Predictors of Survival Without Intestinal Resection after First-Line Endovascular Revascularization in Patients with Acute Arterial Mesenteric Ischemia.

Background Acute arterial mesenteric ischemia requires emergency treatment and is associated with high mortality rate and poor quality of life. Identifying factors associated with survival without intestinal resection (hereafter, intestinal resection-free [IRF] survival) could help in treatment decision-making after first-line endovascular revascularization. Purpose To identify factors associated with 30-day IRF survival in patients with acute arterial mesenteric ischemia whose first-line treatment was endovascular revascularization. Materials and Methods Patients with acute arterial mesenteric ischemia whose first-line treatment was endovascular revascularization because of a low probability of bowel necrosis were included in this single-center retrospective cohort (May 2014 to August 2022). Patient demographics, laboratory values, clinical characteristics at admission, CT scans, angiograms, and endovascular revascularization-related variables were included. The primary end point was 30-day IRF survival, and secondary end points were 3-month, 1-year, and 3-year overall survival. Factors independently associated with 30-day IRF survival were identified with binary logistic regression. Results A total of 117 patients (median age, 70 years [IQR, 60-77]; 53 female, 64 male) were included. Within 30 days after revascularization, 73 of 117 patients (62%) survived without resection, 28 of 117 (24%) survived after resection, 14 of 117 (12%) died without resection, and two of 117 (2%) underwent resection but died. The 30-day IRF survival was 63% (74 of 117). The 3-month, 1-year, and 3-year mortality rate was 18% (21 of 117), 21% (25 of 117), and 27% (32 of 117), respectively. Independent predictors of 30-day IRF survival were persistent bowel enhancement at initial CT (odds ratio [OR], 0.3; 95% CI: 0.2, 0.8; P = .013) and C-reactive protein (CRP) level less than 100 mg/L (OR, 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1, 0.8; P = .002). The 30-day IRF survival was 86%, 61%, 47%, and 23% in patients with both favorable features, persistent bowel enhancement but CRP level greater than 100 mg/L, no bowel enhancement but CRP level less than 100 mg/L, and both unfavorable features, respectively. Conclusion Independent predictors associated with 30-day IRF survival in patients with acute arterial mesenteric ischemia whose first-line treatment was endovascular revascularization were persistent bowel wall enhancement at initial CT and CRP level less than 100 mg/L. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Strengthening the Description of Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusions in Acute Mesenteric Ischaemia: Proposition for an Anatomical Classification.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to propose computed tomography angiography (CTA) based anatomical segmentation of the superior mesenteric artery (SMA), in order to standardise the reporting of occlusive lesions in acute mesenteric ischaemia (AMI). METHODS: A retrospective CTA evaluation of patients with occlusive AMI admitted between 2016 and 2021. After the screening of 468 patients, 95 were included. The SMA was segmented into proximal (S1, ostium to the inferior pancreaticoduodenal artery), middle (S2, from the inferior pancreaticoduodenal to the ileocolic artery), and distal (S3, downstream the ileocolic artery) sections. The jejunal arteries were labelled J1 to J6, and the middle, right, and ileocolic arteries C1, C2, and C3. Two radiologists independently applied the proposed segmentation to a cohort of patients with occlusive AMI to describe occlusive lesions. Intra- and inter-rater agreement was assessed with kappa statistics. RESULTS: Occlusions involved one segment in 50 (53%) patients (S1, n = 27 [28%]; S2, n = 12 [13%]; S3, n = 11 [12%]); two segments in 37 (39%) patients (S2/S3, n = 31 [33%]; S1/S2, n = 3 [3%]; S1/S3, n = 3 [3%]); and all three segments in eight patients (S1/S2/S3, 8%). The median number of jejunal arteries was four (interquartile range 3, 4.5). C1 and C2 were present in 93 (98%) and 23 patients (24%), respectively. Almost perfect intra-rater agreement was obtained for S1 (91% agreement, κ = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 - 0.92); substantial agreement was obtained for S2 (90% agreement, κ = 0.80, 95% CI 0.68 - 0.92) and S3 (86% agreement, κ = 0.72, 95% CI 0.58 - 0.86). Almost perfect inter-rater agreement (with the second junior reading) was obtained for S1 (97% agreement, κ = 0.95, 95% CI 0.89 - 1.0), S2 (91% agreement, κ = 0.82, 95% CI 0.72 - 0.92), and S3 (agreement 96%, κ = 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 - 0.99). CONCLUSION: A standardised CTA based anatomical segmental description of SMA occlusive lesions in AMI is proposed; it provided substantial to almost perfect intra- and inter-rater agreement for most anatomical segments.