0.01), duration of heavy drinking (P < 0.05), adherence to medical treatment (P < 0.01), and declaration of abstinence (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with ALD referred for LT require comprehensive evaluation, including evaluation of psychosocial criteria, to prevent alcoholic recidivism.

[Psychosocial aspects of liver transplantation indication criteria for alcohol-related liver failure].

OBJECTIVES: Consensus regarding psychosocial aspects relevant for the liver transplantation indication criteria in case of alcohol-related liver failure remains to be established. Thus we investigated the psychosocial aspects of candidates for liver transplantation for alcohol-related liver failure in order to determine the indication criteria. SUBJECTS: We evaluated the psychosocial aspects of 19 candidates (14 male and 5 female patients) who met the physical liver transplantation indication criteria for alcohol-related liver failure at Nagoya University Hospital between 2004 and 2012. RESULTS: Of the 19 subjects, 4 underwent liver transplantation (average follow-up phase: 42.3 +/- 36.5 months), and 3 were monitored without resuming alcohol consumption. One patient temporarily resumed alcohol consumption at 12 months after transplantation. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study suggested the importance of pre-and post-transplant psychosocial evaluation. A prospective well-designed analysis is essential to determine psychosocial aspects regarding the liver transplantation indication criteria for alcohol-related liver failure.

[Alcohol dependence and liver transplantation: transplant coordinator's view].

Patients with alcohol-related liver failure are highly probably complicated by alcohol dependence according to the definition in WHO-ICD. Not a few such patients are introduced to liver transplant program when they are decompensated and face the need for liver replacement. Transplant team should evaluate them thoroughly also from the viewpoint of dependence medicine and multidisciplinary approach including psychiatrist is indispensable for the decision of psychosocial indication. Liver transplant therapy should never become an ultimate enabling. Four patients with alcoholic cirrhosis recently received deceased-donor liver transplantation in our program. We reviewed our role and involvement in the process from the recipient transplant coordinator's point of view.