[Preoperative diagnosis of intestinal ischemia in small bowel obstruction. Only computed tomography? A multiple-center observational study]. / Dooperatsionnaya diagnostika intestinal'noi ishemii pri tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti. Tol'ko komp'yuternaya tomografiya?! Rezul'taty mnogotsentrovogo observatsionnogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of clinical, laboratory and instrumental methods for diagnosis of intestinal ischemia following small bowel obstruction in emergency hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Multiple-center observational retrospective study enrolled 158 consecutive patients with benign small bowel obstruction (SBO) treated at four hospitals between May 2017 and December 2019. The role of clinical, laboratory and instrumental diagnostic methods for intestinal ischemia was analyzed. We assessed the impact of CT and contrast-enhanced X-ray examination on survival of patients. RESULTS: Laboratory parameters as criteria of ischemia following SBO were similar (leukocytosis >14·109/l (p=1.0), serum lactate >2.0 mmol/l (p=0.28), heart rate >90/min (p=0.71) and fever (p=0.74)). The only laboratory indicator with significant differences was serum sodium. Decrease in leukocytosis over time was less common in patients with ischemia (25% vs. 61.3%, p=0.012). Univariate Kaplan-Meier analysis did not establish the effect of CT on survival (7.8% [95% CI 7.6-8.0] vs. 6.5% [95% CI 6.3-6.6], p=0.786). Logistic regression revealed 6.4-fold higher chance of accurate diagnosis (ischemia/non-ischemia) in case of CT-based conclusion of ischemia (95% CI 0.025-0.85). Univariate analysis showed that the use of water-soluble contrast for adhesive SBO was associated with lower mortality (4.1% [95% CI 4.0-4.2] vs. 14.3% [95% CI 13.7-14.9], p=0.032) without assessing the comparability of groups. CONCLUSION: Routine laboratory tests were not specific for intestinal ischemia. Therefore, they should not be considered as the only criteria for surgical tactics in intestinal obstruction. Only CT showed acceptable diagnostic accuracy, and, apparently, only this method has real prospects for improving the quality of diagnosis due to technical support, training of surgeons and specialists for diagnosis.

[Surgical approach for small bowel obstruction in the Russian Federation. National survey of surgeons]. / Khirurgicheskaya praktika pri tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti v Rossiiskoi Federatsii. Rezul'taty natsional'nogo oprosa khirurgov.

OBJECTIVE: To study surgical approach for small bowel obstruction (SBO) regarding national and international guidelines. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Considering literature data, national and international guidelines and clinical practice, we have formulated 15 questions regarding surgical approach for non-neoplastic SBO. Questions were sent by e-mail to the members of the Russian Society of Surgeons. Survey lasted 60 days. We used the program that provides the respondent with the possibility of visual control of survey results. Survey results were compared with national and international clinical guidelines, Russian- and English-language scientific publications. Restriction of the number of votes >1 and identification of respondents were not provided by the program. There was no reward for survey. A summary is provided on the main issues. RESULTS: There were 557 respondents (3.0% of surgeons in the Russian Federation). We obtained 481-620 answers for each question. CONCLUSION: This study is a valuable tool for primary assessment of current surgical practice for SBO in the Russian Federation. Study design did not imply conclusions on the optimal strategy based on opinions of majority of respondents. According to our survey, a significant number of respondents use the treatment strategy that differ from clinical guidelines. Their approach is based on their own clinical experience and local guidelines for the treatment of SBO. Less than half of the answers matched to national clinical guidelines, less than 10% - to the WSES guidelines. Despite the formal coincidence of some statements in national clinical guidelines and English-language recommendations, significant nonconformities require scientific discussion.

[Timing of surgery, intestinal ischemia and other real factors of mortality in acute adhesive small bowel obstruction: a multiple-center study]. / Faktory riska letal'nogo iskhoda pri ostroi spaechnoi tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti. Rezul'taty mnogotsentrovogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the factors of mortality in patients with acute adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective multiple-center study included 143 (85.6%) patients with ASBO out of 167 consecutive patients with small bowel obstruction for the period 2017-2019. All patients were divided into 3 groups: early surgery group (within 12 hours after admission), late surgery (after 12 hours), non-surgical management group. The outcomes and Kaplan-Meier survival were compared in all groups. RESULTS: ASBO was resolved without surgery in 77 (53.8%) patients 19.6±17.4 (M=14) hours. In the Early Surgery Group (n=36), 24 patients had strangulation, 12 ones had non-strangulated bowel obstruction. In the Late Surgery Group (n=30), 15 patients had strangulation and 15 ones had no strangulation. Mortality was similar in early and late surgery (p=0.287), early and late surgery in patients with strangulation (p=0.940), early and late surgery in patients without strangulation (p=0.76). Patients died (n=10) after surgery only. Thus, postoperative mortality was 15.2%, overall mortality - 7.0%. All patients who underwent surgery after 24 hours (n=14) survived. Surgery increased the mortality risk compared to non-surgical management (95% CI 0 - 15.9, p=0.001). There was no effect of surgery time (more or less than 12 hours) on mortality for strangulation (95% CI 13.0-16.7, p 0.788) and non-strangulated obstruction (95% CI 29.4-5.4, p=0.061), bowel resection (95% CI 33.3-14.0, p=0.187), presence of bowel ischemia (95% CI 14.3-17.9, p 0.613). CONCLUSION: Delayed surgery may be advisable in patients with ASBO and no obvious signs of strangulation due to less mortality.

[Fast-track rehabilitation for acute cholecystitis: intermediate outcomes of prospective randomized trial]. / Uskorennoe vyzdorovlenie pri ostrom kholetsistite: promezhutochnye rezul'taty prospektivnogo randomizirovannogo issledovaniia.

AIM: To analyze an efficacy of FT-protocol in patients with acute cholecystitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective randomized study included 102 patients (45 of main group (FT) and 57 of control groups). Patients did not differ by TG13 severity index. The protocol included information, antibiotic prophylaxis, restriction of drainage, intraperitoneal anesthesia with long-term anesthetics, low pressure pneumoperitoneum, antiemetics in the presence of risk factors, early activation and feeding of the patient. Pain was assessed by VAS immediately after surgery, and 2, 6 and 12-24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Surgery time was similar in both groups. Need for anesthesia and pain severity were significantly lower in the FT group. A total absence of pain (VAS 0-1) on the 1st postoperative day was noted in 8 (17.7%) of the FT group and 2 (3.5%) patients of the control group (p=0.038). Shoulder pain developed in 4 (8.9%) cases of the main and 22 (38.6%) cases of the control group (p=0.001). Postoperative nausea developed in 13% of the FT group vs 40.5% in the control group (p=0.05). Hospital-stay was 1.29±0.7 days and 2.7±1.6 (p<0.0001), respectively. The time of the first stool was similar. Twenty-four (53.5%) patients of the FT group and 8,9% of the control group were discharged on 1st postoperative day. There were 2 (IIIA) complications in the main group and 3 - in the control group (IIIA, IIIB and IV). There were no mortality and readmissions. CONCLUSION: FT protocol in AC reduce postoperative pain, dyspepsia, shoulder pain and in-hospital stay with equal number of postoperative complications.

[Comparison of standard and fast track rehabilitation in patients with acute appendicitis. Intermediate results of multicenter prospective randomized trial]. / Sravnitel'naia otsenka metodov standartnoi i uskorennoi reabilitatsii bol'nykh s ostrym appenditsitom. Promezhutochnye rezul'taty mnogotsentrovogo prospektivnogo randomizirovannogo issledovaniia.

AIM: To analyze outcomes of fast track rehabilitation in patients with acute appendicitis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, randomized multi-center trial including 86 patients was conducted. There were 38 patients in the main group and 48 in the control group. All patients underwent laparoscopic appendectomy under endotracheal anesthesia. Protocol included informing, no premedication, glucose infusion prior to surgery, antibiotics administration, mesoappendix excision, limited deployment of drainage tubes, intraabdominal prolonged anesthesia, minimal pneumoperitoneum, limited irrigation, minimum power monopolar electrocautery, antiemetics, early activation and eating (2 and 6 hours after surgery). Pain was evaluated by visual-analogue scale. Auscultative peristalsis was considered every 2 hours after surgery. Cortisol level was assessed preoperatively, in 6 and 12-24 hours after surgery in 11 (29%) and 15 (31%) patients of the main and control groups respectively. Discharge criteria: no leukocytosis, fever and pain syndrome requiring anesthesia, no signs of complications and patient's consent. RESULTS: Terms of disease, gender, age and comorbidities were similar in all patients. Duration of surgery under minimal pneumoperitoneum and standard pressure was also similar: 69.2±3.98 and 70.9±3.89 min (p=0.762). Pain syndrome grade and need for analgesics were significantly lower in the main group within entire follow-up. Pain syndrome was absent at the 1st postoperative day in 16 (42%) and 2 (4.1%) patients of both groups, respectively (score 0-1). Phrenic nerve syndrome was observed in 36.8% of the main group and 60.4% of the control group (p=0.05). Incidence of dyspepsia and terms of peristalsis onset were similar. Length of hospital-stay was 1.45 days in the main group and 3.15 days in the control group (p=0.002). In the main group 18 (47%) patients were discharged on the first day after surgery. There were only 4 (8.3%) patients with similar hospital-stay in the control group (p<0.001). There were no repeated hospitalizations. Postoperative cortisol concentration was similar in both groups as well as in complicated and uneventful postoperative period. In the main group postoperative intestinal paresis (Clavien-Dindo grade 2) occurred in 1 patient. In the control group 7 patients had postoperative infiltrate and 1 patient - intestinal paresis (Clavien-Dindo grade 2). Postoperative drainage tube was deployed in 3 out of 7 patients with postoperative infiltrates and 6 of them received antibiotic therapy. Medication was successfully applied in all patients with complications. CONCLUSION: There are some advantages of FTR for AA including reduced pain syndrome, morbidity and less length of hospital-stay. Issue of cortisol concentration requires further trials.

[Optimal time of surgery for acute adhesive small bowel obstruction]. / Vybor sroka operativnogo lecheniia pri ostroi spaechnoi tonkokishechnoi neprokhodimosti (mul'titsentrovoe prospektivnoe randomizirovannoe issledovanie).

AIM: To define optimal terms of surgery for acute adhesive non-strangulatory small bowel obstruction. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis included 703 publications from e-LIBRARI.RU (342 works) and NCBI (361 works) databases for acute adhesive intestinal obstruction. The vast majority of articles presented retrospective analysis of single-center experience. RESULTS: It has been established that short course of medication is predominantly used for acute adhesive intestinal obstruction in the Russian Federation. International studies point 2-5 days for conservative treatment. The advantages and disadvantages of short and long courses of medication were analyzed. Therefore, multicenter, prospective, randomized trial 'Comparison of early operative treatment (12-hour medication) and long-term conservative treatment (48 hours) for acute adhesive small bowel obstruction' (COTACSO) was planned and registered (Unique Protocol ID: 14121729). The study protocol involves clinical, laboratory and instrumental exclusion of strangulation, randomization and conservative treatment of 2 groups of patients for 12 and 48 hours. Patients will undergo surgical interventions if obstruction will be present by that date. The main endpoint is mortality rate in both groups. The end of the study is December 2020.