Outcome of Palliative Urinary Diversion and Observation for Malignant Extrinsic Ureteral Obstruction.

Background: Urologists are often referred to manage the extrinsic malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) caused by nonurological malignancies. Usually palliative urinary diversion (ureteral stent or nephrostomy) will be performed; however, in the cases of no symptom or poor prognosis, observation (OBS) without any intervention will be selected. There are few reports about outcome of the OBS policy for MUO. Objective: To evaluate the outcome of palliative urinary diversion or OBS for MUO. Design: We retrospectively reviewed the selection of treatment and the prognosis. Setting/Subjects: A total of 151 cases were introduced to our department as MUO between April 2011 and December 2016. Measurements: The patients were divided to immediate palliative urinary diversion (immediate-DIV) or OBS. The latter patients were subdivided to OBS followed by deferred palliative urinary diversion (deferred-DIV), and observation only (OBS-only). Results: There was no significant difference between immediate-DIV and OBS about overall survival (OS) from the consultation. In OBS group, deferred-DIV did not prolong prognosis from the consultation more than OBS-only. In the same way, there was no significant difference between immediate-DIV and deferred-DIV in OS from the intervention. Unfavorable prognostic factors for OS were lack of anticancer treatment after consultation, symptoms of MUO, and gastrointestinal cancer. When we classified the patients by these factors, the group with three factors showed significantly poorer prognosis than the others. Conclusion: Immediate-DIV or OBS did not influence the prognosis in the whole patients. Three prognostic factors that will be judged by urologists easily might be useful for the indication and timing of palliative urinary diversion.

[A CASE OF PELVIC CONGESTION SYNDROME SUCCESSFULLY TREATED WITH ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY].

An 84-year-old woman was referred for lower abdominal pain lasting more than six months. Computed tomography showed a left ovarian varicose vein and a peri-uterine venous plexus. Due to suspected pelvic congestion syndrome, left ovarian venography and left ovarian embolization were performed. Blood flowed back through the dilated left ovarian vein and through the uterine venous plexus to the right ovarian vein. Embolization of the left ovarian vein with a sclerosing agent resulted in the disappearance of the venous congestion. Preoperative Visual Analogue Scale was 7, which decreased to 3 after the operation. As a result, improvements in QOL were recognized. Although pelvic congestion syndrome is a treatable disease, its recognition as a urological disease is low. Here, we have reported a case of pelvic congestion syndrome in which symptoms improved with treatment and have discussed its pathophysiology and treatment.

[A CASE OF DISSEMINATED INTRAVASCULAR COAGULATION CAUSED BY ADVANCED PROSTATE CANCER].

The 79 years old man was referred to our department due to high value of serum prostate specific antigen (39.54 ng/ml). The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated diffuse low signal at his prostate. Bone scintigraphy revealed multiple metastatic lesion. Needle biopsy was performed for definite diagnosis. Systemic purpura showed after prostate needle biopsy although he had noticed local purpura at his back before the examination. He was diagnosed as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) syndrome due to advanced prostate cancer. Treatment with anti-DIC therapy, blood transfusion, subcutaneous injection of degarelix acetate settled the DIC. Abiraterone hydrochloride and prednisolone was added as we confirmed Gleason score5+4 in the pathological examination. He has been alive for 15 months after diagnosis without desease progression.