Management of primary achalasia: The role of endoscopy.

Achalasia is an oesophageal motor disorder which leads to the functional obstruction of the lower oesophageal sphincter (LES) and is currently incurable. The main objective of all existing therapies is to achieve a reduction in the obstruction of the distal oesophagus in order to improve oesophageal transit, relieve the symptomatology, and prevent long-term complications. The most common treatments used are pneumatic dilation (PD) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy, which involves partial fundoplication with comparable short-term success rates. The most economic non-surgical therapy is PD, with botulinum toxin injections reserved for patients with a higher surgical risk for whom the former treatment option is unsuitable. A new technology is peroral endoscopic myotomy, postulated as a possible non-invasive alternative to surgical myotomy. Other endoluminal treatments subject to research more recently include injecting ethanolamine into the LES and using a temporary self-expanding metallic stent. At present, there is not enough evidence permitting a routine recommendation of any of these three novel methods. Patients must undergo follow-up after treatment to guarantee that their symptoms are under control and to prevent complications. Most experts are in favour of some form of endoscopic follow-up, however no established guidelines exist in this respect. The prognosis for patients with achalasia is good, although a recurrence after treatment using any method requires new treatment.

[Effectiveness of maintenance azathioprine therapy without oral cyclosporine after severe attacks of ulcerative colitis refractory to endovenous steroids]. / Eficacia del mantenimiento con azatioprina sin ciclosporina oral tras un brote grave de colitis ulcerosa refractario a esteroides intravenosos.

INTRODUCTION: Intravenous (i.v.) cyclosporine (CsA) has proved effective in controlling acute attacks of ulcerative colitis unresponsive to IV steroids. After the initial response to i.v. CsA, two alternatives for maintaining remission have been proposed: either double or triple association with immunosuppressors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of i.v. CsA, its adverse effects, and the subsequent long-term effectiveness of azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine without oral CsA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intravenous CsA was administered for 10 days, at a dose of 4 mg/kg per day, to 20 patients diagnosed with a severe attack of ulcerative colitis who did not respond to IV steroid treatment. Patients who responded to CsA and could be discharged were administered azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine associated with a decreasing dose of oral steroids, without oral CsA. RESULTS: Sixty per cent (12/20) of the patients showed clinical-biological improvement after CsA administration, thus avoiding colectomy, and were discharged from hospital. Nine of the 12 responders (three withdrew from the study) were followed-up long term. Of these nine patients, four (44.4%) underwent colectomy, all before the sixth month of discharge. All adverse effects were mild, except for one death. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous CsA is effective in inducing remission of ulcerative colitis in severe attacks resistant to i.v. steroids. When treatment with azathioprine is administered without oral CsA, patients requiring colectomy need this procedure within the first 6 months of discharge.