Estimating the real-world performance of the PROMISE minimal-risk tool.

BACKGROUND: Stable chest pain is a common indication for cardiac catheterization. We assessed the prognostic value of the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation (PROMISE) Minimal-Risk Tool in identifying patients who are at very low risk of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) or downstream cardiovascular adverse outcomes. METHODS: We applied the PROMISE Minimal-Risk Tool to consecutive patients without known CAD who underwent elective cardiac catheterization for stable angina from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2014 in the Duke Databank for Cardiovascular Disease (DDCD). Patients with scores >0.46 (top decile of lowest-risk from the PROMISE cohort) were classified as low-risk. Logistic regression modeling compared likelihood of freedom from obstructive coronary artery disease on index angiography, 2-year survival, and 2-year survival free of myocardial infarction (MI) and MI/revascularization between low- and non low-risk patients. Alternative cut points to define low- risk patients were also explored. RESULTS: Among 6251 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for stable chest pain, 1082 (17.3%) were low-risk per the PROMISE minimal-risk tool. Among low risk patients, obstructive coronary artery disease was observed in 14.9% and left main disease (≥ 50% Stenosis) was rare (0.9%). Compared with other patients, low risk patients had a higher likelihood of freedom from obstructive coronary disease on index catheterization (85.1% vs. 44.2%, OR 4.84, 95% CI 4.06-5.77). Low risk patients had significantly higher survival (98.2% vs. 94.4%, OR 3.18, 95% CI 1.99-5.08), MI-free survival (97.2% vs. 91.9%, OR 3.03, 95% CI 2.07-4.45), and MI/revascularization-free survival (86.2 vs. 59.9%, OR 4.19, 95% CI 3.48-5.05) at 2 years than non-low risk patients. Operating characteristics for predicting the outcomes of interest varied modestly depending on the low-risk cut-point used but the positive predictive value for 2 year freedom from death was >98% regardless. CONCLUSION: The PROMISE minimal-risk tool identifies 17% of stable chest pain patients referred to cardiac catheterization as low risk. These patients have a low prevalence of obstructive CAD and better survival than non-low risk patients. While this suggests that these patients are unlikely to benefit from catheterization, further research is needed to confirm a favorable downstream prognosis with medical management alone.

Bulls-eye display and quantitation of myocardial perfusion defects using three-dimensional contrast echocardiography.

Three-dimensional (3-D) myocardial contrast echocardiography (MCE) is able to derive parallel cutting planes of the left ventricle (LV). However, assessment of the site and extent of myocardial perfusion abnormalities has to rely on the reader's 3-D mental reconstruction from the tomograms, and a manual approach has to be employed for quantitative analysis. The objective of this study was to explore the display and quantitative capability of a bulls-eye format from contrast 3-D MCE in the assessment of perfusion abnormalities derived from a canine model of acute myocardial infarction (MI). Three-dimensional MCE data were acquired sequentially in a rotational scanning format during triggered harmonic imaging with an intravenous contrast agent. Reconstructed short-axis views of the LV were aligned in a bulls-eye format with the apex as the inner most ring. The total LV was divided into 120 sectors. The number of sectors with lack of contrast enhancement was used to derive the percent of the LV (%LV) with perfusion defect and was compared with the extent of MI calculated from postmortem triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) staining. The perfusion defect regions shown on bulls-eye images corresponded correctly with the territories of the occluded coronary arteries. Three-dimensional MCE perfusion defect mass (19.2 +/- 6.0 %LV) correlated well with anatomic MI mass (19.3 +/- 5.6 %LV; r = 0.92, SEE = 2.3%, mean differential = 0.1 +/- 2.4%). We conclude that bulls-eye display of contrast 3-D MCE demonstrates the site and extent of perfusion abnormalities in an easily appreciable manner. It also allows fast and accurate assessment of endangered myocardium.

Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing as a noninvasive indicator of coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: We studied whether assessment of endothelium-dependent vasomotion (EDV) with brachial artery ultrasound (BAUS) imaging predicts the presence or absence of coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by exercise myocardial perfusion imaging (ExMPI). BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in EDV can be detected in arteries before the development of overt atherosclerosis, and its presence may predict poor long-term prognosis. Brachial artery ultrasound during reactive hyperemia is a noninvasive method of assessing peripheral EDV. METHODS: Clinically-indicated ExMPI along with BAUS were performed in 94 subjects (43 women, 51 men). Coronary artery disease was defined by myocardial ischemia or infarction on single photon emission computed tomography images. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) after upper arm occlusion was defined as the percent change in arterial diameter during reactive hyperemia relative to the baseline. RESULTS: Subjects with CAD by ExMPI (n = 23) had a lower FMD (6.3 +/- 0.7%) than those without CAD by ExMPI (n = 71) (10.5 +/- 0.6%; p = 0.0004). Flow-mediated dilation was highly predictive for CAD with an odds ratio of 1.32 for each percent decrease in FMD (p = 0.001). Based on a receiver-operator analysis, an FMD of 10% was used as a cut-point for further analysis. Twenty-one of 23 subjects who were positive for ExMPI had an FMD < 10% (sensitivity 91%), whereas only two of 40 subjects with an FMD > or =10% were ExMPI-positive (negative predictive value: 95%). There was a correlation between the number of cardiac risk factors and FMD. Individuals with an FMD < 10% exercised for a shorter duration than those with an FMD > or =10% (456 +/- 24 vs. 544 +/- 31 s, respectively; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of EDV with BAUS has a high sensitivity and an excellent negative predictive value for CAD and, thus, has the potential for use as a screening tool to exclude CAD in low-risk subjects. Further standardization of BAUS is required, however, before specific cut-points for excluding CAD can be established.

Acute hemodynamic effects of conivaptan, a dual V(1A) and V(2) vasopressin receptor antagonist, in patients with advanced heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Arginine vasopressin may contribute to abnormalities in hemodynamics and fluid balance in heart failure through its actions on V(1A) (vascular and myocardial effects) and V(2) receptors (renal effects). Inhibiting the action of vasopressin may be beneficial in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 142 patients with symptomatic heart failure (New York Heart Association class III and IV) were randomized to double-blind, short-term treatment with conivaptan, a dual V(1a)/V(2) vasopressin receptor antagonist, at a single intravenous dose (10, 20, or 40 mg) or placebo. Compared with placebo, conivaptan at 20 and 40 mg significantly reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (-2.6+/-0.7, -5.4+/-0.7, and -4.6+/-0.7 mm Hg for placebo and 20 and 40 mg groups, respectively; P<0.05) and right atrial pressure (-2.0+/-0.4, -3.7+/-0.4, and -3.5+/-0.4 mm Hg for placebo and 20 and 40 mg groups, respectively; P<0.05) during the 3- to 6-hour interval after intravenous administration. Conivaptan significantly increased urine output in a dose-dependent manner (-11+/-17, 68+/-17, 152+/-19, and 176+/-18 mL/hour for placebo and 10, 20, and 40 mg groups, respectively; P<0.001) during the first 4 hours after the dose. Changes in cardiac index, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance, blood pressure, and heart rate did not significantly differ from placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced heart failure, vasopressin receptor antagonism with conivaptan resulted in favorable changes in hemodynamics and urine output without affecting blood pressure or heart rate. These data suggest that vasopressin is functionally significant in advanced heart failure and that further investigations are warranted to examine the effects of conivaptan on symptom relief and natural history in such patients.

Economic impact of beta blockade in heart failure.

We reviewed the literature on clinical trials of beta-adrenergic blockade for treatment of heart failure, seeking evidence of reductions in hospital admissions. To analyze the economic implications of six clinical trials, we developed a stochastic cost model to generate estimates of total medical costs resulting from heart failure and related causes. The model includes inpatient, outpatient, and professional cost estimates based on Medicare claims data, and it is driven by traditional endpoint statistics reported in the clinical trial literature. It provides a common framework for comparing cost effectiveness across clinical trials in the absence of detailed cost information collected in the trial. The incremental expected cost per year of life saved is $3,300 for bisoprolol, $2,500 for metoprolol, and $6,700 for carvedilol. The cost per year of life saved for each compound is well below accepted standards for cost effectiveness. These results are sensitive to the cost of drug therapy and the relative mortality rate for the experimental group. For example, if the relative mortality rate of the experimental group were to increase from the reported 40% to 82%, and if the annual cost of the drug were to decrease from $2,000 to $500, then we estimate that carvedilol would break even and the cost per year of life saved would drop to zero. Whether beta-blocker therapy, as assumed, sustains its differential effectiveness in terms of relative mortality risk beyond the study duration has not been demonstrated.

Comparative effects of carvedilol and metoprolol on left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure: results of a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Both metoprolol and carvedilol improve cardiac function and prolong survival in patients with heart failure. Carvedilol has broader antiadrenergic effects than metoprolol, but it is not clear whether this characteristic is associated with greater benefits on cardiac function during long-term treatment. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a meta-analysis of all 19 randomized controlled trials of carvedilol or metoprolol that measured left ventricular ejection fraction before and after an average of 8.3 +/- 0.1 months of treatment in 2184 patients with chronic heart failure. The mean daily doses were 58 +/- 1 mg of carvedilol and the equivalent of 162 +/- 1 mg of extended-release metoprolol. In the 15 placebo-controlled trials, the mean ejection fraction increased more in the trials of carvedilol than in the trials of metoprolol (placebo-corrected increases of +0.065 and +0.038, respectively), P = .0002. In the 4 active-controlled trials that compared metoprolol directly with carvedilol, the mean ejection fraction also increased more in the carvedilol groups than in the metoprolol groups (+0.084 on carvedilol and +0.057 on metoprolol, respectively), P = .009. The difference in favor of carvedilol in the active-controlled trials was nearly identical to the difference observed in the placebo-controlled trials and was apparent in patients with and without coronary artery disease. CONCLUSION: Long-term treatment with carvedilol produces greater effects on left ventricular ejection fraction than metoprolol when both drugs are prescribed in doses similar to those that have been shown to prolong life.

Enhanced detection of reversible perfusion defects by Tc-99m sestamibi compared to Tc-99m tetrofosmin during vasodilator stress SPECT imaging in mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVES: We prospectively compared dipyridamole single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging with Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin for the detection of reversible perfusion defects in patients with mild-to-moderate coronary artery disease. BACKGROUND: Tc-99m tetrofosmin has a lower first-pass myocardial extraction fraction compared to Tc-99m sestamibi and thus could underestimate mild perfusion defects. METHODS: Eighty-one patients with 50% to 90% stenosis in one or two major epicardial vessels without previous myocardial infarction, and seven with <5% probability of coronary artery disease underwent dipyridamole SPECT imaging with both agents. The SPECT data were analyzed quantitatively. RESULTS: Tc-99m sestamibi detected reversible perfusion defects in a greater number of segments (total 363 and 285, p < 0.001, and mean +/- SD, 2.2 +/- 3.0 and 1.8 +/- 2.5 per patient, p = 0.008, for Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin, respectively), demonstrated a larger extent of perfusion defect (mean +/- SD, 15.8% +/- 12.3% and 12.0% +/- 11.4%, p < 0.03, for Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc-99m tetrofosmin, respectively) and more often correctly identified patients with disease in more than one coronary artery (p = 0.02). There was better defect contrast with Tc-99m sestamibi (defect/normal wall count ratios were 0.60 +/- 0.15 vs. 0.73 +/- 0.14 for Tc-99m sestamibi and Tc99m tetrofosmin, respectively, p = 0.01, for reversible defects seen in identical segments with both agents; and 0.73 +/- 0.16 vs 0.79 +/- 0.17, respectively, p <0.01, for reversible defects detected with either agent alone). There was no significant difference in diagnostic sensitivity or image quality. CONCLUSIONS: These differences between two commonly used tracers may have significant diagnostic and prognostic implications.

Heart failure etiology affects peripheral vascular endothelial function after cardiac transplantation.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to examine the effect of heart failure etiology on peripheral vascular endothelial function in cardiac transplant recipients. BACKGROUND: Peripheral vascular endothelial dysfunction occurs in patients with heart failure of either ischemic or nonischemic etiology. The effect of heart failure etiology on peripheral endothelial function after cardiac transplantation is unknown. METHODS: Using brachial artery ultrasound, endothelium-dependent, flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was assessed in patients with heart failure with either nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 10) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 7), cardiac transplant recipients with prior nonischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 10) or prior ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 10) and normal controls (n = 10). RESULTS: Patients with heart failure with either ischemic cardiomyopathy or nonischemic cardiomyopathy had impaired FMD (3.6 +/- 1.0% and 5.1 +/- 1.2%, respectively, p = NS) compared with normal subjects (13.9 +/- 1.3%, p < 0.01 compared with either heart failure group). In transplant recipients with antecedent nonischemic cardiomyopathy, FMD was markedly higher than that of heart failure patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (13.0 +/- 2.4%, p < 0.001) and similar to that of normal subjects (p = NS). However, FMD remained impaired in transplant recipients with prior ischemic cardiomyopathy (5.5 +/- 1.5%, p = 0.001 compared with normal, p = 0.002 vs. transplant recipients with previous nonischemic cardiomyopathy). CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral vascular endothelial function is normal in cardiac transplant recipients with antecedent nonischemic cardiomyopathy, but remains impaired in those with prior ischemic cardiomyopathy. In contrast, endothelial function is uniformly abnormal for patients with heart failure, regardless of etiology. These findings indicate that cardiac transplantation corrects peripheral endothelial function for patients without ischemic heart disease, but not in those with prior atherosclerotic coronary disease.

Intracoronary basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF-2) in patients with severe ischemic heart disease: results of a phase I open-label dose escalation study.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of intracoronary (IC) basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, FGF-2). BACKGROUND: FGF-2 is a heparin-binding growth factor capable of inducing functionally significant angiogenesis in animal models of myocardial ischemia. METHODS: Phase I, open-label dose-escalation study of FGF-2 administered as a single 20-min infusion in patients with ischemic heart disease not amenable to treatment with CABG or PTCA. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients enrolled in this study received IC FGF-2 (0.33 to 48 microg/kg). Hypotension was dose-dependent and dose-limiting, with 36 microg/kg being the maximally tolerated dose. Four patients died and four patients had non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions. Laboratory parameters and retinal examinations showed mild and mainly transient changes during the 6-month follow-up. There was an improvement in quality of life as assessed by Seattle Angina Questionnaire and improvement in exercise tolerance as assessed by treadmill exercise testing (510+/-24 s at baseline, 561+/-26 s at day 29 [p = 0.023], 609+/-26 s at day 57 (p < 0.001), and 633+/-24 s at day 180 (p < 0.001), overall p < 0.001). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging showed increased regional wall thickening (baseline: 34+/-1.7%, day 29: 38.7+/-1.9% [p = 0.006], day 57: 41.4+/-1.9% [p < 0.001], and day 180: 42.0+/-2.3% [p < 0.001], overall p = 0.001) and a reduction in the extent of the ischemic area at all time points compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS: Intracoronary administration of rFGF-2 appears safe and is well tolerated over a 100-fold dose range (0.33 to 0.36 microk/kg). Preliminary evidence of efficacy is tempered by the open-label uncontrolled design of the study.

Therapeutic angiogenesis with recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2 improves stress and rest myocardial perfusion abnormalities in patients with severe symptomatic chronic coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: We report the effects of the administration of recombinant fibroblast growth factor-2 (rFGF-2) protein on myocardial perfusion using single photon emission computed tomography imaging in humans with advanced coronary disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 59 patients with coronary disease that was not amenable to mechanical revascularization underwent intracoronary (n=45) or intravenous (n=14) administration of rFGF-2 in ascending doses. Changes in perfusion were evaluated at baseline and again at 29, 57, and 180 days after rFGF-2 administration. In this uncontrolled study, perfusion scans were analyzed by 2 observers who were blinded to patient identity and test sequence; scans were displayed in random order, with scans from nonstudy patients randomly interspersed to enhance blinding. Combining all dose groups, a reduction occurred in the per-segment reversibility score (reflecting the magnitude of inducible ischemia) from 1.7+/-0.4 at baseline to 1.1+/-0.6 at day 29 (P:<0.001), 1.2+/-0.7 at day 57 (P:<0.001), and 1.1+/-0.7 at day 180 (P:<0.001). The 37 patients with evidence of resting hypoperfusion had evidence of improved resting perfusion: their per-segment rest perfusion score of 1.5+/-0. 5 at baseline decreased to 1.0+/-0.8 at day 29 (P:<0.001), 1.0+/-0.8 at day 57 (P:=0.003), and 1.1+/-0.9 at day 180 (P:=0.11). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary data suggest that the administration of rFGF-2 to patients with advanced coronary disease resulted in an attenuation of stress-induced ischemia and an improvement in resting myocardial perfusion; these findings are consistent with a favorable effect of therapeutic angiogenesis.

Clinical trials in coronary angiogenesis: issues, problems, consensus: An expert panel summary.

The rapid development of angiogenic growth factor therapy for patients with advanced ischemic heart disease over the last 5 years offers hope of a new treatment strategy based on generation of new blood supply in the diseased heart. However, as the field of therapeutic coronary angiogenesis is maturing from basic and preclinical investigations to clinical trials, many new and presently unresolved issues are coming into focus. These include in-depth understanding of the biology of angiogenesis, selection of appropriate patient populations for clinical trials, choice of therapeutic end points and means of their assessment, choice of therapeutic strategy (gene versus protein delivery), route of administration, and the side effect profile. The present article presents a summary statement of a panel of experts actively working in the field, convened by the Angiogenesis Foundation and the Angiogenesis Research Center during the 72nd meeting of the American Heart Association to define and achieve a consensus on the challenges facing development of therapeutic angiogenesis for coronary disease.

Effects of losartan and captopril on left ventricular volumes in elderly patients with heart failure: results of the ELITE ventricular function substudy.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism by which angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality rates and disease progression in patients with heart failure is likely mediated in part through prevention of adverse ventricular remodeling. This study examined the effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor captopril and the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist losartan on ventricular volumes and function in elderly patients with heart failure and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (< or =40%). METHODS: Patients underwent radionuclide ventriculograms (RVG) at baseline and were randomized to either captopril (n = 16) or losartan (n = 13). After 48 weeks, another RVG was obtained. Therapy was then withdrawn for at least 5 days, and the RVG was repeated while the patient was not receiving the drug. RESULTS: At 48 weeks both captopril and losartan significantly reduced left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume index (135 +/- 26 to 128 +/- 23 mL/m(2) for losartan, P <.05 vs baseline; 142 +/- 25 to 131 +/- 20 mL/m(2) for captopril, P <.01; mean (SD). Captopril also reduced LV end-systolic volume index (98 +/- 24 to 89 +/- 21 mL/m(2), P <.01 vs. baseline), whereas a nonsignificant trend was observed for the losartan group (97 +/- 23 to 90 +/- 16 mL/m(2), P = not significant). The between-group differences in the changes in LV volumes were not statistically significant. After drug withdrawal, LV end-diastolic volume index remained significantly lower than baseline in the captopril group (P <.01). CONCLUSIONS: Both captopril and losartan prevent LV dilation, representing adverse ventricular remodeling, previously seen with placebo treatment. Reverse remodeling was observed in the captopril group. On the basis of these results, the relative effects on LV remodeling do not provide a rationale for a survival benefit of losartan over captopril.

Effects of amlodipine on exercise tolerance, quality of life, and left ventricular function in patients with heart failure from left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: A preliminary study suggested that the long-acting late-generation calcium-channel blocker amlodipine has favorable effects on exercise tolerance and is safe to use in heart failure, in contrast to earlier generation agents. The goal of 2 multicenter studies was to assess the effect of adjunctive therapy with amlodipine in addition to standard therapy on exercise capacity, quality of life, left ventricular function, and safety parameters in patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. METHODS: Two large multicenter trials examining the effects of amlodipine on these parameters over a 12-week period of therapy were undertaken in patients with mild to moderate heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. A total of 437 patients with stable heart failure were studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective design. RESULTS: Amlodipine at a dose of 10 mg/day in addition to standard therapy in such patients was associated with no significant difference in change in exercise tolerance on a Naughton protocol compared with placebo in each trial. Among all patients taking amlodipine, exercise time increased 53 +/- 9 (SE) seconds; exercise time for those taking placebo increased 66 +/- 9 seconds (P = not significant). There were no significant differences in changes of quality of life parameters between amlodipine- and placebo-treated patients, and there were no significant differences in symptom scores or New York Heart Association classification between groups. Left ventricular function (measured as ejection fraction) improved 3. 4% +/- 0.5% in amlodipine-treated patients and 1.5% +/- 0.5% in placebo-treated patients (P =.007). There was no statistically significant excess of important adverse events (episodes of worsening heart failure in 10% amlodipine-treated vs 6.3% of placebo-treated patients) or differences in need for changes in background medication between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of 10 mg of amlodipine per day to standard therapy in patients with heart failure is associated with no significant improvement in exercise time compared with placebo therapy over a 12-week period, and there was no increased incidence of adverse events. These data suggest that the addition of amlodipine to standard therapy in heart failure will not result in additional efficacy per se beyond standard therapy.

Resting sestamibi imaging for the prognosis of low-risk chest pain.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the prognostic value of resting Tc-99m sestamibi scanning for adverse cardiac events (ACEs) in ED chest pain patients with a low probability of acute cardiac ischemia (ACI). METHODS: Sixty-nine consenting, hemodynamically stable patients with chest pain and a nondiagnostic electrocardiogram received an injection of 25 mCi of sestamibi during or within two hours of active pain. Scans were interpreted locally by a nuclear cardiologist or radiologist. Interrater reliability was assessed. ACEs of myocardial infarction (MI), death, or revascularization were assessed during the index hospitalization and over a one-year follow-up period. RESULTS: For ACEs, rest scanning with sestamibi had a sensitivity of 71% (95% CI = 0.33 to 0.97), a specificity of 92% (95% CI = 0.82 to 0.97), and an accuracy of 90% (95% CI = 0.87 to 0.99). The positive predictive value was 50% (95% CI = 0.19 to 0.82) and the negative predictive value was 97% (95% CI = 0.87 to 0.98). Sestamibi scanning was highly discriminating, with 62% of patients with positive scans but only 3% with negative scans having ACEs (p<0.001, log rank test). CONCLUSION: In patients with low-risk chest pain, sestamibi scanning has good specificity and moderate sensitivity for ACEs over a 12-month period.