RESUMO
Pain after vaginal prolapse repair surgery with mesh is generally attributed to the mesh fixation, particularly to mesh erosion, dislocation or the development of hematoma. However, once all the causes have been excluded, the urinary system, bladder and ureters should be accurately examined by means of endovaginal ultrasound. This report concerns the case of a 72-year-old woman who had undergone mesh-supported prolapse surgery 3 months prior, with no other relevant diseases, who visited the emergency department complaining of dull, right-sided colic pain. The endovaginal ultrasound examination revealed a prevesical ureteral calculus on the right side with consequent dilatation of the proximal ureter. Computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis confirmed the calculus in the distal right ureter and revealed a right renal lower pole calculus. The patient underwent treatment via an operative ureterorenoscopy with removal of stones and placement of a double-J-stent. Two months later, a second ureterorenoscopy was performed with double-J-stent removal and concomitant stone extraction. It appears that no similar cases have been reported in the literature. This is why, during the urogynecological postoperative follow-up, it is of paramount importance to examine the entire urogenital system with endovaginal ultrasound. This case report highlights how, through a simple, non-invasive, radiation-free examination, like ultrasound, most of the post-operative complications of vaginal prolapse repair surgery using mesh, including urolithiasis, can be excluded.
RESUMO
Introduction: Changes in surgical practice patterns to cure stress urinary incontinence (SUI) became evident after FDA warnings regarding vaginal mesh were issued. The primary aim was to describe nationwide numbers of suburethral alloplastic slings (SAS) inserted in 2010, 2015, 2018 and 2021 in Germany. Secondary, numbers were related to SUI specific non-alloplastic alternatives and bulking agents. Additionally, age distribution and overall inpatient surgeries in women were subject to analysis. Materials and Methods: Descriptive study utilizing data gathered from the German Federal Statistical Office ( www.destatis.de ). Included were the following procedures of inpatient surgery: A. SAS; B. non-allplastic slings; C. open/laparoscopic colposuspension; D. Bulking agents; overall changes and changes in age distribution (groups of 5-years intervals) are described. Results: Overall, n = 3599466 female inpatient procedures were analyzed. There was a considerable decrease of SAS surgeries of 28.49% between 2010 (n = 23464) and 2015 (n = 16778), and a decrease of 12.42% between 2015 and 2018 (n = 14695) and an additional decrease of 40.66% between 2018 and 2021 (n = 8720). Over time a 55.03% continuous decrease in non-alloplastic slings was observed (n = 725 in 2010 to n = 326 in 2021). Open and laparoscopic colposuspension numbers went down with a rate of 58.23% (n = 4415 in 2010, n = 1844 in 2021). Between 2010 and 2018, only bulking agent procedures increased with a rate of 5.89% from n = 1425 to n = 1509. Conclusions: There was a considerable decrease in inpatient surgical procedures using SAS. Alternatives not only failed to compensate, but experienced also a major decline.
RESUMO
Aim This completely revised interdisciplinary S2k-guideline on the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care of female patients with urinary incontinence (AWMF registry number: 015-091) was published in December 2021. This guideline combines and summarizes earlier guidelines such as "Female stress urinary incontinence," "Female urge incontinence" and "Use of Ultrasonography in Urogynecological Diagnostics" for the first time. The guideline was coordinated by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) and the Working Group for Urogynecology and Plastic Pelvic Floor Reconstruction (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Urogynäkologie und plastische Beckenbodenrekonstruktion e.âV., AGUB). Methods This S2k-guideline was developed using a structured consensus process involving representative members from different medical specialties and was commissioned by the Guidelines Commission of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG. The guideline is based on the current version of the guideline "Urinary Incontinence in Adults" published by the European Association of Urology (EAU). Country-specific items associated with the respective healthcare systems in Germany, Austria and Switzerland were also incorporated. Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on the surgical treatment of female patients with stress urinary incontinence and urge incontinence. Specific solutions for the diagnostic workup and treatment of uncomplicated and complicated urinary incontinence are discussed. The diagnostics and surgical treatment of iatrogenic urogenital fistula are presented.
RESUMO
Aim This completely revised interdisciplinary S2k-guideline on the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care of female patients with urinary incontinence (AWMF registry number: 015-091) was published in December 2021. This guideline combines and summarizes earlier guidelines such as "Female stress urinary incontinence," "Female urge incontinence" and "Use of Ultrasonography in Urogynecological Diagnostics" for the first time. The guideline was coordinated by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, DGGG) and the Working Group for Urogynecology and Plastic Pelvic Floor Reconstruction (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Urogynäkologie und plastische Beckenbodenrekonstruktion e.âV., AGUB). Methods This S2k-guideline was developed using a structured consensus process involving representative members from different medical specialties and was commissioned by the Guidelines Commission of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG. The guideline is based on the current version of the guideline "Urinary Incontinence in Adults" published by the European Association of Urology (EAU). Country-specific items associated with the respective healthcare systems in Germany, Austria and Switzerland were also incorporated. Recommendations The short version of this guideline consists of recommendations and statements on the epidemiology, etiology, classification, symptoms, diagnostics, and treatment of female patients with urinary incontinence. Specific solutions for the diagnostic workup and appropriate conservative and medical therapies for uncomplicated and complication urinary incontinence are discussed.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor disorders are common, especially in pregnancy and after delivery, in the postmenopausal period, and old age, and they can significantly impact on the patient's quality of life. METHODS: This narrative review is based on publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature, with special consideration to original articles and AWMF guidelines. RESULTS: Pelvic floor physiotherapy (evidence level [EL] 1), the use of pessaries (EL2), and local estrogen therapy can help alleviate stress/urge urinary incontinence and other symptoms of urogenital prolapse. Physiotherapy can reduce urinary incontinence by 62% during pregnancy and by 29% 3-6 months post partum. Anticholinergic and ß-sympathomimetic drugs are indicated for the treatment of an overactive bladder with or without urinary urge incontinence (EL1). For patients with stress urinary incontinence, selective serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors can be prescribed (EL1). The tension-free tape is the current standard of surgical treatment (EL1); in an observational follow-up study, 87.2% of patients were satisfied with the outcome 17 years after surgery. Fascial reconstruction techniques are indicated for the treatment of primary pelvic organ prolapse, and mesh-based surgical procedures for recurrences and severe prolapse (EL1). CONCLUSION: Urogynecological symptoms should be specifically asked about by physicians of all relevant specialties; if present, they should be treated conservatively at first. Structured surgical techniques with and without mesh are available for the treatment of urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Preventive measures against pelvic floor dysfunction should be offered during pregnancy and post partum.
Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse , Incontinência Urinária , Humanos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Qualidade de Vida , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária/terapia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/terapia , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify differences in the content and quality of online health information for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) presented in social media and digital search engines to sustainably enhance patient guidance for adequate platforms for seeking online health information on POP. METHODS: The platforms Google search, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, and YouTube were searched for the keyword "pelvic organ prolapse". Results were categorized as useful, misleading, advertising, and personal experience. Data were categorized into healthcare professionals, professional organisations, industry, patients, and individuals. The readability score and Health On the Net (HON) code seal were analyzed for Google. Descriptive and univariate analysis was performed. RESULTS: The source with the highest quantity of useful content was YouTube whereas LinkedIn included mostly advertisement and misleading content. YouTube and Google provided the greatest variety of health information. Social media platforms identified emotional distress and sleep disturbances as a common side effect of POP which is limited considered in clinical practice and provide novel insights of bothersome symptoms related to the disease. The spectrum of different surgical techniques was limited in all platforms. Only 12 (40.0%) were HON-qualified websites with a mean readability score of 10.4 which is considered fairly difficult to read. CONCLUSION: Besides Google search, YouTube was identified as a valuable online source for POP information. However, encompassing information of surgical techniques was limited in all platforms. Urogynecological association may contribute to improve patient information by providing online health information which is complete and easy to understand.
Assuntos
Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Mídias Sociais , Compreensão , Humanos , Internet , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Ferramenta de BuscaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIs) complicate about 5% of vaginal births. The risk of anal incontinence is increased. OASI detection rates improve with knowledge and experience. This study describes Berlin's medical care 10 years after starting training focusing on standards set at the German speaking country guideline on third degree tears. METHODS: In 2018, women experiencing OASIs in Berlin's obstetric departments were informed about the study, including standardized after-care. Descriptive analysis in respect to anal sphincter function and risk factor analysis was performed. RESULTS: 207 OASIs occurred in Berlin. 189 women participated. In 148 cases guideline according terminology was applied (n = 57 IIIa, n = 58 IIIb, n = 23 IIIc, n = 10 IV). Minor tears predominated. Minor and major tears differed in respect to birthweight (p = 0.047). N = 75 reported no sphincter function affection. Macrosomia compromised sphincter function (p = 0.008). Univariate analysis showed age (p < 0.001), male infants (p = 0.017) and higher parity (p = 0.013) to be risk factors. Symptomatic women had weaker pelvic floor muscle (p = 0.009) and suffered from urinary incontinence (p < 0.001). Multiple regression analysis showed an association of St. Mark's Scores ≥ 5 with parity (CI 0.191-0.847, p = 0.016) and ≥ 10 with maternal age (CI 1.077-1.396, p = 0.002) and for urinary incontinence with birthweight (CI 1.000-1.002, p = 0.032 and St. Mark's categories ((0-4, 5-9, > 10) CI 2.657-10.904, p = 0.005)). CONCLUSION: Overall, Berlin's medical care of OASI is based on guideline standards. Anal and urinary incontinence correlate. Parity and higher age are risk factors in developing severe anal symptoms.
Assuntos
Incontinência Fecal , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto , Incontinência Urinária , Canal Anal/lesões , Berlim/epidemiologia , Peso ao Nascer , Parto Obstétrico/métodos , Incontinência Fecal/epidemiologia , Incontinência Fecal/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/epidemiologia , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/etiologia , Gravidez , Fatores de Risco , Incontinência Urinária/etiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The international Charité-MAYO Conference aims to promote international dialog on diagnostics, management, scientific breakthroughs, and state-of-the-art surgical procedures in gynecology and gynecologic oncology and senology. Live surgeries are a fundamental tool of interdisciplinary and international exchange of experts in their respective fields. Currently, there is a controversial and emotional debate about the true value, risks, and safety of live surgical broadcasts. The aim of the current study is to analyze peri-operative risks in patients who were operated live during the Charité-MAYO Conferences. METHODS: Live surgeries were performed by the core Charité team consisting of gynecologic oncologic surgeons, breast and plastic surgeons, partly in collaboration with visiting gynecologic oncologic surgeons. We performed a retrospective analysis of live surgeries performed during seven Charité-MAYO Conferences from 2010 to 2019 held in Berlin, Germany. Patients' files and tumor databases were analyzed as required and patients were contacted to update their long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients who were operated live were included. The types of surgery were as follows: urogynecologic procedures (n=13), breast surgery (n=21), and gynecologic oncology surgery for ovarian, uterine, vulvar or cervical cancer (n=35). Peri-operative complications were assessed according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Despite a high rate of complete resection and the high frequency of multivisceral procedures, the rate of peri-operative complications was within the range published in the literature. Time of surgery and length of intensive unit care and hospital stay did not differ from data acquired at the home institution. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our analysis, live surgeries appear to be safe when performed within a multidisciplinary setting without an increase in surgical morbidity and mortality compared with historical controls and without compromise of patients' outcome. This is the first analysis of its kind to set the basis for patient information and consent for this type of surgeries.
Assuntos
Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Feminino , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/complicações , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of the study was to analyze anatomical and functional outcomes after sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for vaginal vault prolapse pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) II-III by random use of absorbable (Vicryl) and non-absorbable sutures (Ethibond) for vaginal mesh fixation. METHODS: This study was designed as a two-center randomized controlled study (RCT). The primary objective was to evaluate the anatomical outcome. Success was defined when the vaginal apex (point C; POPQ) did not descend more than 50% of the total vaginal length (tvl) during Valsalva. Patients completed a pelvic examination incorporating the POPQ and questionnaires (the German pelvic floor questionnaire and the PISQ-12 questionnaire) at baseline and 6 months postsurgery. Perioperative adverse events (AE) were recorded. Sample size calculations, based on a 10% non-inferiority limit required 100 participants per group, with power = 90%. RESULTS: In 190 out of 195 women (ETH group n = 96; VIC group n = 94) anatomical success was achieved. The relative risk of anatomical success failure in the VIC group versus the ETH group was 0.69, with a 95% confidence interval 0.12-4.02. The change in the symptom scores did not differ significantly between the ETH and the VIC group. In the ETH group, three suture penetrations into the vagina were observed, and none in the VIC group 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical success after SCP for vaginal vault prolapse POPQ II-III is not affected by suture type for vaginal monofilament mesh attachment. Moreover, we did not see any differences in functional outcomes between the two groups. Three suture penetrations into the vagina were observed in the ETH group, and none in the VIC group 6 months postoperatively.
Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Telas Cirúrgicas , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Suturas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vagina/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: In developed countries urogenital fistulas are rare and usually a complication of surgery or radiation therapy. Surgical repair can be accomplished transvaginally or by laparotomy, laparoscopy, robotic-assisted laparoscopy, or transurethral endoscopy. Closure can be achieved with or without tissue interposition. The vaginal approach is the least invasive and a variety of techniques with or without tissue interpositions and flaps have been described. This study reviews surgical approaches and techniques for the repair of nonradiogenic urogenital fistulas. METHODS: We identified and reviewed records from all patients treated for urogenital fistulas at our unit between 2008 and 2018. We analyzed fistula location, etiology, type and duration of corrective surgery, length of hospitalization, as well as complication and success rates. RESULTS: Fifty patients (mean age 52 years) were identified. 49 fistulas were related to previous gynecological surgery, 3 were related to obstetric trauma. Thirty-four patients had vesicovaginal, 11 urethrovaginal, 3 ureterovaginal, and 2 neobladder-vaginal fistulas. Forty-eight patients (96%) were operated on using a vaginal approach; a modified Sims-Simon repair was used in 47 cases (94%). No flaps or tissue interpositions were used. In 48 patients (96%) successful closure was achieved with one operation; the modified Sims-Simon technique was successful in all 47 cases. The median operation time was 40 min (range, 20-100 min); the complication rate was 14%. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of vaginal repair of benign gynecological fistulas. The success rate was high and extensive procedures were avoided.
Assuntos
Fístula Vaginal , Fístula Vesicovaginal , Feminino , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gravidez , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Fístula Vaginal/etiologia , Fístula Vaginal/cirurgia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/etiologia , Fístula Vesicovaginal/cirurgiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the performance of mesh-augmented repair of anterior pelvic organ prolapse (POP) with or without apical vaginal wall involvement in women with recurrent or complex prolapse. METHODS: This multicenter cohort study included women undergoing surgery with Calistar S (Promedon, Argentina) for anterior POP between 2016 and 2018. The SCENIHR opinion was considered for patient selection, surgeon's experience and choice of implant. Patients were prospectively invited to assess effectiveness and safety by anamnesis, validated questionnaires and pelvic examination. A composite endpoint defined by POP-Q ≤ 1, absence of a vaginal bulge symptom and repeated surgery for POP was used to define treatment success. Descriptive statistics were applied. McNemar or Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used as paired samples tests. The significance level was set at 5%. RESULTS: A total of 107 non-fertile women with a mean age of 70.6 years were enrolled. Ninety-three (86.9%) women presented with recurrent prolapse. The mean follow-up time was 18.5 months. Treatment success was achieved in 76% of cases according the composite endpoint, with 98% reaching POP-Q ≤ 1 and a significant improvement in quality of life (p < 0.001). Mesh exposure occurred in six (5.6%) patients, although none required further surgery. Four (3.7%) patients reported dyspareunia, and a single (0.9%) patient displayed a prominence due to mesh folding. CONCLUSIONS: Mesh-augmented repair of anterior POP is effective and safe in women with recurrent or complex prolapse. Hence, in a select patient population, the benefits of mesh-augmented POP repair still outweigh the risks.
Assuntos
Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico , Telas Cirúrgicas , Idoso , Argentina , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Qualidade de Vida , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Vagina/cirurgiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Midurethral slings are a well-established treatment option in women suffering stress urinary incontinence. Various different products and methods are used, therefore, the aim of our study was to compare two inside-out retropubic slings (TVT exact® vs. RetroArc®) inserted in two different ways regarding perioperative and mid-term outcomes. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled non-inferiority multicentre trial, primary endpoint was postoperative cure rate, both objective (negative cough test) and subjective (absence of leakage during physical activity using the UDI-6 questionnaire). Secondary endpoints were patients' satisfaction (Likert scale; ICIQ-UI-SF questionnaires). In addition, intra-and postoperative complications were evaluated. The TVT®-group was operated with an empty bladder, a 18 CH catheter was used with a straight inserter as instructed. Patients randomized into the RetroArc®-group were operated without inserter leading to a reduced catheter size (14 CH), bladder was filled (200 ml) during the procedure. RESULTS: Of the 303 women, 152 were randomized to the TVT® and 151 to the RetroArc® operation. At 3 months, n = 288 (95.0%) and at 12 months n = 229 (75.6%) were assessed. In postoperative objective cure the RetroArc®-procedure was not inferior to TVT® (p = 0.144). In subjective cure, however, the TVT exact® procedure achieved significant better results (TVT® 76.1%, RetroArc® 54.3%, p = 0.002). Perioperative complications were in majority voiding difficulties and lower after the TVT exact®-procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Retropubic sling procedures are safe and successful to treat female stress urinary incontinence. However, different materials and techniques result in differences between outcomes also experienced surgeons should be aware of.
Assuntos
Slings Suburetrais/normas , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: It was the aim to evaluate the personal preference of mode of delivery and to analyze differences between medical professionals and non-medical professionals. Interest in participating in a risk stratification system was evaluated. We hypothesized that gaining information about risk stratification provided in the survey could potentially change participants' decision regarding the preferred mode of delivery; therefore, subjects were asked twice (before and after providing information). METHODS: Five cohorts [four professionals (MP) including participants of the German Urogynecology Congress 2017, employees of two major university hospitals in Germany, and members of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and one non-professional group (NP) including pregnant women] were invited online to participate in this survey. RESULTS: Vaginal delivery was the preferred mode of delivery in both groups (MP 90.4% vs. NP 88.8%; p = 0.429). MP are more likely to opt for CS due to concerns regarding pelvic floor disorders (MP 56.6% vs. NP 9.1%; p < 0.001). Likewise, parity and prior experienced CS (pCS) had a significant impact on the decision towards vaginal delivery (parity MP OR 7.5 95% CI 4.6-12.3, NP OR 9.3 95% CI 1.9-44.2; (pCS) MP OR 0.12 95% CI 0.07-0.19, NP OR 0.05 95% CI 0.01-0.25). There is great interest in participating in risk stratification systems in the majority of participants (68.9%). CONCLUSIONS: MP and NP prefer vaginal birth for themselves or their partners. Within the group that opted for CS, MP were significantly more often concerned about pelvic floor disorders. Future prevention aspects might include education about pelvic floor disorders.
Assuntos
Cesárea/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação a Distância/métodos , Pessoal de Saúde/normas , Mães/psicologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Tomada de Decisões , Parto Obstétrico , Feminino , Humanos , Internet , Gravidez , Gestão de Riscos , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Stabilization of the vaginal apex (level 1) is an important component of operations to correct pelvic organ prolapse (POP). We report functional and anatomical results and patient-reported outcomes of our technique of vaginal vault fixation at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. METHODS: One hundred and nine patients-mean 69 years, range 50.4-83.8; body mass index (BMI) 26.3, range 17.7-39.5-with symptomatic stage 2-3 uterine prolapse combined with stage 3-4 cystocele underwent vaginal hysterectomy with anterior vaginal wall repair; the apex was formed with high closure of the peritoneum and incorporation of the uterosacral and round ligaments. Only absorbable sutures were used. Follow-up included clinical examination with Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q) scoring, introital ultrasonography, quality of life (QoL) Likert scale, and the German Pelvic Floor Questionnaire. RESULTS: Seventy patients (64%) were available for a follow-up after a mean of 2.8 years (range, 1.6-4.2). At follow-up, point C was stage 0 in 55 (78.6%) women and stage 1 in 15 (21.4%). The anterior vaginal wall was stage 0 or 1 in 35 (50%), stage 2 (no cystocele beyond the hymen) in 34 (49%), and stage 3 in 1 (1.4%). Vaginal length (VL) was 9 cm. Four women (4%) were reoperated for prolapse: two for recurrent anterior compartment prolapse and two for de novo rectocele. Postvoid residuals >150 ml were seen in 21(30%) patients preoperatively and resolved postoperatively in 20. Urgency occurred in nine (13%), stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in ten (14%), and nocturia in 19 (27%). No patient had discomfort at the vaginal vault and 62 patients (87%) reported improved QoL, which did not correlate with anatomical results. Cystocele ≥ 2° at follow-up was associated with BMI >25 (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our surgical technique without permanent material offers good apical support and functional and subjective results. Anatomical improvement was achieved in all cases of cystocele repair. Recurrent cystoceles are often asymptomatic.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Histerectomia Vaginal , Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/cirurgia , Prolapso Uterino/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cistocele/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prolapso de Órgão Pélvico/psicologia , Gravidez , Qualidade de Vida , Telas Cirúrgicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Prolapso Uterino/psicologiaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Currently, almost every third child in Germany is delivered by caesarean section. Apart from straightforward and clear indications for caesarean section which account for approx. 10%, the large proportion of relative indications in particular needs to be critically reviewed if the current C-section rate is to be effectively lowered. It is more than doubtful, however, whether this can be a realistic goal in Germany, especially in the context of international developments. All studies on this topic demonstrate that the personal attitude of the obstetric team has a considerable influence on the pregnant woman's personally preferred mode of delivery. Therefore, in the first part of the DECISION study, the personal preferences of urogynaecologists were evaluated regarding the best suitable mode of delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All 432 delegates at the 9th German Urogynaecology Congress in Stuttgart in April 2017 were invited to participate in an online questionnaire study. The questionnaire was developed especially for this study. RESULTS: Of the 432 registered delegates, 189 (43.8%) participated in the survey. 84.7% (n = 160) of the study participants would prefer a vaginal delivery, in an otherwise uncomplicated pregnancy. Only 12.2% (n = 23) opted for an elective caesarean section. The main reasons stated for this decision were concerns about incontinence (87.5%) and pelvic floor trauma (79.2%). Amongst the study participants, 83.6% would like to be part of a risk stratification system presented in the questionnaire which, with the aid of specific parameters, is intended to allow early identification of a population with a high risk of developing pelvic floor disorders. There was also great interest in postpartum pelvic floor recovery (97.8%) and an associated optional pessary therapy (64.4%). The type of delivery already experienced (vaginal delivery vs. primary caesarean section) and parity also reveals to have a significant influence on the personal preferred mode of delivery as well. CONCLUSIONS: Urogynaecologists prefer vaginal delivery for themselves. There is a great interest to participate in a risk stratification process in order to approach childbirth in an individualized and risk-adapted manner.
RESUMO
Pelvic floor protection is an issue of increasing relevance. This article sought to summarize the session at last year's annual meeting of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) in Stuttgart (10/2016) called "Urogynecology 2020-what is the optimal rate of cesarean section-does urogynecology have to deal with Obstetrics?". The main focus was set on the two important anatomical structures, the levator ani muscle and the anal sphincters. Operative vaginal delivery, epidural anesthesia, and episiotomy are subject to discussion.
Assuntos
Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/patologia , Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico/prevenção & controle , Canal Anal/lesões , Canal Anal/fisiopatologia , Anestesia Epidural/efeitos adversos , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Parto Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Episiotomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/prevenção & controle , Forceps Obstétrico/efeitos adversos , Obstetrícia/métodos , Diafragma da Pelve/anatomia & histologia , Diafragma da Pelve/lesões , Diafragma da Pelve/fisiopatologia , Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico/etiologia , Distúrbios do Assoalho Pélvico/patologia , Gravidez , Vácuo-Extração/efeitos adversosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: To determine whether predictive parameters exist for successful duloxetine therapy in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: Secondary analysis was performed of 1,714 women who received duloxetine in the Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment (SUIT) study, a 12-month longitudinal observational study to evaluate the results and direct costs of SUI treatment. Data of 1,087 women were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses (stepwise forward logistic regression) were performed to investigate factors for discontinuation of treatment. RESULTS: Parameters that significantly reduced the probability of treatment termination were smoking and a body mass index (BMI) <20, while obesity (BMI >30) increased the probability in the univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis significantly reduced likelihoods of duloxetine treatment discontinuation were found for an age >65 years, country, and 7 to 13 incontinence episodes per week. Co-medication, particularly anti-cholinergics, was significantly associated with therapy termination. Previous SUI surgery had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of predictive parameters for successful therapy with duloxetine in women with SUI is desirable, and co-medications should be critically considered.