Physiotherapist-led exercise versus usual care (waiting-list) control for patients awaiting rotator cuff repair surgery: A pilot randomised controlled trial (POWER).

BACKGROUND: Once a decision to undergo rotator cuff repair surgery is made, patients are placed on the waiting list. It can take weeks or months to receive surgery. There has been a call to move from waiting lists to 'preparation' lists to better prepare patients for surgery and to ensure it remains an appropriate treatment option for them. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, as measured by recruitment rates, treatment fidelity and follow-up rates, of a future multi-centre randomised controlled trial to compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of undertaking a physiotherapist-led exercise programme while waiting for surgery versus usual care (waiting-list control). DESIGN: Two-arm, multi-centre pilot randomised controlled trial with feasibility objectives in six NHS hospitals in England. METHOD: Adults (n = 76) awaiting rotator cuff repair surgery were recruited and randomly allocated to a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise (n = 38) or usual care control (n = 38). RESULTS: Of 302 eligible patients, 76 (25%) were randomised. Of 38 participants randomised to physiotherapist-led exercise, 28 (74%) received the exercise programme as intended. 51/76 (67%) Shoulder Pain and Disability Index questionnaires were returned at 6-months. Of 76 participants, 32 had not received surgery after 6-months (42%). Of those 32, 20 were allocated to physiotherapist-led exercise; 12 to usual care control. CONCLUSIONS: A future multi-centre randomised controlled trial is feasible but would require planning for variable recruitment rates between sites, measures to improve treatment fidelity and opportunity for surgical exit, and optimisation of follow-up. A fully powered, randomised controlled trial is now needed to robustly inform clinical decision-making.

Physiotherapy management of atraumatic anterior sternoclavicular joint instability: A prospective case series.

Background: Atraumatic sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) instability is rare. Long-term outcomes are presented for patients managed with physiotherapy. A standardised method of assessment and treatment with a structured physiotherapy programme is also presented. Methods: Long-term outcome was analysed in this prospectively collected series (2011-2019) of patients who were assigned to a structured physiotherapy programme for atraumatic SCJ instability. Outcome-measures (subjective SCJ grading of joint stability (SSGS score), Oxford shoulder instability score (OSIS adapted for SCJ) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain) were collected at discharge and long-term follow up. Results: 26 patients (29 SCJ's) responded (return rate 81%). Mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range 0.9-8.3 years). 17/26 patients were hyperlax. 93% (27/29) of SCJs achieved a stable joint on SSGS score. Mean OSIS score at long-term follow up was 33.4 (range 3-48) and VAS 2.7 (range 0-9). 95% who were compliant with physiotherapy had a stable SCJ (mean OSIS 37.8 (SD 7.3) and VAS 1.6 (SD 2.1)). Those non-compliant, 90% were stable but had lower function (mean OSIS 25 (SD 14, p = 0.02) and more pain, VAS 4.9 (SD 2.9, p = 0.006). Conclusion: The structured physiotherapy programme is highly effective in treating patients with atraumatic SCJ instability. Compliance was essential in ensuring better outcomes.

Midterm results of chronic anterior instability of the sternoclavicular joint managed using a standardized treatment algorithm.

AIMS: There remains a lack of consensus regarding the management of chronic anterior sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) instability. This study aimed to assess whether a standardized treatment algorithm (incorporating physiotherapy and surgery and based on the presence of trauma) could successfully guide management and reduce the number needing surgery. METHODS: Patients with chronic anterior SCJ instability managed between April 2007 and April 2019 with a standardized treatment algorithm were divided into non-traumatic (offered physiotherapy) and traumatic (offered surgery) groups and evaluated at discharge. Subsequently, midterm outcomes were assessed via a postal questionnaire with a subjective SCJ stability score, Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS, adapted for the SCJ), and pain visual analogue scale (VAS), with analysis on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients (50 SCJs, three bilateral) responded for 75% return rate. Of these, 31 SCJs were treated with physiotherapy and 19 with surgery. Overall, 96% (48/50) achieved a stable SCJ, with 60% (30/50) achieving unrestricted function. In terms of outcomes, 82% (41/50) recorded good-to-excellent OSIS scores (84% (26/31) physiotherapy, 79% (15/19) surgery), and 76% (38/50) reported low pain VAS scores at final follow-up. Complications of the total surgical cohort included a 19% (5/27) revision rate, 11% (3/27) frozen shoulder, and 4% (1/27) scar sensitivity. CONCLUSION: This is the largest midterm series reporting chronic anterior SCJ instability outcomes when managed according to a standardized treatment algorithm that emphasizes the importance of appropriate patient selection for either physiotherapy or surgery, based on a history of trauma. All but two patients achieved a stable SCJ, with stability maintained at a median of 70 months (11 to 116) for the physiotherapy group and 87 months (6 to 144) for the surgery group.Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):815-825.

Development of a physiotherapist-led exercise programme for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff for the SPeEDy study.

OBJECTIVES: The SPeEDy study (Surgery vs. physiotherapist-led exercise for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff) is a two-arm, parallel group, pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial aiming to evaluate the feasibility of a future main trial. In this paper, the development process and the resultant physiotherapist-led exercise programme used in the SPeEDy study is described. METHODS: Thirteen physiotherapists and three patients met to discuss and develop the key principles that should underpin the exercise programme. RESULTS: Taking in to account the current research evidence and incorporating expert clinical and patient opinion, the group developed an individualised, structured and progressive physiotherapist-led exercise programme based on the principle of self dosing. Exercise prescription within the programme is based on establishing the current functional capacity of the patient in relation to the most challenging shoulder movements and is supported over approximately six contact sessions across a 12-week period. CONCLUSION: The SPeEDy study aims to recruit 76 participants across eight hospitals and will provide high quality evidence about the feasibility of a future main randomised controlled trial in a clinical area where there is a lack of evidence from randomised controlled trials to support clinical decision-making. ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04027205) - Registered on 19 July 2019. Available via https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04027205.