Salivary Gland Ultrasound in Primary Sjögren's Syndrome: Current and Future Perspectives.

Salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) is the imaging modality of choice for the assessment of parotid and submandibular gland parenchyma. Being highly effective, non-invasive and easy to perform, SGUS has become increasingly popular among specialists in assessing salivary gland (SG) abnormalities, including those commonly found in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS). SGUS may be useful in the assessment of pSS and its complications, the most serious being the development of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). SGUS may also be useful in the characterization and differential diagnosis of diffuse and focal abnormalities commonly associated with pSS, and may act as a guide for core-needle biopsy (CNB), an established, safe, and feasible technique, which provides enough viable tissue for the diagnosis and assessment of lymphoproliferative diseases of the SG. The combination of SGUS with other tools, such as sonoelastography and artificial intelligence (AI), could further improve the usefulness of SGUS in the management of pSS. In this perspective, we summarize current and future applications of SGUS in pSS.

Sonographic features of lymphoma of the major salivary glands diagnosed with ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in Sjögren's syndrome.

OBJECTIVES: To identify ultrasound (US) features of lymphomas (L) of major salivary glands (SGs) in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) patients and to differentiate US pattern of L and non-L. METHODS: Prospectively, from September 2019 to March 2021, 27 pSS-patients with clinical findings suspicious for L of the SGs underwent US evaluation followed by US-guided core-needle biopsy (CNB). For each patient, we assessed the OMERACT score, dichotomised (0/1 "lower", 2/3 "higher"), and we compared it between L-pSS and nonL-pSS groups. For focal lesions, echogenicity, inner appearance, shape, margins, presence of septa, vascularisation and posterior acoustic features were also assessed and compared between the two groups; we planned to consider as "suspicious" features more frequently associated with L. We expected to compare frequencies at which two or more "suspicious" features were simultaneously present between L-pSS and nonL-pSS. P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: L-pSS showed more inhomogeneous glandular pattern (100% vs. 69.2% higher OMERACT; p=0.0407). For focal lesions, the "suspicious" features identified were: OMERACT grade 3, very hypoechoic, homogenous, oval shape, well-defined margins, presence of septa, colour-Doppler vascularization, posterior acoustic enhancement. 6/8 and 7/8 simultaneous suspicious features were significantly higher among L-pSS patients, compared to nonL-pSS (88.9% vs. 28.6%, p=0.034 for 6/8 features; 77.8% vs. 14.3%, p=0.040 for 7/8 features). CONCLUSIONS: L of the major SGs in pSS was always associated with OMERACT scores 2 or 3 and presented with diffuse or focal patterns. For focal lesions, the association of more "suspicious" features made the diagnosis of L increasingly more likely. This information can help to improve planning of US-guided CNB.

Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in assessing indeterminate renal lesions and Bosniak ≥2F complex renal cysts found incidentally on CT or MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in reclassifying incidental renal findings categorized as indeterminate lesions (IL) or Bosniak ≥ 2F complex renal cysts (CRC) on CT or MRI. METHODS: We retrospectively included 44 subjects who underwent CEUS between 2016 and 2019 to assess 48 IL (n = 12) and CRC (n = 36) incidentally found on CT or MRI. CEUS was performed by one radiologist with 10 year of experience with a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. The same radiologist, blinded to clinical information and previous CT/MRIs, retrospectively reviewed CEUS images/videos, categorizing renal findings with Bosniak-derived imaging categories ranging from 0 (indeterminate) to 5 (solid lesion). CEUS-related reclassification rate was calculated (proportion of IL reclassified with an imaging category >0, or CRC reclassified below or above imaging category >2F). Using histological examination or a ≥ 24 months follow-up as the standard of reference, we also estimated per-lesion sensitivity/specificity for malignancy. RESULTS: CEUS reclassified 24/48 findings (50.0%; 95% C.I. 35.2-64.7), including 12/12 IL (100%; 95% CI 73.5-100) and 12/36 CRC (33.3%; 95% C.I. 18.5-50.9), mostly above category >2F (66.7%). CEUS and CT/MRI showed 96.0% (95%CI 79.7-99.9) vs 44.0% (95%CI 24.4-65.1) sensitivity, and 82.6% (95%CI 61.2-95.1) vs 60.9% (95%CI 38.5-80.3%) specificity. CONCLUSION: CEUS provided substantial and accurate reclassification of CT/MRI incidental findings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Previous studies included Bosniak 2 incidental findings, thus possibly underestimating CEUS-induced reclassification rates. Using a more meaningful cut-off (Bosniak ≥2F), problem-solving CEUS was effective as well, with higher reclassification rates for CRC than in literature.