Cost-utility of breast reduction surgery--a prospective study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-utility of routine breast-reduction surgery in the setting of a large university hospital. METHODS: In the framework of a large trial exploring the feasibility of routine health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment, 80 patients (mean age: 45 years) entering the Department of Plastic Surgery for operative breast reduction filled in the 15-dimension (15D) HRQoL survey before and 6 months after surgery. Data on hospital costs were obtained from the hospital records. RESULTS: Mean (+/-SD) HRQoL score (on a 0-1 scale) increased as a result of surgery from the preoperative 0.916+/-0.075 to 0.939+/-0.076 (p<0.001) 6 months after surgery, corresponding to a mean (+/-SD) gain of 0.930+/-2.117 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Of the 15 health dimensions, discomfort and symptoms showed the greatest improvement (p<0.001). A statistically significant improvement was also seen on the dimensions of breathing, sleeping and distress. Mean hospital cost of treatment was 3383 euro+/-1744, and the cost per QALY was 3638 euro. Using 5% discounting for QALYs, the cost per QALY increased to 8973 euro. CONCLUSION: Breast-reduction surgery improved HRQoL in a statistically significant manner and at a reasonable cost, as the cost per QALY was in the same range as that observed in our material, for example, for hip-replacement surgery.

Patients' satisfaction with breast reconstruction and reduction mammaplasty.

Patients' satisfaction is widely recognised as an important measure of the quality of care. This study measured patients' satisfaction with the outcome of breast reconstruction surgery and reduction mammaplasty and with the treatment received in hospital. A questionnaire about patients' reasons for having the operation and postoperative satisfaction was therefore sent to 137 patients after breast reconstruction and 142 who had had reduction mammaplasty. The response rate in the former group was 84% and in the latter 65%. In both groups of patients the main reasons for having the operation were difficulties with physical activities and in finding clothes to fit. Other factors were poor self-esteem and problems with body image. A total of 69% of the patients who had had reconstructions referred to problems with wearing an external prosthesis. In the reduction mammaplasty group one of the most important reasons for having the operation was pain, in particular neck, shoulder, and back pain. In the reconstruction group 94%, and in the reduction group 88%, thought the outcome of the operation was good or very good. They had no regrets about their decision to seek surgical treatment, even when the aesthetic outcome fell short of their expectations. The patients were generally satisfied with the treatment they had received. In the reconstruction group 97%, and in the reduction group 96%, of patients felt satisfied with their overall decision to have the operation. Our results confirm that these surgical procedures help to improve patients' quality of life. Among the patients who had had reconstructions, the resolved problems with body image were considered to be the main benefit of the operation. In the reduction group the main benefits were reduced neck, shoulder, and back pain. In both groups 91% of patients would have recommended the operation to a friend under similar circumstances. In the light of this evidence doctors should more readily recommend reconstruction to patients after mastectomy and reduction to women with heavy breasts.