Laparoscopic Reintervention for Intraperitoneal Leaks After Colonic Surgery: Do We Need a Routine Stoma?

INTRODUCTION: No universal consensus exists on the management of intraperitoneal anastomosis leakage after colonic surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic reintervention without stoma creation for intraperitoneal leaks after colonic surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Single tertiary center study conducted from January 2010 to December 2020. 54 patients with intraperitoneal leakage were divided into 2 groups according to whether they received a stoma (n = 37) or not (n = 17) during laparoscopic reintervention. Short term outcome was analyzed. RESULTS: Patients in the no stoma group had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (P = .009), lower Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score (5 vs. 10; P < .001) compared with the stoma group. Intensive care unit admission (43.2% vs. 5.8%; P = .006) and major complications (35.1% vs. 5.8%; P = .015) occurred more in the stoma group compared to the no stoma group. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial surgical procedure (P = .001) and APACHE II score (P = .039) were significant predictors of no stoma. The APACHE II score(P = .035) was an independent predictor of major complications. Finally, Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value of APACHE II score for no stoma was 7.5. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, APACHE II score was an independent predictor of stoma formation and the cutoff value of APACHE II score for no stoma was 7.5. Our results need to be confirmed by larger and randomized studies. In particular, a specific APACHE II threshold to omit a stoma in this setting remains to be determined.

A combined abdominal and transanal minimally invasive (TAMIS) approach in redo anastomoses for severe refractory rectal strictures.

AIM: Anastomotic stricture following anterior resection is an uncommon but challenging problem. Endoscopic dilatation and transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) are proven methods of treatment. However, a small proportion of patients repeatedly fail transanal local therapy for underlying reasons of tension, insufficient blood supply or irradiated tissue, eventually necessitating a complete anastomotic excision. We aimed to combine transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) with an abdominal approach in redo anastomoses for severe refractory anastomotic strictures. METHOD: For the TAMIS phase, we use a Lonestar® retractor with a GelPOINT® Path transanal access platform. A circumferential full thickness rectotomy is performed and the dissection is continued proximally in the mesorectal fascial plane past the strictured segment to meet the abdominal dissection or until the peritoneal cavity is entered, facilitating mobilization of the rectum. The abdominal phase is performed as usual with sufficient mobilization of the left colon to enable tension-free redo anastomosis. An accompanying video demonstrates this technique. RESULTS: Two patients with refractory anastomotic strictures following a previous low anterior resection underwent the procedure. One patient had laparoscopy followed by TAMIS and the other had TAMIS followed by laparotomy. Both cases were performed by surgeons experienced in laparoscopy and TES. One patient had postoperative ileus which resolved conservatively. Both anastomoses were widely patent on follow-up. CONCLUSION: TAMIS combined with a conventional abdominal approach offers significant technical advantages over a totally abdominal approach for the definitive management of patients with severe anastomotic strictures refractory to first-line methods of therapy. The operator should already be proficient with TES.

Real-world evidence of the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in Taiwanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: CORRELATE Taiwan.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: This analysis reports safety and effectiveness data from the Taiwanese cohort of the CORRELATE study. METHODS: CORRELATE was a prospective, observational study to assess the safety and effectiveness of regorafenib for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in real-world clinical practice that was conducted in 13 different countries in Asia, Europe and Latin America. The primary endpoint of the study was incidence of all treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control rate (DCR). RESULTS: The global study population (N = 1037) included 128 Taiwanese patients with a median age of 64 years, median weight of 62.02 kg and 66.41% were male. Reduced initiating doses of regorafenib and dose interruptions were common in Taiwanese patients (71.87% and 50.00%, respectively). The safety profile of regorafenib was consistent with that seen in Asian patients in the clinical development trials, including the CORRECT and CONCUR studies, with hand-foot-skin reactions (HFSR) of any grade occurring in 33.59% of patients. Median OS was 11.64 months in the Taiwanese patients (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.36-13.82) and median PFS was 2.17 months (95% CI, 1.97-2.89). CONCLUSION: The safety and effectiveness of regorafenib in this real-world study was generally consistent with the known efficacy and safety profile in Asian patients in clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02042144.

International consensus on natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for colorectal cancer.

In recent years, natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in the treatment of colorectal cancer has attracted widespread attention. The potential benefits of NOSES including reduction in postoperative pain and wound complications, less use of postoperative analgesic, faster recovery of bowel function, shorter length of hospital stay, better cosmetic and psychological effect have been described in colorectal surgery. Despite significant decrease in surgical trauma of NOSES have been observed, the potential pitfalls of this technique have been demonstrated. Particularly, several issues including bacteriological concerns, oncological outcomes and patient selection are raised with this new technique. Therefore, it is urgent and necessary to reach a consensus as an industry guideline to standardize the implementation of NOSES in colorectal surgery. After three rounds of discussion by all members of the International Alliance of NOSES, the consensus is finally completed, which is also of great significance to the long-term progress of NOSES worldwide.

Complete mesocolic excision for colonic cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Complete mesocolic excision for colonic cancer is similar in concept to total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. This review aims to provide the embryological and anatomical rationale behind CME, and to review the current literature on CME, relative to the feasibility via laparoscopy, the oncological adequacy and outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed at the end of 2017 according the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Of 3980 articles found, we analyzed 96 articles. Of note, many case series had overlapping populations; there were five review articles, two consensus conference proceedings, six comparative but only one randomized trial. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The embryonic and anatomical rationale is well described. CME is feasible via laparoscopy, which may facilitate dissection and anatomic precision: no statistically significant differences were found when compared to open CME regarding overall survival. However, morbidity may be higher in the hands of non-expert laparoscopic surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Oncological adequacy can be obtained with laparoscopic CME, with increased lymph node retrieval. However, until now, there is no formal proof that CME improves local recurrence or survival.

Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction With Single Stapling Colorectal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Anterior Resection: Feasibility, Outcomes, and Technical Considerations.

BACKGROUND: Double and triple stapling techniques to close the rectal stump in laparoscopic anterior resection are fraught with technical drawbacks that could possibly be avoided with the use of the single stapling technique. However, little is known of its safety in laparoscopic surgery or outcomes when combined with natural orifice specimen extraction. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the feasibility and the operative and immediate postoperative outcomes of single-stapled anastomosis and natural orifice specimen extraction with conventional techniques. It intends to evaluate technical variations related to colon, mesentery, and pelvic anatomy characteristics. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A consecutive series of 188 patients underwent elective surgery for benign or malignant lesions between 10 and 40 cm from the anal verge, 5 cm or less in diameter on radiological examination, stage T1 to T3, Nx, M0, with 2 different methods of rectal stump closure (pursestring vs linear-stapled closure) associated with single or double stapling and per anus vs conventional specimen extraction. SETTING: This study was conducted at China Medical University Hospital, Taiwan, a tertiary referral center, between January 2012 and April 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcomes measured are feasibility and operative and immediate postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Single-stapled resection with natural orifice specimen extraction was feasible in 94% patients with an 11% perioperative morbidity rate. The patients required statistically significantly less analgesia, had earlier return of bowel movements, and shorter hospital stay, whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the overall readmission rate and overall morbidity, including anastomotic leakage. LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center, retrospective case-matched study. CONCLUSION: Anatomic variations (short colon and short mesentery) can be managed adequately with intracorporeal anvil head fixation. The single stapling technique is feasible and as safe as conventional double stapling techniques, although it is technically more demanding. The transanal endoscopic operation platform can be useful when the rectal stump is long.