The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in the diagnosis and assessment of resectability of pancreatic tumors.

BACKGROUND: Carcinoma of the pancreas is one of the most malignant tumors. Symptoms are usually nonspecific and insidious, such that the cancer is advanced by the time of diagnosis. The aim of the study was to assess the usefulness of MRI and MRCP in the diagnosis of patients suspected of pancreatic carcinoma and to define the role of these methods in the evaluation of resectability of pancreatic cancer in comparison with surgical findings. MATERIAL/METHODS: Forty-seven patients (32 men and 15 women) aged 46-81 had undergone MRI and MRCP examination of the upper abdomen on a 1.5 T system with a standard flexible surface coil. The results of those tests were compared with surgical and histopathological findings. The capacity of MR and MRCP to detect pathological mass, assess the nature of the disease process, and accurately assess the resectability of the malignant lesion were evaluated. In the statistical analysis the chi-squared and Fisher's precise tests were performed. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed 87% sensitivity, 97% specificity, and 95% accuracy of MRI and MRCP in the evaluation of the nature of tumors within the pancreas and 100% sensitivity, 90% specificity, and 93% accuracy in determining the resectability of the lesion. The positive predictive value came to 83%, while the negative predictive value was 100%. The kappa compatibility index in comparison with surgical findings was 0.85714. CONCLUSIONS: MR and MRCP is an important diagnostic method in assessing pancreatic tumors. It is very useful in differential diagnosis and determination of tumor resectability.

Changes in the fibrinolytic system during angiography with ionic and with nonionic contrast media.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare changes in some parameters of the fibrinolytic system caused by the use of ionic and nonionic contrast media during angiography in certain groups of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Angiographic diagnostic procedures were performed in 126 patients (male and female) clinically suspected of having kidney cancer (38 patients), arteriosclerotic occlusive disease of lower extremities (44 patients), or dissection of cerebral artery (44 patients). The control group included 12 patients with clinical symptoms of the disease in whom angiographic examination excluded the presence of cerebral artery dissection or kidney cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either an ionic (diatrizoate sodium) or a nonionic (iopromide) contrast medium. Immediately before and 30 minutes after administration, venous blood samples were obtained to determine select parameters of the hemostatic system. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the fibrinolytic parameters within the control group after contrast medium administration. The nonionic contrast medium (iopromide) caused a decrease in fibrinolytic activity in the patients, unlike the controls, which was particularly pronounced among the patients undergoing renal angiography. CONCLUSION: The use of contrast media in some groups of patients led to transient changes in the fibrinolytic system. These results indicate that ionic contrast media should be used during angiographic procedures in patients at increased risk for thrombotic complications.