Comparison of Strain and Shear Wave Elastography in Prostate Cancer Detection.

The aim of the study was to compare strain elastography with shear wave elastography in prostate cancer detection by comparing data gained during elastography with histological analysis after prostatectomy. Thirty patients with prostate cancer qualified for radical prostatectomy were enrolled into the study. All patients underwent transrectal strain elastography and shear wave elastography during pre-surgical evaluation. In each prostate, 36 regions were evaluated separately whether there was a suspicious prostate cancer lesion or not. Subsequently, the same regions were analyzed during histological analysis of the resected gland. Strain elastography and shear wave elastography (overall stiffness cutoff value = 35 kPa) in our study were characterized by overall sensitivities of 58.9% and 65.3% and specificities of 71.8% and 70.2%, respectively. Cutoff values specific to the zones in the shear wave elastography examination (peripheral zone: 35 kPa, transitional zone: 45 kPa) were characterized by an overall prostate cancer detection sensitivity and specificity of 63.4% and 73% respectively. Shear wave elastography examination revealed a higher sensitivity versus strain elastography, 63.4% versus 58.9% (p = 0.038, p < 0.05), and comparable specificity, 73.0% versus 71.8% (p = 0.547, p > 0.05), respectively. Sensitivity in prostate cancer detection for both methods is higher for larger lesions (except Gleason score 5 massive lesions in strain elastography). Controversially we observed a decrease in sensitivity for strain elastography in the detection of lesions with a large diameter and a Gleason score of 5 near the prostate capsule. Overall sensitivity in the diagnosis of prostate cancer is more significant for shear wave elastography versus strain elastography.

Shear Wave Elastography in the Evaluation of the Urethral Sphincter Complex after Radical Prostatectomy.

Post-prostatectomy pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation has a significant impact on urinary continence recovery. The aim of our study was the evaluation of urethral sphincter complex using shear wave elastography in patients after radical prostatectomy, with and without postsurgical pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation. Thirty-three patients were included in the study. The severity of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy was evaluated. Transrectal ultrasound examination was performed in all patients with shear wave elastography to visualize the urethral sphincter complex and estimate its length. Statistical analysis revealed that higher than average urethral sphincter complex stiffness correlates with a smaller number of pads used per day (p < 0,05) and better urine continence based on scales: subjective 0-10 (p < 0.05) and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Urinary Incontinence Short Form (ICIQ-UI SF) (p < 0.05). The post-prostatectomy pelvic floor muscle rehabilitation group had statistically significant higher stiffness of the urethral sphincter complex compared with the group without rehabilitation (p < 0.05). The study found that shear wave elastography is a valuable method in evaluation of the urethral sphincter complex.

Application of three-dimensional ultrasonography (3D ultrasound) to pretreatment evaluation of plastic induration of the penis (Peyronie's disease).

AIM: Peyronie's disease (PD) or plastic induration of the penis, require complete evaluation of plaques in order to decide the best therapeutic option for patient. The purpose of this study is to compare the findings of three-dimensional ultrasound (3D US) and two-dimensional ultrasound (2D US) in patients with PD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with PD aged 30 to 72 years were included in study. The examination was performed with a 12 MHz linear probe, using 2D US and 3D US. Localization and size of plaques were determined and time needed for imagine acquisition was determined in every case. RESULTS: 3D ultrasound permits the visualization of the entire plaque in the coronal plane of plaque with its precise measurements. No statistical difference in plaque dimensions and its surface area assessment using 3D US and 2D US was found (127.72 mm² vs. 128.74 mm², p>0.05). The possibility to perform detailed analysis of the acquired images using generated digital cube reduced the average duration of the acquisition to 69.8 seconds (median 64 seconds) for 3D US vs. 151.25 seconds (median 145.5 seconds) for 2D US (p<0.05). A supplementary plaque was detected using 3D US. CONCLUSIONS: 3D US seems to be a valuable complement of 2D US for patients with PD. The acquisition time is significantly reduced using 3D US comparing to 2D US and thus it is more comfortable for the patient.

Elastography in prostate gland imaging and prostate cancer detection.

Transrectal prostate biopsies under ultrasonography guidance remain the gold standard for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa). Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), however, has a limited sensitivity in PCa detection. Prostate elastography (TRES) increases the sensitivity of a TRUS examination. Therefore, the aim of this review is to discuss the usefulness of TRES in prostate gland imaging for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer based on published literature. The advantages of transrectal elastography were analysed in the context of better diagnostic performance provided by this method. TRES provides additional information for the detection and biopsy guidance concerning prostate cancer, enabling a significant reduction in the number of biopsies.